Intel Arc A750

The Intel Arc A750 sits in a dense performance cluster, its average benchmark score of 20582 placing it just ahead of several established rivals. This positioning makes it a notable data point for mid-range performance analysis, though its end-of-life production status and distinctive architecture warrant careful consideration against its immediate competition.

How It Compares

Against the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M, the Arc A750 holds a razor-thin lead of 0.1% in average benchmark score. This margin is effectively negligible, meaning the two cards deliver statistically indistinguishable performance in aggregate testing. The comparison is notable because the M4000M is a professional-grade mobile part, while the A750 is a desktop consumer card, yet their overall scores converge at 20582 versus 20561.

The Intel Arc B570 presents an intra-company comparison, with the A750 edging out its successor by the same 0.1% margin. The B570 scores 20556 on average, placing the two Intel parts in a near-dead heat. This suggests that within Intel’s own lineup, generational improvements have not translated into a meaningful aggregate performance leap, at least when measured by this benchmark suite.

Versus the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, the A750 is 0.2% faster, with scores of 20582 and 20534 respectively. This is another statistical tie, though the RTX 3070 Mobile is a laptop part operating under thermal constraints, whereas the A750 is a desktop card with a 225 W TDP. That the desktop part only narrowly outperforms a mobile GPU highlights the competitive pressure in this segment.

The only rival where the A750 falls behind is the AMD Radeon RX 6700S, which leads by 1.1%. The RX 6700S averages 20811, a modest but consistent advantage over the A750’s 20582. This is the largest delta in the comparison group, suggesting that AMD’s mobile offering holds a slight but measurable edge in overall benchmark performance.

Memory Subsystem

The Arc A750 is equipped with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s. Memory operates at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed. This configuration is well-suited for 1440p gaming, where the combination of capacity and bandwidth prevents bottlenecks in most titles.

At higher resolutions, the 8 GB capacity becomes a limiting factor. Modern games at 4K with high-detail textures can exceed this allocation, leading to potential stuttering or reduced texture quality. The 512.0 GB/s bandwidth, however, remains competitive for the card’s class, ensuring that when memory capacity is sufficient, data throughput is not a constraint. The 256-bit bus is a deliberate design choice that balances cost and performance, and benchmark results indicate it delivers consistent frame pacing in memory-intensive scenarios up to 1440p.

The pixel rate of 268.8 GPixel/s and texture rate of 537.6 GTexel/s further support this assessment. These figures suggest the memory subsystem can feed the shading units and ROPs without starvation in most real-world workloads, though the 8 GB ceiling is the primary architectural limitation for future-proofing at high resolutions.

Ray Tracing and Feature Set

The Arc A750 includes 28 ray tracing cores, providing dedicated hardware for real-time ray tracing workloads. While the card does not list tensor cores, it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. This API coverage ensures compatibility with modern game engines and rendering techniques.

Benchmark results do not include a dedicated ray tracing test, so the RT cores’ impact cannot be quantified directly from the data. However, the presence of these cores means the card can enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported titles. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support confirms feature-level 12_2 capabilities, including variable rate shading and mesh shaders, which are increasingly common in current-generation games.

The architecture is Xe-HPG, built on a 6 nm process at TSMC with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. This transistor density of 53.4M per mm² is moderate by modern standards, but the 3584 shading units and 224 TMUs provide substantial compute throughput. The FP32 performance of 17.20 TFLOPS places the card in a competitive position for rasterized workloads, while FP16 at 34.41 TFLOPS (2:1) offers headroom for workloads that utilize reduced precision.

Who Should Consider It

Given the benchmark data, the Arc A750 is best suited for gamers targeting 1080p and 1440p resolutions with high settings. The 8 GB memory and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for these scenarios, and the average benchmark score of 20582 positions it as a mid-range option that can handle most titles without compromise.

Users with 4K displays should exercise caution. The 8 GB VRAM capacity is the primary concern, as it may necessitate reduced texture quality or resolution scaling in memory-heavy titles. The card’s 64th percentile ranking among all GPUs indicates it outperforms the majority of installed hardware, but it does not reach the upper echelon required for consistent 4K ultra settings.

The card’s end-of-life status and successor designation of Battlemage suggest that early adopters should be aware of its limited future support. However, for current-generation games at mainstream resolutions, the data shows the A750 delivers competitive performance. The 225 W TDP and suggested 550 W PSU make it a reasonable fit for standard desktop builds, though the dual-slot form factor and dual power connectors (1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin) require compatible cases and power supplies.

Benchmark Performance

The average benchmark score of 20582 places the Arc A750 in the 64th percentile of all GPUs, indicating it outperforms roughly two-thirds of the hardware tracked in the database. The aggregate score is derived from multiple tests, including 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 2612, Geekbench OpenCL at 98554, and Geekbench Vulkan at 85631.

In DirectX-specific PassMark tests, the card shows interesting variations. DirectX 9 performance is strongest at 181, while DirectX 10, 11, and 12 scores range from 65 to 72. This pattern suggests the card’s legacy DirectX performance is more robust than its modern API results, which may reflect driver maturity or architectural priorities. The PassMark G3D score of 12534 and GPU compute score of 5368 provide additional context, with the G2D score of 732 indicating modest 2D performance.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the A750’s position is defined by narrow margins. The 0.1% advantage over the Quadro M4000M and Arc B570, and the 0.2% lead over the RTX 3070 Mobile, all fall within run-to-run variance. The 1.1% deficit to the RX 6700S is the only statistically meaningful difference in the group, yet even this is a small gap that would be imperceptible in real-world gaming.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2612 is a useful data point for DirectX 12 rasterization performance. This modern test stresses the GPU’s compute and geometry capabilities, and the score indicates the A750 handles contemporary workloads adequately. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 85631 and OpenCL score of 98554 show strong compute performance, which is relevant for non-gaming applications such as content creation or scientific workloads.

In aggregate, the data portrays the Arc A750 as a capable mid-range card that competes effectively with its immediate rivals, though it does not decisively beat any of them. Its 64th percentile ranking and average score of 20582 demonstrate that it sits comfortably in the middle of the performance spectrum, making it a viable option for mainstream gaming at 1080p and 1440p, with the caveat of its 8 GB memory limit at higher resolutions.