NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is a dual-slot, end-of-life graphics card built on the Turing architecture and TSMC's 12 nm process. It packs 6,600 million transistors into a 284 mm² die, and its benchmark data places it at the 51st percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 12504. This card is positioned as a compact, efficient option for 1080p gaming, and the following analysis breaks down its power requirements, target audience, competitive standing, and raw performance metrics.

Power and Cooling

The GTX 1650 SUPER carries a TDP of 100 W, which is modest by modern standards and reflects its efficiency-focused design. The data shows a suggested PSU rating of 300 W, meaning the card can be paired with a wide range of existing power supplies without requiring a high-wattage upgrade. A single 6-pin power connector is required, which is a standard configuration for cards in this performance tier, and the card's dimensions — 229 mm in length, 111 mm in height, and 35 mm in width — make it a dual-slot solution that should fit comfortably in most mid-tower cases.

The cooling solution is not explicitly detailed in the data, but the combination of a 100 W TDP and a dual-slot form factor suggests that a capable air cooler is sufficient. The card's boost clock of 1725 MHz and base clock of 1530 MHz generate heat that a standard dual-fan or blower-style cooler can manage without issue. The 12 nm process node and 6,600 million transistor count contribute to an efficiency profile that keeps thermal demands low. For users building a system around this GPU, the 300 W PSU recommendation is a key constraint; anything below that threshold would be inadvisable, while anything above provides ample headroom for other components. The memory runs at 1500 MHz with 12 Gbps effective speed, which does not add significant power draw beyond the core's requirements.

Who Should Consider It

Benchmark results indicate that the GTX 1650 SUPER is a baseline performer for 1080p gaming, with scores that place it at the 51st percentile. In DirectX 11 workloads, it scores 73 in Passmark, which is a strong showing for older titles, but its DirectX 12 score drops to 45, suggesting it is less optimized for modern API-heavy games. The card's 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus provides 192.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is adequate for 1080p resolution but will become a bottleneck at 1440p or higher with high-texture settings.

For 1080p gaming, this card is best suited for medium to high settings in esports titles or slightly older AAA games, where its 4.416 TFLOPS of FP32 performance can deliver playable frame rates. The Passmark G3D score of 10179 reinforces its position as an entry-level to mid-range option. Users targeting 1440p should look elsewhere, as the 4 GB memory capacity and 128-bit bus will struggle with modern textures. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 55811 and Vulkan score of 53160 indicate respectable compute performance for light productivity tasks, but the card is not designed for heavy rendering or machine learning workloads. It is a straightforward choice for budget-conscious gamers who prioritize 1080p gaming with reasonable settings over high-resolution or high-refresh-rate experiences.

How It Compares

The GTX 1650 SUPER's nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M, which has an average score of 12490. The 1650 SUPER leads by a mere 0.1%, making the two effectively identical in raw performance. The 880M is a mobile-oriented chip, so this comparison highlights that the 1650 SUPER's desktop performance is on par with a previous-generation laptop flagship.

Against the NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm, the 1650 SUPER trails by 0.3%. The K20Xm, with an average score of 12547, is a compute-focused card, yet the 1650 SUPER comes within a hair of it in aggregate benchmarks. This suggests the gaming-oriented 1650 SUPER holds its own even against professional-grade silicon in synthetic tests.

The comparison with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 shows the 1650 SUPER ahead by 1.4%. The GTX 1070, scoring 12331, is a larger and more power-hungry card from a higher tier, but the data indicates the 1650 SUPER edges it out in average benchmark scores, which is a surprising result given the 1070's typically higher standing in the product stack.

The final rival is the NVIDIA Quadro K4200, which scores 12241. The 1650 SUPER leads by 2.1%, the largest margin among its nearest rivals. The Quadro is a workstation card, so this delta shows that the 1650 SUPER offers comparable or better raw performance while being a gaming-focused product.

FAQ

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the GTX 1650 SUPER?

A: The launch MSRP is 159 USD.

Q: Does the GTX 1650 SUPER support DirectX 12?

A: Yes, it supports DirectX 12 (12_1), along with OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: How much memory does the card have and what type is it?

A: It has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 192.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the power connector requirement for this card?

A: The card requires a single 6-pin power connector, and the suggested PSU is 300 W.

Q: What is the production status of the GTX 1650 SUPER?

A: The production status is end-of-life, and it was released on 2019-11-21.

Q: How does the card perform in DirectX 9 versus DirectX 12?

A: In Passmark tests, the card scores 148 in DirectX 9, 73 in DirectX 11, and 45 in DirectX 12, showing a clear decline in performance with newer API versions.

Benchmark Performance

The GTX 1650 SUPER's average benchmark score of 12504 places it at the 51st percentile of all GPUs, indicating a squarely mid-range position. The aggregate data from multiple tests — including 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 352, Geekbench OpenCL at 55811, and Geekbench Vulkan at 53160 — paints a picture of a card that is competent but not exceptional.

In Passmark tests, the card scores 10179 in G3D and 4477 in GPU compute, with DirectX-specific tests showing 148 in DX9, 73 in DX11, and 45 in DX12. The steep drop from DX9 to DX12 is notable: the card is nearly 3.3 times faster in DX9 than in DX12, which suggests architectural limitations in handling modern rendering pipelines. The 2D score of 749 is less relevant for gaming but indicates basic desktop acceleration capabilities.

The nearest rival comparison shows a tightly clustered group. The GTX 880M is nearly identical at 0.1% behind, while the Tesla K20Xm is 0.3% ahead, the GTX 1070 is 1.4% behind, and the Quadro K4200 is 2.1% behind. These deltas are all within a narrow band, meaning the 1650 SUPER does not decisively beat or lose to any of its direct competitors. The 1.4% lead over the GTX 1070 is the most meaningful gap, as the 1070 is a well-known desktop GPU, yet the 1650 SUPER edges it out in aggregate scoring.

The FP32 performance of 4.416 TFLOPS and texture rate of 138.0 GTexel/s are solid for the card's class, and the pixel rate of 55.20 GPixel/s supports its 1080p focus. The FP16 rate of 8.832 TFLOPS (2:1) shows the Turing architecture's ability to double throughput in supported workloads, though this is rarely leveraged in gaming. Overall, the benchmark data shows a card that sits in a narrow performance band, with its closest rivals separated by no more than 2.1%, making it a predictable choice for users who know exactly what 1080p performance they need.