AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM

The AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM occupies a specific niche in the Radeon RX 5000 series, built on the Navi 10 chip with the RDNA 1.0 architecture. Produced on TSMC's 7 nm process, this dual-slot card integrates 10,300 million transistors across a 251 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 41.0M per mm². Its benchmark data shows an average score of 57,599, placing it at the 88th percentile among all GPUs, a position that reflects solid mid-range capability. The card features 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation pipelines, driving a pixel rate of 99.84 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 199.7 GTexel/s. With 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, memory bandwidth reaches 288.0 GB/s, while FP32 compute peaks at 6.390 TFLOPS and FP16 at 12.78 TFLOPS via a 2:1 ratio.

How It Compares

Against the NVIDIA P102-100, the RX 5600 OEM shows a negligible delta of 0%, with average scores of 57,599 versus 57,601. This effectively places the two cards at performance parity, though the comparison is primarily academic given the NVIDIA card's workstation-oriented nature. The data indicates no practical winner in raw compute terms, as the 2-point difference falls well within run-to-run variance.

The AMD Radeon Pro W5500X leads the RX 5600 OEM by a scant 0.1%, scoring 57,661 against 57,599. This margin is statistically insignificant, meaning the two AMD cards deliver virtually identical benchmark performance. The RX 5600 OEM matches a professional workstation card in aggregate results, which speaks to its computational efficiency despite its consumer positioning.

The Intel Arc A580 outperforms the RX 5600 OEM by 0.3%, with an average score of 57,756. While the delta is small, it does indicate that Intel's discrete offering holds a slight edge in the benchmark aggregate. The RX 5600 OEM trails by roughly 157 points, a gap that would be imperceptible in real-world usage but is nonetheless measurable in synthetic tests.

The Intel Arc A570M presents a larger deficit for the RX 5600 OEM, which lags by 1.1% against the Arc A570M's score of 58,239. This 640-point difference is the most substantial among the listed rivals, suggesting that the mobile-oriented Intel part has a modest but consistent advantage in the benchmark suite. The RX 5600 OEM's position at the lower end of this competitive cluster highlights its age relative to newer architectures.

Ray Tracing and Feature Set

The RX 5600 OEM does not include dedicated ray tracing cores, as the RDNA 1.0 architecture predates AMD's hardware RT implementation. Similarly, tensor cores are absent from this chip, meaning no hardware acceleration for AI workloads or DLSS-style upscaling. The card relies entirely on traditional rasterization pipelines, which is consistent with its 2020 release timeframe.

API support includes DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The DirectX 12_1 feature level ensures compatibility with modern titles, though it lacks the ray tracing features found in DirectX 12 Ultimate. Vulkan 1.4 support provides a robust foundation for cross-platform titles, while OpenGL 4.6 covers legacy applications. The absence of RT cores means any ray tracing effects must be handled via compute shaders, which would incur a significant performance penalty compared to dedicated hardware.

The card's feature set is further defined by its display outputs: 1x HDMI 2.0b and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. This configuration supports multi-monitor setups and high refresh rates over DisplayPort, though HDMI 2.0b limits 4K output to 60 Hz. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface provides double the bandwidth of PCIe 3.0, though the card's mid-range performance rarely saturates even PCIe 3.0. Power delivery consists of a single 8-pin connector, with a 125 W TDP and a suggested 300 W power supply.

Benchmark Performance

The Geekbench OpenCL score of 61,660 represents the card's peak performance in compute-heavy workloads. This score sits notably above the average benchmark score of 57,599, indicating that OpenCL tasks exploit the card's 2048 shading units more effectively than other workloads. The Vulkan score of 53,538 is lower, reflecting the API's different execution model and potential driver overhead.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the RX 5600 OEM's performance is tightly clustered. The 0% delta against the P102-100 means the two cards are effectively interchangeable in aggregate benchmarks. The 0.1% deficit to the Radeon Pro W5500X is similarly negligible, suggesting that the OEM variant loses nothing in compute capability compared to its professional counterpart. Against the Intel Arc A580, the 0.3% gap translates to a 157-point difference, which is within the noise floor for most testing methodologies. The 1.1% deficit to the Arc A570M is the only delta that approaches meaningful separation, yet even this 640-point gap represents less than 2% performance difference.

The FP32 throughput of 6.390 TFLOPS provides context for these benchmark results. This figure aligns with the card's 1130 MHz base clock and 1560 MHz boost clock, with a game clock of 1375 MHz serving as the typical sustained frequency. The 12.78 TFLOPS FP16 figure, achieved via a 2:1 ratio, offers double-rate compute for workloads that support reduced precision. Memory bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s, derived from 12 Gbps effective GDDR6 across a 192-bit bus, is sufficient for the card's compute capabilities, preventing bandwidth starvation in most scenarios.

FAQ

Q: How does the RX 5600 OEM compare to the AMD Radeon Pro W5500X?

A: The RX 5600 OEM trails the Pro W5500X by only 0.1% in average benchmark score (57,599 versus 57,661). This difference is negligible, indicating near-identical compute performance between the consumer OEM card and the professional workstation variant.

Q: Does the RX 5600 OEM support hardware ray tracing?

A: No. The card has no ray tracing cores, as it is based on the RDNA 1.0 architecture. Ray tracing workloads would need to run through compute shaders, which would incur significant performance penalties compared to dedicated RT hardware.

Q: What is the card's memory configuration?

A: The RX 5600 OEM features 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory operates at 1500 MHz, which translates to 12 Gbps effective data rate.

Q: How does the card perform in Vulkan versus OpenCL benchmarks?

A: The Geekbench OpenCL score is 61,660, while the Vulkan score is 53,538. This 13% difference indicates that OpenCL workloads achieve higher performance, likely due to better driver optimization or the compute nature of the tests.

Q: What is the power requirement for this card?

A: The RX 5600 OEM has a 125 W TDP and requires a single 8-pin power connector. AMD recommends a 300 W power supply for systems using this card.

Q: Is the RX 5600 OEM still in production?

A: No, the production status is listed as end-of-life. The card was released on January 20, 2020, and has since been succeeded by the Navi II generation.

Who Should Consider It

The RX 5600 OEM's benchmark data positions it for 1080p gaming at high settings, with the 6.390 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth handling most contemporary titles. The 88th percentile ranking among all GPUs suggests it outperforms the majority of installed hardware, making it suitable for gamers who prioritize smooth frame rates over maximum visual fidelity. The 6 GB VRAM capacity is adequate for 1080p textures, though it may struggle with 1440p high-texture packs that exceed memory capacity.

Given the 0-1.1% performance deltas against its nearest rivals, buyers should not choose this card based on raw compute differences alone. The absence of ray tracing cores makes it a poor choice for gamers who want hardware-accelerated RT effects, as the card would rely on inefficient software fallbacks. Conversely, users who play competitive titles or esports games at 1080p will find the card's rasterization performance more than sufficient, with the 99.84 GPixel/s pixel rate ensuring high fill rates.

The card's 125 W TDP and single 8-pin connector make it compatible with a wide range of power supplies, while the dual-slot design fits standard cases. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface provides future-proofing for newer motherboards, though the card's performance ceiling means it will not bottleneck older PCIe 3.0 systems. For users upgrading from older GPUs without hardware RT, the RX 5600 OEM offers a competent rasterization experience, but those seeking modern features like DLSS or dedicated RT cores should look to newer architectures with tensor or RT hardware.