Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile and the Lisuan Tech LX MAX. The database contains zero benchmark entries for both products, and the wins counter for each side sits at zero. This absence of measured performance data means any direct comparison of frame rates, synthetic scores, or real-world application results cannot be established from the available records.

What the data does provide is a clear separation in theoretical compute capabilities. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile manages 384.0 GFLOPS. The ratio between these figures is substantial: the LX MAX offers roughly 64 times the raw FP32 throughput. Similarly, FP16 performance shows the LX MAX at 49.15 TFLOPS against 768.0 GFLOPS for the Intel part, again a large multiplier in favor of the discrete card.

Pixel and texture rates reinforce this divide. The LX MAX achieves 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s, whereas the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile records 4.000 GPixel/s and 12.00 GTexel/s. These figures indicate the LX MAX can fill frames and sample textures at rates that the integrated Intel solution cannot approach. However, without actual benchmark scores, these theoretical numbers remain the only quantitative basis for comparison.

Both products sit at the 50th percentile against all GPUs in the database, though this percentile appears to be a default or unweighted value given the absence of benchmark scores. The average benchmark score for each is recorded as 0, which further confirms that no measured performance data exists for either unit.

Architecture Differences

The two products come from entirely different silicon lineages. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses the Xe-LP architecture, built on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry. Its chip is designated Twin Lake, and it belongs to the HD Graphics-T (Twin Lake) generation. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX employs the TrueGPU architecture on a 6 nm process from TSMC, with the 7G106 chip and a 7G100 generation label.

The Intel part is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with a Ring Bus interface, designed for portable devices. Its display outputs are listed as "Portable Device Dependent," meaning the connections vary by the host system. The LX MAX is a discrete, dual-slot card with a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. This fundamental packaging difference dictates their respective roles: one rides inside a mobile processor package, the other occupies an expansion slot in a desktop.

Compute resources differ by a wide margin. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile contains 192 shading units, 12 texture mapping units, and 4 render output units. The LX MAX scales up to 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The Intel part has no dedicated ray tracing cores or tensor cores listed; the LX MAX also shows null values for these features, so neither product advertises hardware-accelerated ray tracing or AI tensor operations in the database.

Memory architecture could not be more different. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses system shared memory for its frame buffer, with a bus width and bandwidth both listed as "System Shared" and "System Dependent," respectively. Its memory clock is likewise tied to the system. The LX MAX carries 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, with a memory speed of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) and a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. This dedicated, high-bandwidth memory pool is essential for the LX MAX's compute throughput.

The API support reflects the generational gap. Both support DirectX 12 and OpenGL 4.6, but the Intel part lists DirectX 12 (12_1) and Vulkan 1.4, while the LX MAX lists DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.3. The 12_2 feature level on the LX MAX indicates support for the full DirectX 12 Ultimate feature set, including features like mesh shaders and variable rate shading, which the Intel part's 12_1 level does not guarantee.

Power and physical characteristics diverge sharply. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has a thermal design power of 6 W and a slot width of IGP, meaning it is soldered onto the motherboard. The LX MAX draws 225 W, requires a dual-slot cooler, a single 16-pin power connector, and a suggested 550 W power supply. Its physical dimensions are 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width.

The Verdict

The data points to two products with no overlap in intended use. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is a low-power integrated solution for portable devices, with a 6 W TDP and system-shared memory. Its raw compute figures, 384.0 GFLOPS FP32 and 4.000 GPixel/s, are suitable for basic display output and light workloads. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX is a high-power discrete GPU with 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, 432.0 GB/s of dedicated memory bandwidth, and a 225 W TDP, clearly positioned for demanding graphics and compute tasks.

The absence of benchmark scores prevents any statement about real-world performance parity or superiority beyond the theoretical specifications. What the recorded data does show is that the LX MAX outclasses the Intel part in every measured compute metric by a large factor. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile, however, consumes a fraction of the power and requires no additional cooling or power supply, making it suitable for systems where space and energy are constrained.

The production status of both is listed as Active, and their release dates differ: the Intel part came out at the end of 2024, while the LX MAX is dated in early 2026. Neither has a launch MSRP in the database, so no pricing information can be stated.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the two products:

• Manufacturer: Intel versus Unknown (for Lisuan Tech)
• Chip: Twin Lake versus 7G106
• Architecture: Xe-LP versus TrueGPU
• Generation: HD Graphics-T (Twin Lake) versus 7G100
• Process node: 10 nm versus 6 nm
• Foundry: Intel versus TSMC
• Base clock: 300 MHz versus null
• Boost clock: 1000 MHz versus null
• Memory clock: System Shared versus 2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective
• Memory size: System Shared versus 12 GB
• Memory type: System Shared versus GDDR6
• Memory bus width: System Shared versus 192 bit
• Memory bandwidth: System Dependent versus 432.0 GB/s
• Shading units: 192 versus 6144
• TMUs: 12 versus 192
• ROPs: 4 versus 96
• Pixel rate: 4.000 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s
• Texture rate: 12.00 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s
• FP32: 384.0 GFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS
• FP16: 768.0 GFLOPS (2:1) versus 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1)
• TDP: 6 W versus 225 W
• Slot width: IGP versus Dual-slot
• Power connectors: null versus 1x 16-pin
• Suggested PSU: null versus 550 W
• Bus interface: Ring Bus versus PCIe 4.0 x16
• Display outputs: Portable Device Dependent versus 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
• DirectX version: 12 (12_1) versus 12 Ultimate (12_2)
• Vulkan version: 1.4 versus 1.3
• Dimensions: null versus 248 mm length, 118 mm height, 48 mm width
• Release date: 2024-12-31 versus 2026-03-16

Fields that match include OpenGL version (4.6 for both), transistor count (unknown for both), die size (unknown for both), RT cores (null for both), tensor cores (null for both), production status (Active for both), and launch MSRP (null for both).

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 performance?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX MAX delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile provides 384.0 GFLOPS. The LX MAX figure is approximately 64 times higher.

Q: How much memory does each GPU have?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses system shared memory, with its size, type, and bus width all listed as "System Shared" and bandwidth as "System Dependent."

Q: What are the power requirements for each?

A: The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has a TDP of 6 W and requires no separate power connector. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has a TDP of 225 W, needs one 16-pin power connector, and specifies a suggested 550 W power supply.

Q: Which API versions are supported?

A: Both support DirectX 12 and OpenGL 4.6. The Intel part lists DirectX 12 (12_1) and Vulkan 1.4. The LX MAX lists DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.3.

Q: What process nodes are used?

A: The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses a 6 nm process at TSMC.

Q: Are either of these products still in production?

A: Both are listed with a production status of Active. The Intel part has a release date of 2024-12-31, and the LX MAX has a release date of 2026-03-16.

Where Each One Wins

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX wins on every recorded compute metric. Its FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS dwarfs the Intel part's 384.0 GFLOPS. Its pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s are far ahead of the Intel part's 4.000 GPixel/s and 12.00 GTexel/s. The LX MAX also holds the advantage in memory bandwidth with 432.0 GB/s dedicated GDDR6, versus the system-dependent bandwidth of the Intel integrated solution. Its 96 ROPs and 192 TMUs provide the hardware resources needed for high-resolution rendering and texture-heavy workloads.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile wins on power efficiency and integration. Its 6 W TDP means it can operate within the thermal envelope of a portable device without additional cooling or a dedicated power supply. Its Ring Bus interface and system-shared memory architecture allow it to function as an IGP, requiring no expansion slot. The Intel part also lists a newer Vulkan version (1.4) compared to the LX MAX's 1.3. For systems where a discrete GPU is physically impossible, such as ultraportable notebooks, the Intel part is the only viable option of the two.

The LX MAX's dual-slot form factor, 248 mm length, and 225 W TDP clearly position it for desktop towers with adequate airflow and power delivery. Its PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor setups. The 12 GB GDDR6 frame buffer with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth is suited for large textures and high-resolution assets.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile, with its 192 shading units and 4 ROPs, is suited for basic display output, video playback, and light 2D workloads. The LX MAX, with 6144 shading units and 96 ROPs, is suited for compute-heavy applications, high-resolution gaming, and GPU-accelerated tasks. The data does not include any benchmark scores, so relative performance in specific applications remains unquantified. The theoretical specifications, however, show a clear split: the LX MAX is a high-performance discrete GPU, and the Intel part is a low-power integrated solution.