NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data splits the two cards into completely different use-case profiles. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER has a single benchmark entry: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, where it scores 3075. That places it at the 19th percentile among all GPUs in the database, meaning roughly four out of five recorded graphics cards score higher. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has no benchmark entries at all, with an average score of zero, yet it sits at the 50th percentile. That percentile value is a database artifact, not a measured performance result. The comparison is therefore lopsided: one card has a concrete measured score, the other has no recorded test data.

In terms of raw compute throughput, the NVIDIA card delivers 56.28 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the Lisuan card delivers 24.58 TFLOPS. That is a 2.29x gap in single-precision floating-point work. For FP16, the NVIDIA card again delivers 56.28 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio, whereas the Lisuan card reaches 49.15 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. The NVIDIA card wins both precision classes outright. Pixel fill rate favors NVIDIA at 293.1 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s, a 1.53x advantage. Texture fill rate shows a larger gap: 879.3 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s, a 2.29x margin. Every measured throughput metric in the database favors the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER.

The Lisuan card wins in one specific area: power efficiency relative to its own specifications. Its 225 W TDP with 24.58 TFLOPS yields a ratio of about 0.109 TFLOPS per watt. The NVIDIA card, at 415 W and 56.28 TFLOPS, yields about 0.136 TFLOPS per watt. So the NVIDIA card is more efficient per watt for FP32, despite drawing nearly twice the power. The Lisuan card has no measured benchmark to confirm real-world efficiency, so this remains a specification-level observation.

Memory bandwidth also splits the field. The NVIDIA card uses 24 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, achieving 1.02 TB/s. The Lisuan card uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, achieving 432.0 GB/s. The NVIDIA card provides 2.36x the bandwidth. For memory capacity, the NVIDIA card doubles the Lisuan card's 12 GB. The Lisuan card has no ray tracing cores or tensor cores listed in the database, while the NVIDIA card includes 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores, which gives it a feature set the Lisuan card cannot match in those specific workloads.

Architecture Differences

The two cards come from different architectural generations and process nodes. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER uses the GB203 chip, built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses the 7G106 chip, built on the TrueGPU architecture, fabricated on a 6 nm process, also at TSMC. The NVIDIA card integrates 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 120.6M per mm². The Lisuan card's transistor count and die size are listed as unknown in the database.

The NVIDIA card has 10,752 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output units. The Lisuan card has 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The NVIDIA card nearly doubles the shading unit count and exceeds the TMU count by 1.75x, while the ROP difference is smaller at 1.17x. The NVIDIA card includes dedicated RT cores and tensor cores; the Lisuan card lists neither. This suggests the Lisuan architecture may not be designed for hardware-accelerated ray tracing or tensor operations, at least according to the recorded data.

Clock behavior differs significantly. The NVIDIA card has a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2617 MHz. The Lisuan card has no base or boost clock recorded. Memory clock also differs: the NVIDIA card runs at 2000 MHz with 32 Gbps effective data rate, while the Lisuan card runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective. The NVIDIA card's higher effective memory rate compensates for its lower physical memory clock, resulting in far higher bandwidth. The Lisuan card's memory clock is higher in MHz but delivers less effective throughput.

The Lisuan card uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, while the NVIDIA card uses PCIe 5.0 x16. The newer PCIe generation doubles the data transfer rate per lane. Display outputs also differ: the NVIDIA card provides 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b, while the Lisuan card provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. The NVIDIA card supports newer display standards. API support is nearly identical: both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The NVIDIA card supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan card supports Vulkan 1.3, a minor version difference.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries for these two cards. The headToHeadBenchmarks array is empty, and both wins counters sit at zero. The only measured benchmark available is the NVIDIA card's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3075. The Lisuan card has no corresponding score. Direct comparison of measured performance is therefore impossible from the recorded data.

What can be compared is the NVIDIA card's position relative to its nearest rivals. The closest competitor is the Intel Arc Pro B60, which averages 3182, putting the NVIDIA card 3.4% behind. Next is the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 with an average of 3163, where the NVIDIA card trails by 2.8%. On the other side, the NVIDIA GeForce 820A averages 2983, and the NVIDIA card leads by 3.1%. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M averages 2967, and the NVIDIA card leads by 3.6%. These deltas are small, all within a 7% band, which indicates the RTX 5080 SUPER sits in a tightly clustered performance neighborhood in this specific test.

The Lisuan card has no rivals listed and no average benchmark score, so no such comparison exists. The 50th percentile placement for the Lisuan card appears without any supporting measurement. The NVIDIA card's 19th percentile is based on its actual score. The implication is that the NVIDIA card, despite its high absolute specifications, competes at a relatively low percentile in the database's overall distribution. The Lisuan card's percentile cannot be validated against any recorded test.

Specification Differences

| Field | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER | Lisuan Tech LX MAX |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | GB203 | 7G106 |

| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | TrueGPU |

| Process node | 5 nm | 6 nm |

| Transistors | 45,600 million | unknown |

| Die size | 378 mm² | unknown |

| Transistor density | 120.6M / mm² | null |

| Base clock | 2295 MHz | null |

| Boost clock | 2617 MHz | null |

| Memory clock | 2000 MHz, 32 Gbps effective | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective |

| Memory size | 24 GB | 12 GB |

| Memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |

| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory bandwidth | 1.02 TB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading units | 10752 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 336 | 192 |

| ROPs | 112 | 96 |

| RT cores | 84 | null |

| Tensor cores | 336 | null |

| Pixel rate | 293.1 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 879.3 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 56.28 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 56.28 TFLOPS (1:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 415 W | 225 W |

| Power connectors | 1x 16-pin | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | null | 550 W |

| Bus interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Dimensions | 304 mm x 137 mm x 40 mm | 248 mm x 118 mm x 48 mm |

| Release date | 2025-12-31 | 2026-03-16 |

| Launch MSRP | 999 USD | null |

FAQ

Q: Which card has more memory bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER delivers 1.02 TB/s from 24 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX delivers 432.0 GB/s from 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus.

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX MAX support hardware ray tracing?

A: The database lists no RT cores for the Lisuan card. The NVIDIA card includes 84 RT cores. The Lisuan card also has no tensor cores listed, while the NVIDIA card has 336.

Q: What is the process node difference between the two cards?

A: The NVIDIA card is fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The Lisuan card is fabricated on a 6 nm process, also at TSMC. The NVIDIA card uses the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, while the Lisuan card uses the TrueGPU architecture.

Q: Which card has a higher FP32 throughput?

A: The NVIDIA card delivers 56.28 TFLOPS of FP32, which is 2.29x the Lisuan card's 24.58 TFLOPS. For FP16, the NVIDIA card again leads with 56.28 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio, versus 49.15 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio for the Lisuan card.

Q: How does the NVIDIA card compare to its nearest rivals?

A: In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the NVIDIA card scores 3075. It trails the Intel Arc Pro B60 by 3.4% and the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 by 2.8%. It leads the NVIDIA GeForce 820A by 3.1% and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M by 3.6%.

Q: What are the power consumption figures?

A: The NVIDIA card has a TDP of 415 W. The Lisuan card has a TDP of 225 W and specifies a 550 W suggested PSU. The NVIDIA card has no suggested PSU listed.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear performance hierarchy. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER dominates every measured throughput metric: FP32, FP16, pixel rate, texture rate, memory bandwidth, and memory capacity. Its 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 output is more than double the Lisuan's 24.58 TFLOPS. Its 1.02 TB/s bandwidth is 2.36x the Lisuan's 432.0 GB/s. Its 24 GB memory capacity doubles the Lisuan's 12 GB. The NVIDIA card also brings RT cores and tensor cores, which the Lisuan card lacks entirely.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX counters with a lower 225 W TDP, a smaller physical footprint at 248 mm length versus 304 mm, and a later release date of 2026-03-16 compared to 2025-12-31. It also carries a higher physical memory clock of 2250 MHz versus 2000 MHz, though the effective data rate is far lower. The Lisuan card's 50th percentile placement in the database is unsupported by any recorded benchmark, so that figure carries no analytical weight.

For applications that depend on raw compute, memory bandwidth, or hardware-accelerated ray tracing, the NVIDIA card is the only option with measured data. The Lisuan card's lack of RT and tensor cores limits its utility in those specific workloads. The NVIDIA card's launch MSRP is 999 USD, which the database records once. The Lisuan card has no launch MSRP listed.

The database shows no head-to-head benchmark results, so any direct comparison of real-world gaming or rendering performance remains unmeasured. What the recorded data does show is a specification sheet where the NVIDIA card wins 10 out of 10 comparable performance fields. The Lisuan card wins in power draw and physical size. The choice depends on whether the user prioritizes the NVIDIA card's superior throughput and feature set or the Lisuan card's lower power envelope and compact dimensions. The measured evidence, however, resides entirely with the NVIDIA card.