NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains a single benchmark entry for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, where it scores 2690 points. This result places it at the 18th percentile among all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals in the rankings are the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M at 2664 points, the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 at 2662 points, the Intel Arc Pro B50 at 2660 points, and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 at 2645 points. The RTX 5070 SUPER leads each by a narrow margin, with deltas of 1.0%, 1.1%, 1.1%, and 1.7% respectively.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. Its average benchmark score is listed as zero, and it has no nearest rivals associated with it. The head-to-head benchmark comparison table is empty, meaning there are no direct competitive measurements available for the two cards. The win count for each product is also zero.

Because the LX MAX lacks a benchmark result, the data cannot establish a performance relationship between the two cards through direct comparison. The RTX 5070 SUPER stands as the only card with measurable performance data in this pairing. Its 2690 score, while modest against the broader database, is at least quantifiable. The LX MAX, by contrast, offers no comparable figure, which means any analysis of relative speed must rely on the architectural and specification data rather than on benchmark outcomes.

The percentile data further contextualizes the RTX 5070 SUPER’s position. At the 18th percentile, it sits below the majority of GPUs in the database, and its nearest rivals are all older or lower-tier models. The small deltas between the RTX 5070 SUPER and those rivals indicate that the performance gap is minimal, less than 2% in every case. This suggests that the RTX 5070 SUPER’s benchmark standing is closely clustered with those four cards, none of which are recent high-end parts.

For the LX MAX, the absence of benchmarks means its 50th percentile ranking is not derived from measured performance but from an unpopulated dataset. The average benchmark score of zero confirms that no test results have been logged. This leaves the LX MAX as an unverified entity in the database, with no numerical basis for comparison against the RTX 5070 SUPER or any other GPU.

FAQ

Q: What benchmark score does the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER achieve?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER records a score of 2690 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, which places it at the 18th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX MAX have any benchmark results?

A: No, the LX MAX has an empty benchmark list, an average score of zero, and no nearest rivals in the database. Its 50th percentile ranking is not tied to any measured performance data.

Q: How does the RTX 5070 SUPER compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER leads the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M by 1.0%, the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 by 1.1%, the Intel Arc Pro B50 by 1.1%, and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 by 1.7% in average benchmark score.

Q: What is the memory configuration of each card?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER has 18 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus with 672.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX MAX has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What are the FP32 compute figures for the two GPUs?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER delivers 32.15 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. The LX MAX delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 49.15 TFLOPS of FP16 performance.

Q: Which card has a higher pixel rate?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER has a pixel rate of 201.0 GPixel/s, while the LX MAX has a pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5070 SUPER wins on measured performance, as it is the only card with a benchmark score. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, it posts 2690 points, which is a concrete data point. Its nearest rivals are all within 1.7% of that score, but the LX MAX has no score at all. Therefore, in any direct comparison of recorded performance, the RTX 5070 SUPER is the sole occupant of the winning column.

The RTX 5070 SUPER also wins on memory capacity and bandwidth. It carries 18 GB of GDDR7 memory versus the LX MAX’s 12 GB of GDDR6. Its bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s is substantially higher than the LX MAX’s 432.0 GB/s, a difference of 240 GB/s. This gives the RTX 5070 SUPER a clear advantage in memory-heavy workloads, assuming the benchmark data could confirm such a trend, which it currently does not.

In compute throughput, the RTX 5070 SUPER again leads. Its FP32 figure of 32.15 TFLOPS exceeds the LX MAX’s 24.58 TFLOPS by roughly 7.57 TFLOPS. Texture rate follows the same pattern: the RTX 5070 SUPER reaches 502.4 GTexel/s against the LX MAX’s 384.0 GTexel/s. Pixel rate also favors the RTX 5070 SUPER at 201.0 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s.

The LX MAX wins in a few specific areas. Its FP16 performance of 49.15 TFLOPS is higher than the RTX 5070 SUPER’s FP16 figure of 32.15 TFLOPS. This indicates that the LX MAX has a 2:1 FP16 to FP32 ratio, whereas the RTX 5070 SUPER operates at a 1:1 ratio. The LX MAX also has more ROPs, with 96 versus the RTX 5070 SUPER’s 80, which could benefit certain rasterization scenarios. Its power draw is lower at 225 W compared to 275 W, and it is a slightly larger card at 248 mm in length versus 245 mm.

The LX MAX also carries a suggested PSU rating of 550 W, while the RTX 5070 SUPER has no such figure in the database. The LX MAX offers four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, while the RTX 5070 SUPER provides one HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1b outputs. The RTX 5070 SUPER supports PCIe 5.0 x16, while the LX MAX uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across nearly every specification field. The RTX 5070 SUPER uses the GB205 chip built on a 5 nm process at TSMC, with 31,100 million transistors and a die size of 263 mm². The LX MAX uses the 7G106 chip on a 6 nm process at TSMC, with transistor count and die size listed as unknown.

Memory configuration diverges sharply. The RTX 5070 SUPER has 18 GB of GDDR7 with a 192-bit bus and 672.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX MAX has 12 GB of GDDR6 with the same 192-bit bus but only 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The memory clock also differs: the RTX 5070 SUPER runs at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective), while the LX MAX runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

Shading units are close: 6400 for the RTX 5070 SUPER versus 6144 for the LX MAX. TMUs are 200 versus 192, and ROPs are 80 versus 96. The RTX 5070 SUPER includes 50 RT cores and 200 tensor cores, while the LX MAX lists no RT core or tensor core counts. Pixel rate favors the RTX 5070 SUPER at 201.0 GPixel/s, texture rate favors it at 502.4 GTexel/s, and FP32 favors it at 32.15 TFLOPS. FP16, however, favors the LX MAX at 49.15 TFLOPS versus 32.15 TFLOPS.

Power consumption differs by 50 W, with the RTX 5070 SUPER at 275 W and the LX MAX at 225 W. Both use a single 16-pin power connector and are dual-slot cards. The RTX 5070 SUPER lists no suggested PSU, while the LX MAX specifies 550 W.

Bus interface differs as well: PCIe 5.0 x16 for the RTX 5070 SUPER versus PCIe 4.0 x16 for the LX MAX. Display outputs are not identical, with the RTX 5070 SUPER offering HDMI 2.1b and DisplayPort 2.1b, and the LX MAX offering only DisplayPort 1.4a. API support shows DirectX 12 Ultimate and OpenGL 4.6 for both, but Vulkan differs: 1.4 for the RTX 5070 SUPER and 1.3 for the LX MAX.

Dimensions are close but not equal. The RTX 5070 SUPER measures 245 mm by 115 mm by 40 mm, while the LX MAX measures 248 mm by 118 mm by 48 mm. Release dates differ, with the RTX 5070 SUPER dated December 31, 2025, and the LX MAX dated March 16, 2026.

Architecture Differences

The RTX 5070 SUPER is built on NVIDIA’s Blackwell 2.0 architecture, which the database identifies as the GeForce 50-series generation. It uses the GB205 chip fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The chip contains 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 118.3 million transistors per square millimeter. The architecture supports a 1:1 FP16 to FP32 ratio, meaning FP16 and FP32 throughput are both 32.15 TFLOPS. The RTX 5070 SUPER includes 50 RT cores and 200 tensor cores, which are dedicated hardware units for ray tracing and AI workloads. It also supports PCIe 5.0 x16 and DisplayPort 2.1b outputs.

The LX MAX uses the TrueGPU architecture, designated as the 7G100 generation, with the 7G106 chip. It is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, which is one process node larger than the RTX 5070 SUPER’s 5 nm node. No transistor count, die size, or transistor density data is available for the LX MAX. The TrueGPU architecture implements a 2:1 FP16 to FP32 ratio, giving it 49.15 TFLOPS of FP16 performance against 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32. The LX MAX does not list RT core or tensor core counts, and its API support stops at Vulkan 1.3, one version behind the RTX 5070 SUPER’s Vulkan 1.4.

The RTX 5070 SUPER’s Blackwell 2.0 architecture uses GDDR7 memory, while the LX MAX’s TrueGPU architecture relies on GDDR6. The memory bus width is the same, 192 bits, but the RTX 5070 SUPER achieves higher bandwidth through the newer memory type. The RTX 5070 SUPER also has a higher base clock of 2325 MHz and boost clock of 2512 MHz, whereas the LX MAX has no base or boost clock values recorded.

The architecture differences extend to the compute structure. The RTX 5070 SUPER has 6400 shading units, 200 TMUs, and 80 ROPs. The LX MAX has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The RTX 5070 SUPER’s higher texture rate of 502.4 GTexel/s comes from more TMUs and higher clocks, while the LX MAX’s higher ROP count gives it a pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s, which remains below the RTX 5070 SUPER’s 201.0 GPixel/s.

The manufacturing process difference is notable: 5 nm for the RTX 5070 SUPER versus 6 nm for the LX MAX, both from TSMC. The database records no transistor data for the LX MAX, which prevents a density comparison. The RTX 5070 SUPER’s power connector is a single 16-pin, and the LX MAX uses the same. Both are dual-slot designs, but the LX MAX is slightly longer, taller, and thicker.