Intel Arc A370M
Intel graphics card specifications and benchmark scores
Ray Tracing
XMX CoresAt a Glance
IntelIntel Arc A370M Specifications
GPU Core
Shader units and compute resources
The Intel Arc A370M GPU core specifications define its raw processing power for graphics and compute workloads. Shading units (also called CUDA cores, stream processors, or execution units depending on manufacturer) handle the parallel calculations required for rendering. TMUs (Texture Mapping Units) process texture data, while ROPs (Render Output Units) handle final pixel output. Higher shader counts generally translate to better GPU benchmark performance, especially in demanding games and 3D applications.
A370M Clock Speeds
GPU and memory frequencies
Clock speeds directly impact the Arc A370M's performance in GPU benchmarks and real-world gaming. The base clock represents the minimum guaranteed frequency, while the boost clock indicates peak performance under optimal thermal conditions. Memory clock speed affects texture loading and frame buffer operations. The Arc A370M by Intel dynamically adjusts frequencies based on workload, temperature, and power limits to maximize performance while maintaining stability.
Intel's Arc A370M Memory
VRAM capacity and bandwidth
VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory for storing textures, frame buffers, and shader data. The Arc A370M's memory capacity determines how well it handles high-resolution textures and multiple displays. Memory bandwidth, measured in GB/s, affects how quickly data moves between the GPU and VRAM. Higher bandwidth improves performance in memory-intensive scenarios like 4K gaming. The memory bus width and type (GDDR6, GDDR6X, HBM) significantly influence overall GPU benchmark scores.
Arc A370M by Intel Cache
On-chip cache hierarchy
On-chip cache provides ultra-fast data access for the A370M, reducing the need to fetch data from slower VRAM. L1 and L2 caches store frequently accessed data close to the compute units. AMD's Infinity Cache (L3) dramatically increases effective bandwidth, improving GPU benchmark performance without requiring wider memory buses. Larger cache sizes help maintain high frame rates in memory-bound scenarios and reduce power consumption by minimizing VRAM accesses.
A370M Theoretical Performance
Compute and fill rates
Theoretical performance metrics provide a baseline for comparing the Intel Arc A370M against other graphics cards. FP32 (single-precision) performance, measured in TFLOPS, indicates compute capability for gaming and general GPU workloads. FP64 (double-precision) matters for scientific computing. Pixel and texture fill rates determine how quickly the GPU can render complex scenes. While real-world GPU benchmark results depend on many factors, these specifications help predict relative performance levels.
Arc A370M Ray Tracing & AI
Hardware acceleration features
The Intel Arc A370M includes dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI acceleration. RT cores handle real-time ray tracing calculations for realistic lighting, reflections, and shadows in supported games. Tensor cores (NVIDIA) or XMX cores (Intel) accelerate AI workloads including DLSS, FSR, and XeSS upscaling technologies. These features enable higher visual quality without proportional performance costs, making the A370M capable of delivering both stunning graphics and smooth frame rates in modern titles.
Xe-HPG Architecture & Process
Manufacturing and design details
The Intel Arc A370M is built on Intel's Xe-HPG architecture, which defines how the GPU processes graphics and compute workloads. The manufacturing process node affects power efficiency, thermal characteristics, and maximum clock speeds. Smaller process nodes pack more transistors into the same die area, enabling higher performance per watt. Understanding the architecture helps predict how the A370M will perform in GPU benchmarks compared to previous generations.
Power & Thermal
TDP and power requirements
Power specifications for the Intel Arc A370M determine PSU requirements and thermal management needs. TDP (Thermal Design Power) indicates the heat output under typical loads, guiding cooler selection. Power connector requirements ensure adequate power delivery for stable operation during demanding GPU benchmarks. The suggested PSU wattage accounts for the entire system, not just the graphics card. Efficient power delivery enables the Arc A370M to maintain boost clocks without throttling.
Arc A370M by Intel Physical & Connectivity
Dimensions and outputs
Physical dimensions of the Intel Arc A370M are critical for case compatibility. Card length, height, and slot width determine whether it fits in your chassis. The PCIe interface version affects bandwidth for communication with the CPU. Display outputs define monitor connectivity options, with modern cards supporting multiple high-resolution displays simultaneously. Verify these specifications against your case and motherboard before purchasing to ensure a proper fit.
Intel API Support
Graphics and compute APIs
API support determines which games and applications can fully utilize the Intel Arc A370M. DirectX 12 Ultimate enables advanced features like ray tracing and variable rate shading. Vulkan provides cross-platform graphics capabilities with low-level hardware access. OpenGL remains important for professional applications and older games. CUDA (NVIDIA) and OpenCL enable GPU compute for video editing, 3D rendering, and scientific applications. Higher API versions unlock newer graphical features in GPU benchmarks and games.
Arc A370M Product Information
Release and pricing details
The Intel Arc A370M is manufactured by Intel as part of their graphics card lineup. Release date and launch pricing provide context for comparing GPU benchmark results with competing products from the same era. Understanding the product lifecycle helps evaluate whether the Arc A370M by Intel represents good value at current market prices. Predecessor and successor information aids in tracking generational improvements and planning future upgrades.
About Intel Arc A370M
The Intel Arc A370M is an end-of-life mobile GPU built on the Xe-HPG architecture and the DG2-128 chip, part of the Alchemist (Arc 3 Mobile) generation. TSMC fabricates it on a 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors in a 157 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 45.9M per mm². Its average benchmark score is 29,175, placing it in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs, with Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan results of 29,676 and 28,673 respectively. Those figures describe a compact, power-conscious part aimed at portable systems rather than a high-end discrete desktop class GPU.
How It Compares
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH. The RX Vega M GH averages 29,197. The Arc A370M scores 0.1% lower, putting the two effectively at parity. The difference in average score is negligible in benchmark terms.
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20. The Pro Vega 20 averages 29,235, and the Arc A370M trails by 0.2%. This is again a tie in practical terms; all listed rivals sit within a narrow band around the A370M’s average.
AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT. The RX 6650 XT averages 29,024. The Arc A370M is 0.5% ahead, a small but consistent margin that points to similar overall throughput in the measured benchmark set.
AMD Radeon RX 6800M. The RX 6800M averages 29,011. The Arc A370M is 0.6% ahead of this rival in the dataset. Despite being an IGP-form-factor part, the A370M lands slightly above a listed mobile AMD part in aggregate score.
The entire nearest-rival cluster spans from 29,011 to 29,235, and the Arc A370M’s 29,175 sits inside that band. The 72nd percentile ranking confirms that the A370M is not a top-tier GPU, but it is tightly grouped with several established AMD parts.
Power and Cooling
The Arc A370M carries a 35 W TDP, and its slot width is classified as IGP. That means the device is designed as an integrated-class mobile processor rather than a separate expansion card with its own cooler. The FACT PACK lists no power connector requirement and no suggested PSU, so power delivery is expected to come through the portable platform itself rather than through an external power supply.
Because the TDP is 35 W, the cooling burden is low relative to more power-hungry discrete GPUs. However, the exact thermal solution is not defined in the data; the system design determines how the heat is managed. The 6 nm TSMC process helps keep power and thermal characteristics in line with this compact positioning.
Benchmark Performance
The Arc A370M’s average benchmark score is 29,175. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 29,676, and its Geekbench Vulkan score is 28,673. The nearest-rival data shows deltas of -0.1% against the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, -0.2% against the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20, +0.5% against the AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT, and +0.6% against the AMD Radeon RX 6800M. In short, every listed rival is within one percent of the A370M.
The compute pipeline is built around 1,024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 ROPs. The pixel rate is 65.60 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 131.2 GTexel/s. FP32 throughput is 4.198 TFLOPS, while FP16 throughput is 8.397 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. Base clock is 1550 MHz and boost clock is 2050 MHz. These figures indicate a small but balanced execution unit configuration.
The A370M connects through a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface. This interface, combined with a 112.0 GB/s memory path, shapes how quickly data can be fed to the compute units. The benchmark scores show that raw compute is competitive with the four nearest rivals, but the overall result is still a mid-pack ranking at the 72nd percentile.
FAQ
Q: What architecture does the Intel Arc A370M use?
A: It uses the Xe-HPG architecture on the DG2-128 chip, and it belongs to the Alchemist (Arc 3 Mobile) generation. The GPU is manufactured by TSMC on a 6 nm process.
Q: How much memory does the Arc A370M have, and what is its bandwidth?
A: It has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus. The memory clock is 1750 MHz, or 14 Gbps effective, yielding a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s.
Q: Does the Arc A370M support ray tracing?
A: Yes. The FACT PACK lists 8 ray tracing cores. API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, which aligns the GPU with modern graphics features.
Q: What is the power target of the Arc A370M?
A: The TDP is 35 W. The slot width is IGP, there is no separate power connector listed, and no PSU recommendation is provided.
Q: Is the Arc A370M still in production?
A: No. Its production status is end-of-life, and its release date was 2022-03-29.
Q: How does the Arc A370M compare to its nearest rivals?
A: Its average score is 29,175. It is 0.1% behind the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, 0.2% behind the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20, 0.5% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT, and 0.6% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6800M.
Who Should Consider It
The Arc A370M is best suited for users who need modern API support in a low-power mobile package. Its 72nd percentile ranking and near-parity with four AMD rivals show that it is not a flagship-level part, but it delivers a consistent level of compute performance within its class. With 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput and a 131.2 GTexel/s texture rate, the GPU can handle workloads that fit within its compute envelope.
The main constraint is memory. Users should plan for workloads where 4 GB of GDDR6 and 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth are sufficient. At high resolutions, the 64-bit memory bus and 4 GB capacity will limit how much geometry and texture data can be streamed per frame. For lighter rendering loads or less memory-intensive scenarios, the compute and texture rates are better indicators of performance.
The 35 W TDP and IGP slot width make the A370M attractive for thin, power-limited portable devices. Users who prioritize raw FPS or very large frame buffers would be better served by a GPU with a different memory subsystem, but the A370M’s benchmark standing shows it can sit alongside several established mobile parts in average performance.
Memory Subsystem
The memory subsystem consists of 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus. The memory operates at 1750 MHz, with 14 Gbps effective data rate, producing 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a modest memory path by modern standards, and it forms the primary limitation for high-resolution workloads.
The 64-bit bus width means bandwidth is heavily dependent on the high effective memory speed. At high resolutions, the 112.0 GB/s ceiling will constrain how much data can be moved per second. The 4 GB capacity also sets a hard limit on how many high-resolution textures and buffers can reside in VRAM at once. For applications that exceed 4 GB of graphics memory, the A370M will be forced to rely on fallback methods, which reduces performance.
The memory clock, bus width, and capacity together explain why the A370M’s compute scores are competitive while its suitability for memory-heavy high-resolution scenes is limited.
Ray Tracing and Feature Set
The Arc A370M includes 8 ray tracing cores. The tensor core count is not specified in the data, so AI-accelerated compute cannot be quantified from this FACT PACK. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, giving it broad coverage across modern graphics APIs.
The presence of dedicated ray tracing cores and a DirectX 12 Ultimate feature level indicates hardware support for ray-traced effects in titles that use those APIs. The A370M also relies on portable-device-dependent display outputs, meaning the available display connectivity is defined by the host system rather than by the GPU alone. This is consistent with its IGP slot width and mobile positioning.
Detailed benchmark scores and charts for the Intel Arc A370M are below.
Benchmark Scores
geekbench_openclSource
Geekbench OpenCL tests GPU compute performance using the cross-platform OpenCL API. This shows how Intel Arc A370M handles parallel computing tasks like video encoding and scientific simulations. OpenCL is widely supported across different GPU vendors and platforms.
Top 5 Performers
Top 5 PerformersNearby Performers
Nearby Performersgeekbench_vulkanSource
Geekbench Vulkan tests GPU compute using the modern low-overhead Vulkan API. This shows how Intel Arc A370M performs with next-generation graphics and compute workloads. Vulkan offers better CPU efficiency than older APIs like OpenGL. Modern games and applications increasingly use Vulkan for cross-platform GPU acceleration.
Top 5 Performers
Nearby Performers
The NVIDIA Equivalent of Arc A370M
Looking for a similar graphics card from NVIDIA? The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 offers comparable performance and features in the NVIDIA lineup.
Popular Intel Arc A370M Comparisons
See how the Arc A370M stacks up against similar graphics cards from the same generation and competing brands.
Compare with Other GPUs
Select another GPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.
Browse GPUs