AMD Radeon RX 7400 vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows an unusual comparison: the AMD Radeon RX 7400 has eight benchmark scores across DirectX and compute workloads, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX has no recorded benchmarks at all. The database lists the RX 7400 with an average benchmark score of 2467, placing it in the 17th percentile among all GPUs. The LX MAX carries a 50th percentile rating, but with an average benchmark score of 0 and an empty benchmarks array, that percentile appears to reflect its theoretical position rather than measured results.

The RX 7400 delivers a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1103. Its Passmark G3D score reaches 11897, which dominates its Passmark DirectX 9 score of 176, its DirectX 11 score of 97, its DirectX 10 score of 59, and its DirectX 12 score of 44. The GPU compute score comes in at 5152, while the G2D score sits at 1209. These figures indicate a card that performs far better in modern graphics workloads than in legacy DirectX tests, a pattern consistent with its RDNA 3.0 architecture.

For the LX MAX, the absence of benchmark data means no direct score comparison is possible. The nearest rivals for the RX 7400 provide some context: the AMD Radeon 8040S scores 2440, which is 1.1% behind the RX 7400. The NVIDIA GeForce 710M scores 2433, 1.4% behind. The Intel HD Graphics 610 scores 2425, 1.8% behind. The NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M scores 2422, 1.9% behind. These are narrow margins, placing the RX 7400 at the top of this small cluster.

The LX MAX has no nearest rivals listed in the database, so its competitive positioning cannot be established through that channel. What the data does show is a fundamental discrepancy: one card has extensive measured results, the other has none. Any head-to-head comparison therefore relies on the LX MAX's specification sheet rather than its benchmark record.

The RX 7400's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1103 suggests it handles DX12 workloads adequately for its class, though its 17th percentile ranking indicates it sits in the lower portion of the overall GPU population. The LX MAX's 50th percentile placement, if taken at face value, would imply it sits near the midpoint of all GPUs, but the database provides no measured evidence to confirm that.

FAQ

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX MAX have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The LX MAX has an empty benchmarks array and an average benchmark score of 0. Its percentile rating of 50 is recorded, but no test results support it.

Q: What is the RX 7400's strongest benchmark result?

A: The Passmark G3D score of 11897 is its highest recorded result. Its GPU compute score of 5152 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1103 follow, with Passmark G2D at 1209.

Q: How does the RX 7400 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RX 7400 leads the AMD Radeon 8040S by 1.1%, the NVIDIA GeForce 710M by 1.4%, the Intel HD Graphics 610 by 1.8%, and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M by 1.9% in average benchmark score.

Q: Which card has more memory bandwidth?

A: The LX MAX records 432.0 GB/s across a 192-bit bus with 12 GB of GDDR6. The RX 7400 records 288.0 GB/s across a 128-bit bus with 8 GB of GDDR6.

Q: Do both cards use the same process node?

A: Yes. Both are fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The RX 7400 uses the Navi 33 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture, while the LX MAX uses the 7G106 chip with TrueGPU architecture.

Q: What compute performance does each card list?

A: The RX 7400 lists 16.49 TFLOPS FP32 and 32.97 TFLOPS FP16. The LX MAX lists 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16.

Architecture Differences

The RX 7400 belongs to the Radeon RX 7000 series, built on the Navi 33 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture and the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It uses 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2M per mm². The LX MAX uses the 7G106 chip with TrueGPU architecture and belongs to the 7G100 generation. Its transistor count and die size are recorded as unknown, and it has no codename listed.

Both cards share a 6 nm TSMC fabrication process, which is the only architectural commonality in manufacturing. The RX 7400's compute configuration includes 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, 64 render output units, and 28 ray tracing cores. The LX MAX lists 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units, but no ray tracing core count is recorded.

The API support differs. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RX 7400 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX MAX supports Vulkan 1.3. The RX 7400's display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1. The LX MAX offers 4x DisplayPort 1.4a with no HDMI output listed.

The RX 7400's memory clock is recorded as 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, identical to the LX MAX's memory clock of 2250 MHz and 18 Gbps effective. Memory type is GDDR6 for both. The bus interface differs: the RX 7400 uses PCIe 4.0 x8, while the LX MAX uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

The RX 7400 has a predecessor in Navi II and a successor in Navi IV, indicating its position within a product lineage. The LX MAX lists no predecessor or successor, and its production status is recorded as Active. The RX 7400's production status is either unknown or not listed.

Specification Differences

The most significant specification gap is memory. The LX MAX carries 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RX 7400 carries 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX MAX therefore offers 50% more memory capacity and 50% more bandwidth, both derived directly from the recorded figures.

Compute resources also differ sharply. The LX MAX lists 6144 shading units against the RX 7400's 1792, a 3.4x difference. Texture mapping units are 192 versus 112, and render output units are 96 versus 64. The LX MAX's FP32 throughput is 24.58 TFLOPS versus 16.49 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 49.15 TFLOPS versus 32.97 TFLOPS. Pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s versus 147.2 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 384.0 GTexel/s versus 257.6 GTexel/s.

Power requirements diverge substantially. The RX 7400 has a TDP of 43 W, uses a single 6-pin power connector, and a suggested PSU of 200 W. The LX MAX has a TDP of 225 W, uses a single 16-pin power connector, and a suggested PSU of 550 W. Both are dual-slot cards.

Physical dimensions are only recorded for the LX MAX: 248 mm length, 118 mm height, and 48 mm width. The RX 7400's dimensions are not listed. The RX 7400's boost clock is 2300 MHz with a game clock of 2200 MHz and a base clock of 1452 MHz, while the LX MAX has no clock speeds recorded for base, boost, or game.

Release dates differ: the RX 7400 was released on 2025-08-07, and the LX MAX on 2026-03-16. The RX 7400 has no production status listed, while the LX MAX is listed as Active. The RX 7400 has no launch MSRP recorded, and neither does the LX MAX.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split. The RX 7400 is the only card with measured benchmark results, so for any workload where benchmark evidence matters, it is the only choice with recorded performance. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1103, Passmark G3D score of 11897, and GPU compute score of 5152 provide concrete data points. Its 43 W TDP and 200 W suggested PSU indicate a low-power design that fits into systems with modest power delivery.

The LX MAX offers a larger specification sheet in several categories. Its 12 GB memory, 192-bit bus, 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, 6144 shading units, 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 are all higher than the RX 7400's corresponding figures. Its 50th percentile rating, if treated as a projection, suggests it should outperform the RX 7400's 17th percentile in raw capability. But the database contains no benchmark scores to verify that projection.

The RX 7400's nearest rivals all score within 1.9% of its average, which indicates it sits in a tightly packed performance tier. A 1.1% lead over the AMD Radeon 8040S is marginal. The LX MAX has no rival data, so its competitive standing is entirely unverified.

For users who prioritize measured results and low power consumption, the RX 7400 is the only card with evidence in the database. For users who prioritize listed specifications and are willing to accept an unverified performance profile, the LX MAX presents higher numbers on paper. The verdict from the data is conditional: the RX 7400 wins on evidence, the LX MAX wins on paper specifications, and no benchmark exists to reconcile the two.

Where Each One Wins

The RX 7400 wins in every category where benchmark results are the deciding factor. Its Passmark G3D score of 11897 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1103 indicate it can complete modern graphics tests. Its GPU compute score of 5152 shows some compute capability. Its 43 W TDP and 200 W suggested PSU mean it can operate in systems with far less power headroom than the LX MAX requires. Its PCIe 4.0 x8 interface is narrower than the LX MAX's x16, but its lower power draw makes it suitable for compact or lower-end builds.

The LX MAX wins on specifications that the RX 7400 cannot match. Its 12 GB memory capacity, 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 192-bit bus all exceed the RX 7400's 8 GB, 288.0 GB/s, and 128-bit bus. Its 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs are all higher. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 are roughly 49% and 49% higher respectively. Its 248 mm length, 118 mm height, and 48 mm width are recorded, giving it a defined physical footprint. Its 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs offer more display connections than the RX 7400's 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1 combination, though the RX 7400 supports a newer DisplayPort version.

The LX MAX also wins on production status, listed as Active, while the RX 7400 has no production status recorded. The LX MAX's release date of 2026-03-16 is later than the RX 7400's 2025-08-07, which may indicate a more recent entry into the market. The RX 7400 wins on API version support, with Vulkan 1.4 versus the LX MAX's Vulkan 1.3.

The RX 7400 wins on ray tracing, with 28 ray tracing cores recorded, while the LX MAX has no ray tracing core count listed. The RX 7400 also wins on having a defined predecessor and successor, placing it in a product family. The LX MAX has neither.

In practical terms, the RX 7400 is the card for measured performance and low power. The LX MAX is the card for maximum listed specifications and higher memory capacity. The database cannot confirm whether the LX MAX's specifications translate into actual benchmark wins, because no tests are recorded for it.