AMD Radeon RX 7700 vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 and the Lisuan Tech LX MAX present an unusual comparison because the database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between them. The RX 7700 has a complete set of recorded measurements across nine different tests, while the LX MAX has no benchmark scores recorded at all. This absence of data means the comparison must rely on the RX 7700's absolute scores and its position relative to other GPUs, then interpret the LX MAX's capabilities through its architectural specifications.

The RX 7700's average benchmark score of 15852 places it at the 58th percentile among all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals show a tightly clustered competitive field. The AMD Radeon R9 370X averages 15862, which is 0.1% behind the RX 7700. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 averages 16014, putting it 1% ahead. The AMD Radeon Pro W5500 averages 15679, landing 1.1% behind. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti averages 16129, which is 1.7% ahead of the RX 7700. These deltas indicate the RX 7700 sits in a narrow performance band where small percentage differences separate competitors.

Looking at the RX 7700's individual test results, the strongest showing comes in the Passmark G3D test with a score of 20974. The Geekbench OpenCL result reaches 106028, demonstrating substantial compute throughput. The Passmark GPU Compute score of 10963 further confirms compute capability. DirectX-focused tests show more modest numbers: Passmark DirectX 11 scores 186, DirectX 9 scores 261, DirectX 12 scores 96, and DirectX 10 scores 92. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test records 2865, and the Passmark G2D test scores 1206.

The LX MAX's complete lack of benchmark entries means the database cannot assign it any measured scores, percentile ranking beyond its 50th percentile placeholder, or rival comparisons. Its average benchmark score registers as 0. This creates a situation where the RX 7700 wins every direct benchmark comparison by default, simply because it has recorded data and the LX MAX does not.

FAQ

Q: Why does the AMD Radeon RX 7700 have benchmark scores while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX does not?

A: The database contains nine recorded benchmark results for the RX 7700 across tests including 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, Geekbench OpenCL, and multiple Passmark suites. The LX MAX has no benchmark entries listed, resulting in an average benchmark score of 0 and no percentile comparison data.

Q: How does the RX 7700 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RX 7700 averages 15852, sitting 0.1% behind the AMD Radeon R9 370X, 1% behind the AMD Radeon RX 9060, 1.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro W5500, and 1.7% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti.

Q: What is the RX 7700's best performing benchmark category?

A: The Passmark G3D test records the highest score at 20974. The Geekbench OpenCL test follows with 106028, and Passmark GPU Compute reaches 10963.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has 6144 shading units, while the AMD Radeon RX 7700 has 2560 shading units.

Q: What is the memory configuration difference between the two?

A: The RX 7700 uses 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 624.1 GB/s bandwidth. The LX MAX uses 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Do both cards support the same DirectX version?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). Both also support OpenGL 4.6, but the RX 7700 supports Vulkan 1.4 while the LX MAX supports Vulkan 1.3.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from entirely different architectural lineages. The AMD Radeon RX 7700 belongs to the Radeon RX 7000 series, built on RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 32 chip, codenamed Wheat Nas, part of the Navi III generation. It uses a 5 nm process at TSMC with 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 81.2M per mm².

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses the 7G106 chip based on TrueGPU architecture from the 7G100 generation, fabricated on a 6 nm process also at TSMC. The database lists its transistor count and die size as unknown, with no transistor density figure recorded.

Ray tracing support differs between the two. The RX 7700 includes 40 dedicated ray tracing cores. The LX MAX has no ray tracing core count recorded, leaving its RT capability undefined in the database.

Compute throughput characteristics diverge in their FP16 handling. The RX 7700 delivers 25.18 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16, indicating a 1:1 ratio where the card processes both precision levels at the same rate. The LX MAX provides 24.58 TFLOPS for FP32 but doubles to 49.15 TFLOPS for FP16, showing a 2:1 ratio that favors half-precision workloads.

The Vulkan API version also differs, with the RX 7700 supporting Vulkan 1.4 while the LX MAX supports Vulkan 1.3.

Specification Differences

The RX 7700 and LX MAX diverge across several hardware specifications. Clock speeds show a stark contrast: the RX 7700 has defined base, boost, and game clocks at 1900 MHz, 2459 MHz, and 2041 MHz respectively, with memory clocked at 2438 MHz for 19.5 Gbps effective. The LX MAX has no base, boost, or game clock listed, only a memory clock of 2250 MHz for 18 Gbps effective.

Memory capacity and bandwidth favor the RX 7700. It carries 16 GB of GDDR6 over a 256-bit interface, producing 624.1 GB/s bandwidth. The LX MAX has 12 GB of GDDR6 over a 192-bit interface, yielding 432.0 GB/s.

The shader configuration heavily favors the LX MAX in raw unit counts. The LX MAX has 6144 shading units and 192 texture mapping units, while the RX 7700 has 2560 shading units and 160 TMUs. Both have 96 raster output units.

Pixel and texture rates show the RX 7700 slightly ahead. The RX 7700 achieves 236.1 GPixel/s and 393.4 GTexel/s, while the LX MAX delivers 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s.

Power requirements differ with the LX MAX rated at 225 W TDP versus the RX 7700's 200 W. Power connectors reflect this: the RX 7700 uses 2x 8-pin, while the LX MAX uses a single 16-pin. Both suggest a 550 W power supply.

Physical dimensions vary, with the RX 7700 measuring 267 mm by 135 mm by 50 mm and the LX MAX at 248 mm by 118 mm by 48 mm. Both are dual-slot cards.

Display outputs present a clear difference. The RX 7700 offers 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, and 1x USB Type-C. The LX MAX provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a.

The production status for both is Active. Release dates place the RX 7700 on 2025-09-17 and the LX MAX on 2026-03-16.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear but incomplete picture. The AMD Radeon RX 7700 has a full set of benchmark results showing it operates within 1.7% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and within 1% of the AMD Radeon RX 9060, with an average score of 15852 and a 58th percentile standing among all GPUs. Its strongest results appear in compute-oriented tests, particularly the Passmark G3D score of 20974 and Geekbench OpenCL at 106028.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has no measured benchmark data whatsoever. Its average benchmark score is 0, and it has no nearest rivals listed. The database cannot verify its real-world performance through any recorded test.

For users seeking a GPU with verified performance data, the RX 7700 is the only option between these two that offers measurable results. Its specifications support solid performance across DirectX workloads, compute tasks, and general graphics benchmarks.

The LX MAX presents an unknown quantity. Its architectural specifications show high shading unit counts at 6144, strong FP16 throughput at 49.15 TFLOPS, and a 225 W TDP. However, without benchmark scores, the database cannot confirm how these specifications translate into actual performance.

Where Each One Wins

AMD Radeon RX 7700 wins in verified performance data: It has nine recorded benchmark scores across 3DMark, Geekbench, and Passmark suites. Its average score of 15852 places it in the 58th percentile of all GPUs, with competitive margins against the Radeon R9 370X, Radeon RX 9060, Radeon Pro W5500, and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti.

AMD Radeon RX 7700 wins in memory capacity and bandwidth: Its 16 GB GDDR6 configuration with 256-bit bus and 624.1 GB/s bandwidth exceeds the LX MAX's 12 GB, 192-bit, 432.0 GB/s setup. This provides more headroom for high-resolution textures and data-heavy workloads.

AMD Radeon RX 7700 wins in clock speed definition: It has specified base (1900 MHz), boost (2459 MHz), and game (2041 MHz) clocks, allowing for predictable performance scaling. The LX MAX has no recorded clock speeds.

AMD Radeon RX 7700 wins in display connectivity: Its output set includes HDMI 2.1a, DisplayPort 2.1, and USB Type-C, offering newer interface standards than the LX MAX's four DisplayPort 1.4a ports.

Lisuan Tech LX MAX wins in shading unit count: Its 6144 shading units dwarf the RX 7700's 2560, suggesting theoretical parallel processing capability that could benefit compute-heavy workloads if software utilizes it.

Lisuan Tech LX MAX wins in FP16 throughput: Its 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 performance at a 2:1 ratio doubles the RX 7700's 25.18 TFLOPS, indicating stronger half-precision compute potential for AI or scientific applications.

Lisuan Tech LX MAX wins in physical size: At 248 mm long and 48 mm wide, it is more compact than the RX 7700's 267 mm length and 50 mm width, which may ease installation in smaller cases.

Lisuan Tech LX MAX wins in power connector simplicity: A single 16-pin connector replaces the RX 7700's dual 8-pin requirement, though the LX MAX's 225 W TDP is higher than the RX 7700's 200 W.