NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains a single recorded benchmark for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER: the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, where it scores 6269.5 points. This places the card at the 36th percentile among all GPUs in the database. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX currently has no recorded benchmark scores, so direct numerical comparison is limited to the NVIDIA card's standing against its nearest rivals.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's average benchmark score of 6270 sits in a tight cluster of comparable GPUs. It matches the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 exactly, with a delta of 0%. The AMD FirePro W600 trails by 0.8% with a score of 6223, meaning the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER holds a narrow advantage of roughly 47 points. Against the NVIDIA Quadro K620, which scores 6282, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER trails by 0.2%. The AMD Radeon R7 M350 leads this group slightly, scoring 6327 and putting the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER 0.9% behind.

The FP32 compute figure for the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is 43.94 TFLOPS, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX delivers 24.58 TFLOPS. This represents a substantial gap in raw shader throughput. The NVIDIA card also leads in texture rate, posting 686.6 GTexel/s compared to 384.0 GTexel/s for the LX MAX. Pixel rates favor the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER as well, with 235.4 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s.

Memory bandwidth shows a clear separation. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses 16 GB of GDDR7 across a 256-bit bus, delivering 896.0 GB/s. The LX MAX uses 12 GB of GDDR6 across a 192-bit bus, yielding 432.0 GB/s. The NVIDIA card offers more than double the memory bandwidth, which directly impacts high-resolution texture streaming and compute workloads that are memory-bound.

The half-precision (FP16) comparison flips the narrative. The LX MAX outputs 49.15 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio to FP32, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers 43.94 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio. This means the Lisuan card has a 12% advantage in FP16 throughput, which can matter for AI inference and certain scientific workloads that operate in reduced precision.

Shading unit counts differ notably: the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 8960 shading units and 280 texture mapping units, while the LX MAX has 6144 shading units and 192 TMUs. Both cards have 96 ROPs. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER includes 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores; the LX MAX lists no RT or tensor core counts in the database.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's power draw is 350 W, whereas the LX MAX consumes 225 W. The Lisuan card lists a suggested PSU of 550 W; no suggested PSU is recorded for the NVIDIA card. Both use a single 16-pin power connector and occupy dual-slot widths.

The Verdict

The recorded data shows the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER as the stronger card for standard rasterization and FP32 compute. Its 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 output is 79% higher than the LX MAX's 24.58 TFLOPS. Texture rate follows the same pattern, with the NVIDIA card delivering 686.6 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s, a 79% advantage. Memory bandwidth of 896.0 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s gives the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER a 107% lead, which is decisive for 4K texture loads and bandwidth-heavy rendering.

The LX MAX counters in FP16 throughput, where its 49.15 TFLOPS surpasses the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's 43.94 TFLOPS. The Lisuan card also runs cooler from a power perspective, drawing 225 W versus 350 W, and it fits in a shorter chassis at 248 mm length compared to 304 mm.

Buyers prioritizing raw FP32 performance, memory bandwidth, or RT capability should select the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. The data shows it dominates in every measured category except FP16 throughput. Users whose workloads are heavily FP16-oriented and who prefer a lower power envelope and smaller physical footprint would find the LX MAX acceptable, provided they do not need the NVIDIA card's bandwidth or shading resources.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER also holds a production status of Active with a recorded launch MSRP of 749 USD. The LX MAX has no launch MSRP recorded but is also Active. The NVIDIA card released earlier, with a release date of 2025-12-31, while the LX MAX follows on 2026-03-16.

FAQ

Q: How does the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER compare to its closest rival in the database?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's average benchmark score of 6270 matches the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 exactly, with a 0% delta. It trails the AMD Radeon R7 M350 by 0.9% and leads the AMD FirePro W600 by 0.8%.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference between the two cards?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER provides 896.0 GB/s via 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX provides 432.0 GB/s via 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus. The NVIDIA card has 107% more bandwidth.

Q: Which card has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers 43.94 TFLOPS FP32, while the LX MAX delivers 24.58 TFLOPS. The NVIDIA card is roughly 79% faster in FP32 throughput.

Q: Does the LX MAX have any performance advantage?

A: Yes, in FP16 compute. The LX MAX outputs 49.15 TFLOPS with a 2:1 FP16 to FP32 ratio, which is 12% higher than the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's 43.94 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a TDP of 350 W and uses a single 16-pin connector. The LX MAX has a TDP of 225 W, also uses a single 16-pin connector, and lists a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Q: Do both cards support the same API levels?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX MAX supports Vulkan 1.3.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across nearly every major specification. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses the GB203 chip on a 5 nm TSMC process, while the LX MAX uses the 7G106 chip on a 6 nm TSMC process. Transistor counts are recorded for the NVIDIA card at 45,600 million with a die size of 378 mm² and density of 120.6M / mm²; the LX MAX lists these as unknown.

Clock speeds differ substantially. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2452 MHz. The LX MAX has no base or boost clocks recorded. Memory clocks show 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) for the NVIDIA card versus 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) for the Lisuan card.

Memory configuration diverges: 16 GB GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus for the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER versus 12 GB GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus for the LX MAX. Shading units number 8960 versus 6144, TMUs 280 versus 192, and ROPs are equal at 96. The NVIDIA card has 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores; the LX MAX has no recorded RT or tensor core counts.

The bus interface differs, with PCIe 5.0 x16 on the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER and PCIe 4.0 x16 on the LX MAX. Display outputs vary: the NVIDIA card offers 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b, while the LX MAX offers 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. Dimensions show the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER at 304 mm length and 137 mm height, while the LX MAX measures 248 mm length and 118 mm height. Both are 48 mm wide.

Architecture Differences

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is built on NVIDIA's Blackwell 2.0 architecture, part of the GeForce 50 generation. It uses a 5 nm process at TSMC with 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, achieving a transistor density of 120.6M / mm². The architecture includes dedicated RT cores and tensor cores, with 70 and 280 respectively. The FP32 and FP16 throughput are equal at 43.94 TFLOPS, indicating a 1:1 ratio typical of unified shader designs.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses the TrueGPU architecture, part of the 7G100 generation. It is fabricated on a 6 nm TSMC process, but transistor count and die size are not recorded. The architecture has no listed RT or tensor cores, suggesting a design focused purely on raster and compute pipelines. Its FP16 output of 49.15 TFLOPS is exactly double its FP32 output of 24.58 TFLOPS, indicating a 2:1 ratio where half-precision operations execute at twice the rate of full-precision.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's Blackwell 2.0 architecture includes Vulkan 1.4 support, while the LX MAX's TrueGPU architecture supports Vulkan 1.3. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The NVIDIA architecture uses GDDR7 memory, while the Lisuan architecture uses GDDR6. The memory clock difference, 1750 MHz versus 2250 MHz, reflects the different memory types, but effective data rates of 28 Gbps versus 18 Gbps show the GDDR7 implementation carries more data per clock cycle.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's FP16 performance being equal to FP32 is notable for a consumer GPU, as it suggests the tensor cores handle reduced-precision work without doubling throughput. The LX MAX's FP16 advantage likely comes from a simpler shader design that can process two half-precision operations per clock per lane. This architectural difference explains the 12% FP16 lead for the Lisuan card despite its lower overall FP32 output.

Both cards use a dual-slot cooler design and a single 16-pin power connector. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is 56 mm longer and 19 mm taller than the LX MAX. The NVIDIA card's 350 W TDP is 125 W higher than the Lisuan card's 225 W, reflecting the additional shading units, higher clocks, and wider memory bus.