Intel Arc 140V Mobile vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries for the Intel Arc 140V Mobile and the Lisuan Tech LX MAX. Both entries list zero benchmark scores, zero wins for either part, and an average benchmark score of zero. The absence of measured data means the comparative performance picture must be derived entirely from the specification-level figures recorded in the database, rather than from executed workload results.

The raw compute figures show a decisive separation. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, which is approximately 6.2 times the 3.994 TFLOPS recorded for the Intel Arc 140V Mobile. In FP16 with a 2:1 ratio, the LX MAX reaches 49.15 TFLOPS while the Intel part reaches 7.987 TFLOPS. That is a 6.2x gap in both precisions, confirming that the LX MAX holds a commanding lead in raw arithmetic throughput.

Texture and pixel throughput follow the same pattern. The LX MAX records a texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s, versus 124.8 GTexel/s for the Intel Arc 140V Mobile, a 3.1x advantage. The pixel rate for the LX MAX is 192.0 GPixel/s, versus 62.40 GPixel/s for the Intel part, a 3.1x advantage as well. These ratios match the proportional differences in TMUs and ROPs, which are 192 versus 64 and 96 versus 32 respectively.

Memory bandwidth is another area of major separation. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192 bit bus, yielding 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile uses system shared memory with a system dependent bandwidth figure, so no fixed number can be compared directly. The LX MAX also records a dedicated memory clock of 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective transfer, while the Intel part has no independent memory clock because it shares system memory.

Both parts support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, so API feature parity exists at the highest level. Vulkan support differs: the Intel part reports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX MAX reports Vulkan 1.3. That is a one-version difference in the graphics API stack.

The ray tracing comparison is notable. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile includes 8 dedicated RT cores, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX records no RT core count in the database. The database does not provide a ray tracing benchmark score for either part, so the practical impact of that hardware difference cannot be quantified from recorded data.

The Intel Arc 140V Mobile has a 50th percentile ranking versus all GPUs in the database, and the Lisuan Tech LX MAX also sits at the 50th percentile. With no benchmark scores recorded, both parts fall at the median by default, which provides no discriminative information about real-world standing.

The power and physical characteristics separate the two sharply. The Intel part is an integrated graphics processor with a 37 W TDP, while the LX MAX is a dual-slot discrete card with a 225 W TDP. The LX MAX requires a 550 W suggested PSU and a single 16 pin power connector. The Intel part uses the IGP bus interface, while the LX MAX uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX MAX records 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, while the Intel Arc 140V Mobile records 3.994 TFLOPS. The LX MAX is approximately 6.2 times higher in this metric.

Q: How do the memory subsystems differ?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192 bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth and a 2250 MHz memory clock (18 Gbps effective). The Intel Arc 140V Mobile uses system shared memory with a system dependent bandwidth figure and no dedicated memory clock.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same DirectX version?

A: Yes. Both the Intel Arc 140V Mobile and the Lisuan Tech LX MAX support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Vulkan versions differ, with the Intel part at Vulkan 1.4 and the LX MAX at Vulkan 1.3.

Q: What is the physical size of the Lisuan Tech LX MAX?

A: The LX MAX is a dual-slot card measuring 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. It uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and one 16 pin power connector, with a 550 W suggested PSU.

Q: Does the Intel Arc 140V Mobile have ray tracing cores?

A: Yes. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile records 8 RT cores. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has no RT core count listed in the database, so a direct comparison of ray tracing hardware cannot be made.

Q: What process nodes are used by each GPU?

A: The Intel Arc 140V Mobile uses a 3 nm process from TSMC, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses a 6 nm process from TSMC. The Intel part has a die size of 172 mm², while the LX MAX die size is unknown.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural lineages. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile is built on the Lunar Lake chip using the Xe2-LPG architecture, part of the Arc Graphics-M (Lunar Lake) generation. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses the 7G106 chip with an architecture designated as TrueGPU, from the 7G100 generation. These are entirely separate design families with no shared silicon heritage.

The process nodes differ. The Intel part is fabricated on a 3 nm TSMC process, while the LX MAX uses a 6 nm TSMC process. Both use the same foundry, but the Intel part has a smaller feature size. The Intel die is recorded at 172 mm², while the LX MAX die size is unknown. Transistor counts are unknown for both parts.

The execution resource configuration diverges substantially. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile has 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. Those are 6x, 3x, and 3x ratios respectively. The LX MAX also carries no recorded RT core count, while the Intel part includes 8 RT cores. Neither part records tensor core counts.

The memory architecture is fundamentally different. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile uses system shared memory with a system dependent bandwidth, which means its frame buffer performance depends on the host platform. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has a dedicated 12 GB GDDR6 frame buffer on a 192 bit interface with a fixed 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. This is a discrete versus integrated memory model, not just a capacity difference.

The API support shows minor divergence. Both parts support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX supports Vulkan 1.3. Display outputs also differ: the Intel part reports portable device dependent outputs, while the LX MAX provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a.

The packaging and integration approach differ completely. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile is an IGP with a 37 W TDP and no power connector. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX is a dual-slot discrete card with a 225 W TDP, a single 16 pin power connector, and a 550 W suggested PSU. The Intel part connects through the IGP bus interface; the LX MAX uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

Specification Differences

The clock behavior differs. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile has a recorded base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 1950 MHz. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has no base or boost clock recorded in the database. The memory clock is recorded only for the LX MAX at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective; the Intel part has no memory clock because it uses system shared memory.

The memory configuration is a major differentiator. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile lists size, type, bus width, and bandwidth all as system shared or system dependent. The LX MAX lists 12 GB of GDDR6, a 192 bit bus, and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

The compute resources differ across all three main units. Shading units are 1024 on the Intel part versus 6144 on the LX MAX. TMUs are 64 versus 192. ROPs are 32 versus 96. RT cores are 8 on the Intel part versus none recorded on the LX MAX. The pixel rate is 62.40 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 124.8 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s.

The FP32 and FP16 throughput figures differ by the same ratio. The Intel part records 3.994 TFLOPS FP32 and 7.987 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1). The LX MAX records 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1).

Power and physical specifications diverge. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile has a 37 W TDP, IGP slot width, no power connector, no suggested PSU, and an IGP bus interface. The LX MAX has a 225 W TDP, dual-slot width, 1x 16 pin power connector, 550 W suggested PSU, and PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.

The dimensions are recorded only for the LX MAX: 248 mm length, 118 mm height, and 48 mm width. The Intel part has no dimensions because it is an integrated GPU. The process node is 3 nm for Intel and 6 nm for the LX MAX. The die size is 172 mm² for Intel and unknown for the LX MAX.

The release dates differ. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile was released on 2024-09-23, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX has a release date of 2026-03-16. The Intel part has a predecessor listed as HD Graphics-M, while the LX MAX has no predecessor recorded. Neither part has a successor or a recorded launch MSRP.

The Vulkan API version differs: 1.4 for the Intel part and 1.3 for the LX MAX. DirectX and OpenGL versions match at 12 Ultimate (12_2) and 4.6 respectively. Display outputs are portable device dependent for Intel and 4x DisplayPort 1.4a for the LX MAX.

Where Each One Wins

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX wins in raw compute throughput and memory bandwidth by wide margins. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 figure is approximately 6.2x the Intel Arc 140V Mobile's 3.994 TFLOPS, and its 432.0 GB/s dedicated bandwidth dwarfs the system dependent figure of the Intel part. The 12 GB GDDR6 frame buffer on a 192 bit bus provides a fixed memory environment that does not depend on host system configuration. For workloads that stress pixel throughput, texture filtering, or FP32 arithmetic, the LX MAX has a clear hardware advantage: 192.0 GPixel/s versus 62.40 GPixel/s, and 384.0 GTexel/s versus 124.8 GTexel/s.

The LX MAX also wins on board resources. Its 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs give it a wide execution width. The 225 W TDP and dual-slot cooling design indicate that it is built to sustain high continuous load, unlike the 37 W integrated part. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs make it suitable for multi-display desktop configurations.

The Intel Arc 140V Mobile wins in efficiency and integration. Its 37 W TDP is dramatically lower than 225 W, and it requires no power connector and no suggested PSU. As an IGP on the Lunar Lake chip, it is designed for portable devices, with display outputs listed as portable device dependent. The 3 nm TSMC process node gives it a manufacturing advantage over the 6 nm LX MAX, and the 172 mm² die size is recorded while the LX MAX die size is unknown.

The Intel part also holds an advantage in ray tracing hardware. It records 8 RT cores, while the LX MAX records none. That makes the Intel Arc 140V Mobile the only one of the two with dedicated ray tracing resources documented in the database. The Intel part also supports Vulkan 1.4, one version newer than the LX MAX's Vulkan 1.3.

The release timeline favors the Intel part's maturity. It was released on 2024-09-23, while the LX MAX is dated 2026-03-16. The Intel part also has a documented predecessor, HD Graphics-M, while the LX MAX has none.

The use case split is straightforward. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX is positioned for desktop workloads requiring high fill rates, large dedicated memory, and sustained power delivery. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile is positioned for portable systems where power draw, integration, and ray tracing support matter more than raw throughput. Neither part has recorded benchmark scores, so the percentile ranking of 50 for both reflects the absence of data rather than measured equivalence.