Intel Arc 140V Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile Comparison

Intel
GPU

Intel Arc 140V Mobile

CORE STATE Lunar Lake
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 1950 MHz
TDP 37 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE Xe2-LPG
nm
PROCESS 3 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile

CORE STATE GB206
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1425 MHz
TDP 50 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
N/A
122,238
geekbench_vulkan
N/A
116,960
passmark_directx_10
N/A
129
passmark_directx_11
N/A
192
passmark_directx_12
N/A
93
passmark_directx_9
N/A
214
passmark_g2d
N/A
896
passmark_g3d
N/A
20,355
passmark_gpu_compute
N/A
8,279

Analysis: Intel Arc 140V Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile

Intel Arc 140V Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile occupy different segments of the mobile graphics market, which is clearly reflected in their recorded benchmark scores. The Arc 140V is an integrated graphics processor built into Intel's Lunar Lake platform, while the RTX 5070 Mobile is a discrete-class solution from NVIDIA's Blackwell architecture. The database shows a substantial performance gap between these two processors.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc 140V Mobile holds no benchmark wins in the recorded head-to-head data. The GPU's performance profile is defined by its role as an integrated processor, and its benchmark results place it in the 50th percentile of all GPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of zero.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile wins all recorded benchmark comparisons. It sits in the 75th percentile of all GPUs, and its average benchmark score of 29928 is far above the Arc 140V's recorded output. The RTX 5070 Mobile's nearest rivals in the database are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, which scores 29945 and trails by 0.1%, the AMD Radeon RX 6800 at 30095 with a 0.6% deficit, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti at 29783, which the 5070 Mobile leads by 0.5%. The AMD Radeon RX 6700 scores 30433, putting the RTX 5070 Mobile 1.7% behind that particular GPU.

The performance split is clear: the RTX 5070 Mobile is the superior processor for demanding graphics work, while the Arc 140V is positioned as a low-power integrated solution. The data indicates that the Arc 140V is not competitive with the RTX 5070 Mobile in any recorded workload category.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural lineages. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile uses the Xe2-LPG architecture on a 3 nm process node, fabricated by TSMC. The chip, codenamed Lunar Lake, has a die size of 172 mm² and belongs to the Arc Graphics-M (Lunar Lake) generation. Its transistor count is listed as unknown in the database.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile uses the Blackwell 2.0 architecture on a 5 nm process node, also from TSMC. Its chip is designated GB206, and the die measures 181 mm². The database records 21,900 million transistors on this die, giving a transistor density of 121.0 million per mm². The RTX 5070 Mobile belongs to the GeForce 50 Mobile generation and the GeForce 50-series family.

These architectural differences produce major disparities in compute resources. The RTX 5070 Mobile contains 4608 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, 48 raster operation units, 36 ray tracing cores, and 144 tensor cores. The Arc 140V Mobile contains 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, 32 ROPs, and 8 ray tracing cores. The tensor core count for the Arc 140V is listed as null in the database.

Clock speeds also differ substantially. The Arc 140V runs at a base clock of 300 MHz and boosts to 1950 MHz. The RTX 5070 Mobile operates at a base clock of 907 MHz and boosts to 1425 MHz. The memory configurations are fundamentally different: the Arc 140V uses system shared memory with a system dependent bandwidth, while the RTX 5070 Mobile uses 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 5070 Mobile's memory clock is listed as 1500 MHz, or 24 Gbps effective.

Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The RTX 5070 Mobile connects via PCIe 5.0 x16, while the Arc 140V uses an IGP bus interface. Both are integrated form factors with portable device dependent display outputs.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded benchmark data for the RTX 5070 Mobile shows its performance across nine separate tests, while the Arc 140V has no benchmark results in the database. The RTX 5070 Mobile's strongest result comes from Geekbench OpenCL, where it scores 122238. Its Geekbench Vulkan score is 116960.

In the Passmark suite, the RTX 5070 Mobile delivers a G3D score of 20355 and a GPU compute score of 8279. The DirectX-specific Passmark results are lower: DirectX 9 scores 214, DirectX 11 scores 192, DirectX 10 scores 129, and DirectX 12 scores 93. The Passmark G2D score is 896.

The Arc 140V's absence from the benchmark table means no direct comparison can be made on a test-by-test basis. The database's average benchmark score of 0 for the Arc 140V, combined with the RTX 5070 Mobile's average of 29928, indicates a complete performance separation. The RTX 5070 Mobile's percentile ranking of 75 versus the Arc 140V's 50th percentile ranking places the NVIDIA part in a different performance class entirely.

The RTX 5070 Mobile's nearest rival data confirms its position: the 29945 score of the RTX 3070 Ti is nearly identical to its own 29928 average, and the 29783 score of the RTX 2080 Ti is only 0.5% lower. These comparisons show that the RTX 5070 Mobile delivers desktop-class performance in the mobile segment.

FAQ

Q: What is the performance gap between the Arc 140V Mobile and the RTX 5070 Mobile?

A: The database records an average benchmark score of 0 for the Arc 140V Mobile, while the RTX 5070 Mobile averages 29928. The RTX 5070 Mobile also ranks in the 75th percentile of all GPUs, compared to the Arc 140V's 50th percentile.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The RTX 5070 Mobile has 4608 shading units, while the Arc 140V Mobile has 1024.

Q: What memory configurations do these GPUs use?

A: The Arc 140V Mobile uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth. The RTX 5070 Mobile uses 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus with 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: How does the RTX 5070 Mobile compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 5070 Mobile scores 29928, which is 0.1% behind the RTX 3070 Ti's 29945, 0.5% ahead of the RTX 2080 Ti's 29783, 0.6% behind the Radeon RX 6800's 30095, and 1.7% behind the Radeon RX 6700's 30433.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds of each GPU?

A: The Arc 140V Mobile boosts to 1950 MHz from a 300 MHz base clock. The RTX 5070 Mobile boosts to 1425 MHz from a 907 MHz base clock.

Q: Which GPU has more ray tracing cores?

A: The RTX 5070 Mobile has 36 ray tracing cores, while the Arc 140V Mobile has 8.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every recorded specification field. The RTX 5070 Mobile is built on a 5 nm process with 21,900 million transistors and a 181 mm² die, while the Arc 140V uses a 3 nm process with an unknown transistor count and a 172 mm² die. The RTX 5070 Mobile's transistor density is 121.0 million per mm²; the Arc 140V's density is not recorded.

Clock speeds show the Arc 140V with a 300 MHz base and 1950 MHz boost, versus the RTX 5070 Mobile's 907 MHz base and 1425 MHz boost. Memory is a major differentiator: the Arc 140V relies on system shared memory, while the RTX 5070 Mobile provides 8 GB of GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus with 384.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Compute resource counts favor the RTX 5070 Mobile across the board. It carries 4608 shading units versus 1024, 144 TMUs versus 64, 48 ROPs versus 32, 36 ray tracing cores versus 8, and 144 tensor cores where the Arc 140V has none recorded. Pixel and texture rates follow the same pattern: the RTX 5070 Mobile delivers 68.40 GPixel/s and 205.2 GTexel/s, while the Arc 140V delivers 62.40 GPixel/s and 124.8 GTexel/s. FP32 throughput is 13.13 TFLOPS for the RTX 5070 Mobile and 3.994 TFLOPS for the Arc 140V. The RTX 5070 Mobile's FP16 rate matches its FP32 at 13.13 TFLOPS (1:1), while the Arc 140V reaches 7.987 TFLOPS (2:1).

Power consumption differs, with the RTX 5070 Mobile rated at 50 W TDP and the Arc 140V at 37 W. The RTX 5070 Mobile uses PCIe 5.0 x16 as its bus interface and has no power connectors, while the Arc 140V uses an IGP interface. Both are classified as IGP slot widths with portable device dependent display outputs. The RTX 5070 Mobile released on 2025-04-14, while the Arc 140V released on 2024-09-23. The Arc 140V's predecessor is HD Graphics-M, and the RTX 5070 Mobile's predecessor is GeForce 40 Mobile.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
140V Mobile
RTX 5070 Mobile
Core Specs
Shading Units
1,024
4,608 +350.0%
Shaders
1,024
4,608 +350.0%
TMUs
64
144 +125.0%
ROPs
32
48 +50.0%
SM Count
36
Execution Units
128
Clocks
Base Clock
300 MHz
907 MHz
Boost Clock
1950 MHz
1425 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
1500 MHz 24 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
8 GB
VRAM (MB)
8,192
Memory Type
System Shared
GDDR7
Memory Bus
System Shared
128 bit
Bandwidth
System Dependent
384.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
4 MB
32 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
68.40 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
205.2 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
3.994 TFLOPS
13.13 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
998.4 GFLOPS (1:4)
205.2 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
7.987 TFLOPS (2:1)
13.13 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
8
36 +350.0%
Tensor Cores
144
XMX Cores
128
Power
TDP
37 W
50 W
TDP (W)
37
50 +35.1%
Power Connectors
None
Architecture
Architecture
Xe2-LPG
Blackwell 2.0
GPU Name
Lunar Lake
GB206
Generation
Arc Graphics-M (Lunar Lake)
GeForce 50 Mobile
Process Size
3 nm
5 nm
Transistors
unknown
21,900 million
Die Size
172 mm²
181 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
121.0M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
12.0
Shader Model
6.8
6.9
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
IGP
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
IGP
PCIe 5.0 x16
Other
Production
Active
Active
Predecessor
HD Graphics-M
GeForce 40 Mobile
View Arc 140V Mobile Details View GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile Details