AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE vs Intel Arc 140V Mobile Comparison

The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE and the Intel Arc 140V Mobile occupy completely different segments of the graphics market, and the recorded data confirms this at every level. The RX 7650 GRE is a discrete, dual-slot add-in card built for desktop systems, while the Arc 140V is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) fused into Intel’s Lunar Lake mobile chip. Their performance separation, architectural choices, and intended use cases are stark, and the benchmarks in the database reflect a gulf that no software optimization can bridge.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between these two parts, but the available individual measurements tell the story clearly. The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE posts an average benchmark score of 42,723 across all recorded tests. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile, by contrast, has an average benchmark score of 0 in the database, meaning no standardized performance measurements have been recorded for it. This absence is itself informative: the Arc 140V is positioned as an integrated solution where raw compute benchmarks are secondary to system-level efficiency.

Looking at specific tests, the RX 7650 GRE achieves 2,336 points in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. That result places it in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs tracked in the database, meaning it outperforms roughly 83 percent of the graphics hardware catalogued. In the Geekbench OpenCL test, it scores 83,109 points. The Arc 140V has no comparable entries, so direct numerical comparison is impossible, but its 50th percentile ranking across all GPUs, combined with its lack of recorded scores, indicates it sits near the median of the database while the RX 7650 GRE sits well above it.

The RX 7650 GRE’s nearest rivals in the database provide additional context. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER averages 43,223 points, which is 1.2 percent higher than the RX 7650 GRE’s average. The NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB averages 43,262 points, also 1.2 percent higher. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile averages 43,268 points, 1.3 percent higher, and the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 averages 43,301 points, also 1.3 percent higher. These deltas are small, placing the RX 7650 GRE within a narrow performance band of several established NVIDIA parts. The Arc 140V, with no nearest rivals listed and no average score, cannot be positioned in this same competitive field.

The performance gap between the two is also visible in their raw throughput figures. The RX 7650 GRE delivers 22.08 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the Arc 140V delivers 3.994 TFLOPS. That is a ratio of roughly 5.5 to 1 in favor of the AMD part. In FP16, the RX 7650 GRE again hits 22.08 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, while the Arc 140V reaches 7.987 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, still far behind. Pixel fill rate favors the AMD card at 172.5 GPixel/s versus 62.40 GPixel/s, and texture fill rate favors it at 345.0 GTexel/s versus 124.8 GTexel/s. The data shows a consistent, multi-factor advantage for the discrete card.

Architecture Differences

The architectural split between these two GPUs is fundamental. The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE uses the Navi 33 chip, built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename “Hotpink Bonefish.” It belongs to the Navi III (RX 7000) generation and is manufactured by TSMC on a 6 nm process. The die measures 204 mm² and contains 13,300 million transistors, giving it a transistor density of 65.2 million per square millimeter. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile uses the Lunar Lake chip, built on the Xe2-LPG architecture, and belongs to the Arc Graphics-M (Lunar Lake) generation. It is also manufactured by TSMC, but on a 3 nm process. Its die size is 172 mm², which is smaller than the AMD chip, though its transistor count is listed as unknown in the database, and no density figure is available.

The compute resources differ by roughly a factor of two. The RX 7650 GRE has 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, 64 raster operation units, and 32 ray tracing cores. The Arc 140V has 1,024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, 32 raster operation units, and 8 ray tracing cores. The AMD part has double the shaders, double the TMUs, double the ROPs, and four times the ray tracing cores. This structural advantage explains the large performance delta in the throughput figures.

Memory architecture is another major divergence. The RX 7650 GRE uses 8 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 2250 MHz, which translates to 18 Gbps effective. The Arc 140V, as an integrated part, uses system shared memory. Its memory size, type, bus width, and bandwidth are all listed as “System Shared” or “System Dependent,” meaning there is no dedicated VRAM and performance depends entirely on the host system’s DRAM configuration. This is a fundamental design difference: one card has fixed, high-bandwidth memory, while the other borrows from a pool shared with the CPU.

Clock speeds also reflect their different roles. The RX 7650 GRE has a base clock of 1720 MHz, a boost clock of 2695 MHz, and a game clock of 2350 MHz. The Arc 140V has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 1950 MHz, with no game clock listed. The AMD part runs at much higher sustained clocks, which is typical for a discrete card with dedicated cooling. The Arc 140V’s low base clock is typical for an IGP that scales down aggressively to save power.

Power and physical design further separate them. The RX 7650 GRE has a TDP of 170 W, requires a single 8-pin power connector, and is a dual-slot card measuring 204 mm in length and 115 mm in height. It also suggests a 450 W power supply. The Arc 140V has a TDP of 37 W, no power connectors, and is classified as an IGP, meaning it is built directly into the motherboard or system-on-chip and needs no separate slot. The power draw difference is nearly 4.6 to 1 in favor of the Intel part, which reflects its integration into a mobile platform.

Both GPUs support the same API level: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The RX 7650 GRE offers display outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, while the Arc 140V’s display outputs are listed as “Portable Device Dependent,” meaning they vary by laptop design. The bus interface also differs: the RX 7650 GRE uses PCIe 4.0 x8, while the Arc 140V uses an integrated graphics path with no external bus.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear verdict: the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE is the far more powerful graphics solution, with an average benchmark score of 42,723 and an 83rd percentile ranking, while the Intel Arc 140V Mobile sits at the 50th percentile with no recorded benchmarks. The RX 7650 GRE delivers 22.08 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, 288.0 GB/s of dedicated memory bandwidth, and 172.5 GPixel/s of pixel fill rate. The Arc 140V delivers 3.994 TFLOPS, system-dependent shared memory, and 62.40 GPixel/s. These are not close figures.

However, the Arc 140V is not designed to compete with the RX 7650 GRE. It is an integrated GPU with a 37 W TDP, built into a mobile processor, and its performance is bounded by shared system memory and the thermal constraints of a laptop chassis. The RX 7650 GRE is a 170 W discrete card requiring a 450 W power supply, a dual-slot cooler, and PCIe connectivity. The intended usage environments are mutually exclusive.

For any workload that relies on sustained graphics throughput, dedicated VRAM, or high fill rates, the RX 7650 GRE is the only rational choice based on the data. For an ultraportable or low-power mobile system where dedicated graphics is impossible, the Arc 140V provides a baseline level of functionality, but its 50th percentile ranking and lack of recorded benchmark scores indicate it is not a high-performance part.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE has an average benchmark score of 42,723. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile has an average benchmark score of 0 in the database, with no recorded benchmark entries.

Q: How does the RX 7650 GRE compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RX 7650 GRE’s average score is 1.2 percent lower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER and the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB, and 1.3 percent lower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile and the NVIDIA Quadro M6000.

Q: What is the FP32 compute difference between the two?

A: The RX 7650 GRE delivers 22.08 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the Arc 140V delivers 3.994 TFLOPS, a difference of approximately 5.5 times in favor of the AMD card.

Q: Does the Intel Arc 140V have dedicated memory?

A: No. The Arc 140V uses system shared memory. Its memory size, type, bus width, and bandwidth are all listed as “System Shared” or “System Dependent” in the database.

Q: What are the power requirements of each GPU?

A: The RX 7650 GRE has a TDP of 170 W and requires a single 8-pin power connector with a suggested 450 W power supply. The Arc 140V has a TDP of 37 W, no power connectors, and no suggested PSU.

Q: Which GPU has more ray tracing cores?

A: The RX 7650 GRE has 32 ray tracing cores, while the Arc 140V has 8 ray tracing cores, a 4 to 1 difference.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE wins on every recorded performance metric. It has higher FP32 throughput (22.08 TFLOPS versus 3.994 TFLOPS), higher FP16 throughput (22.08 TFLOPS versus 7.987 TFLOPS), higher pixel fill rate (172.5 GPixel/s versus 62.40 GPixel/s), and higher texture fill rate (345.0 GTexel/s versus 124.8 GTexel/s). It has 8 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory with 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth, compared to the Arc 140V’s system-shared memory with bandwidth listed as system dependent. It also has double the shading units (2,048 versus 1,024), double the TMUs (128 versus 64), double the ROPs (64 versus 32), and four times the ray tracing cores (32 versus 8). Its boost clock of 2695 MHz is substantially higher than the Arc 140V’s 1950 MHz. The RX 7650 GRE also posts a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,336 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 83,109, while the Arc 140V has no recorded benchmark scores.

The Intel Arc 140V Mobile wins in power efficiency and physical integration. It has a TDP of 37 W versus 170 W, meaning it consumes roughly one-fifth the power of the RX 7650 GRE. It requires no power connectors, no dedicated slot, and no separate cooler, as it is an IGP built into the Lunar Lake processor. Its base clock of 300 MHz allows for aggressive power scaling at idle. It is also manufactured on a smaller 3 nm process versus the RX 7650 GRE’s 6 nm process, which contributes to its lower power footprint. The Arc 140V’s die size of 172 mm² is smaller than the AMD chip’s 204 mm², and it has no external dimensions listed, reflecting its embedded nature.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every specification field. The RX 7650 GRE is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 33 chip, while the Arc 140V uses the Xe2-LPG architecture with the Lunar Lake chip. The process node is 6 nm for AMD and 3 nm for Intel, both from TSMC. The AMD die is 204 mm² with 13,300 million transistors, while the Intel die is 172 mm² with an unknown transistor count. The RX 7650 GRE has a base clock of 1720 MHz, a boost clock of 2695 MHz, and a game clock of 2350 MHz. The Arc 140V has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 1950 MHz, with no game clock. Memory is the largest divergence: 8 GB GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth versus system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth. The shading units are 2,048 versus 1,024, TMUs are 128 versus 64, ROPs are 64 versus 32, and ray tracing cores are 32 versus 8. Pixel rate is 172.5 GPixel/s versus 62.40 GPixel/s, texture rate is 345.0 GTexel/s versus 124.8 GTexel/s, and FP32 is 22.08 TFLOPS versus 3.994 TFLOPS. FP16 performance is 22.08 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 7.987 TFLOPS (2:1). TDP is 170 W versus 37 W. The RX 7650 GRE is dual-slot with a 1x 8-pin connector and a 450 W suggested PSU, while the Arc 140V is an IGP with no connectors and no PSU suggestion. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8 versus IGP. Display outputs are 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1 versus portable device dependent. The RX 7650 GRE was released on 2025-02-06 with a launch MSRP of 279 USD, while the Arc 140V was released on 2024-09-23 with no launch MSRP listed. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.