AMD Radeon 8050S vs Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a complete and decisive performance separation between the AMD Radeon 8050S and the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile. The AMD part delivers an average benchmark score of 62,108, while the Intel part has no recorded benchmark entries in the database, resulting in an average score of zero. This is not a close contest; it is a comparison between a dedicated mobile GPU tier and an entry-level integrated graphics solution.

In the Geekbench OpenCL test, the AMD Radeon 8050S scores 65,818. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no score recorded for this workload. Similarly, in the Geekbench Vulkan test, the AMD part scores 58,398, and again the Intel part has no recorded result. The absence of data for the Intel component means the database cannot compute any comparative deltas, win counts, or head-to-head benchmark entries; the wins column shows zero for both parts because no shared test results exist.

The AMD Radeon 8050S sits in the 89th percentile of all GPUs in the database. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile sits in the 50th percentile. That percentile gap indicates the AMD part is positioned far above the median GPU, while the Intel part is exactly at the median point of the database distribution, a position consistent with an integrated graphics unit designed for basic display output and light acceleration rather than demanding rendering workloads.

Looking at the nearest rivals for the AMD Radeon 8050S provides context for its score. The AMD Radeon Pro W6600M averages 61,896, which is 0.3% behind the 8050S. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 averages 63,693, putting it 2.5% ahead of the 8050S. The AMD Radeon RX 7600M averages 63,775, which is 2.6% ahead. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP averages 63,830, putting it 2.7% ahead. These are all close margins, meaning the 8050S performs in a tight band with several other AMD mobile and low-profile parts. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no nearest rivals listed, which is consistent with its lack of benchmark data.

The compute throughput figures reinforce the gap. The AMD Radeon 8050S delivers 11.47 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile delivers 384.0 GFLOPS of FP32 performance. Converting the Intel figure, that is 0.384 TFLOPS, which is roughly 30 times lower than the AMD part. The pixel rate tells a similar story: the AMD part renders 179.2 GPixel/s, while the Intel part renders 4.000 GPixel/s. The texture rate for the AMD part is 358.4 GTexel/s, versus 12.00 GTexel/s for the Intel part. These are not incremental differences; they are orders of magnitude apart.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon 8050S wins in every measurable performance category present in the database. Its FP32 throughput of 11.47 TFLOPS enables sustained compute workloads that the Intel part cannot approach. Its 65,818 OpenCL score indicates strong general-purpose compute capability, useful for applications that offload parallel tasks to the GPU. The Vulkan score of 58,398 shows solid graphics API performance for modern rendering workloads.

The AMD Radeon 8050S also wins on architectural features. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes hardware ray tracing support through its 32 RT cores. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile supports DirectX 12 (12_1), which lacks the 12_2 feature set. The AMD part has 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. The Intel part has 192 shading units, 12 TMUs, and 4 ROPs. Those are 10.7 times more shading units, 10.7 times more TMUs, and 16 times more ROPs for the AMD part.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile does have one measurable advantage: power consumption. Its TDP is 6 W, while the AMD Radeon 8050S has a TDP of 55 W. That makes the Intel part suitable for fanless or ultra-low-power designs, while the AMD part requires active cooling and a larger power budget. The Intel part also has a higher FP16 rate relative to its FP32 rate: it delivers 768.0 GFLOPS FP16 versus 384.0 GFLOPS FP32, a 2:1 ratio. The AMD part delivers 11.47 TFLOPS FP16 and 11.47 TFLOPS FP32, a 1:1 ratio. The AMD part still delivers far more absolute FP16 throughput, but the Intel part uses a packed math approach that doubles its FP16 rate.

For use cases, the data indicates the AMD Radeon 8050S fits scenarios requiring actual 3D rendering, compute acceleration, or modern graphics API support. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile fits scenarios requiring only basic display output, video decode, and minimal acceleration, with the benefit of a 6 W power envelope.

Architecture Differences

The two parts come from different manufacturers, different foundries, and different architectural generations. The AMD Radeon 8050S uses the Strix Halo chip based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, part of the Navi Mobile (RX 8000M) generation. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses the Twin Lake chip based on the Xe-LP architecture, part of the HD Graphics-T (Twin Lake) generation. It is fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry.

The process node difference is substantial: 4 nm versus 10 nm. That gives the AMD part a density and efficiency advantage at the transistor level, though the AMD die is larger at 308 mm². The Intel die size is unknown in the database. Transistor counts are unknown for both parts.

The memory subsystem is identical in configuration for both: system shared memory, system shared type, system shared bus width, and system dependent bandwidth. Neither part has dedicated VRAM. The AMD part uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface, while the Intel part uses a Ring Bus interface. The AMD part has no power connectors because it is an IGP, and the Intel part also has no power connectors listed. Both are classified as IGP slot width, meaning they are integrated into a host processor package.

Clock speeds differ significantly. The AMD Radeon 8050S has a base clock of 1295 MHz and a boost clock of 2800 MHz. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 1000 MHz. The AMD boost clock is 2.8 times higher than the Intel boost clock, and the AMD base clock is 4.3 times higher than the Intel base clock.

The API support differs in the DirectX version. The AMD part supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes features like ray tracing and mesh shaders. The Intel part supports DirectX 12 (12_1), which is a subset of the 12_2 feature set. Both parts support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

The AMD part has 32 dedicated ray tracing cores. The Intel part has no RT cores listed in the database. Neither part lists tensor cores. The AMD part has a production status of Active and a release date of 2025-01-05. The Intel part also has a production status of Active and a release date of 2024-12-31. The AMD part lists its predecessor as Polaris Mobile; the Intel part has no predecessor listed.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score difference between the AMD Radeon 8050S and the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile?

A: The AMD Radeon 8050S has an average benchmark score of 62,108. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no recorded benchmark scores, resulting in an average score of 0. The database cannot calculate a percentage delta because the Intel part has no scores.

Q: Which part has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The AMD Radeon 8050S delivers 11.47 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile delivers 384.0 GFLOPS of FP32 performance. The AMD part is approximately 30 times higher.

Q: Does the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile support hardware ray tracing?

A: No. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no ray tracing cores listed in the database. The AMD Radeon 8050S has 32 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes ray tracing features.

Q: What is the power consumption difference between the two parts?

A: The AMD Radeon 8050S has a TDP of 55 W. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has a TDP of 6 W. The Intel part uses roughly one-ninth the power budget.

Q: Are there any benchmark tests where the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile outperforms the AMD Radeon 8050S?

A: The database contains no benchmark results for the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile. There are no head-to-head benchmark entries, and the wins count is zero for both parts. The Intel part cannot be shown to outperform the AMD part in any recorded test.

Q: What process nodes are used for each part?

A: The AMD Radeon 8050S is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon 8050S | Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Manufacturer | AMD | Intel |

| Chip | Strix Halo | Twin Lake |

| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | Xe-LP |

| Generation | Navi Mobile (RX 8000M) | HD Graphics-T (Twin Lake) |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 308 mm² | unknown |

| Base Clock | 1295 MHz | 300 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2800 MHz | 1000 MHz |

| Shading Units | 2048 | 192 |

| TMUs | 128 | 12 |

| ROPs | 64 | 4 |

| RT Cores | 32 | none |

| Pixel Rate | 179.2 GPixel/s | 4.000 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 358.4 GTexel/s | 12.00 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 11.47 TFLOPS | 384.0 GFLOPS |

| FP16 | 11.47 TFLOPS (1:1) | 768.0 GFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 55 W | 6 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | Ring Bus |

| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_1) |

| Release Date | 2025-01-05 | 2024-12-31 |

| Predecessor | Polaris Mobile | none |