Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

The Verdict

The database comparison between the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile and the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 is a study in extremes. The Intel part is a 6 W integrated graphics solution built for low-power mobile devices, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 is a 225 W dual-slot discrete card with 12 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory. The recorded specifications show no overlapping use cases.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 is the unequivocal performance leader on every measurable compute metric. Its FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS is 64 times higher than the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile's 384.0 GFLOPS. The pixel rate advantage is 48 times (192.0 GPixel/s versus 4.000 GPixel/s), and the texture rate advantage is 32 times (384.0 GTexel/s versus 12.00 GTexel/s). For any application that demands raw graphics processing, the LX 7G100 is the only viable option in this pairing.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile serves a completely different purpose. It is an IGP with system-shared memory, a 10 nm process node, and a 6 W TDP. Its performance class places it at the 50th percentile among all GPUs in the database, identical to the LX 7G100's percentile ranking, but that parity is misleading given the enormous gap in absolute specifications. The Intel part exists for basic display output and light compute tasks in portable devices where power draw is the primary constraint.

The verdict is straightforward: the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 is for workloads that need high-throughput rendering or compute. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is for systems that need graphics capability within a minimal power envelope. There is no benchmark data in the database to suggest the Intel part can compete with the LX 7G100 in any performance-oriented task.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile provides 384.0 GFLOPS. The LX 7G100 is 64 times faster in this metric.

Q: What memory configurations do these two GPUs use?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth, and its memory clock is listed as system shared.

Q: How do their power requirements differ?

A: The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has a 6 W TDP and requires no power connectors as an IGP. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has a 225 W TDP, requires a single 8-pin power connector, and the database lists a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Q: What is the process node for each chip?

A: The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses a 10 nm process at Intel's foundry. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses a 6 nm process fabricated by TSMC.

Q: Which GPU supports newer DirectX features?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile supports DirectX 12 (12_1). The LX 7G100 also supports Vulkan 1.3, compared to Vulkan 1.4 on the Intel part.

Q: What are the physical dimensions of the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100?

A: The LX 7G100 is 294 mm long, 120 mm high, and 49 mm wide, making it a dual-slot card. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is an IGP with no listed dimensions.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is built on the Xe-LP architecture, which is Intel's low-power graphics architecture designed for integrated solutions. It belongs to the HD Graphics-T generation under the Twin Lake chip family. The process node is 10 nm, produced at Intel's own foundry. The architecture uses a Ring Bus interface, which is typical for integrated graphics that share memory with the CPU.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses a completely different architecture called TrueGPU, based on the 7G106 chip. It is manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC, which represents a smaller transistor geometry compared to the Intel part. The LX 7G100 connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, a standard discrete card interface. It has four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, whereas the Intel part's display outputs are listed as portable device dependent.

The compute resources differ by an order of magnitude. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has 192 shading units, 12 texture mapping units, and 4 ROPs. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. These numbers translate directly into the pixel rate and texture rate advantages the LX 7G100 holds: 192.0 GPixel/s versus 4.000 GPixel/s, and 384.0 GTexel/s versus 12.00 GTexel/s.

Neither GPU is listed with dedicated ray tracing cores or tensor cores in the database. The Intel part supports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The LX 7G100 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3. The DirectX 12 Ultimate designation on the LX 7G100 indicates support for the full set of DirectX 12 features, while the Intel part's 12_1 level is a subset.

Specification Differences

The core specification differences between the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile and the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 are extensive. The Intel part has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 1000 MHz. The LX 7G100 has no listed base or boost clocks, but its memory runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed.

Memory is where the two diverge most sharply. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses system-shared memory with no dedicated VRAM, a system-shared bus width, and system-dependent bandwidth. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This dedicated high-bandwidth memory is essential for the LX 7G100's performance class.

The FP16 and FP32 throughput figures show the scale of difference. The Intel part delivers 768.0 GFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio) and 384.0 GFLOPS FP32. The LX 7G100 delivers 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio) and 24.58 TFLOPS FP32. Both maintain the same 2:1 FP16 to FP32 ratio, but the absolute numbers are 64 times apart in both cases.

Power and physical specifications also differ completely. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has a 6 W TDP, is an IGP with no power connectors, and has no listed dimensions. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has a 225 W TDP, requires one 8-pin power connector, a 550 W suggested PSU, and measures 294 mm by 120 mm by 49 mm as a dual-slot card.

The production status for both is listed as active. The Intel part has a release date of 2024-12-31, while the LX 7G100 has a release date of 2026-06-17. Neither has a launch MSRP in the database, and neither has recorded benchmark scores or nearest rivals.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark results between the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile and the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100. The winsA and winsB fields are both zero, and the headToHeadBenchmarks array is empty. This means the comparison must rely entirely on the specification-derived performance metrics.

The FP32 compute comparison is the most telling. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 produces 24.58 TFLOPS, which is 64 times the 384.0 GFLOPS of the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile. This ratio holds for FP16 as well: 49.15 TFLOPS versus 768.0 GFLOPS, again a 64-fold difference. For any compute workload that scales with FP32 or FP16 throughput, the LX 7G100 delivers a massive advantage.

Pixel throughput shows a 48-fold gap. The LX 7G100 renders at 192.0 GPixel/s, while the Intel part manages 4.000 GPixel/s. This affects fill-rate-bound scenarios such as high-resolution rendering with heavy overdraw. Texture throughput shows a 32-fold gap: 384.0 GTexel/s versus 12.00 GTexel/s. Texture-bound workloads, common in modern 3D games and content creation, will see a proportional benefit on the LX 7G100.

Memory bandwidth is another decisive factor. The LX 7G100's 432.0 GB/s of dedicated GDDR6 bandwidth stands against the Intel part's system-dependent shared memory bandwidth. In memory-intensive workloads, the LX 7G100's dedicated bandwidth avoids contention with CPU memory traffic. The Intel part must share the system memory bus with the CPU, which can introduce latency and bandwidth bottlenecks.

The API support levels also differ. The LX 7G100's DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support enables features that the Intel part's DirectX 12 (12_1) cannot access. The Vulkan versions are close, with the Intel part supporting 1.4 and the LX 7G100 supporting 1.3, which is a minor advantage for the Intel part in Vulkan-based workloads.

Where Each One Wins

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 wins in every performance-oriented category based on the recorded data. Its FP32 and FP16 compute throughput are 64 times higher, its pixel rate is 48 times higher, and its texture rate is 32 times higher. It has 12 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, making it suitable for large datasets and high-resolution textures. The 6144 shading units and 192 TMUs provide the parallel execution resources needed for demanding 3D rendering, scientific compute, and machine learning inference. DirectX 12 Ultimate support enables the latest graphics features for gaming and professional visualization.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile wins in power efficiency and form factor. Its 6 W TDP is 37.5 times lower than the LX 7G100's 225 W TDP. As an IGP with no power connectors and no listed dimensions, it fits into portable devices where space and cooling are limited. The 10 nm process node at Intel's foundry represents a mature low-power manufacturing approach. The system-shared memory model eliminates the need for dedicated VRAM, reducing component count and cost in the host system. Vulkan 1.4 support is slightly ahead of the LX 7G100's Vulkan 1.3.

Use-case separation is clear. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile suits basic display output, office productivity, media playback, and light 2D tasks in laptops and compact desktops where the 6 W power draw is acceptable. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 suits gaming, 3D rendering, video editing, and compute acceleration where the 225 W power draw and dual-slot footprint are justified by the 64-fold compute advantage. The database shows no overlap in their target application spaces.