NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

FAQ

Q: What benchmark data is available for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER and the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100?

A: The database records a single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2690 for the RTX 5070 SUPER. The LX 7G100 has no recorded benchmark scores, and the head-to-head benchmark section is empty. The RTX 5070 SUPER sits at the 18th percentile among all GPUs, while the LX 7G100 is at the 50th percentile based on unspecified aggregate data.

Q: How does the RTX 5070 SUPER compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER scores 2690, which places it 1% ahead of the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M (2664), 1.1% ahead of the GeForce GT 1030 (2662), 1.1% ahead of the Intel Arc Pro B50 (2660), and 1.7% ahead of the GeForce GT 440 (2645). These are marginal performance gaps.

Q: What are the memory specifications of each card?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER has 18 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus with 672.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX 7G100 has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 5070 SUPER provides 50% more memory capacity and 55.6% more bandwidth.

Q: Which card has higher compute throughput?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER delivers 32.15 TFLOPS FP32 and 32.15 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1 ratio). The LX 7G100 delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio). The RTX 5070 SUPER leads in FP32 by 30.8%, while the LX 7G100 leads in FP16 by 52.9%.

Q: What process nodes do the two chips use?

A: Both use TSMC as the foundry. The RTX 5070 SUPER uses a 5 nm process, while the LX 7G100 uses a 6 nm process. The RTX 5070 SUPER packs 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die, while the LX 7G100 has unknown transistor count and die size.

Q: Which card supports newer display outputs?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER offers 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. The LX 7G100 offers 4x DisplayPort 1.4a only. The RTX 5070 SUPER supports a newer DisplayPort standard.

Architecture Differences

The RTX 5070 SUPER is built on NVIDIA's Blackwell 2.0 architecture using the GB205 chip, produced on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The LX 7G100 uses the 7G106 chip with a "TrueGPU" architecture, produced on a 6 nm process, also at TSMC. The process node difference is one nanometer, which affects transistor density and power characteristics.

The RTX 5070 SUPER has 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 118.3 million per square millimeter. The LX 7G100 has unknown transistor count and die size, so density cannot be compared directly. The smaller node gives the RTX 5070 SUPER a manufacturing advantage in packing more transistors into less area.

The RTX 5070 SUPER includes 50 RT cores and 200 tensor cores, while the LX 7G100 lists null values for both. This indicates the RTX 5070 SUPER has dedicated hardware for ray tracing and tensor operations, while the LX 7G100 either lacks these units or does not expose them in the database. The Blackwell 2.0 architecture also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The LX 7G100 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, but only Vulkan 1.3, one revision older.

The memory subsystems differ fundamentally. The RTX 5070 SUPER uses GDDR7 at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) on a 192-bit bus, achieving 672.0 GB/s. The LX 7G100 uses GDDR6 at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) on the same 192-bit bus width, achieving 432.0 GB/s. The RTX 5070 SUPER has newer memory technology and higher bandwidth.

Power delivery also differs. The RTX 5070 SUPER has a 275 W TDP with a single 16-pin power connector. The LX 7G100 has a 225 W TDP with a single 8-pin connector and a suggested PSU of 550 W. The RTX 5070 SUPER draws more power but also delivers more FP32 throughput per watt: 116.9 GFLOPS/W versus 109.2 GFLOPS/W for the LX 7G100.

The bus interface differs as well. The RTX 5070 SUPER uses PCIe 5.0 x16, while the LX 7G100 uses PCIe 4.0 x16. This affects data transfer rates between the GPU and the host system.

Physical dimensions show the LX 7G100 is larger: 294 mm length versus 245 mm, 120 mm height versus 115 mm, and 49 mm width versus 40 mm. Both are dual-slot cards.

The RTX 5070 SUPER has 6400 shading units, 200 TMUs, and 80 ROPs. The LX 7G100 has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The RTX 5070 SUPER has 4.2% more shading units and 4.2% more TMUs, while the LX 7G100 has 20% more ROPs.

The Verdict

The recorded data shows two differently positioned products. The RTX 5070 SUPER has a verified 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2690, placing it at the 18th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are all at similar scores, within 1.7% performance difference. The LX 7G100 has no recorded benchmark scores and no nearest rivals in the database, making direct performance comparison impossible from benchmark data alone.

For raw FP32 throughput, the RTX 5070 SUPER is the clear choice, delivering 32.15 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS, a 30.8% advantage. For FP16 workloads, the LX 7G100 leads with 49.15 TFLOPS versus 32.15 TFLOPS, a 52.9% advantage. The LX 7G100's 2:1 FP16 ratio suggests it is optimized for mixed-precision workloads, while the RTX 5070 SUPER's 1:1 ratio indicates balanced FP32 and FP16 performance.

Memory capacity favors the RTX 5070 SUPER with 18 GB versus 12 GB, a 50% difference. This matters for large datasets and high-resolution textures. Bandwidth also favors the RTX 5070 SUPER at 672.0 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s.

The RTX 5070 SUPER includes RT and tensor cores with explicit counts, while the LX 7G100 has null values. For ray tracing and AI workloads, the RTX 5070 SUPER has dedicated hardware the LX 7G100 does not appear to offer.

The LX 7G100 wins in ROP count (96 versus 80), pixel rate (192.0 GPixel/s versus 201.0 GPixel/s, the RTX 5070 SUPER still leads), and FP16 throughput. The 50th percentile ranking for the LX 7G100 versus 18th for the RTX 5070 SUPER suggests the LX 7G100 may be positioned differently in the overall GPU landscape, though no benchmark scores support this directly.

The data indicates the RTX 5070 SUPER is the more capable card for standard graphics workloads, memory-heavy tasks, and ray tracing. The LX 7G100 is the choice for FP16-heavy compute, given its 2:1 ratio and higher peak throughput.

Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER | Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | GB205 | 7G106 |

| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | TrueGPU |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 6 nm |

| Transistors | 31,100 million | unknown |

| Die Size | 263 mm² | unknown |

| Transistor Density | 118.3M / mm² | null |

| Base Clock | 2325 MHz | null |

| Boost Clock | 2512 MHz | null |

| Memory Clock | 1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective | 2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective |

| Memory Size | 18 GB | 12 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus Width | 192 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 672.0 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 6400 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 200 | 192 |

| ROPs | 80 | 96 |

| RT Cores | 50 | null |

| Tensor Cores | 200 | null |

| Pixel Rate | 201.0 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 502.4 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 32.15 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 32.15 TFLOPS (1:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 275 W | 225 W |

| Power Connectors | 1x 16-pin | 1x 8-pin |

| Suggested PSU | null | 550 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1b 3x DisplayPort 2.1b | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan Support | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Length | 245 mm | 294 mm |

| Height | 115 mm | 120 mm |

| Width | 40 mm | 49 mm |

| Release Date | 2025-12-31 | 2026-06-17 |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark section in the database is empty, and the LX 7G100 has no recorded scores. However, the existing benchmark data for the RTX 5070 SUPER provides a reference point. The RTX 5070 SUPER scores 2690 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which places it 1% ahead of the Quadro K1100M, 1.1% ahead of the GT 1030, 1.1% ahead of the Arc Pro B50, and 1.7% ahead of the GT 440.

The RTX 5070 SUPER's FP32 throughput of 32.15 TFLOPS is 30.8% higher than the LX 7G100's 24.58 TFLOPS. Its texture rate of 502.4 GTexel/s is 30.8% higher than the LX 7G100's 384.0 GTexel/s. Its pixel rate of 201.0 GPixel/s is 4.7% higher than the LX 7G100's 192.0 GPixel/s. Its memory bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s is 55.6% higher than the LX 7G100's 432.0 GB/s.

The LX 7G100 counters with FP16 throughput of 49.15 TFLOPS, which is 52.9% higher than the RTX 5070 SUPER's 32.15 TFLOPS. The LX 7G100 also has 20% more ROPs (96 versus 80), which could improve fill-rate-bound scenarios, though its pixel rate is still lower due to clock differences.

The RTX 5070 SUPER has a higher boost clock of 2512 MHz compared to the LX 7G100's null boost clock, which prevents a direct clock comparison. The LX 7G100 has a higher memory clock of 2250 MHz versus 1750 MHz, but slower effective data rate due to GDDR6 versus GDDR7.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5070 SUPER wins in FP32 compute performance, delivering 32.15 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS. This makes it the stronger choice for standard graphics rendering, where FP32 shader workloads dominate. Its texture rate of 502.4 GTexel/s exceeds the LX 7G100's 384.0 GTexel/s, indicating faster texture mapping operations.

The RTX 5070 SUPER wins in memory capacity and bandwidth. With 18 GB versus 12 GB, it can handle larger textures, bigger framebuffers, and more data-heavy workloads. The 672.0 GB/s bandwidth versus 432.0 GB/s gives it a substantial advantage in memory-bound scenarios.

The RTX 5070 SUPER has dedicated RT cores and tensor cores, which the LX 7G100 lacks in the database. This makes the RTX 5070 SUPER the only option for ray-traced rendering and AI-accelerated workloads based on the recorded specifications.

The RTX 5070 SUPER wins in pixel rate (201.0 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s) despite having fewer ROPs. It also supports PCIe 5.0 versus PCIe 4.0, and DisplayPort 2.1b versus 1.4a, giving it a newer interface standard.

The LX 7G100 wins in FP16 throughput with 49.15 TFLOPS versus 32.15 TFLOPS. Its 2:1 FP16 ratio means it can process half-precision data at twice the rate of FP32, while the RTX 5070 SUPER processes both at the same rate. For workloads that leverage FP16, such as certain machine learning inference tasks or specific compute kernels, the LX 7G100 delivers higher peak throughput.

The LX 7G100 wins in ROP count (96 versus 80), which may provide better performance in certain rasterization-bound scenarios at lower resolutions, though its lower pixel rate suggests the RTX 5070 SUPER still prevails in aggregate fill-rate.

The LX 7G100 has a lower TDP of 225 W versus 275 W, drawing less power. It also requires a suggested PSU of 550 W, while the RTX 5070 SUPER has no suggested PSU in the database. The LX 7G100 uses a single 8-pin connector versus a single 16-pin connector, potentially simplifying power cabling.

The LX 7G100 has a longer release date (2026-06-17 versus 2025-12-31), making it the newer product by roughly six months. Its 50th percentile ranking versus 18th for the RTX 5070 SUPER suggests it may occupy a different market segment, though the absence of recorded benchmarks limits further interpretation.