NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER?

A: The RTX 5080 SUPER records an average benchmark score of 3075 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. This places it in the 19th percentile of all GPUs in the database.

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database shows an empty benchmark array for the LX 7G100, with an average benchmark score of 0 and a 50th percentile ranking. No performance measurements are currently available for this card.

Q: Which GPU has a higher memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 5080 SUPER delivers 1.02 TB/s of memory bandwidth using 24 GB of GDDR7 over a 256-bit bus. The LX 7G100 provides 432.0 GB/s with 12 GB of GDDR6 over a 192-bit bus, meaning the RTX 5080 SUPER offers more than double the bandwidth.

Q: What are the TDP ratings for each card?

A: The RTX 5080 SUPER has a TDP of 415 W and requires a single 16-pin power connector. The LX 7G100 has a TDP of 225 W with a single 8-pin connector and a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Q: Which GPU uses a smaller manufacturing process?

A: The RTX 5080 SUPER is built on a 5 nm process at TSMC, while the LX 7G100 uses a 6 nm process, also at TSMC. The RTX 5080 SUPER's process node is finer.

Q: How does the RTX 5080 SUPER compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 5080 SUPER scores 2.8% lower than the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 (3163) and 3.4% lower than the Intel Arc Pro B60 (3182). It scores 3.1% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce 820A (2983) and 3.6% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M (2967).

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from entirely different architectural lineages. The RTX 5080 SUPER is based on the GB203 chip using NVIDIA's Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The LX 7G100 uses the 7G106 chip with an architecture designated as TrueGPU, built on a 6 nm process, also at TSMC. This process difference gives the RTX 5080 SUPER a manufacturing advantage in transistor density.

The RTX 5080 SUPER packs 45,600 million transistors into a 378 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 120.6M per mm². The LX 7G100's transistor count and die size are listed as unknown in the database, so no direct density comparison is possible. The RTX 5080 SUPER's larger transistor budget supports substantially more compute resources.

Shading unit counts differ sharply: the RTX 5080 SUPER has 10,752 shading units, while the LX 7G100 has 6,144. Texture mapping units follow the same pattern, with 336 TMUs on the NVIDIA card versus 192 on the Lisuan card. Render output units are 112 versus 96, respectively. The RTX 5080 SUPER also includes 84 ray tracing cores and 336 tensor cores, while the LX 7G100 lists no ray tracing or tensor core counts in the database.

The RTX 5080 SUPER's FP32 compute is rated at 56.28 TFLOPS, more than double the LX 7G100's 24.58 TFLOPS. In FP16, the RTX 5080 SUPER maintains a 1:1 ratio with 56.28 TFLOPS, while the LX 7G100 achieves 49.15 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio, indicating different mixed-precision design philosophies.

API support also diverges. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, but the RTX 5080 SUPER supports Vulkan 1.4 while the LX 7G100 is limited to Vulkan 1.3.

The Verdict

The data in the database clearly favors the RTX 5080 SUPER for raw performance potential. Its FP32 throughput is 56.28 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS, its texture rate is 879.3 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s, and its pixel rate is 293.1 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s. The NVIDIA card also carries double the memory capacity, more than double the bandwidth, and a wider 256-bit memory bus.

The LX 7G100 holds advantages in power efficiency and physical footprint. Its 225 W TDP is substantially lower than the RTX 5080 SUPER's 415 W, and its length of 294 mm (11.6 inches) is slightly shorter than the RTX 5080 SUPER's 304 mm (12 inches). The LX 7G100 also uses a single 8-pin power connector, which simplifies installation compared to the 16-pin connector on the RTX 5080 SUPER.

However, the lack of any benchmark scores for the LX 7G100 in the database means its real-world performance cannot be validated. The RTX 5080 SUPER has a recorded 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3075, placing it in the 19th percentile of all GPUs. Users requiring verified performance data should consider the RTX 5080 SUPER, while the LX 7G100's 50th percentile ranking is derived from an average score of zero, which does not reflect any confirmed measurements.

Specification Differences

Process node: The RTX 5080 SUPER uses a 5 nm process; the LX 7G100 uses a 6 nm process. Both are fabricated at TSMC.

Transistors: The RTX 5080 SUPER contains 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die. The LX 7G100's transistor count and die size are unknown.

Transistor density: The RTX 5080 SUPER achieves 120.6M transistors per mm². No density figure exists for the LX 7G100.

Base clock: The RTX 5080 SUPER has a base clock of 2295 MHz. The LX 7G100 has no base clock listed.

Boost clock: The RTX 5080 SUPER boosts to 2617 MHz. The LX 7G100 has no boost clock listed.

Memory clock: The RTX 5080 SUPER runs memory at 2000 MHz with 32 Gbps effective speed. The LX 7G100 runs memory at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed.

Memory size: The RTX 5080 SUPER has 24 GB; the LX 7G100 has 12 GB.

Memory type: The RTX 5080 SUPER uses GDDR7; the LX 7G100 uses GDDR6.

Memory bus width: The RTX 5080 SUPER uses a 256-bit bus; the LX 7G100 uses a 192-bit bus.

Memory bandwidth: The RTX 5080 SUPER delivers 1.02 TB/s; the LX 7G100 delivers 432.0 GB/s.

Shading units: The RTX 5080 SUPER has 10,752; the LX 7G100 has 6,144.

TMUs: The RTX 5080 SUPER has 336; the LX 7G100 has 192.

ROPs: The RTX 5080 SUPER has 112; the LX 7G100 has 96.

Ray tracing cores: The RTX 5080 SUPER has 84; the LX 7G100 has none listed.

Tensor cores: The RTX 5080 SUPER has 336; the LX 7G100 has none listed.

Pixel rate: The RTX 5080 SUPER is rated at 293.1 GPixel/s; the LX 7G100 at 192.0 GPixel/s.

Texture rate: The RTX 5080 SUPER is rated at 879.3 GTexel/s; the LX 7G100 at 384.0 GTexel/s.

FP32 performance: The RTX 5080 SUPER delivers 56.28 TFLOPS; the LX 7G100 delivers 24.58 TFLOPS.

FP16 performance: The RTX 5080 SUPER delivers 56.28 TFLOPS (1:1); the LX 7G100 delivers 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1).

TDP: The RTX 5080 SUPER is rated at 415 W; the LX 7G100 at 225 W.

Power connectors: The RTX 5080 SUPER uses one 16-pin connector; the LX 7G100 uses one 8-pin connector.

Suggested PSU: None listed for the RTX 5080 SUPER; the LX 7G100 suggests a 550 W PSU.

Bus interface: The RTX 5080 SUPER uses PCIe 5.0 x16; the LX 7G100 uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

Display outputs: The RTX 5080 SUPER has 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. The LX 7G100 has 4x DisplayPort 1.4a.

Vulkan support: The RTX 5080 SUPER supports Vulkan 1.4; the LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3.

Dimensions: The RTX 5080 SUPER measures 304 mm by 137 mm by 40 mm. The LX 7G100 measures 294 mm by 120 mm by 49 mm.

Release date: The RTX 5080 SUPER was released on December 31, 2025. The LX 7G100 was released on June 17, 2026.

Launch MSRP: The RTX 5080 SUPER has a launch MSRP of 999 USD. The LX 7G100 has no launch MSRP listed.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries between the RTX 5080 SUPER and the LX 7G100. The RTX 5080 SUPER has a single recorded benchmark result, while the LX 7G100 has none. This absence of direct comparative measurements means any performance differentiation must rely on the architectural and specification data.

The RTX 5080 SUPER's recorded score of 3075 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 places it near several competitors. The NVIDIA Quadro P1000 scores 3163, which is 2.8% higher. The Intel Arc Pro B60 scores 3182, which is 3.4% higher. The NVIDIA GeForce 820A scores 2983, which is 3.1% lower, and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M scores 2967, which is 3.6% lower. These deltas show the RTX 5080 SUPER clustering with entry-level and older workstation GPUs in this particular test, despite its substantial on-paper specifications.

The LX 7G100 has no benchmark data, so no score-based comparison can be made. The database's 50th percentile ranking for the LX 7G100 is based on an average score of zero, which does not represent any actual measured performance.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5080 SUPER wins in raw compute throughput. Its FP32 rating of 56.28 TFLOPS is 2.3 times the LX 7G100's 24.58 TFLOPS. This advantage extends to texture and pixel processing, where the RTX 5080 SUPER's 879.3 GTexel/s and 293.1 GPixel/s exceed the LX 7G100's 384.0 GTexel/s and 192.0 GPixel/s by wide margins.

The RTX 5080 SUPER wins in memory capacity and bandwidth. With 24 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, it provides 1.02 TB/s of bandwidth. The LX 7G100 offers 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus at 432.0 GB/s. Applications requiring large framebuffers or high-bandwidth data movement would favor the RTX 5080 SUPER.

The RTX 5080 SUPER wins in feature set. It includes ray tracing cores and tensor cores, supports PCIe 5.0 x16, DisplayPort 2.1b, and Vulkan 1.4. The LX 7G100 lacks listed ray tracing and tensor cores, uses PCIe 4.0 x16, DisplayPort 1.4a, and Vulkan 1.3.

The LX 7G100 wins in power consumption. Its 225 W TDP is 190 W lower than the RTX 5080 SUPER's 415 W. Systems with limited power delivery or smaller PSU requirements would benefit from the LX 7G100's lower demand.

The LX 7G100 wins in physical footprint. At 294 mm in length and 120 mm in height, it is shorter and lower than the RTX 5080 SUPER's 304 mm length and 137 mm height. However, the LX 7G100 is wider at 49 mm versus 40 mm, so case clearance must account for thickness as well.

The LX 7G100 wins in connector simplicity. A single 8-pin power connector is easier to accommodate than the RTX 5080 SUPER's 16-pin connector, and the LX 7G100 includes a suggested PSU rating of 550 W to guide system planning.

The RTX 5080 SUPER wins in verified performance data. With a recorded benchmark score and a known launch MSRP of 999 USD, it offers a measurable baseline. The LX 7G100's lack of benchmark results leaves its real-world performance unquantified in the database.