AMD Radeon RX 7700 vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

AMD Radeon RX 7700 vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100: Head-to-Head

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 and the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 represent two distinct approaches to GPU design. The RX 7700 is a well-established product with a complete set of recorded benchmark scores, while the LX 7G100 is a newer entry with no recorded performance data in the database. This analysis relies on the available specifications and the measured results for the RX 7700 to provide a comparison.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between these two cards. The AMD Radeon RX 7700, however, has a full suite of recorded scores. Its average benchmark score is 15852, which places it in the 58th percentile of all GPUs. The LX 7G100 has no recorded benchmarks, resulting in an average score of zero and a 50th percentile placement, which is a default value rather than a measured performance indicator.

For the RX 7700, the most demanding test in the database is 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, where it scored 2865. In compute-heavy workloads, the Geekbench OpenCL score is 106028. The Passmark suite shows a G3D score of 20974, a GPU Compute score of 10963, and an older DirectX 9 score of 261. DirectX 11 and DirectX 12 scores are 186 and 96, respectively, while the DirectX 10 score is 92. The 2D graphics score is 1206.

Because the LX 7G100 has no benchmark scores, there are no direct deltas to report. The nearest rivals for the RX 7700 provide context for its performance. The AMD Radeon R9 370X has an average score of 15862, which is 0.1% higher than the RX 7700. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 scores 16014, putting it 1% ahead. The AMD Radeon Pro W5500 scores 15679, which is 1.1% behind the RX 7700. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 16129, placing it 1.7% ahead of the RX 7700. These figures indicate the RX 7700 sits in a tightly contested performance band, with its closest rivals within a 1.7% margin.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7700 has a recorded average benchmark score of 15852. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has no recorded benchmarks, so its average score is 0 in the database.

Q: What is the difference in memory bandwidth?

A: The RX 7700 offers 624.1 GB/s of bandwidth, while the LX 7G100 provides 432.0 GB/s. The RX 7700 has a 192-bit wider memory bus (256 bit vs 192 bit) and a higher effective memory speed (19.5 Gbps vs 18 Gbps).

Q: How do the shading unit counts compare?

A: The LX 7G100 has 6144 shading units, which is significantly more than the RX 7700's 2560 shading units. However, the RX 7700 has a higher boost clock of 2459 MHz, while the LX 7G100 does not have a recorded boost clock.

Q: Which card supports more display outputs?

A: The LX 7G100 supports up to 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The RX 7700 provides 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, and 1x USB Type-C, for a total of four outputs as well.

Q: What are the power requirements?

A: The LX 7G100 has a TDP of 225 W and uses a single 8-pin power connector. The RX 7700 has a lower TDP of 200 W but requires two 8-pin power connectors. Both cards suggest a 550 W power supply.

Q: Which card has a larger die size?

A: The RX 7700 has a die size of 346 mm² and contains 28,100 million transistors on a 5 nm process. The LX 7G100's die size and transistor count are unknown, but it uses a 6 nm process.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs are built on different architectures and process nodes. The AMD Radeon RX 7700 uses the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 32 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It has a die size of 346 mm² and contains 28,100 million transistors. The LX 7G100 uses the TrueGPU architecture with the 7G106 chip, manufactured on a 6 nm process, also at TSMC. Its die size and transistor count are not listed.

The RX 7700 has a base clock of 1900 MHz and a boost clock of 2459 MHz, with a game clock of 2041 MHz. The LX 7G100 has no recorded base, boost, or game clocks. Its memory clock is 2250 MHz, which translates to 18 Gbps effective, compared to the RX 7700's 2438 MHz and 19.5 Gbps effective.

The RX 7700 features 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 96 render output units (ROPs). It also includes 40 ray tracing cores. The LX 7G100 has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. It does not list any ray tracing cores.

In terms of raw compute, the RX 7700 delivers 25.18 TFLOPS for FP32 and the same 25.18 TFLOPS for FP16 at a 1:1 ratio. The LX 7G100 delivers 24.58 TFLOPS for FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS for FP16 at a 2:1 ratio. This indicates the LX 7G100 has a much higher FP16 throughput, but slightly lower FP32 performance. Pixel rates are 236.1 GPixel/s for the RX 7700 and 192.0 GPixel/s for the LX 7G100. Texture rates are 393.4 GTexel/s for the RX 7700 and 384.0 GTexel/s for the LX 7G100.

Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RX 7700 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3. The RX 7700 uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, as does the LX 7G100.

The Verdict

The data shows a clear split between the two cards. The AMD Radeon RX 7700 is a fully measured product with a 58th percentile placement and an average score of 15852. It sits within a narrow performance window of its nearest rivals, trailing the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti by 1.7% and the AMD Radeon RX 9060 by 1%, while leading the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 by 1.1%. The LX 7G100 has no recorded performance data, making a direct comparison impossible.

From a specification standpoint, the LX 7G100 has a higher shading unit count (6144 vs 2560) and more TMUs (192 vs 160), but it also has a higher TDP (225 W vs 200 W) and a larger physical footprint (294 mm vs 267 mm length). The RX 7700 counters with a smaller process node (5 nm vs 6 nm), higher memory bandwidth (624.1 GB/s vs 432.0 GB/s), more memory (16 GB vs 12 GB), and a smaller die size. The RX 7700 also has a higher pixel rate, a higher texture rate, and a slightly higher FP32 throughput.

For users relying on measured performance, the RX 7700 is the only option with data to support a decision. It provides a competitive standing among its nearest rivals, all within a 1.7% delta. The LX 7G100, despite its larger compute resources on paper, offers no benchmark evidence of real-world performance. The choice depends on whether the user prioritizes the verified performance of the RX 7700 or the untested raw specifications of the LX 7G100.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the AMD Radeon RX 7700 and the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100:

• Architecture: RDNA 3.0 vs TrueGPU
• Chip: Navi 32 vs 7G106
• Process Node: 5 nm vs 6 nm
• Die Size: 346 mm² vs unknown
• Transistors: 28,100 million vs unknown
• Base Clock: 1900 MHz vs not listed
• Boost Clock: 2459 MHz vs not listed
• Game Clock: 2041 MHz vs not listed
• Memory Clock: 2438 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) vs 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective)
• Memory Size: 16 GB vs 12 GB
• Memory Bus Width: 256 bit vs 192 bit
• Memory Bandwidth: 624.1 GB/s vs 432.0 GB/s
• Shading Units: 2560 vs 6144
• TMUs: 160 vs 192
• RT Cores: 40 vs not listed
• Pixel Rate: 236.1 GPixel/s vs 192.0 GPixel/s
• Texture Rate: 393.4 GTexel/s vs 384.0 GTexel/s
• FP32: 25.18 TFLOPS vs 24.58 TFLOPS
• FP16: 25.18 TFLOPS (1:1) vs 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1)
• TDP: 200 W vs 225 W
• Power Connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 1x 8-pin
• Display Outputs: 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C vs 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
• Vulkan Version: 1.4 vs 1.3
• Dimensions: 267 mm length, 135 mm height, 50 mm width vs 294 mm length, 120 mm height, 49 mm width
• Release Date: 2025-09-17 vs 2026-06-17
• Average Benchmark Score: 15852 vs 0
• Percentile: 58 vs 50