Intel Arc Pro B60 vs Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile Comparison

The Intel Arc Pro B60 and the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile occupy opposite ends of the hardware spectrum. The database records a dedicated, high-power workstation graphics card against an integrated graphics processor designed for low-power mobile devices. The recorded data shows no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the two, and the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no benchmark scores listed at all. This analysis relies on the recorded specifications and the available benchmark data for the Arc Pro B60, interpreting what the numbers indicate about each product's intended role.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark results for these two products. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has an empty benchmark list, an average benchmark score of 0, and no nearest rivals recorded. The Intel Arc Pro B60, however, has eight benchmark entries. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2646. In PassMark tests, it scores 61 in DirectX 10, 122 in DirectX 11, 76 in DirectX 12, 179 in DirectX 9, 763 in G2D, 14580 in G3D, and 7029 in GPU compute. The average benchmark score for the Arc Pro B60 is 3182, which places it in the 20th percentile of all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 with an average score of 3163, a delta of 0.6 percent, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER with an average score of 3075, a delta of 3.5 percent. The Arc Pro B60 sits within a narrow band of scores ranging from 3075 to 3287 among its closest competitors, indicating that its performance level is comparable to a specific cluster of mid-range and older workstation cards.

The absence of benchmark data for the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile means that no quantitative comparison can be made. The recorded data implies that the integrated solution was not subjected to the same benchmarking suite, likely because its role is not performance-oriented in the same way. The Arc Pro B60's G3D score of 14580 is a substantial figure, while the integrated part's theoretical FP32 throughput of 384.0 GFLOPS is a fraction of the Arc Pro B60's 12.29 TFLOPS. The difference in compute capability is enormous, but without benchmark scores for the integrated part, the database cannot express this in relative percentage terms. The data shows that the Arc Pro B60 has a measurable performance footprint, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile remains undefined in the benchmark records.

Architecture Differences

The two processors use entirely different architectures, fabrication processes, and design philosophies. The Intel Arc Pro B60 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture, part of the Battlemage Pro Series generation, and fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The chip is designated BMG-G21, containing 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 72.1 million transistors per square millimeter. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses the Xe-LP architecture from the HD Graphics-T (Twin Lake) generation, fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel. Its transistor count and die size are recorded as unknown, and no transistor density is available.

The Arc Pro B60 has a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 1000 MHz. The clock speed differential is substantial, with the Arc Pro B60 boosting to more than twice the integrated part's maximum clock. The Arc Pro B60 uses 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 80 render output units. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has 192 shading units, 12 TMUs, and 4 ROPs. The Arc Pro B60 also includes 20 ray tracing cores, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no ray tracing cores listed. Neither part has tensor cores recorded.

The memory subsystem is a fundamental dividing line. The Arc Pro B60 has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with a memory clock of 2375 MHz and an effective data rate of 19 Gbps. This configuration yields a bandwidth of 456.0 GB/s. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses system shared memory, with the size, type, bus width, and bandwidth all described as system dependent or shared. The Arc Pro B60's pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 384.0 GTexel/s. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has a pixel rate of 4.000 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 12.00 GTexel/s. The FP32 throughput for the Arc Pro B60 is 12.29 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 24.58 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile delivers 384.0 GFLOPS in FP32 and 768.0 GFLOPS in FP16, also at a 2:1 ratio. The Arc Pro B60's FP32 output is roughly 32 times higher than the integrated part's, based on the recorded figures.

The Arc Pro B60 has a thermal design power of 200 W and uses a dual-slot form factor with a single 8-pin power connector. The suggested power supply is 550 W. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has a TDP of 6 W and is an integrated graphics processor with no power connectors or suggested power supply. The bus interface for the Arc Pro B60 is PCIe 5.0 x8, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses a Ring Bus. The Arc Pro B60 has four mini-DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, whereas the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile's display outputs are described as portable device dependent. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) for the Arc Pro B60 and DirectX 12 (12_1) for the integrated part, OpenGL 4.6 for both, and Vulkan 1.4 for both.

The API level differs slightly: the Arc Pro B60 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate with feature level 12_2, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile supports DirectX 12 with feature level 12_1. This indicates the Arc Pro B60 has access to more advanced DirectX 12 features, including those tied to ray tracing hardware. The Arc Pro B60's physical dimensions are recorded as 167 mm in length, 69 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, while the integrated part has no dimensions listed. The release dates differ: the Arc Pro B60 was released on September 4, 2025, and the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile was released on December 31, 2024. Both are marked as active in production.

FAQ

Q: What is the performance difference in raw compute throughput?

A: The Arc Pro B60 delivers 12.29 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile delivers 384.0 GFLOPS. The Arc Pro B60 also has an FP16 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS, compared to 768.0 GFLOPS for the integrated part. The difference is a factor of approximately 32 in FP32.

Q: Which processor has more shading units and what does that indicate?

A: The Arc Pro B60 has 2560 shading units, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has 192. The higher count on the Arc Pro B60 allows for more parallel execution of graphics workloads, consistent with its role as a dedicated workstation card.

Q: How do the memory configurations differ?

A: The Arc Pro B60 uses 24 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory with a 192-bit bus and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile relies on system shared memory, with bandwidth described as system dependent. The dedicated memory on the Arc Pro B60 provides predictable and high-bandwidth access for large datasets.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The Arc Pro B60 has a TDP of 200 W and requires a 550 W power supply. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has a TDP of 6 W and draws power from the host system without additional connectors. The integrated part consumes a small fraction of the power.

Q: Does either processor support ray tracing?

A: The Arc Pro B60 includes 20 ray tracing cores, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no ray tracing cores recorded. The Arc Pro B60 also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes ray tracing features, while the integrated part supports DirectX 12 (12_1).

Q: What is the difference in clock speeds?

A: The Arc Pro B60 has a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 1000 MHz. The Arc Pro B60 operates at more than double the boost speed of the integrated part.

Specification Differences

The following specifications differ between the two products. The chip is BMG-G21 for the Arc Pro B60 and Twin Lake for the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile. The architecture is Xe2-HPG versus Xe-LP. The generation is Battlemage (Pro Series) versus HD Graphics-T (Twin Lake). The process node is 5 nm at TSMC versus 10 nm at Intel. The transistor count is 19,600 million versus unknown, and the die size is 272 mm² versus unknown. The transistor density is 72.1M per mm² versus null. The base clock is 2000 MHz versus 300 MHz, and the boost clock is 2400 MHz versus 1000 MHz. The memory clock is 2375 MHz with 19 Gbps effective versus system shared. Memory size is 24 GB GDDR6 versus system shared, bus width is 192 bit versus system shared, and bandwidth is 456.0 GB/s versus system dependent. Shading units are 2560 versus 192, TMUs are 160 versus 12, and ROPs are 80 versus 4. Ray tracing cores are 20 versus null. Pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s versus 4.000 GPixel/s. Texture rate is 384.0 GTexel/s versus 12.00 GTexel/s. FP32 is 12.29 TFLOPS versus 384.0 GFLOPS, and FP16 is 24.58 TFLOPS versus 768.0 GFLOPS. TDP is 200 W versus 6 W. Slot width is dual-slot versus IGP. Power connectors are 1x 8-pin versus null. Suggested PSU is 550 W versus null. Bus interface is PCIe 5.0 x8 versus Ring Bus. Display outputs are 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1 versus portable device dependent. DirectX support is 12 Ultimate (12_2) versus 12 (12_1). Dimensions are 167 mm by 69 mm by 40 mm versus no dimensions recorded. Release date is September 4, 2025 versus December 31, 2024. The launch MSRP for the Arc Pro B60 is 499 USD, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no launch MSRP recorded.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc Pro B60 wins in every measurable performance category recorded in the database. It has a substantially higher clock speed, a larger memory pool with dedicated bandwidth, more shading units, more texture units, more render output units, and ray tracing hardware. The FP32 compute throughput is 12.29 TFLOPS, which is 32 times the integrated part's 384.0 GFLOPS. The pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s are far beyond the integrated part's 4.000 GPixel/s and 12.00 GTexel/s. The Arc Pro B60 also has a G3D benchmark score of 14580 and a GPU compute score of 7029, although the integrated part has no corresponding scores. The Arc Pro B60's 24 GB of GDDR6 memory with 456.0 GB/s bandwidth provides a foundation for memory-intensive workloads, such as large 3D scenes or compute tasks. The presence of 20 ray tracing cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate support gives it capabilities that the integrated part lacks entirely.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile wins in power efficiency and integration. Its TDP of 6 W is dramatically lower than the Arc Pro B60's 200 W. It requires no power connectors, no suggested power supply, and takes no additional slot space, being an IGP. The system shared memory model eliminates the need for dedicated video memory. The Ring Bus interface indicates it is designed to communicate directly with the host processor. The portable device dependent display outputs suggest it is intended for compact or mobile systems where a dedicated graphics card is not feasible. Its release date of December 31, 2024, precedes the Arc Pro B60's release on September 4, 2025. The 10 nm process at Intel, while older than the 5 nm process at TSMC, is sufficient for the low-power role. The integrated part delivers basic graphics functionality with no measurable benchmark footprint, indicating that its strength is not raw performance but the ability to provide display output and light graphics acceleration within a minimal power envelope.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the Intel Arc Pro B60 is a dedicated workstation graphics card with a launch MSRP of 499 USD. Its specifications place it in a class where it can handle demanding graphics and compute workloads. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2646 and the PassMark G3D score of 14580, combined with an average benchmark score of 3182, show that it performs in the same range as the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER, with deltas of 0.6 percent and 3.5 percent respectively. The 20th percentile ranking among all GPUs suggests that it sits in the lower half of the performance distribution but remains a functional option for its intended use. The 24 GB memory capacity and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth are the standout features, suitable for large data sets.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is a fundamentally different product. With 192 shading units, a 6 W TDP, and system shared memory, it is designed for basic display output in low-power mobile devices. The absence of benchmark scores in the database reinforces that it is not evaluated for high-performance tasks. Its 384.0 GFLOPS FP32 throughput is sufficient for everyday graphics but not for intensive workloads.

The choice between these two products depends on the use case. The Arc Pro B60 is the only option for tasks requiring ray tracing, high-bandwidth memory, and substantial compute throughput. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is suitable for systems where power consumption and physical footprint are the primary constraints. The recorded data shows no overlap in their performance characteristics. The Arc Pro B60's 200 W TDP and dual-slot form factor require a desktop system with adequate cooling and power delivery. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile's 6 W TDP and IGP form factor fit into portable devices. The benchmark data, or lack thereof, confirms that the Arc Pro B60 is a performance-oriented part while the integrated solution is a utility component. The 20th percentile ranking for the Arc Pro B60 indicates that while it is not a top-tier card, it has measurable performance that the integrated part cannot match.