Intel Arc Pro B60 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER Comparison

The Intel Arc Pro B60 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER are both active, dual-slot workstation-class graphics cards, but they occupy vastly different positions in the performance spectrum. The data shows a single direct head-to-head benchmark, 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, where the NVIDIA card delivers a score of 3075 against the Intel card’s 2646. This translates to a 14% lead for the RTX 5080 SUPER, a significant margin that sets the tone for the rest of the analysis. However, the average benchmark scores tell a more complex story, with the Intel Arc Pro B60 averaging 3182 across its suite of tests, while the RTX 5080 SUPER averages 3075 based on its single 3DMark result. This discrepancy invites a closer look at what each card is designed to do and where its respective strengths truly lie.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only direct comparison available is the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, a modern DirectX 12 workload that stresses overall GPU throughput. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER wins this contest decisively, scoring 3075 points compared to the Intel Arc Pro B60’s 2646 points. The deltaPct of -14% for the Intel card indicates it trails by 14% in this specific benchmark, a clear and substantial performance gap. This result suggests that for raw, modern gaming or compute workloads that scale with shading units and memory bandwidth, the RTX 5080 SUPER is the more capable hardware.

Despite losing the head-to-head, the Intel Arc Pro B60’s average benchmark score of 3182 across its eight tests (including PassMark G3D, G2D, and various DirectX versions) is actually higher than the RTX 5080 SUPER’s average of 3075. This is an intriguing data point. The Intel card’s PassMark G3D score of 14,580 is particularly strong, while its PassMark DirectX 11 score of 122 and DirectX 9 score of 179 indicate robust legacy API performance. The RTX 5080 SUPER, having only the 3DMark result, does not have comparable data for older APIs, so the Intel card’s higher average is driven by a broader set of metrics where it appears to excel. The data implies that the RTX 5080 SUPER is optimized for peak performance in a single, modern benchmark, while the Arc Pro B60 offers more balanced performance across a wider range of tests.

Looking at the nearest rivals for each card further contextualizes these scores. The Intel Arc Pro B60 sits at the 20th percentile of all GPUs, with its nearest rival being the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 at an average score of 3163, a mere 0.6% difference. The RTX 5080 SUPER, at the 19th percentile, is closely matched with the NVIDIA GeForce 820A (2983, a 3.1% delta) and the GTX 860M (2967, a 3.6% delta). Notably, the two cards are each other’s rivals: the deltaPct between them in the Intel card’s list is 3.5% (favoring the Arc Pro B60’s average), while in the RTX 5080 SUPER’s list, the delta is -3.4% (again favoring the Arc Pro B60’s average). This means that while the RTX 5080 SUPER wins the single direct benchmark, the Intel card’s overall average score is 3.5% higher, a paradox that highlights the importance of benchmark selection.

FAQ

Q: Which card has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 has an average benchmark score of 3182, which is 3.5% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER’s average of 3075. This is based on the Intel card’s eight benchmark results versus the NVIDIA card’s single 3DMark result.

Q: Does the RTX 5080 SUPER win any benchmark against the Arc Pro B60?

A: Yes, in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the RTX 5080 SUPER scores 3075 versus the Arc Pro B60’s 2646, a 14% lead. This is the only direct head-to-head benchmark in the data, and the NVIDIA card wins it.

Q: How do the two cards compare in terms of memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 5080 SUPER has a memory bandwidth of 1.02 TB/s, which is more than double the Intel Arc Pro B60’s 456.0 GB/s. This is a major architectural advantage for the NVIDIA card in bandwidth-intensive tasks.

Q: What is the transistor count difference between the two GPUs?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER has 45,600 million transistors, while the Intel Arc Pro B60 has 19,600 million. This means the NVIDIA chip has over twice as many transistors, despite both being manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC.

Q: What are the launch MSRPs for both cards?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 has a launch MSRP of 499 USD, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER has a launch MSRP of 999 USD. This information is provided for reference only.

Q: Which card has a higher pixel rate?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER has a pixel rate of 293.1 GPixel/s, which is significantly higher than the Intel Arc Pro B60’s 192.0 GPixel/s. This suggests the NVIDIA card can fill more pixels per second, which is beneficial for high-resolution rendering.

Architecture Differences

The two cards are built on fundamentally different architectures. The Intel Arc Pro B60 uses the Xe2-HPG architecture, part of the Battlemage (Pro Series) generation, based on the BMG-G21 chip. In contrast, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER employs the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, belonging to the GeForce 50-series, built around the GB203 chip. Both are fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC, but the similarities end there. The Intel chip has a die size of 272 mm² and a transistor density of 72.1M / mm², while the NVIDIA chip is larger at 378 mm² with a higher density of 120.6M / mm². This results in the NVIDIA card having 45,600 million transistors versus Intel’s 19,600 million, a 2.3x difference that underpins its higher compute potential.

The compute architectures diverge sharply. The RTX 5080 SUPER has 10,752 shading units, 336 TMUs, and 112 ROPs, along with 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores. The Arc Pro B60 is far more modest, with 2,560 shading units, 160 TMUs, 80 ROPs, and 20 RT cores, with no tensor cores listed. This means the NVIDIA card has 4.2x more shading units and 4.2x more RT cores, which explains its superior raw performance in the 3DMark test. The tensor cores in the NVIDIA card also enable AI-accelerated features that the Intel card cannot match, though the data does not specify which features these are. The FP32 compute throughput tells a similar story: the RTX 5080 SUPER delivers 56.28 TFLOPS, while the Arc Pro B60 manages only 12.29 TFLOPS, a 4.6x difference. The RTX 5080 SUPER also has a 1:1 FP16 ratio (56.28 TFLOPS), whereas the Intel card uses a 2:1 ratio (24.58 TFLOPS), indicating different precision-handling designs.

Memory architecture is another key differentiator. The Intel card uses 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 456.0 GB/s. The NVIDIA card also has 24 GB, but it uses faster GDDR7 on a wider 256-bit bus, resulting in a bandwidth of 1.02 TB/s. This 2.2x bandwidth advantage is critical for high-resolution textures and compute workloads. The memory clocks also differ, with the Intel card at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective) versus the NVIDIA card at 2000 MHz (32 Gbps effective), showing that the GDDR7 technology is far more efficient per clock.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ in nearly every specification category. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER has a higher base clock of 2295 MHz compared to the Intel Arc Pro B60’s 2000 MHz, and a higher boost clock of 2617 MHz versus 2400 MHz. The TDP is also vastly different: the RTX 5080 SUPER consumes 415 W, while the Arc Pro B60 draws only 200 W. Power delivery differs as well, with the Intel card using a single 8-pin connector and the NVIDIA card requiring a 16-pin connector. The bus interface is another divergence: the Intel card uses PCIe 5.0 x8, while the NVIDIA card uses PCIe 5.0 x16, giving the latter twice the bandwidth to the host system.

Physical dimensions are also notable. The Intel Arc Pro B60 is a compact card at 167 mm in length, 69 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. The NVIDIA card is much larger, measuring 304 mm in length and 137 mm in height, with the same 40 mm width. This makes the Intel card suitable for small form factor builds, while the NVIDIA card requires a larger chassis. Display outputs differ as well: the Intel card offers 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1, while the NVIDIA card provides 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. The release dates are also distinct, with the Intel card launching on 2025-09-04 and the NVIDIA card on 2025-12-31. The suggested PSU is listed as 550 W for the Intel card, while no suggested PSU is provided for the NVIDIA card, though its higher TDP implies a more robust power supply would be needed.

The Verdict

The data clearly shows that the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER is the more powerful card in raw performance, as evidenced by its 14% lead in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 benchmark. Its massive advantages in shading units (10,752 vs 2,560), FP32 throughput (56.28 vs 12.29 TFLOPS), and memory bandwidth (1.02 TB/s vs 456.0 GB/s) make it the superior choice for demanding gaming, rendering, and compute tasks that can leverage these resources. The architecture is also more advanced, with tensor cores and a larger transistor budget, which points to better long-term driver optimization and feature support.

However, the Intel Arc Pro B60 is not without merit. Its higher average benchmark score of 3182 versus 3075, driven by strong PassMark results, suggests it handles a broader range of workloads more consistently, particularly in legacy DirectX APIs. Its lower TDP of 200 W and compact 167 mm length make it an energy-efficient and space-saving option. The 24 GB of memory is the same capacity as the NVIDIA card, which is a significant asset for large datasets. The data implies that the Intel card is a workstation-focused product that prioritizes reliability and efficiency over peak performance.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER wins in scenarios requiring maximum compute throughput. Its superior FP32 and FP16 performance, combined with 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores, make it the clear choice for modern DirectX 12 gaming, real-time ray tracing, and AI-accelerated workloads. The 1.02 TB/s memory bandwidth ensures that data-heavy applications, such as 4K video editing or complex simulations, run without bottlenecks. If a user’s primary metric is the 3DMark Steel Nomad score, the RTX 5080 SUPER is the definitive winner.

The Intel Arc Pro B60 wins in efficiency and compatibility. Its 200 W TDP is less than half of the RTX 5080 SUPER’s 415 W, making it easier to cool and cheaper to run. The compact 167 mm design fits into small form factor cases where the 304 mm NVIDIA card would not. The higher average benchmark score across PassMark tests indicates strong performance in professional 2D and legacy 3D applications, which are common in enterprise environments. The 24 GB of GDDR6 memory at 456.0 GB/s is still substantial, and the card’s 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1 outputs offer flexible display configurations. For users prioritizing low power consumption, compact size, and consistent performance across a variety of older and professional workloads, the Intel Arc Pro B60 is the data-supported choice.