Intel Arc Pro B60 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER Comparison

The Intel Arc Pro B60 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER are both actively produced, dual-slot cards built on a 5 nm TSMC process, but they target entirely different corners of the GPU market. The data shows the Arc Pro B60 is a workstation-focused card with a modest average benchmark score of 3182, placing it in the 20th percentile of all GPUs. In contrast, the RTX 5070 SUPER, with a single benchmark score of 2690, sits in the 18th percentile. Despite their close scores, the specifications and intended use cases diverge sharply, making one a better fit for professional compute and the other for raw rasterization throughput.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark results indicate a near-tie in the single shared test, but the broader data reveals distinct strengths. The Intel Arc Pro B60 wins in memory capacity and professional feature support. It packs 24 GB of GDDR6 memory, which is 6 GB more than the RTX 5070 SUPER's 18 GB. This larger frame buffer is a decisive advantage for workloads like large 3D scene rendering, AI inference with big models, or high-resolution multi-display setups where memory exhaustion is a common bottleneck. The Arc Pro B60 also posts a Passmark G3D score of 14580, which is a strong indicator of general OpenGL and DirectX performance for CAD and DCC applications.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER wins on pure speed and bandwidth. Its memory bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s is 47% higher than the Arc Pro B60's 456.0 GB/s, thanks to faster GDDR7 memory running at 28 Gbps effective. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the RTX 5070 SUPER scores 2690, edging out the Arc Pro B60's 2646 by 1.6%. This suggests better raw gaming or real-time rendering performance. The NVIDIA card also has a massively higher FP32 throughput at 32.15 TFLOPS, which is 2.6 times the Arc Pro B60's 12.29 TFLOPS, making it the clear winner for general-purpose compute that relies on single-precision floating-point math.

Architecture Differences

The architectural split is stark. The Intel Arc Pro B60 uses the BMG-G21 chip based on the Xe2-HPG architecture, belonging to the Battlemage (Pro Series) generation. It packs 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 72.1M / mm². The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER uses the GB205 chip with the Blackwell 2.0 architecture from the GeForce 50 generation. It holds 31,100 million transistors on a slightly smaller 263 mm² die, achieving a much higher density of 118.3M / mm². This indicates NVIDIA has packed more compute resources into a similar physical space.

The compute unit counts are dramatically different. The RTX 5070 SUPER has 6400 shading units, 200 TMUs, and 80 ROPs. The Arc Pro B60 has just 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and the same 80 ROPs. The NVIDIA card also features 50 RT cores and 200 tensor cores, while the Intel card has only 20 RT cores and no listed tensor cores. This means the RTX 5070 SUPER is designed for heavy ray tracing and AI-accelerated features, whereas the Arc Pro B60 lacks dedicated tensor hardware. The FP16 performance also differs: the RTX 5070 SUPER delivers 32.15 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, while the Arc Pro B60 offers 24.58 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, indicating the NVIDIA card handles half-precision workloads more efficiently.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear split. For users who need maximum memory capacity and professional-grade display output, the Intel Arc Pro B60 is the better choice. Its 24 GB frame buffer is unmatched by the RTX 5070 SUPER, and its four mini-DisplayPort 2.1 outputs provide flexible multi-monitor connectivity for workstation setups. The Arc Pro B60 also carries a launch MSRP of 499 USD, which is a fixed reference point for its positioning. It is a capable air-cooled card for tasks that prioritize memory over raw compute speed.

For everyone else, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER is the superior performer. Its 32.15 TFLOPS FP32 compute, 672.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, and 6400 shading units make it more than twice as fast in raw throughput tasks. It wins the only direct head-to-head benchmark, 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, with a score of 2690 versus 2646. The presence of 200 tensor cores and 50 RT cores also makes it the only one of the two suitable for modern AI and ray-traced workloads. If your application is compute-bound or relies on the latest rendering features, the RTX 5070 SUPER is the data-backed winner.

FAQ

Q: Which card has more memory?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER has 18 GB of GDDR7 memory.

Q: How do they compare in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 benchmark?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER scores 2690, which is 1.6% higher than the Arc Pro B60's 2646. This gives the NVIDIA card a single win in their head-to-head comparison.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER has a memory bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s, which is significantly higher than the Arc Pro B60's 456.0 GB/s.

Q: Which card has more shading units?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER has 6400 shading units, whereas the Intel Arc Pro B60 has 2560 shading units.

Q: What are the power connector requirements?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 uses a single 8-pin connector and has a suggested PSU of 550 W. The NVIDIA card uses a single 16-pin connector and does not have a listed suggested PSU.

Q: What display outputs does each card offer?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B60 has four mini-DisplayPort 2.1 outputs. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER has one HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1b outputs.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only direct comparison available is the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, and it is a close call. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER scores 2690, while the Intel Arc Pro B60 scores 2646. This results in a 1.6% delta in favor of NVIDIA, marking the RTX 5070 SUPER as the winner in this specific workload. While the margin is slim, it is consistent with the NVIDIA card's higher clock speeds and compute throughput.

Looking beyond that single test, the Passmark suite offers a broader view of the Arc Pro B60's performance. It scores 14580 in Passmark G3D, which is a composite of DirectX 9, 10, 11, and 12 tests. Its individual DirectX scores are 179 for DX9, 61 for DX10, 122 for DX11, and 76 for DX12. The compute score is 7029. These numbers indicate that while the Arc Pro B60 is competitive in legacy APIs, it lags in more modern DirectX 12 workloads, where the RTX 5070 SUPER's architecture is more efficient. The RTX 5070 SUPER does not have Passmark scores listed, but its 3DMark result combined with its superior FP32 and memory bandwidth suggests it would outpace the Arc Pro B60 in most compute-heavy scenarios.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across nearly every major specification. The Intel Arc Pro B60 has a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER runs higher at 2325 MHz base and 2512 MHz boost. Memory configurations are distinct: the Intel card uses 24 GB of GDDR6 with a 192-bit bus and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the NVIDIA card uses 18 GB of GDDR7 with the same 192-bit bus but a higher 672.0 GB/s bandwidth. The memory clock also differs, with the Intel card at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective) and the NVIDIA card at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective).

The compute resources are heavily skewed toward NVIDIA. The RTX 5070 SUPER has 6400 shading units, 200 TMUs, 50 RT cores, and 200 tensor cores. The Arc Pro B60 has 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 20 RT cores, with no tensor cores listed. Pixel and texture rates favor NVIDIA: 201.0 GPixel/s and 502.4 GTexel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s. The FP32 throughput is 32.15 TFLOPS for NVIDIA and 12.29 TFLOPS for Intel. Power consumption is also higher on the NVIDIA card at 275 W versus 200 W for the Intel card. Physical dimensions differ, with the Intel card being shorter at 167 mm (6.6 inches) compared to the NVIDIA card's 245 mm (9.6 inches). The bus interface is PCIe 5.0 x8 for Intel and PCIe 5.0 x16 for NVIDIA. Finally, the Intel card uses a single 8-pin power connector, while the NVIDIA card uses a single 16-pin connector.