AMD Radeon PRO W7400 vs Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Radeon PRO W7400 and the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile. Neither GPU has any benchmark scores listed in the database, and the win counts for both are zero. This absence of measured performance data means any comparison must rely strictly on the architectural and specification differences provided.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 delivers 7.885 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile delivers 384.0 GFLOPS of FP32 compute. This places the AMD part at over 20 times the raw floating-point throughput of the Intel solution. In FP16 workloads, the AMD GPU maintains 7.885 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, whereas the Intel GPU reaches 768.0 GFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, meaning the AMD card is still roughly 10 times faster in half-precision tasks.

Pixel throughput also diverges sharply. The Radeon PRO W7400 sustains 70.40 GPixel/s, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile manages 4.000 GPixel/s. Texture fill rates follow the same pattern: 123.2 GTexel/s for AMD versus 12.00 GTexel/s for Intel. These figures indicate that the AMD GPU can process far more geometry and shading work per frame, which directly impacts resolution scaling and visual complexity.

Memory bandwidth is another major separator. The Radeon PRO W7400 has 172.8 GB/s of dedicated GDDR6 bandwidth across a 128-bit bus, while the Intel part relies on System Shared memory with bandwidth listed as System Dependent. The Intel GPU has no fixed memory bandwidth figure in the database, which means its performance in memory-intensive tasks cannot be quantified here, but the architectural difference is clear: one has a dedicated high-bandwidth pool, the other shares system memory.

Since the database contains no benchmark scores, percentile rankings, or rival comparisons for either GPU, the analysis cannot point to specific percentage leads in synthetic or real-world tests. The data instead shows a categorical performance hierarchy based on the compute, pixel, and texture rates listed above.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 uses the Navi 33 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) generation and is fabricated by TSMC on a 6 nm process. The chip contains 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 65.2M per mm². This is a large, modern discrete GPU designed for workstation tasks.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses the Twin Lake chip built on Xe-LP architecture. It belongs to the HD Graphics-T (Twin Lake) generation and is fabricated by Intel on a 10 nm process. Transistor count and die size are listed as unknown in the database, and transistor density is not recorded. This is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) designed for mobile devices.

Shader resources differ by an order of magnitude. The Radeon PRO W7400 has 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 64 raster output units (ROPs). It also includes 28 ray tracing cores. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has 192 shading units, 12 TMUs, and 4 ROPs, with no ray tracing cores listed. The AMD GPU provides 9.3 times the shading units, 9.3 times the TMUs, and 16 times the ROPs compared to the Intel part.

Clock behavior also differs. The AMD GPU has a base clock of 330 MHz and a boost clock of 1100 MHz, with memory clocked at 1350 MHz (10.8 Gbps effective). The Intel GPU has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 1000 MHz, with memory clock listed as System Shared. The AMD clocks are modest for a discrete GPU, but the massive parallel hardware more than compensates.

Power and packaging tell a clear story. The Radeon PRO W7400 is rated at 55 W TDP, uses a single-slot form factor, requires no power connectors, and has a suggested PSU of 250 W. It connects via PCIe 4.0 x8 and offers 4x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is rated at 6 W TDP, is an IGP (integrated graphics processor), uses a Ring Bus interface, and has display outputs listed as Portable Device Dependent.

API support shows a small but notable difference. Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4. However, the AMD GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the Intel GPU supports DirectX 12 (12_1). The AMD part also has a production status of Active and a release date of 2025-08-02, while the Intel part is also Active with a release date of 2024-12-31. The AMD GPU lists its predecessor as Radeon Pro Vega, while the Intel GPU has no predecessor recorded.

The Radeon PRO W7400 measures 168 mm in length, 69 mm in height, and 20 mm in width. The Intel part has no physical dimensions recorded, consistent with its integrated nature.

The Verdict

The data points to a decisive performance separation between these two GPUs. The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 is a discrete workstation GPU with dedicated memory, ray tracing hardware, and over 20 times the FP32 compute throughput of the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile. The Intel part is an integrated mobile GPU with 6 W TDP, system-shared memory, and no ray tracing support.

For users who need to render complex scenes, run compute-heavy workloads, or drive multiple high-resolution displays, the Radeon PRO W7400 is the only viable option based on the recorded specifications. Its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, 172.8 GB/s bandwidth, and 28 ray tracing cores provide the resources required for modern graphics and compute tasks.

For users on extremely constrained power budgets in portable devices, the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile offers a minimal footprint at 6 W TDP. It can handle basic display output and light 2D workloads, but its 4.000 GPixel/s pixel rate and 384.0 GFLOPS FP32 throughput place it in a fundamentally lower performance class. The database shows no scenario where the Intel GPU approaches the AMD part in raw throughput.

The release dates indicate the Intel part launched first on 2024-12-31, followed by the AMD part on 2025-08-02. Both remain in active production.

Specification Differences

| Field | AMD Radeon PRO W7400 | Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | Navi 33 | Twin Lake |

| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Xe-LP |

| Codename | Hotpink Bonefish | Not recorded |

| Generation | Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) | HD Graphics-T (Twin Lake) |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Transistors | 13,300 million | Unknown |

| Die Size | 204 mm² | Unknown |

| Transistor Density | 65.2M / mm² | Not recorded |

| Base Clock | 330 MHz | 300 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 1000 MHz |

| Memory Clock | 1350 MHz 10.8 Gbps effective | System Shared |

| Memory Size | 8 GB | System Shared |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | System Shared |

| Memory Bus Width | 128 bit | System Shared |

| Memory Bandwidth | 172.8 GB/s | System Dependent |

| Shading Units | 1792 | 192 |

| TMUs | 112 | 12 |

| ROPs | 64 | 4 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 28 | None listed |

| Pixel Rate | 70.40 GPixel/s | 4.000 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 123.2 GTexel/s | 12.00 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 7.885 TFLOPS | 384.0 GFLOPS |

| FP16 | 7.885 TFLOPS (1:1) | 768.0 GFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 55 W | 6 W |

| Slot Width | Single-slot | IGP |

| Power Connectors | None | Not recorded |

| Suggested PSU | 250 W | Not recorded |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | Ring Bus |

| Display Outputs | 4x DisplayPort 2.1 | Portable Device Dependent |

| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_1) |

| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |

| Length | 168 mm 6.6 inches | Not recorded |

| Height | 69 mm 2.7 inches | Not recorded |

| Width | 20 mm 0.8 inches | Not recorded |

| Production Status | Active | Active |

| Release Date | 2025-08-02 | 2024-12-31 |

| Predecessor | Radeon Pro Vega | None recorded |

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 delivers 7.885 TFLOPS, compared to 384.0 GFLOPS for the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile.

Q: Does the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile support ray tracing?

A: No. The database lists no ray tracing cores for the Intel GPU, while the AMD Radeon PRO W7400 includes 28 ray tracing cores.

Q: What memory configuration does each GPU use?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 172.8 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses System Shared memory with System Dependent bandwidth.

Q: How do the power requirements compare?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 is rated at 55 W TDP with a suggested PSU of 250 W. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is rated at 6 W TDP.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 has 1792 shading units, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has 192.

Q: What is the release date difference between the two?

A: The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile was released on 2024-12-31, and the AMD Radeon PRO W7400 was released on 2025-08-02. Both are in active production.

Where Each One Wins

AMD Radeon PRO W7400 wins in:

• Raw compute throughput: 7.885 TFLOPS FP32 versus 384.0 GFLOPS FP32.
• Pixel fill rate: 70.40 GPixel/s versus 4.000 GPixel/s.
• Texture fill rate: 123.2 GTexel/s versus 12.00 GTexel/s.
• Memory bandwidth: 172.8 GB/s dedicated GDDR6 versus System Dependent shared memory.
• Ray tracing: 28 dedicated cores versus none.
• API support: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) versus DirectX 12 (12_1).
• Display outputs: 4x DisplayPort 2.1 versus Portable Device Dependent.
• Shader resources: 1792 shading units, 112 TMUs, 64 ROPs versus 192, 12, and 4 respectively.
• Physical presence: discrete single-slot card with PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.

Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile wins in:

• Power efficiency by TDP rating: 6 W versus 55 W.
• Physical footprint: integrated processor with no dimensions recorded versus a 168 mm card.
• Memory sharing: uses System Shared memory, eliminating the need for dedicated VRAM allocation.
• Release timing: launched on 2024-12-31, ahead of the AMD part.
• FP16 ratio: 2:1 ratio means it can double FP32 throughput in half-precision workloads, though absolute numbers remain far lower.

The data does not show any benchmark scenario where the Intel GPU outperforms the AMD GPU in throughput or feature support. The Intel part is best suited for minimal-power integrated graphics duties in portable devices, while the AMD part is built for workstation-class rendering and compute tasks. The 6 nm process node versus 10 nm, the 13,300 million transistors versus unknown, and the 204 mm² die versus unknown all reinforce the same conclusion: these are different product categories with a wide performance gap.