AMD Radeon PRO W7400 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no shared head-to-head benchmark entries for the AMD Radeon PRO W7400 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile. The Radeon PRO W7400 has no recorded benchmark scores, while the RTX 5080 Mobile carries an average benchmark score of 38349 across multiple tests. The RTX 5080 Mobile records its strongest result in Geekbench Vulkan with a score of 169754, closely followed by Geekbench OpenCL at 166986. Its Passmark G3D score of 27711 and Passmark GPU Compute score of 12134 further illustrate its compute-oriented performance profile. The Radeon PRO W7400, lacking any benchmark entries, cannot be directly compared on a per-test basis.

The RTX 5080 Mobile sits at the 81st percentile among all GPUs in the database, while the Radeon PRO W7400 sits at the 50th percentile. This percentile gap indicates that the NVIDIA part occupies a substantially higher position in the overall performance distribution. In the nearest rivals table for the RTX 5080 Mobile, the closest competitor is the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 with an average score of 38299, a delta of 0.1 percent, meaning the RTX 5080 Mobile is essentially tied with that entry. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile averages 38135, putting the RTX 5080 Mobile 0.6 percent ahead. Against the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A, which averages 38691, the RTX 5080 Mobile trails by 0.9 percent. The AMD Radeon Pro 580X averages 38706, also placing the RTX 5080 Mobile 0.9 percent behind.

The absence of head-to-head data means the only quantitative comparison available is the aggregate average benchmark score and percentile placement. The RTX 5080 Mobile's average score of 38349 is the sole recorded performance figure for either product. The Radeon PRO W7400 has an average benchmark score of 0, which reflects the lack of recorded tests rather than a measured performance result. The wins tally shows zero wins for the Radeon PRO W7400 and zero wins for the RTX 5080 Mobile in head-to-head comparisons, confirming that no direct benchmark confrontations exist in the database.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs diverge fundamentally in their underlying designs. The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 uses the Navi 33 chip built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) generation. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile uses the GB203 chip built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture and belongs to the GeForce 50 Mobile generation. The process nodes differ: the AMD part uses a 6 nm TSMC process, while the NVIDIA part uses a 5 nm TSMC process.

Transistor counts reveal a large scale difference. The Radeon PRO W7400 packs 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2 million per square millimeter. The RTX 5080 Mobile integrates 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, giving a density of 120.6 million per square millimeter. The NVIDIA chip holds roughly 3.4 times the transistor count of the AMD chip, and its density is nearly double per unit area.

Core configurations differ sharply. The Radeon PRO W7400 has 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, 64 render output units, and 28 ray tracing cores. The RTX 5080 Mobile has 7680 shading units, 240 texture mapping units, 96 render output units, 60 ray tracing cores, and 240 tensor cores. The NVIDIA part delivers 4.3 times the shading units, 2.1 times the texture units, 1.5 times the render output units, and 2.1 times the ray tracing cores. Tensor cores exist only on the NVIDIA side, providing dedicated AI acceleration hardware that the AMD part lacks entirely.

Memory subsystems are also distinct. The Radeon PRO W7400 uses 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128 bit bus, delivering 172.8 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 5080 Mobile uses 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256 bit bus, delivering 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The NVIDIA memory bandwidth is 5.2 times higher. Clock behavior differs as well: the AMD base clock is 330 MHz with a boost of 1100 MHz, while the NVIDIA base clock is 975 MHz with a boost of 1500 MHz. The memory clock on the AMD part is 1350 MHz (10.8 Gbps effective), whereas the NVIDIA part runs at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective).

The physical form factors differ completely. The Radeon PRO W7400 is a single-slot card measuring 168 mm in length, 69 mm in height, and 20 mm in width. It uses PCIe 4.0 x8 and provides four DisplayPort 2.1 outputs. The RTX 5080 Mobile is an integrated GPU (IGP) with no slot width, no dimensions listed, and PCIe 5.0 x16 connectivity. Its display outputs are listed as portable device dependent, reflecting its mobile integration. The Radeon PRO W7400 specifies a suggested PSU of 250 W, while the RTX 5080 Mobile has no suggested PSU entry.

Power consumption figures differ: the Radeon PRO W7400 has a TDP of 55 W, the RTX 5080 Mobile has a TDP of 80 W. Neither part uses external power connectors. The API support is identical for both: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The NVIDIA part supports the same API set as the AMD part, so software compatibility at the API level is equivalent.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 38349, while the AMD Radeon PRO W7400 has an average benchmark score of 0, indicating no recorded benchmark results for the Radeon part.

Q: How do the transistor counts compare?

A: The RTX 5080 Mobile contains 45,600 million transistors, while the Radeon PRO W7400 contains 13,300 million transistors. The NVIDIA chip has approximately 3.4 times the transistor count on a die that is 378 mm² versus 204 mm².

Q: What are the memory specifications for each GPU?

A: The Radeon PRO W7400 uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128 bit bus with 172.8 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 5080 Mobile uses 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256 bit bus with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same graphics APIs?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the TDP of each GPU?

A: The Radeon PRO W7400 has a TDP of 55 W, and the RTX 5080 Mobile has a TDP of 80 W.

Q: Which GPU has ray tracing cores and tensor cores?

A: Both have ray tracing cores: the Radeon PRO W7400 has 28, and the RTX 5080 Mobile has 60. Tensor cores are present only on the RTX 5080 Mobile, with 240 tensor cores.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon PRO W7400 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | Navi 33 | GB203 |

| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 5 nm |

| Transistors | 13,300 million | 45,600 million |

| Die Size | 204 mm² | 378 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 65.2M / mm² | 120.6M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 330 MHz | 975 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 1500 MHz |

| Memory Clock | 1350 MHz (10.8 Gbps effective) | 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) |

| Memory Size | 8 GB | 16 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |

| Memory Bus Width | 128 bit | 256 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 172.8 GB/s | 896.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 1792 | 7680 |

| TMUs | 112 | 240 |

| ROPs | 64 | 96 |

| RT Cores | 28 | 60 |

| Tensor Cores | None | 240 |

| Pixel Rate | 70.40 GPixel/s | 144.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 123.2 GTexel/s | 360.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 7.885 TFLOPS | 23.04 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 7.885 TFLOPS (1:1) | 23.04 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 55 W | 80 W |

| Slot Width | Single-slot | IGP |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | 4x DisplayPort 2.1 | Portable Device Dependent |

| Dimensions | 168 mm x 69 mm x 20 mm | Not listed |

| Suggested PSU | 250 W | Not listed |

| Average Benchmark Score | 0 | 38349 |

| Percentile vs All GPUs | 50 | 81 |

| Release Date | 2025-08-02 | 2025-04-01 |

| Predecessor | Radeon Pro Vega | GeForce 40 Mobile |

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile dominates on raw computational metrics. Its FP32 throughput of 23.04 TFLOPS is 2.9 times the 7.885 TFLOPS of the Radeon PRO W7400. The pixel rate of 144.0 GPixel/s doubles the 70.40 GPixel/s of the AMD part, and the texture rate of 360.0 GTexel/s is 2.9 times the 123.2 GTexel/s. Memory bandwidth at 896.0 GB/s is 5.2 times higher, which benefits data-intensive workloads. The 16 GB frame buffer doubles the 8 GB capacity, enabling larger textures and datasets. The RTX 5080 Mobile also carries 240 tensor cores, which provide dedicated AI acceleration that the Radeon PRO W7400 cannot match. Its 81st percentile ranking versus the 50th percentile for the AMD part confirms a higher placement in the overall GPU performance distribution.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 wins on power efficiency and physical integration. Its TDP of 55 W is 25 W lower than the 80 W TDP of the RTX 5080 Mobile. The single-slot form factor with four DisplayPort 2.1 outputs suits workstation setups that require multiple display connections. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, while narrower than the RTX 5080 Mobile's PCIe 5.0 x16, consumes less bandwidth and suits the lower compute throughput. The Radeon PRO W7400 specifies a suggested PSU of 250 W, while the RTX 5080 Mobile has no PSU guidance, reflecting the desktop card's standalone power requirements versus the mobile GPU's integration into a laptop platform.

The RTX 5080 Mobile wins in memory capacity and bandwidth, shading units, texture units, render output units, ray tracing cores, and tensor cores. It leads in clock speeds at both base and boost. The Radeon PRO W7400 wins in power draw, slot footprint, and display output flexibility. For workloads that rely on FP32 compute, ray tracing, or AI inference, the RTX 5080 Mobile is clearly ahead. For low-power desktop graphics with multiple display outputs, the Radeon PRO W7400 offers a compact solution. The release dates differ by four months, with the RTX 5080 Mobile launching on 2025-04-01 and the Radeon PRO W7400 on 2025-08-02. The predecessor relationships also differ: the RTX 5080 Mobile follows the GeForce 40 Mobile series, while the Radeon PRO W7400 follows the Radeon Pro Vega series.