AMD Radeon PRO W7400 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no shared benchmark scores for the AMD Radeon PRO W7400 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile. Head-to-head comparison must therefore rely on the aggregate performance statistics recorded for each part. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile holds a decisive advantage in the overall database standings. Its average benchmark score of 29,928 places it at the 75th percentile among all GPUs, while the AMD Radeon PRO W7400 sits at the 50th percentile with an average score of 0, indicating no benchmark results have been recorded for that workstation card in the current database.

The RTX 5070 Mobile's recorded scores span multiple API levels. Under Geekbench OpenCL it scores 122,238, and under Geekbench Vulkan it scores 116,960. Passmark results show 20,355 in G3D, 8,279 in GPU compute, 896 in G2D, 214 in DirectX 9, 192 in DirectX 11, 129 in DirectX 10, and 93 in DirectX 12. These figures establish a broad performance envelope across legacy and modern workloads.

The W7400's percentile placement at 50 suggests it is positioned near the median of all tracked GPUs, but without concrete benchmark entries, precise deltas against the RTX 5070 Mobile cannot be computed from direct measurements. The RTX 5070 Mobile's nearest rivals in the database are all desktop-class parts: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti with an average score of 29,945 and a delta of -0.1 percent, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti at 29,783 with a delta of 0.5 percent, the AMD Radeon RX 6800 at 30,095 with a delta of -0.6 percent, and the AMD Radeon RX 6700 at 30,433 with a delta of -1.7 percent. The RTX 5070 Mobile effectively trades blows with these established desktop cards, sitting within 1.7 percent of all four.

No single benchmark can be cited as a direct win for either card. The recorded data indicates the RTX 5070 Mobile is the only one of the two with measurable results, and its 75th percentile ranking is well above the W7400's 50th percentile. The absence of W7400 scores means the database cannot currently validate any specific workload advantage for the AMD card; all quantitative comparison favors the NVIDIA part.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score in the database?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 29,928. The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 has an average benchmark score of 0, as no benchmark results are recorded for it.

Q: How does the RTX 5070 Mobile compare to its closest rivals?

A: It is 0.1 percent behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, 0.5 percent ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti, 0.6 percent behind the AMD Radeon RX 6800, and 1.7 percent behind the AMD Radeon RX 6700.

Q: What is the percentile ranking of each GPU?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile ranks at the 75th percentile among all GPUs in the database. The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 ranks at the 50th percentile.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile has 4,608 shading units, while the AMD Radeon PRO W7400 has 1,792.

Q: What are the memory configurations of the two GPUs?

A: Both use 8 GB of memory with a 128-bit bus. The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 uses GDDR6 with 172.8 GB/s of bandwidth, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile uses GDDR7 with 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU has more ray tracing cores?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile has 36 RT cores. The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 has 28 ray tracing cores.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural families. The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 uses the RDNA 3.0 architecture on the Navi 33 chip, with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) generation. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile uses the Blackwell 2.0 architecture on the GB206 chip and belongs to the GeForce 50 Mobile series.

Manufacturing processes differ. The AMD card is built on a 6 nm process at TSMC, while the NVIDIA card uses a 5 nm process, also at TSMC. Transistor counts reflect the process and design differences. The Navi 33 chip packs 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 65.2 million per square millimeter. The GB206 chip contains 21,900 million transistors on a smaller 181 mm² die, yielding a density of 121.0 million per square millimeter. The NVIDIA chip therefore fits substantially more transistors into a smaller physical area.

Compute resources are organized differently. The W7400 has 1,792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. The RTX 5070 Mobile has 4,608 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 48 render output units. The NVIDIA part has more than 2.5 times the shading units and more TMUs, but fewer ROPs. Ray tracing hardware also differs: the AMD card carries 28 RT cores, while the NVIDIA card carries 36 RT cores. The RTX 5070 Mobile additionally includes 144 tensor cores; the W7400 lists no tensor cores at all.

Pixel and texture throughput reflect these configurations. The W7400 posts a pixel rate of 70.40 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 123.2 GTexel/s. The RTX 5070 Mobile posts 68.40 GPixel/s and 205.2 GTexel/s. The AMD card has a slight pixel rate edge, while the NVIDIA card has a substantial texture rate advantage. Floating point performance follows the shading unit count. The W7400 delivers 7.885 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 at a 1:1 ratio. The RTX 5070 Mobile delivers 13.13 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16, also at 1:1. The NVIDIA card has roughly 66 percent higher raw FP32 throughput.

Memory architecture shares the same 8 GB capacity and 128-bit bus width but diverges in technology and bandwidth. The W7400 uses GDDR6 at 1350 MHz with 10.8 Gbps effective speed, producing 172.8 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 5070 Mobile uses GDDR7 at 1500 MHz with 24 Gbps effective speed, producing 384.0 GB/s. That is more than double the memory bandwidth for the NVIDIA part. Clock behavior also differs: the W7400 has a base clock of 330 MHz and a boost clock of 1100 MHz, while the RTX 5070 Mobile has a base clock of 907 MHz and a boost clock of 1425 MHz.

Interface and display capabilities separate the two further. The AMD card uses PCIe 4.0 x8 and outputs four DisplayPort 2.1 connections. The NVIDIA card uses PCIe 5.0 x16 and its display outputs are listed as portable device dependent. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Specification Differences

The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile differ across nearly every core specification in the database. Process node: 6 nm versus 5 nm. Transistors: 13,300 million versus 21,900 million. Die size: 204 mm² versus 181 mm². Transistor density: 65.2M per mm² versus 121.0M per mm². Base clock: 330 MHz versus 907 MHz. Boost clock: 1100 MHz versus 1425 MHz. Memory clock: 1350 MHz with 10.8 Gbps effective versus 1500 MHz with 24 Gbps effective. Memory type: GDDR6 versus GDDR7. Memory bandwidth: 172.8 GB/s versus 384.0 GB/s. Shading units: 1,792 versus 4,608. TMUs: 112 versus 144. ROPs: 64 versus 48. RT cores: 28 versus 36. Tensor cores: none listed versus 144. Pixel rate: 70.40 GPixel/s versus 68.40 GPixel/s. Texture rate: 123.2 GTexel/s versus 205.2 GTexel/s. FP32: 7.885 TFLOPS versus 13.13 TFLOPS. FP16: 7.885 TFLOPS versus 13.13 TFLOPS. TDP: 55 W versus 50 W.

Form factor and power delivery also differ. The AMD card is single-slot with no power connectors and a suggested PSU of 250 W. It measures 168 mm in length, 69 mm in height, and 20 mm in width. The NVIDIA card is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) with no power connectors and no suggested PSU listed; it has no recorded dimensions. The bus interface differs: PCIe 4.0 x8 for the AMD card versus PCIe 5.0 x16 for the NVIDIA card. Display outputs: 4x DisplayPort 2.1 for the AMD card versus portable device dependent for the NVIDIA card. Release dates differ as well, with the W7400 listed as released in August 2025 and the RTX 5070 Mobile in April 2025. The AMD card's predecessor is the Radeon Pro Vega; the NVIDIA card's predecessor is the GeForce 40 Mobile. Both are currently active in production, and neither has a successor listed. Both are also listed without a launch MSRP.

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data points to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile as the stronger performer in the database. Its 75th percentile ranking, average score of 29,928, and complete benchmark suite give it a clear quantitative edge over the AMD Radeon PRO W7400, which has no recorded benchmark scores and sits at the 50th percentile. The RTX 5070 Mobile wins in raw compute throughput, memory bandwidth, shading unit count, ray tracing core count, and texture rate. Its 13.13 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is nearly double that of the W7400's 7.885 TFLOPS. Its 384.0 GB/s of GDDR7 bandwidth more than doubles the W7400's 172.8 GB/s over GDDR6. The presence of 144 tensor cores gives the NVIDIA part an advantage in workloads that can use tensor acceleration, while the AMD card lists no tensor hardware.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7400 does hold advantages in specific areas. Its 64 ROPs exceed the RTX 5070 Mobile's 48 ROPs, and its pixel rate of 70.40 GPixel/s is higher than the NVIDIA card's 68.40 GPixel/s. That could favor fill-rate-bound rendering scenarios at lower resolutions. The W7400 also offers four fixed DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, which suits a workstation environment with multiple external monitors, whereas the RTX 5070 Mobile's display connectivity is portable device dependent. The AMD card uses the PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, while the NVIDIA card uses PCIe 5.0 x16, giving the latter more host bandwidth for data transfer. Power draw is close: the W7400 lists a 55 W TDP and the RTX 5070 Mobile lists 50 W.

The use-case split follows these strengths. The RTX 5070 Mobile is the choice for compute-heavy workloads, ray tracing, tensor-based tasks, and any application that benefits from high memory bandwidth or large shading unit counts. Its benchmark record, including a 122,238 Geekbench OpenCL score and a 116,960 Geekbench Vulkan score, confirms strong general compute performance. The W7400 aligns with workstation display configurations and fill-rate-oriented tasks, where its higher ROP count and dedicated DisplayPort outputs matter more than raw FP32 throughput. Its 50th percentile ranking indicates mid-range standing, but the lack of recorded benchmarks leaves its practical performance unverified in the database. For any workload where the database has measurable data, the RTX 5070 Mobile leads.