Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded benchmark data offers only one direct measurement for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no benchmark scores in the database. This makes a conventional head-to-head comparison impossible, but the available figures still illustrate the scale of the performance gap.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 scores 16,504 points in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. This places it at the 59th percentile among all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals in the recorded data are the NVIDIA T400 with an average score of 16,508 (a delta of 0%), the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 with 16,415 (0.5% behind), the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell with 16,408 (0.6% behind), and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT with 16,361 (0.9% behind). The RTX 5090 D V2 sits essentially at parity with the T400, trailing by just 4 points, and maintains a narrow lead over the other three rivals. The data shows a tightly clustered group where the RTX 5090 D V2 is neither dominant nor trailing by any meaningful margin within this specific benchmark.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has zero recorded benchmark scores and an average benchmark score of 0. It also holds a 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs, which reflects its position in the database rather than actual measured performance. With no rivals listed and no test results, the database provides no quantitative basis for assessing its performance against the RTX 5090 D V2. The only conclusion the data supports is that the RTX 5090 D V2 delivers a measurable 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result, while the Intel part has no comparable entry.

Because the head-to-head benchmark array is empty and the win counts are zero for both items, any comparison must rely on architectural and specification differences rather than direct performance measurements. The RTX 5090 D V2’s single benchmark score of 16,504 serves as a reference point, but without a corresponding Intel score, no delta percentage can be calculated between the two. The data simply does not support a numeric comparison of their relative performance in any shared workload.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has an empty benchmarks array, an average benchmark score of 0, and no nearest rivals listed. The database contains no recorded performance measurements for this GPU.

Q: What is the only benchmark result available for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2?

A: The RTX 5090 D V2 has a single recorded result in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 with a score of 16,504. This is also its average benchmark score, as only one test is listed.

Q: How does the RTX 5090 D V2 compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The RTX 5090 D V2 scores 16,504, which is 4 points lower than the NVIDIA T400 (16,508, 0% delta), 89 points higher than the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 (16,415, 0.5% delta), 96 points higher than the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell (16,408, 0.6% delta), and 143 points higher than the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (16,361, 0.9% delta). The differences are minimal, with the largest gap being less than 1%.

Q: What is the percentile ranking for each GPU?

A: The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is at the 50th percentile among all GPUs. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 is at the 59th percentile. These rankings reflect their database positions, though the Intel part has no actual benchmark scores to support its percentile.

Q: Which GPU has a higher boost clock?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 has a boost clock of 2407 MHz, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has a boost clock of 1000 MHz. The RTX 5090 D V2’s boost clock is more than double that of the Intel part.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the RTX 5090 D V2?

A: The launch MSRP of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 is 2,299 USD. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no launch MSRP listed in the database.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from entirely different design philosophies and market segments. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is an integrated graphics processor built on the Xe-LP architecture, part of the HD Graphics-T (Twin Lake) generation. It uses a 10 nm process node fabricated by Intel. The chip is named Twin Lake, and the architecture is Xe-LP. The RTX 5090 D V2, in contrast, is a discrete NVIDIA GeForce 50-series card built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, using the GB202 chip. It is fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process node. The RTX 5090 D V2 has 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 122.9M per mm². The Intel part’s transistor count and die size are listed as unknown.

The memory subsystems differ completely. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses system shared memory, with system shared type and bus width, and system dependent bandwidth. The RTX 5090 D V2 has 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 384 bit bus, delivering 1.34 TB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock for the RTX 5090 D V2 is 1750 MHz, or 28 Gbps effective. The Intel part’s memory clock is also system shared.

Compute resources are vastly different. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has 192 shading units, 12 texture mapping units, and 4 raster output pipelines. It has no dedicated ray tracing cores or tensor cores. The RTX 5090 D V2 has 21,760 shading units, 680 TMUs, and 176 ROPs, plus 170 ray tracing cores and 680 tensor cores. Pixel rate for the Intel part is 4.000 GPixel/s, while the RTX 5090 D V2 achieves 423.6 GPixel/s. Texture rate is 12.00 GTexel/s for Intel and 1,636.8 GTexel/s for NVIDIA. FP32 compute is 384.0 GFLOPS for Intel versus 104.8 TFLOPS for NVIDIA. FP16 performance is 768.0 GFLOPS (2:1 ratio) for Intel and 104.8 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio) for NVIDIA.

Power and physical characteristics also diverge. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has a TDP of 6 W, slots as an IGP, and uses a Ring Bus interface. The RTX 5090 D V2 has a TDP of 575 W, is dual-slot, requires a 1x 16-pin power connector, and a suggested PSU of 950 W. Its bus interface is PCIe 5.0 x16. The Intel part has no power connectors listed and no suggested PSU. Display outputs are portable device dependent for Intel, while the RTX 5090 D V2 offers 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. The RTX 5090 D V2 measures 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 48 mm in width.

API support shows some overlap. Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4. The Intel part supports DirectX 12 (12_1), while the RTX 5090 D V2 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). The release dates differ as well: the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile was released on 2024-12-31, while the RTX 5090 D V2 was released on 2025-08-14. The RTX 5090 D V2 lists its predecessor as GeForce 40 and successor as GeForce 60. The Intel part lists no predecessor or successor.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear segmentation. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is an integrated solution with minimal compute resources, a 6 W TDP, and system shared memory. It targets portable devices where low power consumption and basic graphics output matter more than raw performance. Its 192 shading units, 12 TMUs, and 4 ROPs, combined with a 384.0 GFLOPS FP32 rate, indicate a part designed for light workloads, not gaming or compute-heavy tasks.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 is a discrete flagship. With 21,760 shading units, 170 ray tracing cores, 680 tensor cores, and 104.8 TFLOPS FP32, it delivers two orders of magnitude more compute throughput. Its 24 GB GDDR7 memory with 1.34 TB/s bandwidth and 384 bit bus positions it for high-resolution gaming, professional rendering, and AI workloads. The 575 W TDP and 950 W suggested PSU confirm this is a high-power component for desktop systems.

The benchmark data reinforces this split. The RTX 5090 D V2 has a recorded Steel Nomad score of 16,504, placing it near the NVIDIA T400, AMD Radeon PRO W7500, NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT. The Intel part has no benchmark results at all. The database cannot support a claim that one outperforms the other, because no shared test exists. But the architectural differences make the intended use cases obvious.

Who should pick which? The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile suits systems where the GPU is integrated into the processor, power draw must stay low, and the display output depends on the portable device. The RTX 5090 D V2 suits desktop builders who need maximum compute, ray tracing, and memory bandwidth, and who can accommodate a dual-slot card requiring a 16-pin connector and a 950 W power supply. The data shows these are not competing products; they occupy different tiers entirely.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ in nearly every measurable specification. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses a 10 nm process from Intel, while the RTX 5090 D V2 uses a 5 nm process from TSMC. The Intel part has unknown transistor count and die size, whereas the RTX 5090 D V2 has 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die. Base clocks are 300 MHz for Intel and 2017 MHz for NVIDIA. Boost clocks are 1000 MHz and 2407 MHz, respectively.

Memory: Intel uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth. NVIDIA uses 24 GB GDDR7 with a 384 bit bus and 1.34 TB/s bandwidth. Shading units: 192 versus 21,760. TMUs: 12 versus 680. ROPs: 4 versus 176. Ray tracing cores: none versus 170. Tensor cores: none versus 680. Pixel rate: 4.000 GPixel/s versus 423.6 GPixel/s. Texture rate: 12.00 GTexel/s versus 1,636.8 GTexel/s. FP32: 384.0 GFLOPS versus 104.8 TFLOPS. FP16: 768.0 GFLOPS versus 104.8 TFLOPS.

TDP: 6 W versus 575 W. Slot width: IGP versus dual-slot. Power connectors: none versus 1x 16-pin. Suggested PSU: none versus 950 W. Bus interface: Ring Bus versus PCIe 5.0 x16. Display outputs: portable device dependent versus 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. DirectX support: 12 (12_1) versus 12 Ultimate (12_2). Release date: 2024-12-31 versus 2025-08-14. Launch MSRP: none versus 2,299 USD.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile wins in power efficiency and integration. Its 6 W TDP is dramatically lower than the RTX 5090 D V2’s 575 W. It requires no external power connectors, no dedicated PSU recommendation, and slots as an IGP, meaning it fits into any system with a compatible processor. Its ring bus interface and system shared memory eliminate the need for separate VRAM. For portable devices, where the display output is device dependent and power is limited, this part is the only viable option of the two.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 wins in every compute and graphics metric recorded. Its boost clock of 2407 MHz, 24 GB GDDR7 memory, 1.34 TB/s bandwidth, 21,760 shading units, 170 RT cores, 680 tensor cores, and 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 make it suitable for tasks the Intel part cannot handle, such as ray-traced rendering, AI inference, and high-refresh gaming. Its single benchmark score of 16,504 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 confirms it delivers measurable performance in a demanding DirectX 12 workload.

The data also shows the RTX 5090 D V2 holds a narrow edge over its nearest rivals in the database. It trails the NVIDIA T400 by only 0% (4 points), but leads the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 by 0.5%, the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell by 0.6%, and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT by 0.9%. These margins are small, but they indicate the RTX 5090 D V2 performs at a level comparable to professional and previous-generation enthusiast cards in this specific test.

In terms of API support, both parts offer OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4, but the RTX 5090 D V2 adds DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) versus Intel’s DirectX 12 (12_1). This gives NVIDIA access to features in the higher-tier DirectX 12 feature set. The RTX 5090 D V2 also provides a fixed set of display outputs (1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b), while Intel relies on the portable device for output.

The verdict is straightforward: the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile wins on power, size, and system integration, while the RTX 5090 D V2 wins on raw performance, memory capacity, and feature support. No benchmark overlap exists to declare a single winner, but the specification sheet makes the division of roles clear.