Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

FAQ

Q: What are the core architectural identities of these two GPUs?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile is a Meteor Lake chip built on the Xe-LPG architecture using a 10 nm process at Intel's foundry. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses the 7G106 chip with the TrueGPU architecture, fabricated by TSMC on a 6 nm process.

Q: How do their memory subsystems compare?

A: The Intel part shares system memory with a type of "System Shared" and a bandwidth that is "System Dependent". The Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses 12 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What are the raw compute throughput figures for each?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile delivers 3.942 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 7.885 TFLOPS of FP16 (2:1). The Lisuan Tech LX MAX delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS of FP16 (2:1).

Q: Which GPU has the higher pixel and texture throughput?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX MAX leads with 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate and 384.0 GTexel/s texture rate. The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile records 52.80 GPixel/s and 123.2 GTexel/s respectively.

Q: What are the power and physical requirements of each?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile has a 65 W TDP, is an IGP with a Ring Bus interface, and uses no power connectors. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has a 225 W TDP, is a Dual-slot card with a 1x 16-pin power connector, and requires a 550 W suggested PSU. Its dimensions are 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width.

Q: What API support does each GPU offer?

A: The Intel part supports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs are built on fundamentally different foundations. The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile uses the Xe-LPG architecture, which is part of the Meteor Lake generation. It is manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry. This is an integrated graphics solution, indicated by its IGP slot width and Ring Bus interface. Its memory architecture is entirely system-shared, meaning it relies on the host system's RAM for both capacity and bandwidth, with the latter being explicitly listed as "System Dependent".

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX, in contrast, is built on the TrueGPU architecture using the 7G106 chip from the 7G100 generation. It is fabricated by TSMC on a 6 nm process. This is a discrete, Dual-slot card with a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface. It carries 12 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a fixed 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is listed at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed.

The compute resources differ substantially. The Intel part has 896 shading units, 56 texture mapping units, and 24 ROPs. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. This is a 6.86x difference in shading units, 3.43x in TMUs, and 4x in ROPs. Neither GPU lists dedicated ray tracing cores or tensor cores in the data.

The manufacturing process difference is notable: 10 nm for Intel versus 6 nm for TSMC. The Intel chip's transistor count and die size are not recorded, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX lists them as "unknown". The Intel part has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2200 MHz; the Lisuan Tech LX MAX has no recorded base or boost clocks. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX's feature set includes 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, while the Intel part's display outputs are "Portable Device Dependent". The Lisuan Tech LX MAX also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), a higher feature level than the Intel part's DirectX 12 (12_1).

Where Each One Wins

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX is the clear winner in every category of raw computational throughput. Its FP32 performance of 24.58 TFLOPS is 6.24x higher than the Intel part's 3.942 TFLOPS. Its FP16 performance of 49.15 TFLOPS is 6.23x higher than the Intel's 7.885 TFLOPS. In pixel throughput, the Lisuan Tech LX MAX's 192.0 GPixel/s is 3.64x higher than the Intel's 52.80 GPixel/s. In texture throughput, the Lisuan Tech LX MAX's 384.0 GTexel/s is 3.12x higher than the Intel's 123.2 GTexel/s.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX also wins decisively in memory capacity, bandwidth, and bus width. Its 12 GB of GDDR6 is a fixed, dedicated allocation versus the Intel's system-shared memory. The 432.0 GB/s bandwidth is a fixed figure, whereas the Intel's bandwidth is system-dependent. The 192-bit bus is a dedicated memory interface, whereas the Intel part uses a shared system bus.

The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile wins in specific areas related to integration and power efficiency. Its 65 W TDP is 160 W lower than the Lisuan Tech LX MAX's 225 W TDP. The Intel part is an IGP with no power connectors, making it a zero-add-in-card solution. It has a higher Vulkan version support at 1.4 versus the Lisuan Tech LX MAX's 1.3. The Intel part also has a higher base clock at 300 MHz, though the Lisuan Tech LX MAX has no recorded clock speeds to compare directly.

The release dates differ significantly: the Intel part was released on 2023-12-13, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX is dated 2026-03-16. Both are listed as "Active" in production status.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile | Lisuan Tech LX MAX |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Xe-LPG | TrueGPU |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 6 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Shading Units | 896 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 56 | 192 |

| ROPs | 24 | 96 |

| FP32 | 3.942 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| Pixel Rate | 52.80 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 123.2 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| TDP | 65 W | 225 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | None | 550 W |

| Bus Interface | Ring Bus | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Memory Size | System Shared | 12 GB |

| Memory Type | System Shared | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus Width | System Shared | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | 432.0 GB/s |

| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Release Date | 2023-12-13 | 2026-03-16 |

| Length | N/A | 248 mm |

| Height | N/A | 118 mm |

| Width | N/A | 48 mm |

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has a 6x lead in shading units (6144 versus 896), a 3.43x lead in TMUs, and a 4x lead in ROPs. Its FP32 output is 6.24x higher, and its FP16 output is 6.23x higher. The pixel rate is 3.64x higher, and the texture rate is 3.12x higher. The memory bandwidth is fixed at 432.0 GB/s versus the Intel's system-dependent figure. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX also has a higher DirectX feature level (12_2 versus 12_1).

The Intel part has a lower TDP (65 W versus 225 W), a smaller form factor (IGP versus Dual-slot), and a higher Vulkan version (1.4 versus 1.3). Its base clock is 300 MHz, and its boost clock is 2200 MHz, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX has no recorded clock speeds.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded benchmark data shows no direct head-to-head benchmark scores between these two GPUs. The wins and losses must be derived from the specification-level throughput figures, which are decisive in one direction.

The largest win for the Lisuan Tech LX MAX is in FP32 compute. At 24.58 TFLOPS, it is 20.638 TFLOPS higher than the Intel part's 3.942 TFLOPS. This represents a 6.24x advantage. In FP16, the Lisuan Tech LX MAX's 49.15 TFLOPS is 41.265 TFLOPS higher than the Intel's 7.885 TFLOPS, a 6.23x advantage. These are the most significant deltas in the comparison.

The texture rate differential is also substantial. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX's 384.0 GTexel/s is 260.8 GTexel/s higher than the Intel's 123.2 GTexel/s, a 3.12x advantage. The pixel rate differential is 139.2 GPixel/s, with the Lisuan Tech LX MAX's 192.0 GPixel/s versus the Intel's 52.80 GPixel/s, a 3.64x advantage.

The memory bandwidth comparison is not a direct numeric delta because the Intel part's bandwidth is "System Dependent". However, the Lisuan Tech LX MAX's fixed 432.0 GB/s on a 192-bit bus with 12 GB GDDR6 is a categorical advantage over a system-shared configuration with no fixed capacity or bandwidth figure.

The Intel part's wins are in power and integration. Its 65 W TDP is 160 W lower than the Lisuan Tech LX MAX's 225 W TDP. Its IGP form factor requires no additional power connectors and no suggested PSU, whereas the Lisuan Tech LX MAX requires a 1x 16-pin connector and a 550 W suggested PSU. The Intel part also has a higher Vulkan version (1.4 versus 1.3).

The shading unit count differential is 5248 units (6144 versus 896), the TMU differential is 136 units (192 versus 56), and the ROP differential is 72 units (96 versus 24). All of these favor the Lisuan Tech LX MAX.

The Verdict

The data shows a complete performance class separation. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX is a discrete, high-power GPU designed for maximum throughput. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 performance is 6.24x higher than the Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile's 3.942 TFLOPS. Its 12 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth is a fixed, high-bandwidth resource, while the Intel part relies on system memory with system-dependent bandwidth. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX's 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs represent a fundamentally larger execution engine.

The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile is an integrated solution with a 65 W TDP, a Ring Bus interface, and no power connectors. Its performance ceiling is defined by the host system's memory configuration. Its 3.942 TFLOPS FP32 and 7.885 TFLOPS FP16 figures place it in a completely different performance tier. Its advantages are portability, integration, and power consumption, not raw output.

For workloads requiring maximum compute, texture, pixel, or memory throughput, the Lisuan Tech LX MAX is the only choice. The 6.24x FP32 lead and 6.23x FP16 lead are decisive. For systems where a discrete card is impossible, the Intel part provides a baseline level of graphics capability within a 65 W envelope.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX also offers a higher DirectX feature level (12_2 versus 12_1) and dedicated display outputs (4x DisplayPort 1.4a). The Intel part counters with a higher Vulkan version (1.4 versus 1.3). The Lisuan Tech LX MAX's release date of 2026-03-16 is later than the Intel part's 2023-12-13, indicating a newer product generation.

Neither GPU has recorded benchmark scores or nearest rival data in the database. The percentile ranking for both is 50, indicating a median position among all GPUs, but the specification differentials are so large that the percentile figures do not reflect the head-to-head separation. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX's 225 W TDP and 550 W suggested PSU indicate a desktop-oriented, high-performance card. The Intel part's 65 W TDP and IGP status indicate a mobile or low-power integrated solution. The choice is determined by the platform and the performance requirement.