Intel Arc 140V Mobile vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no head-to-head benchmark results for the Intel Arc 140V Mobile and the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA. The winsA and winsB fields both read zero, and the headToHeadBenchmarks array is empty. This means no direct performance comparison can be made from the data. The absence of scores is notable, as the two parts occupy very different performance classes based on their specifications alone.

The Intel Arc 140V Mobile shows a pixel rate of 62.40 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 124.8 GTexel/s, while the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA delivers 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s. The LX ULTRA is therefore 3.08 times faster in pixel throughput and 3.08 times faster in texture throughput. In FP32 compute, the LX ULTRA reaches 24.58 TFLOPS against the Arc 140V's 3.994 TFLOPS, a 6.15 times advantage. FP16 figures follow the same ratio: 49.15 TFLOPS versus 7.987 TFLOPS, again 6.15 times higher for the LX ULTRA.

These gaps are consistent across every compute metric in the database. The LX ULTRA leads in raw throughput by a factor of roughly six in FP32 and FP16, and by a factor of three in pixel and texture rates. The Arc 140V counters with a much lower thermal envelope of 37 W versus 225 W, though no efficiency benchmarks exist to quantify performance per watt.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different manufacturers and architectures. Intel builds the Arc 140V Mobile on the Lunar Lake chip using the Xe2-LPG architecture, manufactured by TSMC on a 3 nm process. The die size is 172 mm². Lisuan Tech uses the 7G105 chip with the TrueGPU architecture, manufactured by TSMC on a 6 nm process. The die size for the LX ULTRA is not recorded.

Shading units differ substantially: the Arc 140V has 1024, while the LX ULTRA has 6144. Texture mapping units follow the same pattern: 64 versus 192. Render output units are 32 versus 96. The Intel part includes 8 ray tracing cores, while the Lisuan part lists no ray tracing cores in the database.

Memory architecture is fundamentally different. The Arc 140V uses system shared memory with a system shared bus width and system dependent bandwidth. The LX ULTRA has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192 bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. Its memory clock is recorded as 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective.

The LX ULTRA lists no base or boost clocks for its core, while the Arc 140V runs at a 300 MHz base and 1950 MHz boost. The Arc 140V's memory clock is also system shared, meaning it depends on the host platform.

API support shows both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Arc 140V supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX ULTRA supports Vulkan 1.3.

Form factor and interface differ completely. The Arc 140V is an integrated GPU with an IGP bus interface and slot width. The LX ULTRA is a dual-slot discrete card with a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The LX ULTRA measures 268 mm in length, 112 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. The Arc 140V has no recorded dimensions because it is an IGP.

The LX ULTRA draws 225 W and requires a 550 W suggested power supply, using a single 16-pin power connector. The Arc 140V has no power connectors or suggested PSU because it is integrated. The LX ULTRA outputs to 4x DisplayPort 1.4a, while the Arc 140V's display outputs are portable device dependent.

Release dates place the Intel part at 2024-09-23 and the Lisuan part at 2026-03-16. Both are listed as active production. The Arc 140V has a predecessor, HD Graphics-M, while the LX ULTRA has no predecessor or successor listed.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has 6144 shading units, which is six times the 1024 shading units on the Intel Arc 140V Mobile.

Q: What memory configurations do the two GPUs use?

A: The Arc 140V uses system shared memory with a system shared bus width and system dependent bandwidth. The LX ULTRA uses 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192 bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Do both GPUs support ray tracing?

A: The Intel Arc 140V Mobile includes 8 ray tracing cores. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA lists no ray tracing cores in the database.

Q: What is the thermal design power difference?

A: The Arc 140V has a TDP of 37 W, while the LX ULTRA has a TDP of 225 W. The LX ULTRA also lists a 550 W suggested power supply.

Q: Which GPU has a smaller manufacturing process?

A: The Intel Arc 140V Mobile is built on TSMC's 3 nm process. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA is built on TSMC's 6 nm process. The 3 nm node is smaller.

Q: What are the API differences?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Arc 140V supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX ULTRA supports Vulkan 1.3.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Arc 140V Mobile | Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Manufacturer | Intel | Unknown |

| Chip | Lunar Lake | 7G105 |

| Architecture | Xe2-LPG | TrueGPU |

| Generation | Arc Graphics-M (Lunar Lake) | 7G100 |

| Process Node | 3 nm | 6 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | TSMC |

| Die Size | 172 mm² | unknown |

| Base Clock | 300 MHz | null |

| Boost Clock | 1950 MHz | null |

| Memory Clock | System Shared | 2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective |

| Memory Size | System Shared | 24 GB |

| Memory Type | System Shared | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus Width | System Shared | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 1024 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 64 | 192 |

| ROPs | 32 | 96 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 8 | null |

| Pixel Rate | 62.40 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 124.8 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 3.994 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 7.987 TFLOPS (2:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 37 W | 225 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | null | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | null | 550 W |

| Bus Interface | IGP | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Dimensions | null | 268 mm, 112 mm, 40 mm |

| Release Date | 2024-09-23 | 2026-03-16 |

| Predecessor | HD Graphics-M | null |

The Verdict

The data shows two GPUs for different purposes. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile is an integrated part with a 37 W TDP, 1024 shading units, and system shared memory. It fits into portable devices where power draw and physical space are constrained. Its 3 nm process, 8 ray tracing cores, and Vulkan 1.4 support give it modern feature coverage, but its compute capacity is limited to 3.994 TFLOPS FP32.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA is a discrete, dual-slot card with 6144 shading units, 24 GB of GDDR6, and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 performance is 6.15 times higher than the Intel part. It requires a 225 W TDP and a 550 W suggested power supply, plus a PCIe 4.0 x16 slot. The LX ULTRA delivers 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s, both exactly 3.08 times the Intel figures.

Buyers needing maximum throughput for compute-heavy workloads would select the LX ULTRA based on its raw specification advantage. Buyers needing an integrated solution with low power draw would select the Arc 140V Mobile. The Arc 140V has no launch MSRP recorded, and the LX ULTRA also has no launch MSRP recorded, so no price comparison is possible from the database.

The Arc 140V's predecessor, HD Graphics-M, indicates a lineage in integrated graphics. The LX ULTRA has no predecessor, suggesting a new product line. The LX ULTRA's release date of 2026-03-16 is later than the Arc 140V's 2024-09-23.

The database records no benchmark scores for either GPU, so the percentileVsAllGpus field of 50 for both reflects the absence of data, not measured performance. The verdict rests entirely on specifications. The LX ULTRA is the higher-performing part by every compute metric. The Arc 140V is the lower-power integrated alternative.