NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 GB205 vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 GB205 and the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA shows a split with no direct head-to-head benchmark results in the database. Each card instead demonstrates strengths through its architectural and specification profile. The RTX 5060 GB205 targets efficiency and modern feature support, while the LX ULTRA prioritizes raw compute throughput and memory capacity.

The RTX 5060 GB205 wins on power efficiency and interface modernity. Its 145 W TDP is substantially lower than the LX ULTRA's 225 W TDP, and it requires a suggested PSU of 300 W versus 550 W for the rival. The card uses a PCIe 5.0 x8 interface, while the LX ULTRA uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The RTX 5060 also includes dedicated ray tracing cores (30) and tensor cores (120), features absent from the LX ULTRA's specification sheet. Its GDDR7 memory runs at 28 Gbps effective, delivering 448.0 GB/s bandwidth from a 128-bit bus.

The LX ULTRA wins on raw compute and memory volume. It fields 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, compared to 3840 shading units, 120 TMUs, and 48 ROPs on the RTX 5060. Its FP32 throughput reaches 24.58 TFLOPS versus 19.18 TFLOPS for the NVIDIA card. The LX ULTRA also offers 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, triple the RTX 5060's 8 GB capacity, though its bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s is slightly lower. The LX ULTRA's FP16 rate of 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) more than doubles its FP32 output, while the RTX 5060 runs FP16 at a 1:1 ratio matching its FP32 figure.

The RTX 5060 GB205 wins on display connectivity with one HDMI 2.1b port and three DisplayPort 2.1b outputs, versus four DisplayPort 1.4a ports on the LX ULTRA. The NVIDIA card also supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX ULTRA tops out at Vulkan 1.3. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6.

FAQ

Q: Which card has more memory?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 GB205 has 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus.

Q: How do their memory bandwidths compare?

A: The RTX 5060 GB205 delivers 448.0 GB/s from its 28 Gbps effective GDDR7 memory. The LX ULTRA provides 432.0 GB/s from its 18 Gbps effective GDDR6 memory, a difference of 16.0 GB/s in favor of the NVIDIA card.

Q: Which card has higher FP32 compute?

A: The LX ULTRA reaches 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, while the RTX 5060 GB205 produces 19.18 TFLOPS FP32. The LX ULTRA leads by roughly 28 percent in this metric.

Q: What ray tracing hardware does each card include?

A: The RTX 5060 GB205 includes 30 ray tracing cores and 120 tensor cores. The LX ULTRA's specification sheet lists no dedicated ray tracing or tensor core counts.

Q: What are the power requirements?

A: The RTX 5060 GB205 has a 145 W TDP and a suggested PSU of 300 W, using a single 8-pin connector. The LX ULTRA has a 225 W TDP and a suggested PSU of 550 W, using a single 16-pin connector.

Q: Which card supports newer display outputs?

A: The RTX 5060 GB205 offers 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. The LX ULTRA offers 4x DisplayPort 1.4a and no HDMI output.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no recorded head-to-head benchmark results between the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 GB205 and the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA. The winsA and winsB fields both stand at zero. However, the specification data allows for direct comparisons across several compute and memory metrics.

The largest victory for the LX ULTRA comes in FP32 throughput. The LX ULTRA produces 24.58 TFLOPS against the RTX 5060's 19.18 TFLOPS, a lead of 5.40 TFLOPS, or approximately 28 percent. In FP16, the gap widens dramatically: the LX ULTRA delivers 49.15 TFLOPS versus 19.18 TFLOPS for the RTX 5060, more than double the NVIDIA card's output. The LX ULTRA also leads in texture rate at 384.0 GTexel/s versus 299.6 GTexel/s, a difference of 84.4 GTexel/s. Its pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s compares to 119.9 GPixel/s on the RTX 5060, a margin of 72.1 GPixel/s.

The RTX 5060 GB205 counters with a memory bandwidth advantage. Its 448.0 GB/s exceeds the LX ULTRA's 432.0 GB/s by 16.0 GB/s, achieved with a 128-bit bus and GDDR7 at 28 Gbps effective. The NVIDIA card also wins on power efficiency when normalized for performance, but the data does not provide a direct performance-per-watt figure. Its 145 W TDP is 80 W lower than the LX ULTRA's 225 W TDP, and its suggested PSU is 250 W lower at 300 W versus 550 W.

The shading unit comparison favors the LX ULTRA by a wide margin: 6144 units versus 3840 units, a difference of 2304. TMU counts show 192 versus 120, a lead of 72 for the LX ULTRA. ROP counts double on the LX ULTRA at 96 versus 48. The RTX 5060 has no counter for these advantages except its ray tracing cores (30) and tensor cores (120), which the LX ULTRA does not list.

Pixel and texture throughput numbers follow the same pattern. The LX ULTRA's 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s both exceed the RTX 5060's 119.9 GPixel/s and 299.6 GTexel/s. The LX ULTRA's memory bandwidth deficit of 16.0 GB/s is modest relative to its other compute leads.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across nearly every major specification field. The RTX 5060 GB205 uses a 5 nm process node from TSMC, while the LX ULTRA uses a 6 nm node from the same foundry. Transistor counts differ sharply: the RTX 5060 has 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die, giving a density of 118.3M per mm². The LX ULTRA lists unknown transistor count, die size, and density.

Clock speeds are only partially specified. The RTX 5060 has a base clock of 2280 MHz and a boost clock of 2497 MHz. The LX ULTRA lists no base or boost clocks. Memory clocks show the RTX 5060 at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective, while the LX ULTRA runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective.

Memory configuration differs fundamentally. The RTX 5060 uses 8 GB of GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus. The LX ULTRA uses 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus. Bandwidth favors the RTX 5060 at 448.0 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s.

Compute resources show the LX ULTRA with more shading units (6144 versus 3840), more TMUs (192 versus 120), and more ROPs (96 versus 48). The RTX 5060 has 30 RT cores and 120 tensor cores; the LX ULTRA has no listed counts for either. FP32 output favors the LX ULTRA at 24.58 TFLOPS versus 19.18 TFLOPS. FP16 output favors the LX ULTRA at 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) versus 19.18 TFLOPS (1:1).

Power and cooling specifications diverge. The RTX 5060 has a 145 W TDP, uses a single 8-pin connector, and suggests a 300 W PSU. The LX ULTRA has a 225 W TDP, uses a single 16-pin connector, and suggests a 550 W PSU. Both are dual-slot cards.

Physical dimensions differ mainly in length. The RTX 5060 measures 241 mm (9.5 inches) long, 111 mm (4.4 inches) high, and 40 mm (1.6 inches) wide. The LX ULTRA measures 268 mm (10.6 inches) long, 112 mm (4.4 inches) high, and 40 mm (1.6 inches) wide.

Bus interfaces differ by generation and lane count. The RTX 5060 uses PCIe 5.0 x8. The LX ULTRA uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs show the RTX 5060 with one HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1b ports, while the LX ULTRA provides four DisplayPort 1.4a ports.

API support is close but not identical. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RTX 5060 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX ULTRA supports Vulkan 1.3.

Release dates place the LX ULTRA earlier. The LX ULTRA released on 2026-03-16, while the RTX 5060 released on 2026-05-31. The RTX 5060 has a launch MSRP of 299 USD; the LX ULTRA has no launch MSRP listed. Production status for both is Active.

Architecture Differences

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 GB205 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, part of the GeForce 50-series and GeForce 50 generation. Its predecessor is the GeForce 40 series, and its successor is the GeForce 60 series. The chip is designated GB205. The architecture includes dedicated ray tracing cores (30) and tensor cores (120), enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI processing. The 5 nm TSMC process node and 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die produce a transistor density of 118.3M per mm².

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA is built on the TrueGPU architecture, part of the 7G100 generation with chip designation 7G105. It has no listed predecessor or successor in the database. The architecture uses a 6 nm TSMC process node, but transistor count, die size, and transistor density are unknown. The LX ULTRA lists no ray tracing cores or tensor cores, indicating a design focused on traditional raster compute rather than hybrid rendering features.

The FP16 computation ratio highlights an architectural difference. The RTX 5060 runs FP16 at 19.18 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio to its FP32 rate. The LX ULTRA runs FP16 at 49.15 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, doubling its FP32 throughput. This suggests the LX ULTRA's shader array is optimized for packed half-precision math, while the RTX 5060's design treats FP16 and FP32 with equal throughput.

Memory subsystem architecture differs by type and generation. The RTX 5060 uses GDDR7 with a 128-bit bus and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth, a newer memory standard that achieves higher per-pin data rates (28 Gbps effective). The LX ULTRA uses GDDR6 with a 192-bit bus and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth at 18 Gbps effective. The wider bus on the LX ULTRA compensates for the older memory type, but the RTX 5060 still edges ahead in total bandwidth.

The RTX 5060's PCIe 5.0 x8 interface delivers a newer generation and narrower lane count, while the LX ULTRA's PCIe 4.0 x16 uses an older generation with double the lanes. Both provide sufficient bandwidth for their respective memory pools, but the interface generation difference reflects the RTX 5060's newer platform support.

Display output architecture also differs. The RTX 5060 includes HDMI 2.1b and DisplayPort 2.1b, supporting higher bandwidth display connections. The LX ULTRA offers DisplayPort 1.4a outputs only, with no HDMI. This positions the RTX 5060 for modern high-refresh-rate monitors, while the LX ULTRA targets displays using DP 1.4a.

The absence of RT and tensor cores on the LX ULTRA means it lacks hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI workloads. The RTX 5060's 30 RT cores and 120 tensor cores provide dedicated paths for these tasks. The 12_2 feature level for DirectX 12 Ultimate appears on both cards, but the underlying hardware capabilities differ substantially.