AMD Radeon RX 7700 vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data presents an unusual comparison. AMD Radeon RX 7700 has a full set of benchmark results across nine tests, while Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has no recorded benchmark scores at all. The database shows zero wins for either product in head-to-head testing, as no shared test results exist for direct comparison.

AMD Radeon RX 7700 delivers measurable results in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 with a score of 2865. Its Geekbench OpenCL result reaches 106028. PassMark tests show a G3D score of 20974, GPU compute at 10963, G2D at 1206, DirectX 9 at 261, DirectX 11 at 186, DirectX 12 at 96, and DirectX 10 at 92. These figures place the RX 7700 at the 58th percentile among all GPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 15852.

Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA holds the 50th percentile position based on its specification profile, but no test scores are present in the database. The average benchmark score for this card is recorded as zero, indicating that no benchmark runs have been submitted or verified. Consequently, the use-case analysis must rely on architectural and specification differences rather than measured performance data.

The RX 7700 clearly wins in any scenario requiring measured performance validation. Applications that depend on established DirectX 12 performance, OpenCL compute workloads, or general 3D rendering can reference its recorded scores. The LX ULTRA cannot claim any verified benchmark victory, as no data exists to support such a claim.

Architecture Differences

The two cards diverge at the fundamental architecture level. AMD Radeon RX 7700 uses the Navi 32 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Wheat Nas, and belongs to the Navi III (RX 7000) generation. Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA uses the 7G105 chip on TrueGPU architecture, belonging to the 7G100 generation with no codename recorded.

Manufacturing processes differ. The RX 7700 uses a 5 nm process at TSMC with 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die, producing a transistor density of 81.2M per mm². The LX ULTRA uses a 6 nm process, also at TSMC, but its transistor count, die size, and density values are unknown in the database.

The RX 7700 features 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 96 ROPs. It also includes 40 dedicated ray tracing cores. The LX ULTRA carries 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, but has no ray tracing core count recorded. The LX ULTRA more than doubles the shading unit count while matching ROP count and exceeding TMU count.

Shader capabilities show a notable split. The RX 7700 achieves 25.18 TFLOPS FP32 and 25.18 TFLOPS FP16 at a 1:1 ratio. The LX ULTRA reaches 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, slightly lower, but its FP16 performance jumps to 49.15 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio, nearly double its own FP32 output and almost double the RX 7700's FP16 figure.

Clock behavior differs as well. The RX 7700 records base clock of 1900 MHz, boost clock of 2459 MHz, and game clock of 2041 MHz. The LX ULTRA has no base, boost, or game clock entries in the database. Memory clocks show 2438 MHz with 19.5 Gbps effective on the RX 7700 versus 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective on the LX ULTRA.

API support overlaps on DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6 for both. The RX 7700 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX ULTRA lists Vulkan 1.3. Display outputs differ: the RX 7700 has one HDMI 2.1a, two DisplayPort 2.1, and one USB Type-C; the LX ULTRA has four DisplayPort 1.4a ports.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Direct benchmark comparisons are impossible with the available data. The head-to-head benchmark array in the database is empty, and the LX ULTRA has zero recorded test scores. This limits the analysis to specification-derived comparisons and the RX 7700's standalone results.

The RX 7700's strongest recorded result is the Geekbench OpenCL score of 106028, which indicates substantial compute throughput for general purpose workloads. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2865 provides a modern DirectX 12 gaming reference point. PassMark G3D at 20974 and GPU compute at 10963 round out the performance picture.

Comparing theoretical throughput, the LX ULTRA leads in FP16 compute with 49.15 TFLOPS versus 25.18 TFLOPS for the RX 7700, a 95% advantage in half-precision workloads. The RX 7700 leads slightly in FP32 with 25.18 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS, a 2.4% margin. Pixel rate favors the RX 7700 at 236.1 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s, a 23% difference. Texture rate is nearly identical: 393.4 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s, a 2.4% gap in favor of the RX 7700.

Memory bandwidth strongly favors the RX 7700. Its 624.1 GB/s bandwidth on a 256-bit bus exceeds the LX ULTRA's 432.0 GB/s on a 192-bit bus by 44%. However, the LX ULTRA offers 24 GB of memory versus 16 GB, a 50% capacity advantage that matters for large datasets or high-resolution texture loads.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across nearly every measurable specification field.

| Specification | AMD Radeon RX 7700 | Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA |

|---|---|---|

| Process node | 5 nm | 6 nm |

| Transistors | 28,100 million | unknown |

| Die size | 346 mm² | unknown |

| Shading units | 2560 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 160 | 192 |

| ROPs | 96 | 96 |

| RT cores | 40 | none recorded |

| FP32 | 25.18 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 25.18 TFLOPS (1:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| Memory size | 16 GB | 24 GB |

| Memory bus | 256 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory bandwidth | 624.1 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Memory clock | 2438 MHz | 2250 MHz |

| TDP | 200 W | 225 W |

| Power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 16-pin |

| Pixel rate | 236.1 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 393.4 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| Vulkan version | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Display outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DP 2.1, 1x USB-C | 4x DP 1.4a |

| Dimensions | 267 mm x 135 mm x 50 mm | 268 mm x 112 mm x 40 mm |

| Release date | 2025-09-17 | 2026-03-16 |

Both cards use GDDR6 memory, PCIe 4.0 x16 interfaces, dual-slot coolers, and require a 550 W suggested power supply. The RX 7700 has a lower TDP at 200 W versus 225 W for the LX ULTRA. Physical dimensions are similar in length but differ in height and width: the RX 7700 is taller and thicker, while the LX ULTRA is shorter in profile.

The RX 7700 sits in the Radeon RX 7000 series from AMD with a predecessor in the Navi II line and successor in Navi IV. The LX ULTRA has no series, predecessor, or successor recorded. Its manufacturer is listed as Unknown.

FAQ

Q: Which card has more shading units?

A: Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has 6144 shading units, while AMD Radeon RX 7700 has 2560. The LX ULTRA's count is 140% higher.

Q: Which card offers more memory bandwidth?

A: AMD Radeon RX 7700 provides 624.1 GB/s across a 256-bit bus. Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA provides 432.0 GB/s across a 192-bit bus, a 44% lower bandwidth figure.

Q: Which card has ray tracing cores?

A: AMD Radeon RX 7700 includes 40 ray tracing cores. Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has no ray tracing core count recorded in the database.

Q: How do the FP16 compute figures compare?

A: Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA reaches 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 at a 2:1 ratio, nearly double the AMD Radeon RX 7700's 25.18 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio.

Q: What is the memory capacity difference?

A: Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA offers 24 GB of GDDR6 memory, while AMD Radeon RX 7700 offers 16 GB. The LX ULTRA has 50% more capacity.

Q: Which card has recorded benchmark scores?

A: Only AMD Radeon RX 7700 has benchmark results in the database, including a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2865 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 106028. Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has no recorded scores, and its average benchmark score is zero.

The Verdict

The data supports different selections based on workload priorities. AMD Radeon RX 7700 is the only card with verified performance results, making it the defensible choice for any application requiring measured benchmark validation. Its 58th percentile ranking among all GPUs, average benchmark score of 15852, and nearest rival comparisons confirm its standing: it trails AMD Radeon RX 9060 by 1%, trails NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti by 1.7%, leads AMD Radeon Pro W5500 by 1.1%, and essentially matches AMD Radeon R9 370X at 0.1% behind.

The RX 7700 also wins on raw FP32 throughput, pixel rate, memory bandwidth, and ray tracing support. Its 5 nm process node and higher transistor count of 28,100 million suggest a denser, more refined implementation. The 16 GB memory capacity and 256-bit bus deliver 624.1 GB/s, which supports high-resolution gaming and compute workloads.

Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA appeals to workloads that prioritize FP16 compute and memory capacity. Its 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 output and 24 GB memory capacity are the clear specification advantages. The 6144 shading units and 192 TMUs indicate a wide parallel design, though without benchmark results, the practical impact remains unverified. Its 50th percentile ranking is based on specifications alone, not measured performance.

For gaming, DirectX 12 workloads, and any task where verified performance matters, the AMD Radeon RX 7700 is the data-supported choice. For FP16-heavy compute tasks or workloads that require more than 16 GB of memory, the LX ULTRA's specifications make it a candidate, but the absence of benchmark data means its real-world behavior cannot be confirmed from the database. The RX 7700's release date of 2025-09-17 also gives it a longer verified track record than the LX ULTRA's 2026-03-16 entry.