Intel Arc 140V Mobile vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries for the Intel Arc 140V Mobile and the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100. The wins count for both parts sits at zero, and no individual test scores are available to compare directly. This absence of measured data means the comparison must rely on the architectural and specification fields provided, rather than on performance deltas.

Without benchmark results, the raw compute figures become the primary differentiator. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, while the Intel Arc 140V Mobile delivers 3.994 TFLOPS. That puts the Lisuan part at roughly 6.2 times the FP32 output of the Intel part, a substantial gap that would likely dominate any compute-heavy workload if both were measured. The FP16 figures follow the same pattern: 49.15 TFLOPS for the Lisuan Tech versus 7.987 TFLOPS for the Intel, again a factor of about 6.2.

Pixel and texture rates tell a similar story. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 reaches 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile reaches 62.40 GPixel/s and 124.8 GTexel/s. The Lisuan part is 3.1 times faster in pixel throughput and 3.1 times faster in texture throughput. These are pure theoretical ceilings, not real-world game results, but they establish the performance envelope for each design.

Memory bandwidth separates the two even more sharply. The Lisuan Tech uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile relies on system shared memory, with bandwidth listed as "System Dependent." In practice, shared memory bandwidth varies with the host platform's memory configuration, but the recorded data shows no fixed figure for the Intel part. The Lisuan's dedicated 432.0 GB/s is a hard number and a clear advantage for data movement.

The shading resources also differ by a wide margin. The Lisuan Tech packs 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile has 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. The Lisuan part has 6 times the shading units, 3 times the TMUs, and 3 times the ROPs. The Intel part does list 8 ray tracing cores, while the Lisuan part lists none, which suggests the Intel architecture carries dedicated RT hardware that the Lisuan design does not specify.

Clock speeds are only partially recorded. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 1950 MHz. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 lists no base or boost clock at all. The Lisuan's memory clock is recorded as 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective, but the core clocks are absent from the database. This missing data limits any frequency-based analysis.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc 140V Mobile is an integrated graphics processor, listed as an IGP with a 37 W TDP. Its design targets portable devices, as indicated by the display output field reading "Portable Device Dependent." The architecture is Xe2-LPG on a 3 nm TSMC process, and the die size is 172 mm². The low power envelope and shared memory setup point toward light workloads, integrated graphics duties, and battery-conscious systems. The presence of 8 ray tracing cores and support for DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 means it is not without modern API coverage, even if raw throughput is limited.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 is a discrete, dual-slot card with a 225 W TDP and a single 8-pin power connector. Its 12 GB of GDDR6 memory with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth gives it a clear edge in any workload that needs large, fast local memory. The 6144 shading units and 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 output position it for heavier compute and higher resolution rendering. The card uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and offers 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, which indicates a desktop-oriented design. The process node is 6 nm TSMC, and the architecture is called TrueGPU.

The use-case split is straightforward. The Intel part wins in power efficiency and integration, since it is an IGP with a 37 W TDP and no separate power connector. The Lisuan part wins in raw throughput, memory bandwidth, and memory capacity. For portable devices where power draw and physical space are constrained, the Intel Arc 140V Mobile is the only viable option of the two. For desktop systems with a 550 W suggested PSU and room for a 294 mm long, dual-slot card, the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 offers dramatically higher compute and pixel rates.

The Lisuan Tech also wins on memory configuration. The 12 GB GDDR6 pool with a 192-bit bus and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth is a fixed, dedicated resource. The Intel part's system shared memory is dependent on the host platform, which introduces variability. In a database comparison, the Lisuan part's memory figures are concrete, while the Intel part's are conditional.

The Verdict

The data shows two parts built for different roles. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile is an integrated GPU for laptops and portables, with a 37 W TDP, shared memory, and a 3 nm process. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 is a discrete desktop card with a 225 W TDP, 12 GB GDDR6, and a 6 nm process. On paper, the Lisuan part dominates every compute and memory metric recorded. Its FP32 output is 24.58 TFLOPS versus 3.994 TFLOPS, its bandwidth is 432.0 GB/s versus system dependent, and its shading unit count is 6144 versus 1024.

The Intel part is not without merit. It uses a smaller process node at 3 nm versus 6 nm, and its power draw is far lower at 37 W versus 225 W. It also has 8 ray tracing cores, which the Lisuan part does not list. For an integrated solution, the Intel Arc 140V Mobile delivers modern API support and a compact design. But the benchmark database contains no direct test results, so the verdict rests on specifications alone.

A buyer needing portable, low-power graphics should choose the Intel Arc 140V Mobile, as it is the only integrated option in this pair. A buyer needing maximum compute throughput, dedicated memory, and high pixel rates should choose the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100. The Lisuan part is larger, heavier, and more power hungry, but the recorded data shows it is in a different performance class.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 performance?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the Intel Arc 140V Mobile has 3.994 TFLOPS.

Q: How much memory does each GPU have?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile uses system shared memory, so its size is listed as "System Shared."

Q: What is the power draw difference?

A: The Intel Arc 140V Mobile has a TDP of 37 W, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has a TDP of 225 W.

Q: Which GPU supports ray tracing?

A: The Intel Arc 140V Mobile lists 8 ray tracing cores. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 does not list any ray tracing cores.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has a memory bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s, based on a 192-bit bus and 2250 MHz memory clock.

Q: Which GPU uses a smaller manufacturing process?

A: The Intel Arc 140V Mobile uses a 3 nm TSMC process, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses a 6 nm TSMC process.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc 140V Mobile uses the Xe2-LPG architecture, part of the Lunar Lake chip, and belongs to the Arc Graphics-M (Lunar Lake) generation. The process node is 3 nm at TSMC, and the die size is 172 mm². The architecture is designed for integrated graphics, with a bus interface listed as IGP and display outputs dependent on the portable device. The API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses a different architecture called TrueGPU, built on the 7G106 chip, and belongs to the 7G100 generation. The process node is 6 nm at TSMC, and the die size is not recorded. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, and the display outputs are 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. The API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3, so Vulkan support differs by one version.

The Intel part's Xe2-LPG architecture includes explicit ray tracing cores, listed as 8, which the TrueGPU architecture does not mention. The Intel part also uses system shared memory, meaning the memory controller relies on the host system's RAM. The Lisuan part uses dedicated GDDR6 memory, which is a fundamental architectural difference in how data is stored and accessed.

The transistor count for both parts is listed as unknown, and the transistor density is not recorded for either. The Intel part has a known die size of 172 mm², while the Lisuan part's die size is unknown. The production status for both is Active.

Specification Differences

The two parts differ across nearly every recorded specification field. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 1950 MHz, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has no base or boost clock recorded. The Lisuan part lists a memory clock of 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective, while the Intel part lists memory as system shared with no clock.

Memory size, type, bus width, and bandwidth all differ. The Intel part uses system shared memory with a system shared bus width and system dependent bandwidth. The Lisuan part uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

The compute units differ: the Intel part has 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, 32 ROPs, and 8 RT cores. The Lisuan part has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, 96 ROPs, and no RT cores listed. The pixel rate is 62.40 GPixel/s for the Intel part and 192.0 GPixel/s for the Lisuan part. The texture rate is 124.8 GTexel/s for the Intel part and 384.0 GTexel/s for the Lisuan part. FP32 is 3.994 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS. FP16 is 7.987 TFLOPS versus 49.15 TFLOPS.

The TDP is 37 W for the Intel part and 225 W for the Lisuan part. The slot width is IGP for the Intel part and dual-slot for the Lisuan part. The Intel part has no power connectors listed, while the Lisuan part uses a single 8-pin connector. The suggested PSU is not listed for the Intel part, but the Lisuan part calls for a 550 W PSU.

The bus interface is IGP for the Intel part and PCIe 4.0 x16 for the Lisuan part. Display outputs are portable device dependent for the Intel part and 4x DisplayPort 1.4a for the Lisuan part. The Lisuan part has recorded physical dimensions: 294 mm in length, 120 mm in height, and 49 mm in width. The Intel part has no dimensions listed, consistent with an integrated design.

The release dates differ. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile launched on 2024-09-23, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has a release date of 2026-06-17. The Intel part lists a predecessor as HD Graphics-M and no successor. The Lisuan part lists no predecessor and no successor. Neither part has a launch MSRP recorded in the database.