AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP vs Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a decisive performance gap between the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP and the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile. The AMD part delivers an average benchmark score of 63,830, while the Intel iGPU has no recorded benchmark entries and an average score of zero. This places the RX 9060 XT LP in the 89th percentile of all GPUs, compared to the Intel part's 50th percentile.

In the Geekbench OpenCL test, the RX 9060 XT LP scores 88,183. In Geekbench Vulkan, it scores 39,476. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no scores recorded for either test, so direct numerical comparisons are impossible. However, the architectural data provides context: the AMD GPU delivers 24.99 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the Intel part delivers 384.0 GFLOPS. That is a 65-fold difference in raw floating-point throughput. Pixel fill rates tell a similar story: 195.2 GPixel/s versus 4.000 GPixel/s, a factor of roughly 49. Texture rate stands at 390.4 GTexel/s versus 12.00 GTexel/s.

The nearest rivals to the RX 9060 XT LP in the database include the NVIDIA CMP 30HX, which scores 63,842 (a 0% delta), and the AMD Radeon RX 7600M at 63,775 (0.1% ahead of the RX 9060 XT LP). The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 scores 63,693 (0.2% ahead). The AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 scores 64,212, which is 0.6% higher. These deltas are small, indicating the RX 9060 XT LP sits in a tight competitive cluster. The Intel part has no nearest rivals listed, reflecting its position outside any comparable performance tier.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from entirely different design philosophies. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP uses the Navi 44 chip built on RDNA 4.0 architecture, part of the Navi IV (RX 9000) generation. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with 29,700 million transistors packed into a 199 mm² die. Transistor density reaches 149.2 million per square millimeter. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses the Twin Lake chip with Xe-LP architecture, part of the HD Graphics-T (Twin Lake) generation. It is built on a 10 nm process at Intel, with transistor count and die size listed as unknown.

The AMD GPU features 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output pipelines. It also includes 32 dedicated ray tracing cores. The Intel part has 192 shading units, 12 TMUs, and 4 ROPs, with no dedicated ray tracing hardware listed. The AMD chip operates at a base clock of 1380 MHz, a boost clock of 3050 MHz, and a game clock of 2450 MHz. The Intel chip runs at a 300 MHz base and 1000 MHz boost.

Memory architecture differs fundamentally. The RX 9060 XT LP uses 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 322.3 GB/s of bandwidth. Memory clocks are 2518 MHz, or 20.1 Gbps effective. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses system shared memory, with the type, bus width, and bandwidth all listed as "System Shared" or "System Dependent." No dedicated VRAM exists on the Intel part.

Power and physical specifications diverge sharply. The AMD GPU has a TDP of 140 W, uses a dual-slot cooler, requires a single 8-pin power connector, and suggests a 300 W power supply. It interfaces via PCIe 5.0 x16. The Intel part has a 6 W TDP, is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with no power connectors, no suggested PSU, and connects via a Ring Bus. Display outputs on the AMD card include 1x HDMI 2.1b and 2x DisplayPort 2.1a, while the Intel part's outputs are listed as "Portable Device Dependent."

API support shows partial overlap. Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4. The AMD GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2); the Intel part supports DirectX 12 (12_1). FP16 compute on the AMD card is 24.99 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio with FP32. The Intel GPU delivers 768.0 GFLOPS FP16 at a 2:1 ratio, meaning half-rate FP16 relative to its FP32 throughput.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP wins every category where data exists. It has higher compute throughput, higher fill rates, dedicated ray tracing cores, and dedicated high-bandwidth memory. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile wins in power efficiency: 6 W versus 140 W TDP, which suits fanless or passively cooled portable devices. It also has a lower base clock of 300 MHz, which may reduce idle power draw.

For gaming workloads, the RX 9060 XT LP's 32 ray tracing cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate support position it for hardware-accelerated ray tracing and modern graphics features. The Intel part's DirectX 12 (12_1) support is a step below Ultimate, which may limit certain feature sets. The AMD card's 16 GB VRAM capacity and 322.3 GB/s bandwidth allow it to handle large textures and high-resolution assets. The Intel iGPU relies on system memory, which creates variable performance depending on the host platform's memory configuration.

For integrated use cases, the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile serves as a basic display output and lightweight compute solution. Its 192 shading units and 4 ROPs handle simple 2D workloads and basic video playback. The RX 9060 XT LP targets discrete GPU workloads requiring sustained throughput.

FAQ

Q: How much faster is the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP than the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile in FP32 compute?

A: The RX 9060 XT LP delivers 24.99 TFLOPS of FP32, while the Intel part delivers 384.0 GFLOPS. The AMD GPU offers roughly 65 times the FP32 throughput.

Q: Does the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile have any dedicated VRAM?

A: No. Its memory size, type, and bus width are all listed as "System Shared," and bandwidth is "System Dependent." It uses the host system's memory rather than a dedicated frame buffer.

Q: What is the percentile ranking for each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP sits in the 89th percentile of all GPUs. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile sits in the 50th percentile.

Q: Does the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP support ray tracing?

A: Yes. It includes 32 dedicated ray tracing cores. The Intel part lists no ray tracing cores.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP has a TDP of 140 W. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has a TDP of 6 W.

Q: Which API versions do they support?

A: Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4. The AMD card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the Intel card supports DirectX 12 (12_1).

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ in nearly every measurable specification.

Process node: The AMD RX 9060 XT LP uses a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses a 10 nm process at Intel.

Transistor count: AMD lists 29,700 million transistors on a 199 mm² die. Intel lists transistor count and die size as unknown.

Shading units: AMD has 2,048; Intel has 192.

Texture mapping units: AMD has 128; Intel has 12.

Raster output pipelines: AMD has 64; Intel has 4.

Ray tracing cores: AMD has 32; Intel has none listed.

Base clock: AMD runs at 1380 MHz; Intel runs at 300 MHz.

Boost clock: AMD runs at 3050 MHz; Intel runs at 1000 MHz.

Game clock: AMD lists 2450 MHz; Intel lists none.

Memory size: AMD has 16 GB GDDR6; Intel uses system shared memory.

Memory bus width: AMD uses 128 bit; Intel uses system shared.

Memory bandwidth: AMD delivers 322.3 GB/s; Intel is system dependent.

Pixel rate: AMD achieves 195.2 GPixel/s; Intel achieves 4.000 GPixel/s.

Texture rate: AMD achieves 390.4 GTexel/s; Intel achieves 12.00 GTexel/s.

FP32 performance: AMD delivers 24.99 TFLOPS; Intel delivers 384.0 GFLOPS.

FP16 performance: AMD delivers 24.99 TFLOPS (1:1); Intel delivers 768.0 GFLOPS (2:1).

TDP: AMD is 140 W; Intel is 6 W.

Slot width: AMD is dual-slot; Intel is IGP.

Power connectors: AMD uses 1x 8-pin; Intel has none.

Suggested PSU: AMD suggests 300 W; Intel lists none.

Bus interface: AMD uses PCIe 5.0 x16; Intel uses Ring Bus.

Display outputs: AMD has 1x HDMI 2.1b and 2x DisplayPort 2.1a; Intel is portable device dependent.

DirectX support: AMD supports 12 Ultimate (12_2); Intel supports 12 (12_1).

Release date: AMD launched on 2025-12-16; Intel launched on 2024-12-31.

The Verdict

The data shows a clear split. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP is a discrete GPU for sustained, high-throughput workloads. Its 89th percentile ranking, 24.99 TFLOPS FP32, 32 ray tracing cores, and 16 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory make it suitable for gaming, content creation, and compute tasks. Its nearest rivals, such as the NVIDIA CMP 30HX and AMD Radeon RX 7600M, sit within 0.6% of its average score, confirming it competes at a specific performance tier.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is an integrated solution for low-power portable devices. Its 6 W TDP, 192 shading units, and reliance on system shared memory place it at the 50th percentile. It has no recorded benchmarks and no rivals in the database. It handles basic graphics output and light compute, but its 4.000 GPixel/s pixel rate and 384.0 GFLOPS FP32 limit it to undemanding tasks.

Users who need dedicated graphics performance, ray tracing, high-bandwidth memory, or competitive benchmark scores should select the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP. Users who need minimal power draw in an integrated form factor, such as thin-and-light laptops, will find the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile appropriate. The two parts address different markets, and their specifications reflect that divergence.