AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE vs Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE and Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile occupy entirely different segments of the GPU spectrum, and the recorded data reflects that divide clearly. The RX 7650 GRE is a discrete, dual-slot add-in board with 8 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory, a 128-bit bus, and 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. It posts an average benchmark score of 42723 and sits at the 83rd percentile of all GPUs in the database. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is an integrated processor graphics solution built into the Twin Lake chip, sharing system memory with a bandwidth described as system dependent, and it carries an average benchmark score of 0 with no recorded benchmark entries.

The RX 7650 GRE wins outright in every measurable category where data exists. It has 2048 shading units against Intel's 192, 128 texture mapping units versus 12, and 64 ROPs versus 4. The AMD part also has 32 ray tracing cores, while the Intel part lists no ray tracing hardware. In floating-point throughput, the RX 7650 GRE delivers 22.08 TFLOPS FP32, while the Intel part manages 384.0 GFLOPS FP32, a 57.5x difference. The AMD card's pixel rate of 172.5 GPixel/s dwarfs the Intel's 4.000 GPixel/s, and the texture rate of 345.0 GTexel/s compared to 12.00 GTexel/s shows a similar gap.

The Intel part's only advantages are in power draw and form factor. Its 6 W TDP and IGP slot width make it suitable for portable devices, where display outputs are described as portable device dependent. The RX 7650 GRE requires 170 W, a dual-slot cooler, a single 8-pin power connector, and a suggested 450 W power supply. For a system that needs graphics without a discrete card, the Intel solution works; for any performance-critical task, the database shows the AMD card is the only option with meaningful results.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different manufacturers, different foundries, and different design philosophies. The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE uses the Navi 33 chip on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It is built on a 6 nm process at TSMC, with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 65.2M per mm². The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses the Twin Lake chip on the Xe-LP architecture, built on a 10 nm process at Intel, with transistor count and die size listed as unknown.

The memory architecture could not be more different. The AMD card uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, with memory clocks at 2250 MHz and 18 Gbps effective, delivering 288.0 GB/s. The Intel part uses system shared memory, with a bus width described as system shared, and bandwidth described as system dependent. This means the Intel part's memory performance depends entirely on the host system's RAM configuration, while the AMD card has dedicated, fixed-bandwidth memory.

Clock behavior also differs substantially. The RX 7650 GRE has a base clock of 1720 MHz, a boost clock of 2695 MHz, and a game clock of 2350 MHz. The Intel part has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 1000 MHz. The AMD card's boost clock is 2.7x higher than Intel's, and its base clock is 5.7x higher than Intel's base.

The feature sets show generational gaps. The AMD card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the Intel part supports DirectX 12 (12_1). Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4. The AMD card has 32 ray tracing cores, while the Intel part lists none. The AMD card also has dedicated display outputs: 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, while the Intel part's display outputs are portable device dependent.

The bus interface differs as well. The AMD card uses PCIe 4.0 x8, while the Intel part uses a Ring Bus. The AMD card's release date is 2025-02-06, while the Intel part's release date is 2024-12-31, making Intel the earlier release by about five weeks. The AMD card's predecessor is Navi II and successor is Navi IV, while the Intel part lists no predecessor or successor in the database.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between these two products. The headToHeadBenchmarks array is empty, and both winsA and winsB are zero. This is consistent with the absence of any benchmark scores for the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile, which has an empty benchmarks array and an average benchmark score of 0.

What the database does provide is a percentile comparison. The RX 7650 GRE sits at the 83rd percentile of all GPUs, indicating it performs better than roughly four out of five GPUs in the database. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile sits at the 50th percentile, exactly the median. However, the Intel part's average benchmark score of 0 suggests this percentile may reflect the absence of recorded performance data rather than actual measured performance.

For the RX 7650 GRE, two specific benchmark scores are recorded. In 3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12, it scores 2336. In geekbench_opencl, it scores 83109. These are the only raw performance numbers in the database for either product. The Intel part has no comparable scores.

The nearest rivals for the RX 7650 GRE provide context for its performance tier. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER has an average score of 43223, which is 1.2% higher than the AMD card's 42723. The NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB scores 43262, also 1.2% higher. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile scores 43268, 1.3% higher, and the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 scores 43301, 1.3% higher. This cluster of rivals within roughly 1.3% of the RX 7650 GRE indicates the AMD card sits in a competitive performance band, slightly below these specific NVIDIA parts but within a narrow margin.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no nearest rivals listed, which means the database contains no comparable products for it. This absence of comparison data reinforces that the Intel part is not positioned for performance benchmarking but rather for basic integrated graphics duties in portable devices.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE has an average benchmark score of 42723. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has an average benchmark score of 0.

Q: What is the FP32 performance difference between the two?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE delivers 22.08 TFLOPS FP32, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile delivers 384.0 GFLOPS FP32. The AMD card is approximately 57.5 times higher.

Q: Do both GPUs support ray tracing?

A: No. The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE has 32 ray tracing cores. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile lists no ray tracing cores.

Q: What is the power consumption of each part?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE has a TDP of 170 W and requires a suggested 450 W power supply. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has a TDP of 6 W and has no suggested power supply listed.

Q: What memory does each GPU use?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile supports DirectX 12 (12_1), which is a lower feature level.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ in nearly every specification field recorded in the database.

| Specification | AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE | Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile |

|---|---|---|

| Manufacturer | AMD | Intel |

| Chip | Navi 33 | Twin Lake |

| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Xe-LP |

| Generation | Navi III (RX 7000) | HD Graphics-T (Twin Lake) |

| Process node | 6 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Transistors | 13,300 million | unknown |

| Die size | 204 mm² | unknown |

| Base clock | 1720 MHz | 300 MHz |

| Boost clock | 2695 MHz | 1000 MHz |

| Game clock | 2350 MHz | none |

| Memory size | 8 GB | System Shared |

| Memory type | GDDR6 | System Shared |

| Memory bus | 128 bit | System Shared |

| Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | System Dependent |

| Shading units | 2048 | 192 |

| TMUs | 128 | 12 |

| ROPs | 64 | 4 |

| Ray tracing cores | 32 | none |

| Pixel rate | 172.5 GPixel/s | 4.000 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 345.0 GTexel/s | 12.00 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 22.08 TFLOPS | 384.0 GFLOPS |

| FP16 | 22.08 TFLOPS (1:1) | 768.0 GFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 170 W | 6 W |

| Slot width | Dual-slot | IGP |

| Power connectors | 1x 8-pin | none |

| Suggested PSU | 450 W | none |

| Bus interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | Ring Bus |

| Display outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1 | Portable Device Dependent |

| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_1) |

| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |

| Release date | 2025-02-06 | 2024-12-31 |

| Launch MSRP | 279 USD | none |

| Percentile | 83rd | 50th |

| Average benchmark score | 42723 | 0 |

The Verdict

The data presents a clear separation of roles. The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE is a performance-oriented discrete GPU with recorded benchmark scores, a competitive position near the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER (1.2% lower average score), and a feature set that includes ray tracing, DirectX 12 Ultimate, and dedicated GDDR6 memory. Its 83rd percentile ranking places it well above the median GPU in the database.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is an integrated solution with no recorded benchmark scores, no nearest rivals, and a 50th percentile ranking that appears to reflect the absence of performance data rather than measured capability. Its 6 W TDP and IGP form factor make it suitable for portable devices where power draw and space are primary constraints, not performance.

For any workload requiring measurable graphics performance, the RX 7650 GRE is the only option with data to support it. The Intel part serves a different purpose: basic display output in portable systems where a discrete GPU cannot fit. The specification differences confirm this split. The AMD card's 2048 shading units, 32 ray tracing cores, and 288.0 GB/s of dedicated bandwidth support demanding applications, while the Intel part's 192 shading units and system shared memory handle fundamental display tasks.

The recorded data does not support a direct performance comparison because no head-to-head benchmarks exist. The nearest rivals for the RX 7650 GRE all come from NVIDIA and sit within 1.3% of its average score, indicating the AMD card competes in a specific performance tier. The Intel part has no comparable products in the database, which suggests it is not evaluated in the same context. Buyers seeking a GPU for gaming, rendering, or compute workloads should select the RX 7650 GRE based on its benchmark presence and feature set. Buyers seeking integrated graphics for a portable device should consider the Intel part based on its power characteristics, but the database provides no performance evidence for it.