Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB Comparison

FAQ

Q: What is the architectural generation difference between these two GPUs?

A: The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses the Xe-LP architecture on a 10 nm process from Intel, belonging to the HD Graphics-T (Twin Lake) generation. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB uses Blackwell 2.0 architecture on a 5 nm process from TSMC, belonging to the GeForce 50 series.

Q: How do the shading unit counts compare?

A: The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has 192 shading units, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB has 4608 shading units. This represents a 24-fold difference in raw shader hardware.

Q: What memory configurations do these GPUs use?

A: The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses System Shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB uses 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the FP32 compute performance difference?

A: The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile delivers 384.0 GFLOPS of FP32 compute. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB delivers 23.70 TFLOPS, which is roughly 61.7 times higher.

Q: What is the launch date and MSRP of the NVIDIA card?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB launched on April 16, 2025, with a launch MSRP of 379 USD. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile launched on January 1, 2025.

Q: How do the benchmark percentiles compare?

A: The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has a percentile rank of 50 among all GPUs, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB sits at percentile 29. The NVIDIA card has an average benchmark score of 4901, whereas the Intel part has a recorded average benchmark score of 0.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs represent entirely different design philosophies and market segments. Intel's Graphics 24EU Mobile is an integrated graphics processor built on the Xe-LP architecture, fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process. It is part of the HD Graphics-T (Twin Lake) generation and uses a Ring Bus interface. This is a low-power IGP solution with a 6 W TDP, designed to be embedded in portable devices. The chip has 192 shading units, 12 texture mapping units, and only 4 ROPs. It supports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

NVIDIA's GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB is a discrete add-in board based on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process. The GB206 chip contains 21,900 million transistors on a 181 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 121.0M per mm². This GPU is equipped with 4608 shading units, 144 TMUs, 48 ROPs, 36 RT cores, and 144 tensor cores. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The board uses a PCIe 5.0 x8 interface and is a dual-slot design measuring 241 mm in length, 111 mm in height, and 40 mm in width.

The Intel part has no dedicated RT or tensor cores, reflecting its integrated nature and focus on basic graphics output. The NVIDIA card includes dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI workloads. The memory subsystem differs fundamentally: Intel uses System Shared memory with bandwidth described as System Dependent, while NVIDIA uses dedicated 8 GB GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus delivering 448.0 GB/s. Clock speeds also diverge sharply, with Intel's base clock at 300 MHz and boost at 1000 MHz, versus NVIDIA's base clock of 2407 MHz and boost of 2572 MHz. The NVIDIA memory clock is 1750 MHz, translating to 28 Gbps effective.

The Verdict

The benchmark data indicates these two products serve completely different purposes. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is an integrated solution with a 6 W TDP, no dedicated memory, and a 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs. Its average benchmark score is recorded as 0, meaning no standardized benchmarks have been logged in the database for this part. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB, by contrast, is a discrete graphics card with a 180 W TDP, 8 GB of GDDR7 memory, and a 29th percentile ranking. Its average benchmark score is 4901.

The NVIDIA card's nearest rivals in the database are AMD FirePro W5130M (average score 4904, delta -0.1%), NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 (average score 4893, delta 0.2%), AMD Radeon R7 M265 (average score 4929, delta -0.6%), and AMD Radeon R7 M360 (average score 4931, delta -0.6%). This places the RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB in a performance band where it is effectively tied with older mobile and entry-level discrete GPUs, despite its modern architecture.

For users requiring dedicated graphics performance, the NVIDIA card is the only option with recorded benchmark scores. The Intel part has no benchmark entries, so its measured performance cannot be quantified from the database. The data shows that the RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB is positioned among mid-range mobile GPUs from previous generations, while the Intel IGP is best understood as a basic display output solution for portable devices. The choice between them is dictated by the host platform: the Intel part is embedded and cannot be upgraded, while the NVIDIA card is a standalone PCIe add-in board.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Xe-LP | Blackwell 2.0 |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 5 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Transistors | Unknown | 21,900 million |

| Die Size | Unknown | 181 mm² |

| Transistor Density | N/A | 121.0M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 300 MHz | 2407 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 2572 MHz |

| Memory Size | System Shared | 8 GB |

| Memory Type | System Shared | GDDR7 |

| Memory Bus Width | System Shared | 128 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | 448.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 192 | 4608 |

| TMUs | 12 | 144 |

| ROPs | 4 | 48 |

| RT Cores | None | 36 |

| Tensor Cores | None | 144 |

| Pixel Rate | 4.000 GPixel/s | 123.5 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 12.00 GTexel/s | 370.4 GTexel/s |

| FP32 Compute | 384.0 GFLOPS | 23.70 TFLOPS |

| FP16 Compute | 768.0 GFLOPS (2:1) | 23.70 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 6 W | 180 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |

| Suggested PSU | None | 450 W |

| Bus Interface | Ring Bus | PCIe 5.0 x8 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b |

| DirectX Support | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |

| Release Date | 2025-01-01 | 2025-04-16 |

| Launch MSRP | None | 379 USD |

| Predecessor | None | GeForce 40 |

| Successor | None | GeForce 60 |

The specification table shows that every meaningful performance-related parameter favors the NVIDIA card. The Intel part has no discrete memory, no RT cores, no tensor cores, and no power connectors. The NVIDIA card requires a 450 W suggested power supply and uses a single 8-pin connector.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries between the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB. The Intel part has an empty benchmarks array and an average benchmark score of 0. The NVIDIA card has eight recorded benchmark scores, which provide the only quantitative comparison available.

In 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12), the RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB scores 4019. In PassMark tests, the scores are: DirectX 10 at 142, DirectX 11 at 220, DirectX 12 at 82, DirectX 9 at 228, G2D at 1169, G3D at 21981, and GPU Compute at 11365. These results show that the highest PassMark score comes from G3D, while the lowest comes from DirectX 12.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB's average score of 4901 is essentially identical to the AMD FirePro W5130M at 4904, a delta of -0.1%. It is 0.2% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 (4893), and 0.6% ahead of both the AMD Radeon R7 M265 (4929) and the AMD Radeon R7 M360 (4931). The data shows that this modern Blackwell GPU performs on par with mobile GPUs from several generations ago.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no benchmark scores, so its performance cannot be compared numerically. The only recorded data for it is the 50th percentile ranking, which places it in the middle of the database's GPU distribution despite having no measured scores. This percentile figure likely reflects its integrated status rather than actual performance.

The FP32 compute figures provide the clearest mathematical contrast: 384.0 GFLOPS versus 23.70 TFLOPS. The pixel rate difference is similarly stark at 4.000 GPixel/s versus 123.5 GPixel/s, a factor of nearly 31. The texture rate comparison shows 12.00 GTexel/s versus 370.4 GTexel/s, a factor of roughly 30.9. These raw throughput numbers indicate that the NVIDIA card is designed for substantial rendering workloads, while the Intel IGP is suited only to basic display output and light 2D tasks.