AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE

CORE STATE Navi 33
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2695 MHz
TDP 170 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.0
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile

CORE STATE GB205
VRAM 12 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1447 MHz
TDP 60 W
BUS WIDTH 192 bit
ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
2,336
N/A
geekbench_opencl
83,109
143,870
geekbench_vulkan
N/A
139,213
passmark_directx_10
N/A
151
passmark_directx_11
N/A
237
passmark_directx_12
N/A
102
passmark_directx_9
N/A
259
passmark_g2d
N/A
981
passmark_g3d
N/A
24,004
passmark_gpu_compute
N/A
10,101

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile

The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile occupy strikingly different positions in the GPU landscape despite arriving within weeks of each other in early 2025. The RX 7650 GRE, released on February 6, 2025, is a desktop card built on the Navi 33 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture, carrying a launch MSRP of 279 USD. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, released on February 22, 2025, is an integrated mobile part built on the GB205 chip with Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The recorded data shows only one benchmark where the two overlap directly, and in that test the NVIDIA part wins decisively. The broader database picture, however, is more nuanced, with the AMD card holding a higher percentile ranking against all GPUs in the database.

Where Each One Wins

The head-to-head record is unambiguous where measurements exist. In Geekbench OpenCL, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile scores 143,870 against the RX 7650 GRE's 83,109, a 42.2 percent advantage for NVIDIA. That is the only shared benchmark in the database between these two parts, so the direct win count stands at one for NVIDIA and zero for AMD.

Where the RX 7650 GRE wins is in raw specification throughput. Its higher clock speeds translate into a pixel fill rate of 172.5 GPixel/s versus 115.8 GPixel/s for the mobile part, and a texture rate of 345.0 GTexel/s versus 266.2 GTexel/s. Its FP32 compute output of 22.08 TFLOPS also exceeds the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's 17.04 TFLOPS, and FP16 performance is identical to FP32 on both cards at a 1:1 ratio. For workloads that scale with traditional shading throughput and clock speed rather than parallel width, the AMD card holds the edge on paper.

The database percentile rankings add another layer. The RX 7650 GRE sits in the 83rd percentile against all GPUs, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile sits in the 80th percentile. The average benchmark scores, 42,723 for AMD and 35,435 for NVIDIA, favor the Radeon by roughly 20 percent. The caveat is that these averages are computed across different benchmark sets, since each card has been tested in different suites, so the comparison is indicative rather than strictly controlled.

The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile also wins on features that matter for modern rendering workloads. It carries 184 tensor cores and 46 RT cores, while the RX 7650 GRE has no tensor cores at all and only 32 RT cores. Anything that leans on AI acceleration or heavier ray tracing hardware will favor the Blackwell part.

Architecture Differences

These two GPUs could hardly be more architecturally distinct. The RX 7650 GRE uses AMD's RDNA 3.0 architecture on the Navi 33 chip, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process. It packs 13,300 million transistors into a 204 mm² die, yielding a density of 65.2 million transistors per square millimeter. It belongs to the Radeon RX 7000 series, following the Navi II generation and preceding Navi IV.

The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses NVIDIA's Blackwell 2.0 architecture on the GB205 chip, built on TSMC's 5 nm process. It contains 31,100 million transistors in a 263 mm² die, a density of 118.3 million transistors per square millimeter, nearly double the density of the AMD part. The generational leap in process node is the single biggest architectural differentiator here, letting NVIDIA fit far more hardware into a modestly larger die while targeting a 60 W thermal envelope.

The core counts reflect opposite design philosophies. AMD relies on fewer, faster units: 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, all clocked high, with a base clock of 1720 MHz, a game clock of 2350 MHz, and a boost clock of 2695 MHz. NVIDIA goes wide and slow: 5888 shading units, 184 TMUs, and 80 ROPs, running at a base clock of 847 MHz and a boost of 1447 MHz. NVIDIA also brings 184 tensor cores for AI workloads, something the AMD card lacks entirely, plus 46 RT cores against AMD's 32.

Memory subsystems diverge sharply too. The RX 7650 GRE uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus running at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective), producing 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses 12 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective), delivering 672.0 GB/s, more than twice the bandwidth plus 50 percent more capacity. Both parts support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The direct comparison is short but lopsided. In Geekbench OpenCL, the only test both cards have recorded entries for, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile scored 143,870 and the RX 7650 GRE scored 83,109. The delta is 42.2 percent in NVIDIA's favor. Benchmark results indicate that the mobile part's vastly larger shading count, 5888 units versus 2048, and its 672.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth overwhelm the AMD card's clock speed advantage in compute workloads.

The rest of the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's recorded results provide context for its standing. It scored 139,213 in Geekbench Vulkan, 24,004 in PassMark G3D, 981 in PassMark G2D, 10,101 in PassMark GPU Compute, and 259, 237, 151, and 102 in PassMark DirectX 9, 11, 10, and 12 respectively. Its average benchmark score of 35,435 places it within a tight cluster of rivals: the Quadro GV100 sits just 0.2 percent ahead, the Radeon Pro Duo 1.2 percent ahead, the NVIDIA A2 2.1 percent behind, and the T1000 2.4 percent ahead.

The RX 7650 GRE's recorded results include 2336 in 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12) and its 83,109 Geekbench OpenCL score. Its average of 42,723 puts it in equally tight company: the RTX 4070 SUPER and Quadro M6000 24 GB are both 1.2 percent ahead, the RTX 5050 Mobile is 1.3 percent ahead, and the Quadro M6000 is 1.3 percent ahead. In other words, the AMD card trades blows with desktop RTX 4070 SUPER-class hardware in the database averages, while the NVIDIA mobile part matches professional workstation cards like the Quadro GV100. Against each other, though, the single shared benchmark goes to NVIDIA by a wide margin.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ in nearly every specification that matters:

  • Process node: 6 nm (AMD) versus 5 nm (NVIDIA), both on TSMC
  • Transistors: 13,300 million versus 31,100 million
  • Die size: 204 mm² versus 263 mm²
  • Shading units: 2048 versus 5888
  • TMUs: 128 versus 184
  • ROPs: 64 versus 80
  • RT cores: 32 versus 46
  • Tensor cores: none versus 184
  • Memory: 8 GB GDDR6, 128-bit, 288.0 GB/s versus 12 GB GDDR7, 192-bit, 672.0 GB/s
  • Memory speed: 18 Gbps effective versus 28 Gbps effective
  • Base/boost clocks: 1720/2695 MHz versus 847/1447 MHz
  • FP32 compute: 22.08 TFLOPS versus 17.04 TFLOPS
  • Pixel rate: 172.5 versus 115.8 GPixel/s
  • Texture rate: 345.0 versus 266.2 GTexel/s
  • TDP: 170 W desktop card versus 60 W integrated mobile part
  • Bus interface: PCIe 4.0 x8 versus PCIe 5.0 x16
  • Form factor: dual-slot card with one 8-pin connector and a suggested 450 W PSU versus an IGP with no power connectors
  • Display outputs: 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1 versus portable-device-dependent outputs
  • Dimensions: 204 mm long and 115 mm tall versus not applicable, being an integrated part

Both remain in active production, support the same API feature level, and launched within the same month.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU wins the only direct benchmark comparison between them?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile. In Geekbench OpenCL it scored 143,870 versus 83,109 for the RX 7650 GRE, a 42.2 percent margin.

Q: Which card has the higher average benchmark score and percentile in the database?

A: The RX 7650 GRE, with an average of 42,723 and an 83rd percentile ranking, versus 35,435 and the 80th percentile for the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile.

Q: Which GPU has more raw FP32 compute throughput?

A: The RX 7650 GRE, at 22.08 TFLOPS versus 17.04 TFLOPS, thanks to its much higher clock speeds despite having fewer shading units.

Q: How do their memory subsystems compare?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is far ahead: 12 GB of GDDR7 with 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth on a 192-bit bus, versus 8 GB of GDDR6 with 288.0 GB/s on a 128-bit bus.

Q: Which GPU has AI acceleration hardware?

A: Only the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, which includes 184 tensor cores. The RX 7650 GRE has no tensor cores.

Q: What kind of power delivery does each require?

A: The RX 7650 GRE is a 170 W desktop card using one 8-pin connector with a suggested 450 W PSU. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is a 60 W integrated mobile part requiring no power connectors.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RX 7650 GRE
RTX 5070 Ti Mobile
Core Specs
Shading Units
2,048
5,888 +187.5%
Shaders
2,048
5,888 +187.5%
TMUs
128
184 +43.8%
ROPs
64
80 +25.0%
Compute Units
32
—
SM Count
—
46
Clocks
Base Clock
1720 MHz
847 MHz
Boost Clock
2695 MHz
1447 MHz
Game Clock
2350 MHz
—
Shader Clock
2350 MHz
—
Memory Clock
2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective
1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
8 GB
12 GB
VRAM (MB)
8,192
12,288 +50.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR7
Memory Bus
128 bit
192 bit
Bandwidth
288.0 GB/s
672.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
2 MB
48 MB
L3 Cache
32 MB
—
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
—
Performance
Pixel Rate
172.5 GPixel/s
115.8 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
345.0 GTexel/s
266.2 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
22.08 TFLOPS
17.04 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
689.9 GFLOPS (1:32)
266.2 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
22.08 TFLOPS (1:1)
17.04 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
32
46 +43.8%
Tensor Cores
—
184
Matrix Cores
64
—
Power
TDP
170 W
60 W
TDP (W)
170
60 -64.7%
Suggested PSU
450 W
—
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
None
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
Blackwell 2.0
GPU Name
Navi 33
GB205
Codename
Hotpink Bonefish
—
Generation
Navi III (RX 7000)
GeForce 50 Mobile
Process Size
6 nm
5 nm
Transistors
13,300 million
31,100 million
Die Size
204 mm²
263 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
65.2M / mm²
118.3M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.2
3.0
CUDA
—
12.0
Shader Model
6.9
6.9
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
IGP
Length
204 mm 8 inches
—
Height
115 mm 4.5 inches
—
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a3x DisplayPort 2.1
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 5.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
279 USD
—
Production
Active
Active
Predecessor
Navi II
GeForce 40 Mobile
Successor
Navi IV
—
View Radeon RX 7650 GRE Details View GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile Details