AMD Radeon PRO V710 vs Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a decisive performance gap between these two parts, though direct comparison is limited by the fact that the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 delivers an average benchmark score of 58,657, while the Intel part sits at 0 due to missing entries. The AMD card occupies the 88th percentile among all GPUs, whereas the Intel integrated graphics lands at the 50th percentile.

In the two recorded tests for the AMD Radeon PRO V710, the results are substantial. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test yields a score of 853, while the Geekbench OpenCL score reaches 116,460. These figures place the card in the upper tier of the database's ranking. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no corresponding entries, so no direct head-to-head scores exist.

The nearest rivals for the AMD Radeon PRO V710 provide context for its positioning. The NVIDIA P102-100 averages 58,528, which is 0.2% behind the AMD card. The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT follows at 58,392, a 0.5% deficit. The Intel Arc A570M trails by 0.7% at 58,239, and the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM rounds out the group at 58,085, 1% behind. These deltas are narrow, indicating that the Radeon PRO V710 sits within a tightly clustered band of comparable performers.

The FP32 compute figures illustrate the magnitude of the difference. The Radeon PRO V710 delivers 27.65 TFLOPS, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile manages 384.0 GFLOPS. That is a ratio of roughly 72 to 1 in raw shading throughput. Texture rate shows a similar chasm: 432.0 GTexel/s versus 12.00 GTexel/s, a 36-fold advantage. Pixel rate stands at 192.0 GPixel/s for the AMD part versus 4.000 GPixel/s for the Intel chip, a 48-fold spread.

Memory bandwidth amplifies the disparity. The Radeon PRO V710 uses 28 GB of GDDR6 on a 224-bit bus, producing 504.0 GB/s. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile relies on system shared memory, with bandwidth listed as system dependent. No fixed number exists for the Intel side, but the architectural difference is categorical: dedicated VRAM versus shared system resources.

Clock behavior also diverges sharply. The AMD card runs at a 1900 MHz base and 2000 MHz boost, while the Intel part operates at 300 MHz base and 1000 MHz boost. Even at boost, the Intel chip reaches only half the AMD card's base clock.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 records an average benchmark score of 58,657, placing it in the 88th percentile. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no benchmark scores in the database, giving it an average of 0 and a 50th percentile ranking.

Q: How do the shading unit counts compare?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has 3,456 shading units, 216 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation pipelines. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has 192 shading units, 12 TMUs, and 4 ROPs. The AMD card also features 54 ray tracing cores, while the Intel part lists none.

Q: What memory configurations do these GPUs use?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 ships with 28 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 224-bit bus, delivering 504.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses system shared memory with a system dependent bandwidth figure and a system shared bus width.

Q: Which GPU has the higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 boosts to 2000 MHz from a 1900 MHz base. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile boosts to 1000 MHz from a 300 MHz base. The AMD card's boost clock is double the Intel part's boost clock.

Q: Are the API support levels different?

A: Both support DirectX 12, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile supports DirectX 12 (12_1). The AMD card's ray tracing hardware aligns with its higher-tier API designation.

Q: What are the power requirements for each?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has a TDP of 158 W, uses a single 8-pin power connector, and requires a suggested 450 W power supply. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has a 6 W TDP, uses no power connectors, and lists no suggested power supply since it is an integrated graphics processor.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 uses the RDNA 3.0 architecture on a 5 nm process at TSMC, built around the Navi 32 chip with the codename Wheat Nas. It belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi generation. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses the Xe-LP architecture on a 10 nm process at Intel, built around the Twin Lake chip, and belongs to the HD Graphics-T generation.

Transistor counts reveal the scale gap. The AMD card contains 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 81.2 million per square millimeter. The Intel part lists its transistor count and die size as unknown. The process node difference alone, 5 nm versus 10 nm, indicates a generational manufacturing advantage for the AMD part.

Compute resources diverge across every unit type. The AMD card has 3,456 shading units, 216 TMUs, 96 ROPs, and 54 ray tracing cores. The Intel part has 192 shading units, 12 TMUs, and 4 ROPs, with no ray tracing cores listed. The FP32 throughput of 27.65 TFLOPS for AMD compares with 384.0 GFLOPS for Intel, and the FP16 figures show 27.65 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio versus 768.0 GFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio.

Memory architecture is a defining difference. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 uses dedicated 28 GB GDDR6 with a 224-bit bus and 504.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses system shared memory with no dedicated VRAM, a system shared bus width, and system dependent bandwidth. This affects not just capacity but also latency and bandwidth determinism.

Physical and power characteristics separate the two as well. The AMD card is a single-slot add-in board with a 1x 8-pin power connector, a 158 W TDP, and a suggested 450 W power supply. It uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface and has no display outputs, indicating a compute-focused or render-farm role. The Intel part is an integrated graphics processor with a 6 W TDP, a Ring Bus interface, and portable device dependent display outputs.

Release timing differs by roughly three months. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 launched on October 2, 2024, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile launched on December 31, 2024. The AMD card's predecessor is listed as the Radeon Pro Vega, while the Intel part has no predecessor listed. Production status for the AMD card is not recorded, while the Intel part is marked as active.

The Verdict

The data positions these two products in entirely different segments. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 is a discrete, high-throughput compute card aimed at professional workloads that require substantial FP32 power, large dedicated memory, and ray tracing support. Its 88th percentile ranking and narrow deltas against the NVIDIA P102-100, AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, Intel Arc A570M, and AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM indicate it competes in the upper midrange of discrete GPUs.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is an integrated solution for portable devices, with a 6 W TDP, no dedicated memory, and minimal compute resources. Its 50th percentile ranking and absence of benchmark scores reflect its entry-level positioning. The 192 shading units, 4 ROPs, and 384.0 GFLOPS FP32 output are appropriate for basic display and light acceleration tasks, not for intensive rendering or compute workloads.

The choice between them depends on the use case. For workloads requiring dedicated GPU compute, high memory bandwidth, and ray tracing, the AMD Radeon PRO V710 is the only viable option from the recorded data. For power-constrained mobile applications where integrated graphics suffice, the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile fits that role. The two do not overlap in performance, power, or intended deployment.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon PRO V710 | Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Xe-LP |

| Process node | 5 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Transistors | 28,100 million | unknown |

| Die size | 346 mm² | unknown |

| Base clock | 1900 MHz | 300 MHz |

| Boost clock | 2000 MHz | 1000 MHz |

| Memory size | 28 GB | System Shared |

| Memory type | GDDR6 | System Shared |

| Memory bus width | 224 bit | System Shared |

| Memory bandwidth | 504.0 GB/s | System Dependent |

| Shading units | 3,456 | 192 |

| TMUs | 216 | 12 |

| ROPs | 96 | 4 |

| Ray tracing cores | 54 | null |

| FP32 | 27.65 TFLOPS | 384.0 GFLOPS |

| FP16 | 27.65 TFLOPS (1:1) | 768.0 GFLOPS (2:1) |

| Pixel rate | 192.0 GPixel/s | 4.000 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 432.0 GTexel/s | 12.00 GTexel/s |

| TDP | 158 W | 6 W |

| Slot width | Single-slot | IGP |

| Power connectors | 1x 8-pin | null |

| Suggested PSU | 450 W | null |

| Bus interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | Ring Bus |

| Display outputs | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |

| DirectX support | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_1) |

| OpenGL support | 4.6 | 4.6 |

| Vulkan support | 1.4 | 1.4 |

| Release date | 2024-10-02 | 2024-12-31 |

| Production status | null | Active |