AMD Radeon PRO V710 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains one direct head-to-head benchmark between the AMD Radeon PRO V710 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile: Geekbench OpenCL. The NVIDIA part wins this test with a score of 143870 against the AMD part's 116460, a margin of 19.1 percent. This is the only shared benchmark result in the database, so the overall head-to-head win count favors NVIDIA by 1 to 0.

The Geekbench OpenCL result is a compute workload, meaning it measures raw throughput rather than graphics-specific performance. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's 143870 score places it comfortably ahead, and the 19.1 percent delta is substantial. For context, the AMD Radeon PRO V710's average benchmark score across all recorded tests is 58657, while the NVIDIA part's average is 35435. This discrepancy reflects the different benchmark sets each card was tested with, not a direct comparison. The AMD card was tested in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 (score 853) and Geekbench OpenCL, while the NVIDIA card has a broader suite including multiple PassMark tests, Geekbench OpenCL, and Geekbench Vulkan.

Looking at the percentile rankings, the AMD Radeon PRO V710 sits at the 88th percentile of all GPUs, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile sits at the 80th percentile. This indicates that the AMD card, despite losing the one direct comparison, performs better relative to the entire GPU landscape in the database. The AMD card's nearest rivals include the NVIDIA P102-100 (0.2 percent ahead), the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (0.5 percent ahead), the Intel Arc A570M (0.7 percent ahead), and the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (1 percent ahead). All four rivals are within a single percentage point, showing that the AMD card's average score is tightly clustered with these parts.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's nearest rivals are the NVIDIA Quadro GV100 (0.2 percent behind), the AMD Radeon Pro Duo (1.2 percent behind), the NVIDIA A2 (2.1 percent ahead), and the NVIDIA T1000 (2.4 percent behind). This cluster is tighter than the AMD card's, with all rivals within 2.4 percent. The NVIDIA part's average score of 35435 is dragged down by the PassMark DirectX tests, which produce very low scores (102 to 259), while the Geekbench tests produce much higher scores. The PassMark G3D score of 24004 and the GPU compute score of 10101 are more representative of its overall capability.

The Geekbench OpenCL delta of 19.1 percent in favor of the NVIDIA part is the only direct evidence of relative performance. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score for the AMD card (853) has no corresponding NVIDIA result, so no direct comparison is possible there. Similarly, the NVIDIA card's Geekbench Vulkan score of 139213 has no AMD counterpart. The data supports a clear NVIDIA win in the single shared test, but the AMD card's higher percentile rank suggests that its overall performance profile is stronger when considering all recorded benchmarks.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural generations and design philosophies. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 uses the Navi 32 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Wheat Nas, part of the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) generation. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses the GB205 chip with Blackwell 2.0 architecture, part of the GeForce 50 Mobile generation. Both are fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC, but the transistor counts and die sizes differ significantly.

The AMD chip packs 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 81.2 million per square millimeter. The NVIDIA chip packs 31,100 million transistors on a smaller 263 mm² die, giving a density of 118.3 million per square millimeter. The NVIDIA chip is denser, fitting more transistors into less space, which is characteristic of a newer or more tightly packed design. The AMD die is larger overall, which likely contributes to its higher power draw and single-slot physical design.

Clock speeds show a stark difference. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has a base clock of 1900 MHz and a boost clock of 2000 MHz. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has a base clock of 847 MHz and a boost clock of 1447 MHz. Despite the lower clocks, the NVIDIA part achieves a higher Geekbench OpenCL score, indicating that architectural efficiency and other factors compensate for the clock deficit. The AMD card's memory clock is 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective, while the NVIDIA card's memory clock is 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective. The higher effective data rate on the NVIDIA part is due to its GDDR7 memory type.

Memory configurations differ substantially. The AMD card has 28 GB of GDDR6 on a 224-bit bus, providing 504.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The NVIDIA card has 12 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus, providing 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The NVIDIA part offers more bandwidth despite a narrower bus and less capacity, thanks to the faster GDDR7 standard. The AMD part's larger capacity is notable, but the NVIDIA part's bandwidth advantage is clear.

Compute resources are organized differently. The AMD card has 3456 shading units, 216 texture mapping units, 96 render output units, and 54 ray tracing cores. It has no tensor cores listed. The NVIDIA card has 5888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, 80 render output units, 46 ray tracing cores, and 184 tensor cores. The NVIDIA part has more shading units and a large number of tensor cores, which are absent from the AMD card. The AMD card has more texture mapping units and render output units, which may benefit certain rasterization workloads.

Pixel and texture rates reflect these resource counts. The AMD card delivers 192.0 GPixel/s and 432.0 GTexel/s. The NVIDIA card delivers 115.8 GPixel/s and 266.2 GTexel/s. The AMD part is significantly faster in these traditional rasterization metrics, with 66 percent higher pixel rate and 62 percent higher texture rate. Floating point performance tells a different story: the AMD card is rated at 27.65 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1), while the NVIDIA card is rated at 17.04 TFLOPS for both. The AMD part has a 62 percent advantage in raw FP32 throughput.

Power and physical design differ as well. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has a TDP of 158 W, uses a single 8-pin power connector, requires a 450 W suggested power supply, and occupies a single-slot form factor. It has no display outputs. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has a TDP of 60 W, uses no power connectors, is an integrated graphics processor (IGP), and has display outputs described as portable device dependent. The NVIDIA part is far more power-efficient on paper, consuming 98 W less, and is designed for laptops rather than discrete card installation.

The bus interfaces also differ. The AMD card uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while the NVIDIA card uses PCIe 5.0 x16. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The AMD card has no production status listed, while the NVIDIA card is marked as active. The AMD card was released on 2024-10-02, and the NVIDIA card on 2025-02-28. The AMD card's predecessor is the Radeon Pro Vega, and the NVIDIA card's predecessor is the GeForce 40 Mobile.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear split. In the single direct head-to-head benchmark, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile wins decisively, scoring 143870 against the AMD Radeon PRO V710's 116460 in Geekbench OpenCL, a 19.1 percent margin. For compute-heavy workloads that resemble OpenCL, the NVIDIA part is the stronger choice based on this recorded result.

However, the AMD Radeon PRO V710 holds a higher percentile rank at 88 versus the NVIDIA part's 80, and its average benchmark score of 58657 far exceeds the NVIDIA part's 35435. The AMD card also delivers significantly higher pixel rate, texture rate, and FP32 throughput. These metrics indicate that for rasterization-focused tasks and raw shader compute, the AMD card is the more capable part. The NVIDIA card counters with more shading units, tensor cores, memory bandwidth, and a much lower power draw.

Users who need maximum compute performance in OpenCL-type workloads should favor the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile. Users who prioritize rasterization throughput, higher memory capacity, or a discrete single-slot card should favor the AMD Radeon PRO V710. The NVIDIA part is also the only one with a production status of active and the only one with tensor cores, making it the obvious pick for AI-related tasks that rely on tensor acceleration. The AMD part has no tensor cores and no display outputs, so it is not suitable for direct display connection. The NVIDIA part's portable device dependent outputs make it suitable for laptop integration.

Specification Differences

The AMD Radeon PRO V710 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile differ in nearly every major specification category. The AMD card uses the Navi 32 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture, while the NVIDIA card uses the GB205 chip with Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The AMD card has 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die, while the NVIDIA card has 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die. Transistor density is 81.2M per mm² for AMD and 118.3M per mm² for NVIDIA.

Clock speeds differ: AMD base 1900 MHz, boost 2000 MHz; NVIDIA base 847 MHz, boost 1447 MHz. Memory clocks are 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) for AMD and 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) for NVIDIA. Memory size is 28 GB GDDR6 for AMD versus 12 GB GDDR7 for NVIDIA. Bus width is 224 bit for AMD versus 192 bit for NVIDIA. Bandwidth is 504.0 GB/s for AMD versus 672.0 GB/s for NVIDIA.

Compute units differ: AMD has 3456 shading units, 216 TMUs, 96 ROPs, 54 RT cores, and no tensor cores. NVIDIA has 5888 shading units, 184 TMUs, 80 ROPs, 46 RT cores, and 184 tensor cores. Pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s for AMD versus 115.8 GPixel/s for NVIDIA. Texture rate is 432.0 GTexel/s for AMD versus 266.2 GTexel/s for NVIDIA. FP32 and FP16 are both 27.65 TFLOPS for AMD versus 17.04 TFLOPS for NVIDIA.

Power and physical specs differ: AMD TDP 158 W, single-slot, 1x 8-pin connector, 450 W suggested PSU, no display outputs. NVIDIA TDP 60 W, IGP, no power connectors, no suggested PSU, portable device dependent outputs. Bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16 for AMD versus PCIe 5.0 x16 for NVIDIA. Release dates are 2024-10-02 for AMD and 2025-02-28 for NVIDIA. The NVIDIA part has a production status of active; the AMD part does not list one.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU wins the only direct benchmark comparison?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile wins the Geekbench OpenCL test with a score of 143870 against the AMD Radeon PRO V710's 116460, a 19.1 percent margin.

Q: Which card has higher memory bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has higher bandwidth at 672.0 GB/s, compared to the AMD Radeon PRO V710's 504.0 GB/s. The NVIDIA part uses GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus, while the AMD part uses GDDR6 on a 224-bit bus.

Q: How do the FP32 compute ratings compare?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 is rated at 27.65 TFLOPS for FP32, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is rated at 17.04 TFLOPS. The AMD card has a 62 percent advantage in raw FP32 throughput.

Q: Which card has more memory capacity?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has 28 GB of GDDR6 memory, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has 12 GB of GDDR7 memory. The AMD card offers more than double the capacity.

Q: What is the power draw difference?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has a TDP of 158 W, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has a TDP of 60 W. The NVIDIA part consumes 98 W less power.

Q: Which card has tensor cores?

A: Only the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has tensor cores, with 184 of them. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 has no tensor cores listed.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile wins in compute performance as measured by Geekbench OpenCL, delivering 143870 against the AMD card's 116460. It also wins on memory bandwidth (672.0 GB/s versus 504.0 GB/s), shading unit count (5888 versus 3456), and tensor core availability (184 versus zero). Its lower TDP of 60 W makes it the more power-efficient choice, and its PCIe 5.0 x16 interface is newer than the AMD card's PCIe 4.0 x16. The NVIDIA part's active production status also indicates current availability.

The AMD Radeon PRO V710 wins on raw rasterization metrics: pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s versus 115.8 GPixel/s, texture rate of 432.0 GTexel/s versus 266.2 GTexel/s, and FP32 throughput of 27.65 TFLOPS versus 17.04 TFLOPS. It also holds more memory capacity at 28 GB versus 12 GB, more texture mapping units (216 versus 184), more render output units (96 versus 80), and more ray tracing cores (54 versus 46). Its higher percentile rank of 88 versus 80 indicates stronger overall standing in the database. The AMD card's single-slot design and 1x 8-pin power connector suit discrete workstation installations, while the NVIDIA part's IGP form factor targets portable devices.

The benchmark data gives the NVIDIA part one win in the head-to-head test, but the AMD part's higher average score and percentile suggest it is the stronger all-round performer in the database's broader context. Users with OpenCL-heavy workloads should side with NVIDIA, while those prioritizing shader throughput, memory capacity, or rasterization speed should side with AMD.