AMD Radeon PRO V710 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon PRO V710

CORE STATE Navi 32
VRAM 28 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2000 MHz
TDP 158 W
BUS WIDTH 224 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

CORE STATE GB203
VRAM 16 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2452 MHz
TDP 300 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
853
6,604
geekbench_opencl
116,460
212,363
geekbench_vulkan
N/A
225,122
passmark_directx_10
N/A
192
passmark_directx_11
N/A
300
passmark_directx_12
N/A
127
passmark_directx_9
N/A
351
passmark_g2d
N/A
1,332
passmark_g3d
N/A
32,974
passmark_gpu_compute
N/A
20,203

Analysis: AMD Radeon PRO V710 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

The AMD Radeon PRO V710 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti occupy different corners of the GPU market, and the benchmark data confirms a decisive performance gap. Across the two shared tests, the NVIDIA card wins outright, but the V710’s positioning as a professional compute card means the comparison is less about raw speed and more about architectural intent and workload fit.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most dramatic separation occurs in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. The RTX 5070 Ti scores 6604, while the Radeon PRO V710 manages only 853. That is a delta of -87.1% for the AMD card, meaning the NVIDIA part is roughly 7.7 times faster in this particular DirectX 12 workload. This is not a marginal difference; it is a generational chasm in rasterization and geometry throughput.

The Geekbench OpenCL test tells a similar story, though with a smaller gap. The RTX 5070 Ti posts 212363, against 116460 for the V710. The delta here is -45.2%, meaning the NVIDIA card delivers roughly 82% higher compute performance in this synthetic OpenCL benchmark. While the V710 is not embarrassed — it still clears the six-figure mark — the NVIDIA card’s lead is substantial.

There are no benchmark wins for the AMD card in the head-to-head data. The scoreboard shows 0 wins for the Radeon PRO V710 and 2 wins for the RTX 5070 Ti. The data is unambiguous: in every shared test, the NVIDIA card is faster, often by a wide margin.

Looking at the broader context, the RTX 5070 Ti’s average benchmark score of 49957 places it at the 86th percentile of all GPUs. The Radeon PRO V710, despite losing both head-to-head tests, has a higher average benchmark score of 58657 and sits at the 88th percentile. This apparent contradiction stems from the fact that the V710 has only two benchmark entries, both of which are heavy compute workloads; the RTX 5070 Ti has ten entries, including several low-level Passmark tests that drag its average down. In direct comparison, however, the NVIDIA card wins.

The nearest rivals for each card further contextualize their standing. The V710’s closest competitor is the NVIDIA P102-100, which scores 58528 — just 0.2% behind. The RTX 5070 Ti’s nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, which scores 50001, a -0.1% delta. Both cards are close to their immediate rivals, but the V710’s rival pool is anchored around the 58k score range, while the RTX 5070 Ti’s pool sits near 50k.

Architecture Differences

The two cards are built on fundamentally different architectures. The Radeon PRO V710 uses AMD’s RDNA 3.0 architecture, specifically the Navi 32 chip, codenamed Wheat Nas. It is part of the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) generation. The RTX 5070 Ti, by contrast, uses NVIDIA’s Blackwell 2.0 architecture, built on the GB203 chip, and belongs to the GeForce 50-series.

Both are manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC, but the die sizes differ. The V710’s die is 346 mm², while the RTX 5070 Ti’s die is 378 mm². Transistor counts tell a more interesting story: the RTX 5070 Ti packs 45,600 million transistors, versus 28,100 million for the V710. That translates to a transistor density of 120.6 million per mm² for NVIDIA, against 81.2 million per mm² for AMD.

The memory subsystem is another major divergence. The V710 offers 28 GB of GDDR6 on a 224-bit bus, delivering 504.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 5070 Ti has 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, with 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The NVIDIA card has less capacity but nearly 78% more bandwidth, which is critical for high-resolution gaming and certain compute workloads.

Core counts heavily favor the RTX 5070 Ti. It has 8960 shading units, 280 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, along with 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores. The V710 has 3456 shading units, 216 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, with 54 RT cores and no tensor cores listed. The NVIDIA card also has higher clocks: a base of 2295 MHz and boost of 2452 MHz, versus 1900 MHz base and 2000 MHz boost for the AMD card.

These architectural differences manifest in raw throughput. The RTX 5070 Ti delivers 43.94 TFLOPS of FP32 and FP16 (1:1), while the V710 delivers 27.65 TFLOPS in both. Pixel rate and texture rate also favor NVIDIA: 235.4 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s, and 686.6 GTexel/s versus 432.0 GTexel/s.

Power and form factor differences are stark. The V710 has a TDP of 158 W, is single-slot, and uses a single 8-pin power connector with a suggested PSU of 450 W. The RTX 5070 Ti has a TDP of 300 W, is dual-slot, uses a 16-pin connector, and requires a 700 W PSU. The V710 also has no display outputs, while the RTX 5070 Ti offers 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b.

The bus interface differs too: the V710 uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while the RTX 5070 Ti uses PCIe 5.0 x16. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The release dates are nearly five months apart: the V710 launched on 2024-10-02, and the RTX 5070 Ti on 2025-02-19.

Where Each One Wins

Based strictly on the benchmark data, the RTX 5070 Ti wins in every measured category. It is faster in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 by 87.1%, and faster in Geekbench OpenCL by 45.2%. There are no tests where the V710 comes out ahead.

However, the absence of head-to-head wins does not mean the V710 lacks a use case. Its 28 GB of memory is a significant capacity advantage over the 16 GB on the RTX 5070 Ti. For workloads that require large datasets to reside in VRAM — such as certain machine learning inference, scientific visualization, or rendering tasks — the V710’s larger pool could be the deciding factor, even if the NVIDIA card is faster per byte.

The V710’s lower TDP of 158 W and single-slot design make it suitable for dense server environments where power and space are constrained. The RTX 5070 Ti’s 300 W TDP and dual-slot footprint require more substantial cooling and power delivery. The V710 also uses a standard 8-pin connector, while the RTX 5070 Ti needs a 16-pin connector, which may limit compatibility with older power supplies.

The RTX 5070 Ti wins decisively in raw compute and gaming-oriented workloads. Its 280 tensor cores and 70 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for AI and ray tracing tasks that the V710 cannot match, given its 54 RT cores and no tensor core count listed. The NVIDIA card’s PCIe 5.0 interface also offers double the bandwidth of the V710’s PCIe 4.0 interface, which can matter for data transfer-heavy workloads.

For display purposes, the RTX 5070 Ti is the only viable option of the two, as the V710 has no display outputs. This makes the V710 a compute-only accelerator, not a card for a workstation with a monitor attached.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear conclusion: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is the superior performer in every shared benchmark. It wins both head-to-head tests, with deltas of -87.1% and -45.2% in its favor. Its higher core counts, faster clocks, greater memory bandwidth, and newer architecture all contribute to this outcome.

The RTX 5070 Ti should be chosen by anyone needing maximum compute performance, whether for gaming, ray tracing, or general-purpose GPU workloads. Its 43.94 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 896.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth place it in a different class than the V710. Its tensor cores make it suitable for AI workloads, and its display outputs allow it to serve as a traditional graphics card.

The AMD Radeon PRO V710, despite losing all head-to-head tests, has a distinct role. Its 28 GB of memory is 75% larger than the RTX 5070 Ti’s 16 GB, which is critical for memory-bound professional workloads. Its lower power draw and single-slot form factor make it attractive for multi-GPU server configurations. However, its lack of display outputs and slower compute performance mean it is not a general-purpose card.

The verdict is straightforward: for performance, choose the RTX 5070 Ti. For memory capacity and density in a compute-only environment, the V710 has a niche that the data supports, even if it loses every speed comparison.

FAQ

Q: Which card is faster in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti scores 6604, which is 87.1% higher than the AMD Radeon PRO V710’s score of 853.

Q: Does the AMD Radeon PRO V710 have more memory than the RTX 5070 Ti?

A: Yes. The V710 has 28 GB of GDDR6 memory, while the RTX 5070 Ti has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference between the two cards?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti has 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth, while the V710 has 504.0 GB/s. The NVIDIA card has approximately 78% more bandwidth.

Q: Which card has a higher transistor count?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti has 45,600 million transistors, compared to 28,100 million for the V710.

Q: Does the AMD Radeon PRO V710 have any display outputs?

A: No. The V710 has no display outputs, while the RTX 5070 Ti has 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two cards?

A: The V710 has a TDP of 158 W, while the RTX 5070 Ti has a TDP of 300 W. The V710 also requires a 450 W PSU, versus 700 W for the RTX 5070 Ti.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
PRO V710
RTX 5070 Ti
Core Specs
Shading Units
3,456
8,960 +159.3%
Shaders
3,456
8,960 +159.3%
TMUs
216
280 +29.6%
ROPs
96
96 0.0%
Compute Units
54
—
SM Count
—
70
Clocks
Base Clock
1900 MHz
2295 MHz
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
2452 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective
1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
28 GB
16 GB
VRAM (MB)
28,672
16,384 -42.9%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR7
Memory Bus
224 bit
256 bit
Bandwidth
504.0 GB/s
896.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
2 MB
48 MB
L3 Cache
54 MB
—
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
—
Performance
Pixel Rate
192.0 GPixel/s
235.4 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
432.0 GTexel/s
686.6 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
27.65 TFLOPS
43.94 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
864.0 GFLOPS (1:32)
686.6 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
27.65 TFLOPS (1:1)
43.94 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
54
70 +29.6%
Tensor Cores
—
280
Power
TDP
158 W
300 W
TDP (W)
158
300 +89.9%
Suggested PSU
450 W
700 W
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
1x 16-pin
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
Blackwell 2.0
GPU Name
Navi 32
GB203
Codename
Wheat Nas
—
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series)
GeForce 50
Process Size
5 nm
5 nm
Transistors
28,100 million
45,600 million
Die Size
346 mm²
378 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
81.2M / mm²
120.6M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.2
3.0
CUDA
—
12.0
Shader Model
6.9
6.9
Physical
Slot Width
Single-slot
Dual-slot
Length
—
304 mm 12 inches
Height
—
137 mm 5.4 inches
Outputs
No outputs
1x HDMI 2.1b3x DisplayPort 2.1b
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
PCIe 5.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
—
749 USD
Production
—
Active
Predecessor
Radeon Pro Vega
GeForce 40
Successor
—
GeForce 60
View Radeon PRO V710 Details View GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Details