AMD Radeon 8060S vs Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile Comparison
AMD Radeon 8060S
Graphics 24EU Mobile
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Radeon 8060S vs Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile
The Verdict
The data positions the AMD Radeon 8060S and Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile at opposite ends of the mobile graphics spectrum. The AMD part sits in the 87th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 55757, placing it within 0.1% of the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB and just 0.6% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile, by contrast, sits at the 50th percentile with no recorded benchmark scores and no rival comparisons in the database. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, which indicates the absence of measured data rather than a literal zero-performance result.
The AMD Radeon 8060S is the only one of the two with recorded performance data across three distinct tests: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 2162, Geekbench OpenCL at 84626, and Geekbench Vulkan at 80483. The Intel part has no entries in the benchmark database. For any workload that requires measurable graphics throughput, the AMD Radeon 8060S is the only option with substantiated results. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile appears to be aimed at basic display output and low-load scenarios, but the database lacks the data to confirm even that role empirically.
Architecture Differences
The two GPUs come from fundamentally different design philosophies. AMD uses the RDNA 3.5 architecture on a 4 nm TSMC process, with the chip identified as Strix Halo. Intel uses the Xe-LP architecture on a 10 nm Intel process, with the chip identified as Twin Lake. The manufacturing process difference is significant: 4 nm versus 10 nm. Die size for AMD is 308 mm², while Intel's die size is listed as unknown.
The AMD part supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The Intel part supports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The DirectX feature level difference, 12_2 versus 12_1, indicates AMD can handle more advanced rendering features. Both use system shared memory, with bandwidth described as system dependent. AMD connects via PCIe 5.0 x16, while Intel uses a Ring Bus interface. Both are integrated graphics processors (IGP) with portable device dependent display outputs.
The AMD Radeon 8060S has 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, 64 render output units, and 40 ray tracing cores. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has 192 shading units, 12 TMUs, 4 ROPs, and no ray tracing cores listed. That is a 13.3x difference in shading units, a 13.3x difference in TMUs, and a 16x difference in ROPs. The ray tracing hardware exists only on the AMD side. The AMD part is rated at 55 W TDP, while the Intel part is rated at 6 W TDP. That 49 W gap frames the AMD part as a high-performance integrated solution and the Intel part as an ultra-low-power companion.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Radeon 8060S and the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile. The headToHeadBenchmarks field is empty for both directions, and neither the winsA nor winsB counters show any recorded victories. This absence of comparative data is itself informative. The AMD Radeon 8060S has three standalone benchmark scores, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has none. Without direct comparisons, the only quantitative basis for differentiation comes from the AMD part's own benchmark results and its nearest rival comparisons.
The AMD Radeon 8060S scores 2162 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 84626 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 80483 in Geekbench Vulkan. Its average benchmark score of 55757 places it 0.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB, 0.6% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080, 1.7% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X, and 2.8% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080. These rival deltas show the AMD Radeon 8060S operating in a performance band normally occupied by discrete desktop graphics cards, which is notable for an integrated processor. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no rival data, no percentile movement beyond the neutral 50th percentile, and no benchmark scores to compare against the AMD part's 14.85 TFLOPS FP32 throughput.
Specification Differences
Clock speeds differ sharply. The AMD Radeon 8060S has a base clock of 1295 MHz and a boost clock of 2900 MHz. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 1000 MHz. The AMD part boosts 1900 MHz higher than the Intel part's maximum.
Compute throughput shows the scale of the gap. AMD delivers 14.85 TFLOPS FP32 and 14.85 TFLOPS FP16 at a 1:1 ratio. Intel delivers 384.0 GFLOPS FP32 and 768.0 GFLOPS FP16 at a 2:1 ratio. In FP32, AMD is 38.7x higher. In FP16, AMD is 19.3x higher. Pixel rate for AMD is 185.6 GPixel/s versus 4.000 GPixel/s for Intel, a 46.4x difference. Texture rate for AMD is 464.0 GTexel/s versus 12.00 GTexel/s for Intel, a 38.7x difference.
Release dates are close: AMD on 2025-01-05 and Intel on 2024-12-31. Both are marked as Active in production status. Neither has a launch MSRP in the database. AMD's predecessor is listed as Polaris Mobile, while Intel has no predecessor listed. Power connectors are absent on AMD and not listed for Intel. The AMD part uses no external power connector, consistent with its IGP slot width. The Intel part also carries an IGP slot width.
FAQ
Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?
A: The AMD Radeon 8060S has an average benchmark score of 55757. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has an average benchmark score of 0, meaning no benchmark data is recorded for it.
Q: How does the AMD Radeon 8060S compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080?
A: The AMD Radeon 8060S is 2.8% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 in average benchmark score. It is also 0.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB and 1.7% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X, while sitting 0.6% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080.
Q: Does the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile support ray tracing?
A: No ray tracing cores are listed for the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile. The AMD Radeon 8060S includes 40 ray tracing cores.
Q: What DirectX versions do the two GPUs support?
A: The AMD Radeon 8060S supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile supports DirectX 12 (12_1). Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.
Q: What are the TDP ratings for each GPU?
A: The AMD Radeon 8060S is rated at 55 W. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is rated at 6 W.
Q: Which GPU has more shading units?
A: The AMD Radeon 8060S has 2560 shading units. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has 192 shading units.
Where Each One Wins
The AMD Radeon 8060S wins in every measured category where data exists. Its 2162 score in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 shows it can handle modern DirectX 12 rendering workloads. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 84626 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 80483 both clear 80000, indicating strong general compute and cross-API graphics performance. The 14.85 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, 464.0 GTexel/s texture rate, and 185.6 GPixel/s pixel rate all point to a GPU capable of sustained rendering tasks. The 40 ray tracing cores give it hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects that the Intel part cannot match. Its nearest rival comparisons place it within 0.6% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 and 2.8% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, which suggests it can approach discrete desktop GPU performance in an integrated package. The 55 W TDP and PCIe 5.0 x16 interface indicate it is designed for platforms that can supply meaningful power and bandwidth.
The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile wins on power efficiency. Its 6 W TDP is 49 W lower than the AMD part's 55 W. Its 300 MHz base clock and 1000 MHz boost clock consume far less energy. The 384.0 GFLOPS FP32 throughput and 768.0 GFLOPS FP16 throughput are modest figures, but they come with a 10 nm Intel process and a Ring Bus interface that suggests integration into low-power system-on-chip designs. The 4 ROPs and 12 TMUs are minimal, appropriate for basic display output rather than intensive rendering. The absence of benchmark scores means the database cannot confirm any performance advantage, but the specification profile indicates a GPU meant for longevity in battery-driven devices where the AMD part's 55 W draw would be impractical.
The data does not support a direct performance comparison because no head-to-head benchmarks exist. What the data does show is that the AMD Radeon 8060S is a high-throughput integrated GPU with discrete-class benchmark results, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is a low-power integrated GPU with no recorded performance measurements. Users who need measurable 3D performance have exactly one choice in this pairing. Users who need minimal power draw have exactly one choice as well. The 87th percentile ranking for AMD versus the 50th percentile for Intel summarizes the positioning: one part is built for performance, the other for presence.