AMD Radeon 8060S vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon 8060S

CORE STATE Strix Halo
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 2900 MHz
TDP 55 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

CORE STATE GB203
VRAM 16 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2452 MHz
TDP 300 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
2,162
6,604
geekbench_opencl
84,626
212,363
geekbench_vulkan
80,483
225,122
passmark_directx_10
N/A
192
passmark_directx_11
N/A
300
passmark_directx_12
N/A
127
passmark_directx_9
N/A
351
passmark_g2d
N/A
1,332
passmark_g3d
N/A
32,974
passmark_gpu_compute
N/A
20,203

Analysis: AMD Radeon 8060S vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

The AMD Radeon 8060S and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti are not competing in the same weight class, despite both being active products with PCIe 5.0 x16 interfaces. In the three head-to-head benchmarks available, the NVIDIA card wins decisively across the board, with deltas ranging from -60.2% to -67.3% in favor of the RTX 5070 Ti. However, the AMD part occupies a fundamentally different niche: it is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with a 55 W TDP and no power connectors, while the NVIDIA card is a dual-slot, 300 W discrete GPU with a 16-pin connector and a 700 W suggested PSU. The data indicates that the 8060S is designed for portable, power-constrained devices, whereas the 5070 Ti targets traditional desktop performance.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5070 Ti wins every single benchmark in the comparison set. There is no scenario in the data where the AMD Radeon 8060S outperforms the NVIDIA card. The closest margin is in Geekbench OpenCL, where the 5070 Ti scores 212363 against 84626, a -60.2% delta. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the gap widens to -67.3% (6604 vs 2162), and in Geekbench Vulkan it sits at -64.2% (225122 vs 80483). If the criterion is raw performance, the NVIDIA card wins outright.

The AMD 8060S wins on the metrics that matter for its intended form factor. Its 55 W TDP is drastically lower than the 300 W TDP of the RTX 5070 Ti, and it requires no power connectors whatsoever. The 8060S is an IGP with a "Portable Device Dependent" display output, meaning it slots into laptops or compact devices where the 5070 Ti's 304 mm length, 137 mm height, and 48 mm width would never fit. The average benchmark score tells a similar story: the 8060S averages 55757 (87th percentile), while the 5070 Ti averages 49957 (86th percentile), but this is skewed by the NVIDIA card's additional PassMark tests, which include lower DirectX 9/10/11 scores. In the shared tests, the NVIDIA card is unambiguously faster.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from entirely different architectural lineages. The AMD Radeon 8060S uses the Strix Halo chip built on RDNA 3.5, fabricated on TSMC's 4 nm process, with a die size of 308 mm². The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti uses the GB203 chip on Blackwell 2.0, fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process, with a die size of 378 mm² and 45,600 million transistors (a density of 120.6M per mm²). The AMD chip's transistor count is listed as unknown, so no direct comparison is possible there.

The memory architecture is a fundamental differentiator. The 8060S uses System Shared memory — its size, type, bus width, and bandwidth are all system-dependent, with no dedicated VRAM. The 5070 Ti has 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This means the AMD part relies on the host system's memory, while the NVIDIA card has its own high-speed pool. The clock speeds reflect their roles: the 8060S runs at a 1295 MHz base and 2900 MHz boost, while the 5070 Ti runs at 2295 MHz base and 2452 MHz boost — the AMD part boosts higher, but the NVIDIA part has far more execution resources.

Compute resources differ massively. The 8060S has 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, with 40 RT cores. The 5070 Ti has 8960 shading units, 280 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, with 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores (the AMD part lists no tensor cores). This translates to 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 for the NVIDIA card versus 14.85 TFLOPS for the AMD part. The 5070 Ti also has a higher pixel rate (235.4 GPixel/s vs 185.6 GPixel/s) and texture rate (686.6 GTexel/s vs 464.0 GTexel/s). Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API compatibility is identical.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The largest relative win for the RTX 5070 Ti comes in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, a modern DirectX 12 test. The NVIDIA card scores 6604, while the AMD 8060S scores 2162, a delta of -67.3%. This is a 3.05x advantage in raw rasterization performance. The gap is slightly narrower in Geekbench Vulkan, where the 5070 Ti scores 225122 versus 80483, a -64.2% delta (2.80x). In Geekbench OpenCL, the NVIDIA card scores 212363 versus 84626, a -60.2% delta (2.51x). The pattern is consistent: the NVIDIA card is roughly 2.5 to 3 times faster across all three workloads.

The AMD 8060S's nearest rivals in the overall database are the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (0.1% ahead), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 (-0.6%), and AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (1.7% ahead). This shows that despite its low TDP, the 8060S performs in the same league as mid-range discrete GPUs. The RTX 5070 Ti's nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (-0.1%), Intel Arc A550M (0.4%), and AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (-2%). The NVIDIA card's average benchmark score of 49957 is actually lower than the AMD part's 55757, but this is because the 5070 Ti includes PassMark DirectX 9/10/11 scores (192, 300, 127, 351) that drag down its average; the 8060S only has the three higher-level tests.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU is faster in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti scores 6604, which is 67.3% higher than the AMD Radeon 8060S's 2162. The NVIDIA card wins this test decisively.

Q: Does the AMD Radeon 8060S have dedicated video memory?

A: No. The 8060S uses System Shared memory, meaning its memory size, type, bus width, and bandwidth are all dependent on the host system. The RTX 5070 Ti, by contrast, has 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The AMD Radeon 8060S has a 55 W TDP and requires no power connectors, functioning as an integrated GPU. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti has a 300 W TDP, uses a single 16-pin connector, and requires a 700 W suggested PSU.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti has 8960 shading units, while the AMD Radeon 8060S has 2560. The NVIDIA card also has 70 RT cores versus 40, and 280 tensor cores versus none listed for AMD.

Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare?

A: The AMD Radeon 8060S averages 55757 across its tests (87th percentile), while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti averages 49957 (86th percentile). However, the NVIDIA card's average includes additional PassMark DirectX 9/10/11 tests that lower its mean.

Q: Are there any benchmarks where the AMD Radeon 8060S wins?

A: No. In the three head-to-head benchmarks (3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, Geekbench OpenCL, Geekbench Vulkan), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti wins all three. The AMD part has zero wins in this comparison.

Specification Differences

  • Process Node: AMD Radeon 8060S uses 4 nm (TSMC); NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti uses 5 nm (TSMC).
  • Die Size: 308 mm² for AMD; 378 mm² for NVIDIA.
  • Transistors: AMD lists unknown; NVIDIA lists 45,600 million (120.6M / mm² density).
  • Base Clock: 1295 MHz (AMD) vs 2295 MHz (NVIDIA).
  • Boost Clock: 2900 MHz (AMD) vs 2452 MHz (NVIDIA).
  • Memory Size: System Shared (AMD) vs 16 GB GDDR7 (NVIDIA).
  • Memory Bus Width: System Shared (AMD) vs 256 bit (NVIDIA).
  • Memory Bandwidth: System Dependent (AMD) vs 896.0 GB/s (NVIDIA).
  • Shading Units: 2560 (AMD) vs 8960 (NVIDIA).
  • TMUs: 160 (AMD) vs 280 (NVIDIA).
  • ROPs: 64 (AMD) vs 96 (NVIDIA).
  • RT Cores: 40 (AMD) vs 70 (NVIDIA).
  • Tensor Cores: None listed (AMD) vs 280 (NVIDIA).
  • Pixel Rate: 185.6 GPixel/s (AMD) vs 235.4 GPixel/s (NVIDIA).
  • Texture Rate: 464.0 GTexel/s (AMD) vs 686.6 GTexel/s (NVIDIA).
  • FP32 Performance: 14.85 TFLOPS (AMD) vs 43.94 TFLOPS (NVIDIA).
  • FP16 Performance: 14.85 TFLOPS (AMD) vs 43.94 TFLOPS (NVIDIA).
  • TDP: 55 W (AMD) vs 300 W (NVIDIA).
  • Slot Width: IGP (AMD) vs Dual-slot (NVIDIA).
  • Power Connectors: None (AMD) vs 1x 16-pin (NVIDIA).
  • Suggested PSU: None listed (AMD) vs 700 W (NVIDIA).
  • Display Outputs: Portable Device Dependent (AMD) vs 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b (NVIDIA).
  • Dimensions: None listed (AMD) vs 304 mm x 137 mm x 48 mm (NVIDIA).
  • Release Date: 2025-01-05 (AMD) vs 2025-02-19 (NVIDIA).
  • Launch MSRP: None listed (AMD) vs 749 USD (NVIDIA).

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is the superior performer in every benchmark where both are measured. It delivers between 2.51x and 3.05x the score of the AMD Radeon 8060S across 3DMark Steel Nomad, Geekbench OpenCL, and Geekbench Vulkan. With 8960 shading units, 16 GB of GDDR7, and 43.94 TFLOPS FP32, it is a high-end discrete GPU built for maximum throughput.

The AMD Radeon 8060S, however, wins on a different axis: integration. At 55 W with no power connectors and system-shared memory, it is an IGP designed for portability. Its 308 mm² die on 4 nm packs 2560 shading units and 40 RT cores into a package that fits in devices with portable-dependent display outputs. Its average benchmark score of 55757 (87th percentile) is respectable, placing it near the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 in the overall rankings.

Buyers should choose the RTX 5070 Ti if they need maximum frame rates, dedicated VRAM, and are willing to accommodate a 300 W, dual-slot card with a 700 W PSU. The 8060S is the pick for systems where power efficiency and physical space are paramount, and where the system's shared memory can suffice. The NVIDIA card costs 749 USD at launch MSRP; the AMD part has no listed MSRP, reflecting its role as a component in pre-built portable devices. In short: the 5070 Ti is a performance king, the 8060S is an efficiency specialist, and the data shows no overlap in their intended use cases.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
8060S
RTX 5070 Ti
Core Specs
Shading Units
2,560
8,960 +250.0%
Shaders
2,560
8,960 +250.0%
TMUs
160
280 +75.0%
ROPs
64
96 +50.0%
Compute Units
40
—
SM Count
—
70
Clocks
Base Clock
1295 MHz
2295 MHz
Boost Clock
2900 MHz
2452 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
16 GB
VRAM (MB)
—
16,384
Memory Type
System Shared
GDDR7
Memory Bus
System Shared
256 bit
Bandwidth
System Dependent
896.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
—
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
2 MB
48 MB
L3 Cache
32 MB
—
Performance
Pixel Rate
185.6 GPixel/s
235.4 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
464.0 GTexel/s
686.6 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
14.85 TFLOPS
43.94 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
464.0 GFLOPS (1:32)
686.6 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
14.85 TFLOPS (1:1)
43.94 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
40
70 +75.0%
Tensor Cores
—
280
Power
TDP
55 W
300 W
TDP (W)
55
300 +445.5%
Suggested PSU
—
700 W
Power Connectors
None
1x 16-pin
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 3.5
Blackwell 2.0
GPU Name
Strix Halo
GB203
Generation
Navi Mobile (RX 8000M)
GeForce 50
Process Size
4 nm
5 nm
Transistors
unknown
45,600 million
Die Size
308 mm²
378 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
—
120.6M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.1
3.0
CUDA
—
12.0
Shader Model
6.8
6.9
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Dual-slot
Length
—
304 mm 12 inches
Height
—
137 mm 5.4 inches
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x HDMI 2.1b3x DisplayPort 2.1b
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
PCIe 5.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
—
749 USD
Production
Active
Active
Predecessor
Polaris Mobile
GeForce 40
Successor
—
GeForce 60
View Radeon 8060S Details View GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Details