AMD Radeon 8050S vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data presents an unusual comparison. The AMD Radeon 8050S has two recorded benchmark scores: 65,818 in Geekbench OpenCL and 58,398 in Geekbench Vulkan, producing an average benchmark score of 62,108. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, with an average benchmark score of zero. Consequently, the direct head-to-head benchmark comparison is one-sided: the Radeon 8050S delivers measurable performance data, while the LX MAX offers none.

The Radeon 8050S places in the 89th percentile among all GPUs, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of recorded graphics hardware. Its nearest rivals in the database include the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M with an average score of 61,896, placing the 8050S 0.3% ahead. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 scores 63,693, which is 2.5% higher than the 8050S. The AMD Radeon RX 7600M averages 63,775, 2.6% ahead. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP reaches 63,830, 2.7% higher. These narrow margins place the 8050S in a tightly contested performance tier.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX, by contrast, has an empty benchmark record. Its 50th percentile placement among all GPUs reflects the absence of measured data rather than a verified performance level. The database contains no rival entries for the LX MAX, which means no comparative scores or delta percentages exist to position it against other hardware.

The LX MAX does carry theoretical specifications that suggest high compute capability, but without benchmark results, those specifications cannot be validated against the 8050S's measured scores. The 8050S delivers confirmed 11.47 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the LX MAX lists 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, more than double the theoretical figure. Yet the data does not record any test confirming whether that theoretical output translates into real-world performance.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon 8050S wins in every measurable benchmark category because it is the only one of the two with recorded results. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 65,818 exceeds its Vulkan score of 58,398, indicating stronger OpenCL compute performance. The 8050S's average benchmark score of 62,108 and 89th percentile ranking place it among higher-performing GPUs in the database, within 2.7% of the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP and 2.5% of the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX wins in no recorded benchmark categories. Its theoretical specifications, however, point to areas where it could potentially excel if measured. The LX MAX lists 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 at a 2:1 ratio, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units. These figures exceed the 8050S's 11.47 TFLOPS FP32, 11.47 TFLOPS FP16 at 1:1, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. The LX MAX also features 12 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, whereas the 8050S uses system-shared memory with bandwidth described as system dependent.

In practical terms, the 8050S wins where measured data matters: confirmed compute performance, established driver support through DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, and an active production status with a 2025 release date. The LX MAX remains an unverified entry with a 2026 release date and no benchmark presence.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon 8050S uses the Strix Halo chip with RDNA 3.5 architecture, fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. Its die measures 308 mm². The architecture belongs to the Navi Mobile (RX 8000M) generation. The LX MAX uses the 7G106 chip with TrueGPU architecture, fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, with an unknown die size and belonging to the 7G100 generation.

The 8050S employs 2,048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 32 ray tracing cores. The LX MAX uses 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, with no ray tracing core count recorded. The LX MAX's shading unit count is triple that of the 8050S, and its TMU and ROP counts are 1.5 times higher.

Memory architecture differs fundamentally. The 8050S uses system-shared memory with system dependent bandwidth, reflecting its integrated GPU design. The LX MAX uses 12 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory clocked at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, a 192-bit bus, and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Power characteristics separate the two substantially. The 8050S has a 55 W TDP, occupies a single IGP slot width, and requires no power connectors. The LX MAX has a 225 W TDP, occupies a dual-slot design, uses a single 16-pin power connector, and requires a 550 W suggested power supply. The LX MAX measures 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width, while the 8050S has no recorded dimensions.

Interface and output specifications also differ. The 8050S uses PCIe 5.0 x16 and portable device dependent display outputs. The LX MAX uses PCIe 4.0 x16 and provides four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate and OpenGL 4.6, but the 8050S supports Vulkan 1.4 while the LX MAX supports Vulkan 1.3.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher measured benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon 8050S is the only one with recorded scores. It averages 62,108 across Geekbench OpenCL (65,818) and Geekbench Vulkan (58,398). The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has no benchmark scores recorded in the database.

Q: How does the Radeon 8050S compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The 8050S sits 0.3% above the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M (61,896), 2.5% below the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 (63,693), 2.6% below the AMD Radeon RX 7600M (63,775), and 2.7% below the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP (63,830).

Q: What memory configurations do the two GPUs use?

A: The 8050S uses system-shared memory with system dependent bandwidth. The LX MAX uses 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What are the FP32 compute figures for each GPU?

A: The 8050S lists 11.47 TFLOPS FP32. The LX MAX lists 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, more than double the 8050S's figure.

Q: What are the power requirements of each GPU?

A: The 8050S has a 55 W TDP, an IGP slot width, and no power connectors. The LX MAX has a 225 W TDP, a dual-slot design, one 16-pin power connector, and a 550 W suggested power supply.

Q: Which GPU has ray tracing support?

A: The 8050S includes 32 ray tracing cores. The LX MAX has no ray tracing core count recorded in the database.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon 8050S | Lisuan Tech LX MAX |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | TrueGPU |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 6 nm |

| Die Size | 308 mm² | Unknown |

| Memory | System Shared | 12 GB GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus | System Shared | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 2048 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 128 | 192 |

| ROPs | 64 | 96 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 32 | Not recorded |

| FP32 | 11.47 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 11.47 TFLOPS (1:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 55 W | 225 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | Not recorded | 550 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Dimensions | Not recorded | 248 mm x 118 mm x 48 mm |

| Release Date | 2025-01-05 | 2026-03-16 |

The Verdict

The data supports a clear conclusion for the AMD Radeon 8050S. It holds an 89th percentile ranking, an average benchmark score of 62,108, and sits within 2.7% of the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP, a strong position in the database. Its measured Geekbench scores of 65,818 in OpenCL and 58,398 in Vulkan provide concrete evidence of performance. The 8050S also offers a lower power profile at 55 W TDP, a 4 nm process, 32 ray tracing cores, PCIe 5.0 x16 connectivity, and Vulkan 1.4 support.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX presents a theoretical specification sheet without validated results. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, 49.15 TFLOPS FP16, 12 GB GDDR6 memory with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 6,144 shading units indicate substantial compute resources on paper. The 225 W TDP and 550 W suggested power supply signal a high-power discrete design. The absence of benchmark scores, ray tracing core data, and nearest rival comparisons leaves its actual performance unverified.

For users selecting based on recorded database measurements, the AMD Radeon 8050S is the only option with confirmed results. For users prioritizing maximum theoretical compute specifications and dedicated memory capacity, the LX MAX lists higher figures, but those figures lack supporting benchmark evidence. The 8050S's 89th percentile placement among all GPUs provides a verified performance anchor, while the LX MAX's 50th percentile ranking reflects no measured data at all. The verdict from the data: the 8050S is the proven performer, and the LX MAX remains an unmeasured entry awaiting validation.