Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records no benchmark entries for either the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 or the Lisuan Tech LX MAX. With zero recorded scores for both parts, there are no direct performance comparisons to draw from the measured data. The head-to-head benchmark table is empty, and the win tally sits at 0 for each product.

Both cards share identical compute specifications. The shading unit count is 6144 for both, the texture mapping units are 192 each, and the render output units are 96 apiece. The FP32 throughput is listed at 24.58 TFLOPS for both, while FP16 performance is 49.15 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio for each. Pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s and texture rate is 384.0 GTexel/s on both models. Since every measured compute metric matches exactly, the absence of benchmark data leaves no numerical basis for declaring a winner in any workload category.

The memory subsystem is also identical. Both cards use 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 2250 MHz, which translates to 18 Gbps effective. The percentile ranking against all GPUs is 50 for both parts, and the average benchmark score is 0 for each. Without recorded performance numbers, the database cannot establish a performance delta between these two products.

Architecture Differences

The two cards share the same fundamental architecture. Both use the 7G106 chip, built on the TrueGPU architecture, and belong to the 7G100 generation. The manufacturing process is 6 nm at TSMC for both. Transistor count and die size are listed as unknown for each, so no comparison can be made on those fronts.

The API support is identical across both cards. DirectX 12 Ultimate with feature level 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3 are all present on both models. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16 for both. Display outputs are 4x DisplayPort 1.4a on both cards.

The thermal design power is 225 W for both parts, and the suggested power supply is 550 W for each. The slot width is dual-slot on both cards. The key architectural difference lies in the physical design and power delivery. The LX 7G100 uses a single 8-pin power connector, while the LX MAX uses a single 16-pin power connector. This is the only specification that differs in the compute and power architecture.

Physical dimensions also diverge. The LX 7G100 measures 294 mm in length, 120 mm in height, and 49 mm in width. The LX MAX is shorter and slightly slimmer, at 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. Both are dual-slot cards, but the LX MAX has a more compact footprint.

The release dates differ. The LX MAX launched on March 16, 2026, while the LX 7G100 launched on June 17, 2026. Both are currently marked as Active in production status. Neither card has a listed predecessor or successor in the database.

FAQ

Q: Do the two cards have identical compute performance?

A: Yes. Both the LX 7G100 and the LX MAX are listed with 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, 96 render output units, 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16. Every compute specification matches exactly.

Q: What is the memory configuration on each card?

A: Both cards use 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The memory clock is 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) for both.

Q: How do the power connectors differ?

A: The LX 7G100 uses a single 8-pin power connector, while the LX MAX uses a single 16-pin power connector. Both have a 225 W TDP and a suggested 550 W power supply.

Q: Are the physical dimensions different?

A: Yes. The LX 7G100 is 294 mm long, 120 mm tall, and 49 mm wide. The LX MAX is 248 mm long, 118 mm tall, and 48 mm wide. Both are dual-slot cards.

Q: Which card was released earlier?

A: The LX MAX released on March 16, 2026, which is earlier than the LX 7G100, which released on June 17, 2026. Both are currently listed as Active in production.

Q: Do the cards support the same APIs?

A: Yes. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3, with a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface.

The Verdict

The data presents a straightforward picture: these are functionally identical graphics cards in terms of compute, memory, and power specifications. The LX 7G100 and LX MAX share the same chip, the same architecture, the same memory configuration, and the same thermal envelope. The only differences recorded in the database are physical dimensions, power connector type, and release date.

For a user prioritizing physical fit, the LX MAX holds a clear advantage. Its 248 mm length is 46 mm shorter than the LX 7G100's 294 mm, which can matter for smaller chassis. The LX MAX is also 2 mm shorter in height and 1 mm slimmer in width. The 16-pin power connector on the LX MAX may require an adapter or a newer power supply, while the 8-pin connector on the LX 7G100 is more widely compatible with existing power supplies.

For a user prioritizing compatibility with older power supplies, the LX 7G100 is the safer choice. The 8-pin connector is a common standard, and the card still fits within a dual-slot design. However, the longer card body at 294 mm may not fit in compact cases.

The release timing shows the LX MAX came first by three months, but both remain active products. Neither card has recorded benchmark scores, so the database cannot rank one above the other in raw performance. The decision rests entirely on physical and power delivery preferences. The LX MAX is the more compact option with a modern 16-pin connector. The LX 7G100 is the larger card with a traditional 8-pin connector.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 and the Lisuan Tech LX MAX:

• Power Connectors: LX 7G100 uses 1x 8-pin; LX MAX uses 1x 16-pin
• Length: LX 7G100 is 294 mm (11.6 inches); LX MAX is 248 mm (9.8 inches)
• Height: LX 7G100 is 120 mm (4.7 inches); LX MAX is 118 mm (4.6 inches)
• Width: LX 7G100 is 49 mm (1.9 inches); LX MAX is 48 mm (1.9 inches)
• Release Date: LX 7G100 released on June 17, 2026; LX MAX released on March 16, 2026

All other listed specifications are identical, including chip, architecture, process node, memory size and type, bus width, bandwidth, shading units, texture units, render output units, pixel rate, texture rate, FP32 and FP16 throughput, TDP, slot width, suggested PSU, bus interface, display outputs, API support, and production status.