Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile vs NVIDIA H200 NVL Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The data records no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile and the NVIDIA H200 NVL. This is expected, as the two products occupy entirely different segments of the graphics hardware spectrum. The Intel part is an integrated graphics solution found in mobile processors, while the NVIDIA H200 NVL is a server-class accelerator designed for data center workloads.

What can be established from the database is the NVIDIA H200 NVL's absolute performance level. Its recorded Geekbench OpenCL score is 334,891, which places it in the 100th percentile of all GPUs in the database. This means it outperforms every other recorded graphics processor in the database, a remarkable achievement for a server accelerator. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile, by contrast, has no recorded benchmark scores, and its percentile rank sits at 50, indicating a median position among all GPUs based on the database's aggregate data.

The H200 NVL's nearest rivals in the database provide context for its performance. It trails the NVIDIA B200 by 3.1 percent, with the B200 scoring 345,482. It leads the AMD Instinct MI300X by 5.3 percent, which scores 317,994. Against the NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC, the H200 NVL is 9.4 percent behind, as that part scores 369,831. It also holds a 13.2 percent advantage over the NVIDIA L40S, which scores 295,763. These deltas confirm that the H200 NVL sits at the upper tier of accelerator performance, trading the top spot only with newer or differently configured data center parts.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no recorded benchmark scores and no nearest rivals listed in the database. Its performance profile must therefore be inferred from its specifications, which indicate a low-power integrated solution. The absence of benchmark data for the Intel part, combined with the H200 NVL's dominant single result, means any head-to-head comparison is qualitative rather than quantitative.

FAQ

Q: What is the performance difference between the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile and the NVIDIA H200 NVL?

A: The NVIDIA H200 NVL records a Geekbench OpenCL score of 334,891 and ranks in the 100th percentile of all GPUs. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no recorded benchmark scores and sits at the 50th percentile. The performance gap is extreme, with the H200 NVL designed for compute-intensive server workloads and the Intel part intended for basic mobile graphics.

Q: How does the NVIDIA H200 NVL compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The H200 NVL is 3.1 percent behind the NVIDIA B200 (345,482), 5.3 percent ahead of the AMD Instinct MI300X (317,994), 9.4 percent behind the NVIDIA B300 SXM6 AC (369,831), and 13.2 percent ahead of the NVIDIA L40S (295,763).

Q: What are the memory specifications of each product?

A: The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses system shared memory with a system dependent bandwidth. The NVIDIA H200 NVL has 141 GB of HBM3e memory on a 6144-bit bus, delivering 4.89 TB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the power consumption of each product?

A: The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has a TDP of 6 W. The NVIDIA H200 NVL has a TDP of 600 W and requires an 8-pin EPS power connector, with a suggested PSU of 1000 W.

Q: What APIs does each product support?

A: The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile supports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The NVIDIA H200 NVL supports none of these APIs, as its DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan support are all listed as N/A.

Q: What is the form factor of each product?

A: The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with a Ring Bus interface and no power connectors. The NVIDIA H200 NVL is a dual-slot card measuring 267 mm in length and 111 mm in height, using a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface.

Architecture Differences

The two products are built on fundamentally different architectures, nodes, and design philosophies. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses the Xe-LP architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process. It belongs to the HD Graphics-T (Twin Lake) generation and is built around the Twin Lake chip. The NVIDIA H200 NVL uses the Hopper architecture, manufactured by TSMC on a 5 nm process, with the GH100 chip. The H200 NVL's transistor count is 80,000 million, and its die size is 814 mm², with a transistor density of 98.3 million per square millimeter. The Intel part's transistor count and die size are listed as unknown.

The compute resources differ by orders of magnitude. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has 192 shading units, 12 texture mapping units, and 4 raster operation pipelines. The NVIDIA H200 NVL has 16,896 shading units, 528 texture mapping units, and 24 raster operation pipelines. The H200 NVL also includes 528 tensor cores, while the Intel part has none. Neither product has dedicated ray tracing cores listed in the database.

Clock speeds also differ substantially. The Intel part has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 1000 MHz. The NVIDIA part has a base clock of 1365 MHz and a boost clock of 1785 MHz, with memory clocked at 1593 MHz, translating to 6.4 Gbps effective. The Intel part's memory clock is listed as system shared.

Rates and throughput figures show the scale of the difference. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile achieves 4.000 GPixel/s pixel rate and 12.00 GTexel/s texture rate, with FP32 performance of 384.0 GFLOPS and FP16 performance of 768.0 GFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. The NVIDIA H200 NVL achieves 42.84 GPixel/s pixel rate and 942.5 GTexel/s texture rate, with FP32 performance of 60.32 TFLOPS and FP16 performance of 120.6 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio.

The H200 NVL is a data center product with no display outputs, while the Intel part's display outputs are portable device dependent. The H200 NVL supports no graphics APIs, whereas the Intel part supports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The Intel part's power draw is 6 W, while the H200 NVL draws 600 W.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear conclusion: these two products serve entirely different purposes and should not be considered competitors. The NVIDIA H200 NVL is a server accelerator that ranks in the 100th percentile of all GPUs, with a Geekbench OpenCL score of 334,891. It is designed for compute-heavy workloads, as indicated by its 141 GB of HBM3e memory, 4.89 TB/s bandwidth, 528 tensor cores, and PCIe 5.0 x16 interface. Its nearest rivals are all data center accelerators, and it trades the top performance spot only with the NVIDIA B200 and B300 SXM6 AC.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is an integrated processor with a 6 W TDP, designed for portable devices. It has no recorded benchmark scores, no nearest rivals, and a median percentile rank of 50. Its specifications indicate basic graphics capability: 192 shading units, 4 ROPs, and system shared memory. It supports standard graphics APIs and has no tensor cores, no dedicated memory, and no server-oriented features.

The verdict is straightforward. For server-side compute, inference, or training workloads, the NVIDIA H200 NVL is the appropriate choice based on its recorded performance and memory capacity. For a mobile device requiring basic graphics output with minimal power consumption, the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile fits that role. No benchmark data suggests any overlap in their intended use cases.

Specification Differences

The table below lists only the fields where the two products differ.

| Field | Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile | NVIDIA H200 NVL |

|-------|---------------------------|-----------------|

| Chip | Twin Lake | GH100 |

| Architecture | Xe-LP | Hopper |

| Generation | HD Graphics-T (Twin Lake) | Server Hopper (Hxx) |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 5 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Transistors | unknown | 80,000 million |

| Die Size | unknown | 814 mm² |

| Transistor Density | null | 98.3M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 300 MHz | 1365 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 1785 MHz |

| Memory Clock | System Shared | 1593 MHz 6.4 Gbps effective |

| Memory Size | System Shared | 141 GB |

| Memory Type | System Shared | HBM3e |

| Memory Bus Width | System Shared | 6144 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | 4.89 TB/s |

| Shading Units | 192 | 16896 |

| TMUs | 12 | 528 |

| ROPs | 4 | 24 |

| Tensor Cores | null | 528 |

| Pixel Rate | 4.000 GPixel/s | 42.84 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 12.00 GTexel/s | 942.5 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 384.0 GFLOPS | 60.32 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 768.0 GFLOPS (2:1) | 120.6 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 6 W | 600 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | null | 8-pin EPS |

| Suggested PSU | null | 1000 W |

| Bus Interface | Ring Bus | PCIe 5.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |

| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | N/A |

| OpenGL | 4.6 | N/A |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | N/A |

| Length | null | 267 mm 10.5 inches |

| Height | null | 111 mm 4.4 inches |

| Release Date | 2024-12-31 | 2024-11-17 |

| Predecessor | null | Server Ada |

| Successor | null | Server Blackwell |

| Percentile | 50 | 100 |

| Avg Benchmark Score | 0 | 334891 |

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile wins in power efficiency, portability, and API compatibility. Its 6 W TDP makes it suitable for fanless or low-power portable devices. It supports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, enabling standard graphics applications. Its display outputs are portable device dependent, meaning it can drive the integrated displays of laptops or tablets. Its Ring Bus interface and system shared memory keep the design simple and cost-effective for integrated use.

The NVIDIA H200 NVL wins decisively in raw compute performance, memory capacity, and bandwidth. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 334,891 places it in the 100th percentile, and it leads the AMD Instinct MI300X by 5.3 percent and the NVIDIA L40S by 13.2 percent. Its 141 GB of HBM3e memory with 4.89 TB/s bandwidth allows it to handle massive datasets. Its 528 tensor cores are designed for AI and machine learning workloads. Its 60.32 TFLOPS FP32 and 120.6 TFLOPS FP16 performance dwarf the Intel part's 384.0 GFLOPS and 768.0 GFLOPS.

The use-case split is clear from the data. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile serves mobile devices where low power and basic graphics output are priorities. The NVIDIA H200 NVL serves data centers where compute density, memory capacity, and throughput are the primary metrics. The H200 NVL's lack of display outputs and graphics API support confirms it is not intended for any client-side rendering role, while the Intel part's lack of tensor cores and server interface confirms it is not intended for accelerated compute. Each product wins in its respective domain, and the database shows no overlap.