Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is an integrated graphics processor built for portable devices, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is a dedicated desktop-class add-in board. The recorded data shows these two products occupy completely different performance tiers, with the NVIDIA part holding every benchmark advantage.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, giving it a percentile rank of 50 among all GPUs and an average benchmark score of zero. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, by contrast, has ten recorded benchmark results, an average score of 31087, and sits at the 76th percentile of all GPUs.

In terms of use cases, the Intel part is limited to basic display output and light computational tasks on portable devices, as indicated by its 6 W thermal design power, integrated graphics package, and system-shared memory. The NVIDIA part, with 16 GB of dedicated GDDR6X memory, 8448 shading units, and 66 ray tracing cores, is positioned for demanding 3D rendering, ray-traced workloads, and high-resolution gaming.

The database shows the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER outperforms its nearest rivals by small margins. It trails the NVIDIA Quadro M5000 by 0.4% (31206 vs 31087 average), the NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q by 0.4% (31220 vs 31087), the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell by 1.4% (31532 vs 31087), and the NVIDIA TITAN RTX by 1.9% (31676 vs 31087). These deltas are narrow, placing the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER in a competitive cluster just below those four cards.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different manufacturers, process technologies, and architectural families. Intel uses the Xe-LP architecture on a 10 nm process built at Intel, with the chip codenamed Twin Lake. This belongs to the HD Graphics-T generation, also called Twin Lake. NVIDIA uses the Ada Lovelace architecture on a 5 nm process fabricated by TSMC, with the AD103 chip.

The Intel part has 192 shading units, 12 texture mapping units, and 4 raster output units. It has no dedicated ray tracing cores and no tensor cores. The NVIDIA part has 8448 shading units, 264 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units, plus 66 ray tracing cores and 264 tensor cores.

The transistor counts differ enormously. Intel lists an unknown transistor count and die size. NVIDIA lists 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 121.1M per mm².

Clock behavior also separates the two. Intel runs at a 300 MHz base and 1000 MHz boost. NVIDIA runs at a 2340 MHz base and 2610 MHz boost. Memory configurations are fundamentally different: Intel uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth, while NVIDIA uses 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus delivering 672.3 GB/s.

The bus interface differs as well. Intel uses a Ring Bus, typical for integrated parts. NVIDIA uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs differ: Intel is portable-device dependent, while NVIDIA provides 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a.

API support shows a notable split. Intel supports DirectX 12 (12_1), while NVIDIA supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between these two products. The absence of any recorded scores for the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile means no comparative numbers exist to walk through.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has its own benchmark profile, which provides context for its performance class. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, it scores 5569. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 199267. In Geekbench Vulkan, it scores 53683.

The Passmark suite shows a wide spread across API levels: DirectX 9 scores 360, DirectX 10 scores 181, DirectX 11 scores 278, and DirectX 12 scores 119. The Passmark G2D score is 1225, while the G3D score reaches 31811. The Passmark GPU compute score is 18372.

The average benchmark score of 31087 for the NVIDIA part, combined with its 76th percentile standing, indicates strong overall performance. The nearest rivals sit within roughly 2% of this average, confirming the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER operates at the upper edge of a dense performance band. The Intel part has no comparable data, so any performance relationship between the two cannot be quantified from the database.

Specification Differences

The specification fields where these two products differ are extensive. The table below lists only the differing fields.

| Field | Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |

|---|---|---|

| Series | null | GeForce 40-series |

| Manufacturer | Intel | NVIDIA |

| Chip | Twin Lake | AD103 |

| Architecture | Xe-LP | Ada Lovelace |

| Generation | HD Graphics-T (Twin Lake) | GeForce 40 |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 5 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Transistors | unknown | 45,900 million |

| Die Size | unknown | 379 mm² |

| Transistor Density | null | 121.1M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 300 MHz | 2340 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 2610 MHz |

| Memory Clock | System Shared | 1313 MHz 21 Gbps effective |

| Memory Size | System Shared | 16 GB |

| Memory Type | System Shared | GDDR6X |

| Memory Bus Width | System Shared | 256 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | 672.3 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 192 | 8448 |

| TMUs | 12 | 264 |

| ROPs | 4 | 96 |

| RT Cores | null | 66 |

| Tensor Cores | null | 264 |

| Pixel Rate | 4.000 GPixel/s | 250.6 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 12.00 GTexel/s | 689.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 384.0 GFLOPS | 44.10 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 768.0 GFLOPS (2:1) | 44.10 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 6 W | 285 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Triple-slot |

| Power Connectors | null | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | null | 600 W |

| Bus Interface | Ring Bus | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |

| Dimensions | null | 310 mm x 140 mm x 61 mm |

| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |

| Release Date | 2024-12-31 | 2024-01-23 |

| Predecessor | null | GeForce 30 |

| Successor | null | GeForce 50 |

| Launch MSRP | null | 799 USD |

The FP32 compute difference is stark: Intel delivers 384.0 GFLOPS, while NVIDIA delivers 44.10 TFLOPS. The FP16 rates also differ sharply, with Intel at 768.0 GFLOPS using a 2:1 ratio and NVIDIA at 44.10 TFLOPS using a 1:1 ratio.

Pixel rate and texture rate follow the same pattern. Intel produces 4.000 GPixel/s and 12.00 GTexel/s. NVIDIA produces 250.6 GPixel/s and 689.0 GTexel/s.

FAQ

Q: What is the performance percentile of each GPU in the database?

A: The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile sits at the 50th percentile of all GPUs. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER sits at the 76th percentile.

Q: What average benchmark score does each GPU record?

A: The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has an average benchmark score of 0 with no recorded tests. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has an average benchmark score of 31087 across ten tests.

Q: How does the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER compare to its nearest rivals?

A: It trails the NVIDIA Quadro M5000 by 0.4%, the NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q by 0.4%, the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell by 1.4%, and the NVIDIA TITAN RTX by 1.9% in average benchmark score.

Q: What memory configurations do the two GPUs use?

A: The Intel part uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth. The NVIDIA part uses 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus with 672.3 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What are the thermal design power ratings?

A: The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has a TDP of 6 W. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has a TDP of 285 W and requires a 600 W suggested power supply.

Q: What production status do these GPUs have?

A: The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is listed as Active. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is listed as End-of-life, with the GeForce 50 series as its successor.