NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER Comparison

NVIDIA
GEFORCE

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

CORE STATE AD106
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1695 MHz
TDP 115 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ada Lovelace
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

CORE STATE AD103
VRAM 16 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2610 MHz
TDP 285 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ada Lovelace
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
109,197
199,267
geekbench_vulkan
108,367
53,683
passmark_directx_10
116
181
passmark_directx_11
179
278
passmark_directx_12
85
119
passmark_directx_9
223
360
passmark_g2d
763
1,225
passmark_g3d
19,587
31,811
passmark_gpu_compute
8,399
18,372
3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
N/A
5,569

Analysis: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

FAQ

Q: Which GPU is faster in overall average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has a higher average benchmark score at 31087, compared to the RTX 4070 Mobile's 27435. The desktop card also sits at the 76th percentile among all GPUs, while the mobile part sits at the 73rd percentile.

Q: Does the mobile GPU win any benchmark against the desktop card?

A: Yes, the RTX 4070 Mobile wins the Geekbench Vulkan test with a score of 108367, versus the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 53683. That is a 50.5% advantage for the mobile part in that specific test.

Q: How large is the performance gap in the Passmark G3D test?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER scores 31811 in Passmark G3D, while the RTX 4070 Mobile scores 19587. The desktop card is 62.4% ahead in that test.

Q: What is the difference in memory bandwidth between the two?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 672.3 GB/s of bandwidth with 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus. The RTX 4070 Mobile has 256.0 GB/s with 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus. The desktop card has more than 2.6 times the bandwidth.

Q: Are both GPUs based on the same architecture?

A: Yes, both use the Ada Lovelace architecture and are manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. They also both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two cards?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has a TDP of 285 W, while the RTX 4070 Mobile has a TDP of 115 W. The desktop card draws significantly more power, which aligns with its larger chip and higher clock speeds.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER wins 8 out of 9 head-to-head benchmarks, making it the clear choice for raw compute and traditional rasterization workloads. Its wins span across every DirectX generation tested, from DirectX 9 (360 vs 223, 61.4% ahead) through DirectX 12 (119 vs 85, 40% ahead). The desktop card also dominates compute-heavy tasks, as shown in the Passmark GPU Compute test where it scores 18372 versus 8399, a massive 118.7% advantage.

The RTX 4070 Mobile's single win in Geekbench Vulkan (108367 vs 53683) is notable, but it is an outlier. In every other recorded test, the desktop card holds a substantial lead. This makes the mobile GPU viable only for scenarios where Vulkan API performance is the primary metric, which is a narrow use case.

For gaming at high resolutions or with heavy graphics settings, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's wins in Passmark G3D (62.4% ahead) and DirectX 11 (55.3% ahead) indicate it is the stronger option. The mobile GPU is better suited for portable systems where the 115 W TDP is a practical constraint, but the data does not show it as competitive in raw performance outside of the Vulkan test.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs share the same Ada Lovelace architecture and 5 nm TSMC process, but they are built on different chips. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses the AD103 chip with 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die. The RTX 4070 Mobile uses the AD106 chip with 22,900 million transistors on a 188 mm² die. The transistor density is nearly identical, at 121.1M per mm² for the desktop chip and 121.8M per mm² for the mobile chip.

The compute resources scale accordingly. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 8448 shading units, 264 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, while the RTX 4070 Mobile has 4608 shading units, 144 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. The desktop card also has 66 RT cores and 264 tensor cores, versus 36 RT cores and 144 tensor cores on the mobile part.

The memory subsystem is a major architectural split. The desktop card uses 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus, while the mobile card uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus. This leads to the bandwidth difference of 672.3 GB/s versus 256.0 GB/s. The clock speeds also differ significantly, with the desktop card boosting to 2610 MHz versus the mobile card's 1695 MHz.

The physical design reflects their intended use. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is a triple-slot card with a 16-pin power connector and a suggested PSU of 600 W. The RTX 4070 Mobile is an IGP (integrated graphics package) with no power connectors, designed to be soldered into laptops.

Specification Differences

The following table summarizes the key specification differences between the two GPUs:

| Specification | RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | RTX 4070 Mobile |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | AD103 | AD106 |

| Transistors | 45,900 million | 22,900 million |

| Die Size | 379 mm² | 188 mm² |

| Base Clock | 2340 MHz | 1395 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2610 MHz | 1695 MHz |

| Memory Size | 16 GB | 8 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus | 256 bit | 128 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 672.3 GB/s | 256.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 8448 | 4608 |

| TMUs | 264 | 144 |

| ROPs | 96 | 48 |

| RT Cores | 66 | 36 |

| Tensor Cores | 264 | 144 |

| Pixel Rate | 250.6 GPixel/s | 81.36 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 689.0 GTexel/s | 244.1 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 44.10 TFLOPS | 15.62 TFLOPS |

| TDP | 285 W | 115 W |

| Slot Width | Triple-slot | IGP |

| Power Connectors | 1x 16-pin | None |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |

| Release Date | 2024-01-23 | 2023-01-02 |

| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |

The desktop card has roughly double the shading units, TMUs, ROPs, RT cores, and tensor cores. Its FP32 compute of 44.10 TFLOPS is nearly triple the mobile card's 15.62 TFLOPS. The memory clock is also higher on the desktop card, with 21 Gbps effective versus 16 Gbps effective on the mobile part.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The largest win for the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER comes in Passmark GPU Compute, where it scores 18372 versus 8399. That is a 118.7% advantage, meaning the desktop card delivers more than twice the compute throughput of the mobile part. This aligns with the FP32 specifications, where the desktop card has 44.10 TFLOPS versus 15.62 TFLOPS.

In Passmark G3D, the desktop card scores 31811 versus 19587, a 62.4% lead. This is the most relevant test for general gaming performance, and the margin is substantial. The DirectX 9 test shows a 61.4% advantage (360 vs 223), and the DirectX 10 test shows a 56% advantage (181 vs 116). DirectX 11 follows with a 55.3% lead (278 vs 179), while DirectX 12 shows a smaller but still clear 40% lead (119 vs 85).

The Passmark G2D test, which measures 2D graphics performance, also favors the desktop card with a 60.6% advantage (1225 vs 763). The Geekbench OpenCL test shows an 82.5% lead for the desktop card (199267 vs 109197), which is another strong indicator of compute performance.

The only benchmark where the RTX 4070 Mobile wins is Geekbench Vulkan, scoring 108367 versus the desktop card's 53683. That is a 50.5% advantage for the mobile part. This is a curious result, as the desktop card wins every other test by a wide margin. It may reflect driver optimization or workload characteristics specific to the Vulkan test, but the data is clear: in this single test, the mobile GPU outperforms the desktop card.

Overall, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER wins 8 of 9 head-to-head benchmarks. The average benchmark score difference is 31087 versus 27435, which puts the desktop card about 13.3% ahead in aggregate.

The Verdict

The data makes the choice straightforward for most users. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the stronger GPU in nearly every recorded benchmark, with particularly large margins in compute (118.7% in Passmark GPU Compute) and general 3D performance (62.4% in Passmark G3D). It also has more than double the memory capacity and nearly triple the bandwidth, which makes it better suited for high-resolution textures and memory-intensive workloads.

The RTX 4070 Mobile is a different class of product. Its 115 W TDP and IGP form factor make it suitable for laptops, where power draw and physical space are constrained. The single Vulkan win is interesting but does not outweigh the consistent losses across all other tests. The mobile card also has 8 GB of memory and a 128-bit bus, which will limit performance in modern games at higher settings.

For desktop builders, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the obvious pick. Its end-of-life production status means it is being phased out, but the benchmark data shows it remains a capable performer. For laptop buyers, the RTX 4070 Mobile is the only option in this comparison, and its performance is adequate for 1080p gaming, though it will not match the desktop card in demanding scenarios.

The verdict: choose the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER if you need maximum performance and have the power budget for a 285 W card. Choose the RTX 4070 Mobile only if you require a portable system and can accept the significant performance gap in exchange for the 115 W power envelope.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RTX 4070 Mobile
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
Core Specs
Shading Units
4,608
8,448 +83.3%
Shaders
4,608
8,448 +83.3%
TMUs
144
264 +83.3%
ROPs
48
96 +100.0%
SM Count
36
66 +83.3%
Clocks
Base Clock
1395 MHz
2340 MHz
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
2610 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
1313 MHz 21 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
8 GB
16 GB
VRAM (MB)
8,192
16,384 +100.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6X
Memory Bus
128 bit
256 bit
Bandwidth
256.0 GB/s
672.3 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
32 MB
48 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
81.36 GPixel/s
250.6 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
244.1 GTexel/s
689.0 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
15.62 TFLOPS
44.10 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
244.1 GFLOPS (1:64)
689.0 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
15.62 TFLOPS (1:1)
44.10 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
36
66 +83.3%
Tensor Cores
144
264 +83.3%
Power
TDP
115 W
285 W
TDP (W)
115
285 +147.8%
Suggested PSU
—
600 W
Power Connectors
None
1x 16-pin
Architecture
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Ada Lovelace
GPU Name
AD106
AD103
Generation
GeForce 40 Mobile
GeForce 40
Process Size
5 nm
5 nm
Transistors
22,900 million
45,900 million
Die Size
188 mm²
379 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
121.8M / mm²
121.1M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.9
8.9
Shader Model
6.8
6.9
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Triple-slot
Length
—
310 mm 12.2 inches
Height
—
140 mm 5.5 inches
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
—
799 USD
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
GeForce 30 Mobile
GeForce 30
Successor
GeForce 50 Mobile
GeForce 50
View GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile Details View GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER Details