Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile Comparison

Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile represent two extremes of the mobile graphics spectrum. The database shows the Intel part is an integrated processor graphics solution based on the Twin Lake chip, while the NVIDIA part is a discrete mobile GPU built on the Ada Lovelace architecture. The recorded data indicates a massive performance gap, with the RTX 4060 Mobile scoring 22,729 on average across all benchmark tests, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. The RTX 4060 Mobile sits at the 67th percentile of all GPUs, whereas the Intel part is at the 50th percentile, though that figure is based on no actual measurements.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The RTX 4060 Mobile dominates every measurable benchmark category. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 89,420 demonstrates a level of compute throughput that is orders of magnitude beyond what the integrated Intel solution could theoretically produce. The Vulkan score of 89,569 shows similar strength in graphics API performance, suggesting the GPU is well-equipped for modern game engines and compute workloads that leverage Vulkan's low-level access.

PassMark results further illustrate the gap. The RTX 4060 Mobile scores 17,469 in the PassMark G3D test, which measures full 3D graphics rendering capability. The GPU compute score of 6,816 indicates strong parallel processing for tasks like physics simulation, AI inference, and data processing. Even the DirectX 9 legacy test shows 216 points, and DirectX 10 scores 107, while DirectX 11 reaches 157 points and DirectX 12 scores 73. The G2D score of 730 reflects 2D desktop and video processing capability.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no benchmark scores recorded in the database, so direct numerical comparison is impossible. However, the hardware specifications alone indicate a fundamental difference in capability. The Intel part has 192 shading units, 12 texture mapping units, and 4 raster output units. The RTX 4060 Mobile has 3,072 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output units. That is 16 times more shading units, 8 times more texture units, and 12 times more raster output units.

Pixel throughput tells a similar story. The RTX 4060 Mobile achieves 90.72 GPixel/s, while the Intel part reaches only 4.000 GPixel/s, a factor of roughly 22.7 times difference. Texture fill rates show 181.4 GTexel/s versus 12.00 GTexel/s, a 15.1 times gap. Floating point performance is 11.61 TFLOPS for the NVIDIA part versus 384.0 GFLOPS for the Intel part, meaning the discrete GPU delivers about 30 times more FP32 compute.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from entirely different architectural generations and design philosophies. Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses the Xe-LP architecture, which is designed primarily for power efficiency and basic graphics acceleration in thin and light laptops. It is built on Intel's 10 nm process and belongs to the HD Graphics-T generation for Twin Lake chips. The RTX 4060 Mobile uses NVIDIA's Ada Lovelace architecture, built on TSMC's 5 nm process, representing a dedicated high-performance mobile GPU design.

The NVIDIA chip, AD107, contains 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 118.9 million per square millimeter. The Intel part's transistor count and die size are listed as unknown, but its 10 nm process and integrated nature suggest a much smaller, less complex design. The RTX 4060 Mobile also carries a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, while the Intel part uses a Ring Bus, which is typical for integrated graphics sharing the processor's memory subsystem.

Memory architecture differs drastically. The RTX 4060 Mobile has 8 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s and an effective speed of 16 Gbps. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses system shared memory, with a system dependent bandwidth and no dedicated VRAM. This means the RTX 4060 Mobile can access its memory without competing with CPU workloads, while the Intel part must share the system's memory bandwidth with the processor and other components.

Ray tracing and AI acceleration represent another major architectural split. The RTX 4060 Mobile includes 24 ray tracing cores and 96 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and tensor operations for features like DLSS. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no RT cores or tensor cores listed, meaning it relies entirely on software or driver-level implementations for these features, if they are supported at all.

API support also differs. The NVIDIA part supports DirectX 12 Ultimate with feature level 12_2, while the Intel part supports DirectX 12 with feature level 12_1. Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4, but the higher feature level on the RTX 4060 Mobile indicates support for more advanced DirectX 12 features such as mesh shaders, variable rate shading, and enhanced ray tracing.

Power consumption is a defining difference. The RTX 4060 Mobile has a thermal design power of 115 W, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile consumes only 6 W. That is a 109 W difference, meaning the discrete GPU requires nearly 19 times more power to deliver its performance. The Intel part has no power connectors and is an integrated graphics processor, while the RTX 4060 Mobile also lists no power connectors, though its 115 W TDP would require adequate cooling in a laptop chassis.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 4060 Mobile wins in every performance-oriented category. Its 11.61 TFLOPS of FP32 compute makes it suitable for demanding workloads such as 3D rendering, video editing, scientific simulations, and high-end gaming. The 24 ray tracing cores enable real-time ray-traced lighting in supported games, while the 96 tensor cores accelerate AI-based features like DLSS frame generation and image reconstruction. The 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth allows it to handle large textures and complex scenes without bottlenecking.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile wins in power efficiency. Its 6 W TDP means it draws a fraction of the power of the RTX 4060 Mobile, making it ideal for ultra-portable devices where battery life is prioritized over performance. The system shared memory design eliminates the need for dedicated VRAM, reducing component cost and complexity. The 10 nm process and integrated nature mean it generates very little heat, allowing for fanless or passively cooled designs in some cases.

For basic tasks like web browsing, office productivity, video playback, and light image editing, the Intel part is likely sufficient, though the database has no direct benchmark scores to confirm its real-world performance. The RTX 4060 Mobile, on the other hand, is overkill for such tasks but provides headroom for future workloads and more demanding applications.

The Verdict

The data clearly shows that the RTX 4060 Mobile is the superior performer by every measurable metric. Its average benchmark score of 22,729 places it at the 67th percentile of all GPUs, and its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 with an average score of 22,895 (0.7% higher), the Intel Arc B580 at 23,021 (1.3% higher), the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT at 22,549 (0.8% lower), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile at 22,435 (1.3% lower). This puts the RTX 4060 Mobile in a competitive position within its performance class, trading blows with both desktop and mobile GPUs from previous and current generations.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no benchmark data, no average score, and no rival comparisons. Its 50th percentile ranking is nominal, based on no test results. This means any assessment of its performance must rely on its specifications alone, which indicate a very low-end integrated solution.

Users who need serious gaming, content creation, or compute performance should choose the RTX 4060 Mobile. Users who prioritize battery life, portability, and low power consumption in a basic productivity laptop can consider a system with the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile, but they must accept that it cannot handle demanding 3D workloads.

FAQ

Q: How much faster is the RTX 4060 Mobile than the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile?

A: The RTX 4060 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 22,729, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no recorded benchmark scores. The FP32 compute rate is 11.61 TFLOPS versus 384.0 GFLOPS, meaning the NVIDIA part delivers roughly 30 times more floating point throughput.

Q: What are the memory specifications of each GPU?

A: The RTX 4060 Mobile has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth and an effective speed of 16 Gbps. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth and no dedicated VRAM size or type.

Q: Does the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile support ray tracing?

A: No, the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no ray tracing cores listed. The RTX 4060 Mobile has 24 ray tracing cores and 96 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI features.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The RTX 4060 Mobile has a TDP of 115 W, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has a TDP of 6 W. The NVIDIA part consumes about 19 times more power.

Q: Which GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate?

A: The RTX 4060 Mobile supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (feature level 12_2). The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile supports DirectX 12 with feature level 12_1, which is a lower tier.

Q: What process nodes are used for each GPU?

A: The RTX 4060 Mobile uses TSMC's 5 nm process. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses Intel's 10 nm process.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Architecture | Xe-LP | Ada Lovelace |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 5 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Transistors | Unknown | 18,900 million |

| Die Size | Unknown | 159 mm² |

| Base Clock | 300 MHz | 1545 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 1890 MHz |

| Memory Size | System Shared | 8 GB |

| Memory Type | System Shared | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus Width | System Shared | 128 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | 256.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 192 | 3072 |

| TMUs | 12 | 96 |

| ROPs | 4 | 48 |

| RT Cores | None | 24 |

| Tensor Cores | None | 96 |

| Pixel Rate | 4.000 GPixel/s | 90.72 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 12.00 GTexel/s | 181.4 GTexel/s |

| FP32 Performance | 384.0 GFLOPS | 11.61 TFLOPS |

| FP16 Performance | 768.0 GFLOPS (2:1) | 11.61 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 6 W | 115 W |

| Bus Interface | Ring Bus | PCIe 4.0 x8 |

| DirectX Support | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |

| OpenGL Support | 4.6 | 4.6 |

| Vulkan Support | 1.4 | 1.4 |

| Release Date | 2024-12-31 | 2023-01-02 |

| Production Status | Active | Active |