Intel Arc Pro B370 vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

FAQ

Q: What are the core architectural differences between the Intel Arc Pro B370 and the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses the Xe3-LPG architecture on Intel's 3 nm node, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses the TrueGPU architecture on TSMC's 6 nm node. The LX 7G100 has substantially more shading units (6144 vs. 1280), more texture mapping units (192 vs. 40), and more raster output units (96 vs. 20).

Q: How do the memory configurations compare between these two GPUs?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses system shared memory, meaning its memory size, type, bus width, and bandwidth are all dependent on the host system.

Q: Which GPU has higher raw compute throughput?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1), while the Intel Arc Pro B370 delivers 6.144 TFLOPS FP32 and 12.29 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1). The LX 7G100 is roughly 4x faster in both metrics.

Q: What are the power and physical requirements for each card?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has a 225 W TDP, requires a 550 W suggested PSU, uses a single 8-pin power connector, and is a dual-slot card measuring 294 mm in length. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has a 25 W TDP, uses no power connectors, and is an integrated graphics processor (IGP).

Q: Do both cards support the same graphics APIs?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Intel Arc Pro B370 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3.

Q: What are the display output capabilities?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The Intel Arc Pro B370's display outputs are portable device dependent, meaning they vary based on the host device.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc Pro B370 and the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 represent fundamentally different design approaches. The Arc Pro B370 is built on Intel's 3 nm process and uses the Xe3-LPG architecture, part of the Panther Lake chip generation. It is an integrated graphics solution (IGP) with system shared memory, meaning it relies on the host system's memory rather than dedicated VRAM.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100, in contrast, is a discrete dual-slot graphics card built on TSMC's 6 nm process using the TrueGPU architecture with the 7G106 chip. It features 12 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The LX 7G100 connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, while the Arc Pro B370 uses an IGP bus interface.

The shading resources differ dramatically. The LX 7G100 contains 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units. The Arc Pro B370 contains 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, and 20 ROPs. The LX 7G100 also has no dedicated ray tracing cores listed, while the Arc Pro B370 includes 10 ray tracing cores.

Clock behavior also differs significantly. The Arc Pro B370 has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. The LX 7G100 has no base or boost clock listed in the database, but its memory operates at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed. The Arc Pro B370's memory clock is listed as system shared, making it dependent on the host platform.

The LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3, while the Arc Pro B370 supports the newer Vulkan 1.4 specification. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Arc Pro B370 was released on January 26, 2026, and the LX 7G100 followed on June 17, 2026.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no recorded benchmark scores for either GPU. Both the Intel Arc Pro B370 and the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 show an average benchmark score of 0, and both are placed at the 50th percentile among all GPUs in the database. With no head-to-head benchmark results available, the analysis must rely on the recorded hardware specifications.

The raw compute metrics favor the LX 7G100 substantially. In FP32 throughput, the LX 7G100 delivers 24.58 TFLOPS versus 6.144 TFLOPS for the Arc Pro B370, a difference of roughly 4x. The FP16 figures follow the same pattern: 49.15 TFLOPS versus 12.29 TFLOPS. Pixel fill rates show the LX 7G100 at 192.0 GPixel/s compared to 48.00 GPixel/s for the Arc Pro B370, again a 4x advantage. Texture fill rates are 384.0 GTexel/s versus 96.00 GTexel/s.

Memory bandwidth is another area of clear separation. The LX 7G100's 432.0 GB/s dedicated GDDR6 bandwidth stands against the Arc Pro B370's system dependent shared memory. For workloads that stress memory bandwidth, the discrete card's dedicated VRAM provides a structural advantage that system shared memory cannot match.

The power envelope tells the opposite story. The Arc Pro B370 operates at 25 W TDP, while the LX 7G100 requires 225 W. This 9x difference in power consumption places the two cards in different deployment categories. The Arc Pro B370 is an integrated solution for portable devices, while the LX 7G100 is a full-size dual-slot card with an 8-pin power connector and a 550 W suggested PSU.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Arc Pro B370 | Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 |

|----------------|---------------------|----------------------|

| Architecture | Xe3-LPG | TrueGPU |

| Process Node | 3 nm | 6 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Shading Units | 1280 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 40 | 192 |

| ROPs | 20 | 96 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 10 | None listed |

| Base Clock | 300 MHz | Not listed |

| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz | Not listed |

| Memory Size | System Shared | 12 GB |

| Memory Type | System Shared | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus Width | System Shared | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | 432.0 GB/s |

| Pixel Rate | 48.00 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 96.00 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 6.144 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 25 W | 225 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |

| Suggested PSU | Not listed | 550 W |

| Bus Interface | IGP | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Dimensions | Not listed | 294 mm x 120 mm x 49 mm |

| Release Date | 2026-01-26 | 2026-06-17 |

| Predecessor | HD Graphics-WM | None listed |

The two cards differ on nearly every measurable specification. The LX 7G100 holds advantages in raw compute, memory capacity, memory bandwidth, and fill rates. The Arc Pro B370 holds advantages in process node (3 nm vs. 6 nm), power consumption (25 W vs. 225 W), Vulkan version support (1.4 vs. 1.3), and physical footprint (IGP vs. dual-slot).

The Verdict

The recorded data places these two GPUs in entirely different product categories. The Intel Arc Pro B370 is an integrated graphics processor built for portable devices, operating at 25 W with system shared memory. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 is a discrete dual-slot graphics card with 12 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory, a 192-bit bus, and 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

For applications that demand maximum compute throughput, the LX 7G100 is the clear choice based on the numbers. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 performance is 4x the Arc Pro B370's 6.144 TFLOPS. Its 384.0 GTexel/s texture rate and 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate similarly dwarf the Arc Pro B370's 96.00 GTexel/s and 48.00 GPixel/s. The dedicated 12 GB GDDR6 memory pool with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth provides a foundation for memory-intensive workloads that system shared memory cannot replicate.

For systems where power consumption is the primary constraint, the Arc Pro B370 presents a compelling profile. Its 25 W TDP requires no power connectors and no suggested PSU rating, making it suitable for compact portable devices. The 3 nm process node is more advanced than the LX 7G100's 6 nm node, and the Vulkan 1.4 support is newer than the LX 7G100's Vulkan 1.3.

The 10 ray tracing cores on the Arc Pro B370 are notable, as the LX 7G100 lists no ray tracing cores. The database shows equal 50th percentile placement for both GPUs, but that ranking is based on the full GPU population and does not reflect any head-to-head benchmark data, as none exists in the database.

The LX 7G100's physical requirements are substantial: 294 mm length, dual-slot width, 225 W TDP, and a 550 W suggested PSU. The Arc Pro B370 carries no such requirements. The LX 7G100 also offers four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, while the Arc Pro B370's display outputs depend on the host portable device.

The choice between these two GPUs depends entirely on the deployment context. Systems with space and power budgets for a full-size discrete card should select the LX 7G100 for its 4x compute advantage and dedicated memory. Portable or ultra-low-power systems should select the Arc Pro B370 for its 25 W envelope and integrated form factor. The data does not present a single superior product, but rather two specialized solutions for different hardware classes.