Intel Arc Pro B370 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER Comparison

Intel Arc Pro B370 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER occupy opposite ends of the graphics spectrum, and the recorded data reflects that divide clearly. The Intel part is an integrated graphics processor built for mobile platforms, while the NVIDIA card is a discrete dual-slot accelerator with a dedicated 24 GB GDDR7 frame buffer. Benchmark results, specification sheets, and architectural details separate the two across nearly every measurable category.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only benchmark score recorded in the database is a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER. That score is 3075 points. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has no benchmark entries in the database, so no direct head-to-head comparison can be drawn from measured results. Instead, the analysis relies on the NVIDIA card's position relative to its nearest rivals and the raw specification differences between the two products.

The RTX 5080 SUPER's score of 3075 places it in the 19th percentile of all GPUs in the database. That percentile figure indicates that roughly 81% of all recorded graphics cards score higher in this specific test. The nearest rivals confirm a tight grouping: the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 averages 3163 points, which is 2.8% higher than the RTX 5080 SUPER's result. The Intel Arc Pro B60 scores 3182 points, 3.4% higher. On the lower side, the NVIDIA GeForce 820A averages 2983 points, 3.1% lower, and the GeForce GTX 860M scores 2967, 3.6% lower. The RTX 5080 SUPER sits nearly centered among these four competitors, with a spread of roughly 3.5% in either direction.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 has zero benchmark results, zero wins in head-to-head tests, and an average benchmark score of zero. Its percentile versus all GPUs is 50, which in the database represents a midpoint placeholder rather than a measured performance rank. The RTX 5080 SUPER has one benchmark result, one win in head-to-head tests, and an average score of 3075. The wins tally in the database is 0 for Intel and 1 for NVIDIA, reflecting that only the NVIDIA part has any recorded test data.

Without a direct benchmark comparison, the specification table provides the only quantitative bridge. The RTX 5080 SUPER delivers 56.28 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the Intel Arc Pro B370 delivers 6.144 TFLOPS. That is a ratio of roughly 9.2 to 1 in favor of NVIDIA. Pixel throughput differs similarly: 293.1 GPixel/s versus 48.00 GPixel/s. Texture rate on the NVIDIA card is 879.3 GTexel/s against 96.00 GTexel/s on the Intel part. These figures do not come from a shared benchmark, but they establish a clear performance envelope.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc Pro B370 wins in power efficiency and integration. Its TDP is 25 W, compared to 415 W for the NVIDIA card. The Intel part requires no power connectors and uses the system's shared memory, making it suitable for portable devices with tightly constrained thermal and electrical budgets. Its base clock is 300 MHz, boosting to 2400 MHz, which suggests a design tuned for low-power operation rather than sustained high-throughput workloads. The slot width is listed as IGP, meaning it is integrated into the processor package, and the bus interface is also IGP, so no separate expansion slot is needed.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER wins in raw compute, memory capacity, memory bandwidth, and feature throughput. Its 24 GB GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus delivers 1.02 TB/s of bandwidth. The Intel part has system-shared memory with no fixed bus width or bandwidth, described only as system dependent. The RTX 5080 SUPER also carries 10752 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, 112 raster output units, 84 ray tracing cores, and 336 tensor cores. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, and 10 ray tracing cores, with no tensor core count listed.

In ray tracing and tensor workloads, the NVIDIA card has a structural advantage. The RTX 5080 SUPER lists 84 ray tracing cores and 336 tensor cores, while the Intel part lists only 10 ray tracing cores and no tensor core entry. The FP16 throughput on the RTX 5080 SUPER is 56.28 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio to FP32, meaning it does not sacrifice half-precision performance. The Intel Arc Pro B370 delivers 12.29 TFLOPS FP16 at a 2:1 ratio, which is half its FP32 rate. For AI inference or machine learning training, the NVIDIA card's tensor cores and full-rate FP16 make it the only viable option between the two.

Display output flexibility also favors NVIDIA. The RTX 5080 SUPER provides 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b outputs. The Intel Arc Pro B370's display outputs are listed as portable device dependent, which means they vary by the host device and cannot be specified independently.

The Verdict

The data indicates that these two products serve entirely different roles. The Intel Arc Pro B370 is an integrated GPU aimed at low-power portable systems. Its 25 W TDP, system-shared memory, and IGP bus interface confirm that it is not designed for high-end gaming or compute tasks. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER is a discrete, dual-slot, 415 W accelerator with 24 GB of dedicated GDDR7 memory and a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface. Its benchmark score of 3075 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, while modest relative to the full GPU population, places it in a specific performance tier that the Intel part cannot approach based on the recorded specifications.

A user or system designer choosing between these two is not making a performance trade-off; they are choosing between an integrated solution and a discrete accelerator. The Intel Arc Pro B370 is appropriate for portable devices where power draw and physical space are critical constraints. The RTX 5080 SUPER is appropriate for desktop systems with a 304 mm length, 137 mm height, 40 mm width envelope, a 1x 16-pin power connector, and a power supply capable of supporting a 415 W card. The launch MSRP of the RTX 5080 SUPER is 999 USD, a figure that reflects its discrete, high-end positioning. The Intel part has no launch MSRP listed.

Performance percentile data reinforces the separation. The RTX 5080 SUPER sits at the 19th percentile in the database, meaning it outperforms less than a quarter of recorded GPUs in the Steel Nomad test. The Intel Arc Pro B370 sits at the 50th percentile, but that value is a placeholder due to the absence of benchmark data, not a measured ranking. The database records zero benchmark scores for the Intel part, so any performance claim about it must derive from its clock rates, compute units, and memory configuration rather than from empirical tests.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher benchmark score in the database?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER has a recorded 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3075. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has no benchmark scores recorded.

Q: How does the RTX 5080 SUPER compare to its nearest rivals?

A: It scores 2.8% lower than the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 (3163), 3.4% lower than the Intel Arc Pro B60 (3182), 3.1% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce 820A (2983), and 3.6% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M (2967).

Q: What is the memory configuration difference?

A: The RTX 5080 SUPER has 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus with 1.02 TB/s bandwidth. The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses system-shared memory with no fixed size, type, bus width, or bandwidth; its bandwidth is listed as system dependent.

Q: How do the shading unit counts differ?

A: The RTX 5080 SUPER has 10752 shading units, while the Intel Arc Pro B370 has 1280 shading units.

Q: What are the power requirements for each GPU?

A: The RTX 5080 SUPER has a TDP of 415 W and uses a single 16-pin power connector. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has a TDP of 25 W and requires no power connectors.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same API versions?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different manufacturers, foundries, and process nodes. Intel builds the Arc Pro B370 on a 3 nm process at Intel's own foundry. The chip is called Panther Lake and uses the Xe3-LPG architecture, belonging to the Arc Graphics-WM (Panther Lake) generation. NVIDIA builds the RTX 5080 SUPER on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The chip is GB203 and uses the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, part of the GeForce 50 series.

Transistor counts differ dramatically. The RTX 5080 SUPER contains 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 120.6 million per square millimeter. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has unknown transistor count and die size, so no density figure can be stated.

Ray tracing and AI acceleration structures differ. The RTX 5080 SUPER has 84 ray tracing cores and 336 tensor cores. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has 10 ray tracing cores and no tensor core entry in the database. This means the NVIDIA card has dedicated hardware for both ray tracing and tensor operations, while the Intel part only lists ray tracing resources.

FP16 processing also differs in implementation. The RTX 5080 SUPER computes FP16 at the same rate as FP32 (56.28 TFLOPS, 1:1 ratio). The Intel Arc Pro B370 computes FP16 at 12.29 TFLOPS, which is a 2:1 ratio relative to its 6.144 TFLOPS FP32 rate, indicating it halves FP16 throughput compared to FP32.

Clock behavior shows different design philosophies. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz, a wide range suggesting aggressive power scaling. The RTX 5080 SUPER has a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2617 MHz, a narrow range indicating a high-idle, high-load constant performance profile.

Specification Differences

The physical dimensions favor the integrated Intel part. The Arc Pro B370 has no listed length, height, or width because it is an IGP. The RTX 5080 SUPER measures 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, occupying a dual-slot design.

Memory differs completely. The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth. The RTX 5080 SUPER uses 24 GB of dedicated GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus with 1.02 TB/s bandwidth.

Compute resources differ in every category. The Intel part has 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, and 10 ray tracing cores. The RTX 5080 SUPER has 10752 shading units, 336 TMUs, 112 ROPs, and 84 ray tracing cores. The NVIDIA card also has 336 tensor cores; the Intel part has none listed.

Clock speeds and power draw diverge sharply. The Intel Arc Pro B370 runs at 300 MHz base and 2400 MHz boost with a 25 W TDP. The RTX 5080 SUPER runs at 2295 MHz base and 2617 MHz boost with a 415 W TDP. The memory clock on the NVIDIA card is 2000 MHz with 32 Gbps effective speed; the Intel part's memory clock is system shared.

Interfaces and outputs differ. The Intel part uses an IGP bus interface and portable device dependent display outputs. The RTX 5080 SUPER uses PCIe 5.0 x16 and provides 1x HDMI 2.1b plus 3x DisplayPort 2.1b outputs. The power connector on the NVIDIA card is a single 16-pin; the Intel part has no power connector.

Release dates differ by less than a month. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has a release date of January 26, 2026. The RTX 5080 SUPER has a release date of December 31, 2025. Both are listed as active in production status. The RTX 5080 SUPER has a launch MSRP of 999 USD; the Intel part has no launch MSRP recorded.