AMD Radeon RX 7400 vs Intel Arc Pro B370 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for these two GPUs is asymmetrical. The AMD Radeon RX 7400 has eight benchmark entries across 3DMark and Passmark suites, while the Intel Arc Pro B370 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. This makes a direct numerical comparison of performance impossible for the Intel part, but the AMD side provides substantial data points for analysis.

The AMD Radeon RX 7400 delivers its strongest result in the Passmark G3D test, scoring 11897. This places it in the 17th percentile of all GPUs tracked in the database. The GPU compute score of 5152 shows a different performance profile, as compute workloads typically scale differently than rasterization tests. The DirectX 9 legacy test returns 176, which is notably higher on a relative scale than the DirectX 11 score of 97, the DirectX 10 score of 59, or the DirectX 12 score of 44. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test yields 1103, a modern workload that stresses current-generation graphics features.

The average benchmark score across all recorded tests for the RX 7400 is 2467. The nearest rivals in the database show tight clustering around this figure. The AMD Radeon 8040S averages 2440, which is 1.1% behind the RX 7400. The NVIDIA GeForce 710M averages 2433, a 1.4% deficit. The Intel HD Graphics 610 averages 2425, trailing by 1.8%. The NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M averages 2422, sitting 1.9% behind. These deltas are small, indicating that the RX 7400 sits at the top of a very closely packed performance cluster in the database's aggregate scoring.

The Passmark G2D score of 1209 for the RX 7400 represents the 2D graphics workload, which tests desktop composition, video playback, and basic display operations. This is a separate metric from the 3D and compute tests and shows a different aspect of the GPU's capabilities. The RX 7400's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1103 reflects DirectX 12 performance in a modern game-like workload, while the Passmark DirectX 12 score of 44 is a different test method and should not be compared directly to the 3DMark result.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 has zero benchmarks recorded, an average benchmark score of 0, and no nearest rivals listed. Its percentile ranking is 50, which reflects its position in the database's distribution of all GPUs, but without actual scores this represents a placeholder rather than a measured result. The data shows no wins for either card in head-to-head comparisons because no head-to-head benchmark entries exist in the database for this pairing.

The Verdict

The data supports selecting the AMD Radeon RX 7400 when measured performance is the requirement. Its eight recorded benchmarks provide concrete figures across multiple API generations and workload types. The Intel Arc Pro B370 offers no recorded performance data, so any assessment of its capabilities must rely on architectural specifications rather than benchmark evidence.

The RX 7400's average score of 2467 places it ahead of four closely matched rivals by margins between 1.1% and 1.9%. These are small differences, but the RX 7400 leads its cluster. The 17th percentile ranking indicates that most GPUs in the database score higher, but within its immediate competitive set, this card leads.

For users requiring a discrete graphics solution with verified performance across DirectX 9, 10, 11, and 12 workloads plus compute tests, the RX 7400 has documented results. The Intel Arc Pro B370 is an integrated graphics processor per its slot width of "IGP," bus interface of "IGP," and power connector of "None." Its 25 W TDP and system-shared memory architecture target a different use case entirely, one where the GPU shares system resources and draws minimal power.

The RX 7400's 43 W TDP with a 200 W suggested PSU and a single 6-pin power connector indicates a low-power discrete card. The Arc Pro B370 consumes 25 W, uses no power connectors, and relies on shared system memory. These are fundamentally different product categories. The benchmark data only validates the RX 7400.

FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Radeon RX 7400 compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The RX 7400 averages 2467. The AMD Radeon 8040S scores 2440 (1.1% behind), the NVIDIA GeForce 710M scores 2433 (1.4% behind), the Intel HD Graphics 610 scores 2425 (1.8% behind), and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M scores 2422 (1.9% behind).

Q: What is the RX 7400's best and worst benchmark result?

A: The highest single score is the Passmark G3D result of 11897. The lowest is the Passmark DirectX 12 score of 44. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 1103, and the Passmark GPU compute score is 5152.

Q: Does the Intel Arc Pro B370 have any recorded benchmarks?

A: No. The database contains zero benchmark entries for the Intel Arc Pro B370, and its average benchmark score is recorded as 0. It also has no nearest rivals listed.

Q: What percentile does each GPU occupy in the database?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7400 sits in the 17th percentile of all GPUs. The Intel Arc Pro B370 sits in the 50th percentile, though this is not based on measured benchmark scores.

Q: What are the DirectX API support levels for both cards?

A: Both the AMD Radeon RX 7400 and the Intel Arc Pro B370 support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: How does the RX 7400's performance vary across DirectX versions?

A: The Passmark DirectX 9 score is 176, DirectX 10 is 59, DirectX 11 is 97, and DirectX 12 is 44. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test returns 1103, which uses a different methodology than Passmark.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across nearly every specification field. Process node: the AMD Radeon RX 7400 uses a 6 nm process at TSMC, while the Intel Arc Pro B370 uses a 3 nm process at Intel. The RX 7400 has 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die with a density of 65.2M per mm², while the Arc Pro B370's transistor count, die size, and density are listed as unknown or null.

Clock speeds diverge significantly. The RX 7400 has a base clock of 1452 MHz, a boost clock of 2300 MHz, a game clock of 2200 MHz, and a memory clock of 2250 MHz or 18 Gbps effective. The Arc Pro B370 has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz, with no game clock listed and memory clock marked as "System Shared."

Memory configuration is a major difference. The RX 7400 uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Arc Pro B370 uses system-shared memory of unknown type, bus width, and bandwidth, listed as "System Dependent."

Compute unit counts differ. The RX 7400 has 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, 64 ROPs, and 28 ray tracing cores. The Arc Pro B370 has 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, and 10 ray tracing cores. Neither card lists tensor cores.

Fill rates and throughput figures reflect these differences. The RX 7400 achieves 147.2 GPixel/s pixel rate, 257.6 GTexel/s texture rate, 16.49 TFLOPS FP32, and 32.97 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1). The Arc Pro B370 achieves 48.00 GPixel/s, 96.00 GTexel/s, 6.144 TFLOPS FP32, and 12.29 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1).

Power and physical specifications differ substantially. The RX 7400 has a 43 W TDP, dual-slot width, one 6-pin power connector, a 200 W suggested PSU, and PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. The Arc Pro B370 has a 25 W TDP, IGP slot width, no power connectors, no suggested PSU, and an IGP bus interface. Display outputs: the RX 7400 provides 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, while the Arc Pro B370's outputs are "Portable Device Dependent."

Release dates differ by several months. The RX 7400 released on 2025-08-07, and the Arc Pro B370 released on 2026-01-26. The RX 7400's predecessor is Navi II and successor is Navi IV. The Arc Pro B370's predecessor is HD Graphics-WM and it has no successor listed. The Arc Pro B370's production status is "Active," while the RX 7400's is null.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon RX 7400 belongs to the Radeon RX 7000 series built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the chip codename "Hotpink Bonefish" and the generation listed as Navi III (RX 7000). Its chip is Navi 33. The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses Xe3-LPG architecture on the Panther Lake chip, with the generation listed as Arc Graphics-WM (Panther Lake), and no codename recorded. The RX 7400's predecessor is Navi II and successor is Navi IV, while the Arc Pro B370's predecessor is HD Graphics-WM with no successor listed.

The process technology differences are stark: 6 nm at TSMC versus 3 nm at Intel. The transistor count of 13,300 million for the RX 7400 dwarfs the unknown figure for the Arc Pro B370, and the die size of 204 mm² likewise has no counterpart. The RX 7400 is a discrete card with its own memory subsystem, while the Arc Pro B370 is an integrated graphics processor sharing system memory.

Core counts reflect the architectural split. The RX 7400 has 1792 shading units against the Arc Pro B370's 1280, a 512-unit advantage. Texture mapping units stand at 112 versus 40, ROPs at 64 versus 20, and ray tracing cores at 28 versus 10. The RX 7400's pixel rate of 147.2 GPixel/s is approximately three times the Arc Pro B370's 48.00 GPixel/s, and its texture rate of 257.6 GTexel/s is roughly 2.7 times the Arc Pro B370's 96.00 GTexel/s. FP32 compute of 16.49 TFLOPS versus 6.144 TFLOPS shows a 2.7x advantage for the AMD card, with FP16 scaling similarly at 32.97 versus 12.29 TFLOPS.

Memory architecture is the most fundamental difference. The RX 7400 uses dedicated 8 GB GDDR6 with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth on a 128-bit bus. The Arc Pro B370 uses system-shared memory with bandwidth listed as "System Dependent," meaning its performance scales with the host system's memory configuration rather than a fixed specification. The RX 7400's memory clock of 2250 MHz or 18 Gbps effective is a fixed value, while the Arc Pro B370's is tied to the system.

Both cards support identical API levels: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Neither lists tensor cores, and both use a 2:1 ratio for FP16 to FP32 throughput. The RX 7400 is built for desktop use with a dual-slot form factor and external power connector, while the Arc Pro B370 is an IGP with no external power requirements, designed for portable devices as its display output specification indicates.