Intel Arc Pro B370 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 GB205 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no recorded benchmark scores for either the Intel Arc Pro B370 or the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 GB205. Both entries show an average benchmark score of zero, with no individual benchmark results listed. The head-to-head benchmark comparison field is empty, and neither product has recorded wins in any category. This means the quantitative performance relationship between these two GPUs cannot be established from the recorded data.

What the database does provide is raw computational throughput figures that can be compared directly. The Intel Arc Pro B370 delivers 6.144 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 GB205 delivers 19.18 TFLOPS. The NVIDIA part is 3.12 times faster in raw FP32 throughput. In FP16 compute, the Intel part reaches 12.29 TFLOPS using a 2:1 ratio, while the NVIDIA part achieves 19.18 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio. The NVIDIA GPU maintains its full FP32 rate in FP16, whereas the Intel GPU doubles its rate, yet still trails by 56 percent.

Texture and pixel throughput show similar gaps. The RTX 5060 GB205 outputs 299.6 GTexel/s, which is 3.12 times the 96.00 GTexel/s of the Arc Pro B370. Pixel fill rates stand at 119.9 GPixel/s for the NVIDIA card versus 48.00 GPixel/s for the Intel part, a 2.50 times advantage. These figures derive directly from the shading unit counts, texture mapping unit counts, and clock speeds recorded in the database.

Clock behavior differs notably between the two. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz, an 8 times multiplier between base and boost. The RTX 5060 GB205 sits at 2280 MHz base and 2497 MHz boost, a modest 9.5 percent boost headroom. The Intel part relies on aggressive boost behavior to reach its rated throughput, while the NVIDIA part runs near its maximum clock continuously.

Neither product has a recorded percentile ranking above 50, and both sit at the 50th percentile against all GPUs in the database. With no nearest rivals listed and no average benchmark scores, the relative standing of these two products within the broader GPU landscape remains undefined. The recorded data confirms only that both occupy the midpoint of the database distribution, which is a default value rather than a measured outcome.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc Pro B370 wins in power efficiency based on recorded specifications. Its TDP of 25 W is 83 percent lower than the 145 W TDP of the RTX 5060 GB205. For systems constrained by thermal or power budgets, the Intel part delivers 6.144 TFLOPS of FP32 compute while drawing a fraction of the power. The RTX 5060 GB205, by contrast, requires 5.8 times the power budget to achieve its higher throughput.

The Intel part also wins on integration flexibility. It is an IGP with no power connectors and no defined slot width, meaning it integrates into the host processor package. The RTX 5060 GB205 is a dual-slot discrete card requiring a 1x 8-pin power connector and a suggested 300 W power supply. The Arc Pro B370 has no suggested PSU rating, reflecting its integrated nature. Systems without expansion slots or dedicated GPU power headers can only use the Intel part.

The RTX 5060 GB205 wins decisively in memory bandwidth and capacity. It has 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus delivering 448.0 GB/s. The Arc Pro B370 uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth, meaning its memory performance scales with the host platform rather than being fixed. Any workload that depends on memory bandwidth, such as high-resolution texturing or large dataset processing, favors the NVIDIA part.

Compute throughput favors the RTX 5060 GB205 across every measured metric. It has 3840 shading units, 120 texture mapping units, 48 ROPs, 30 RT cores, and 120 tensor cores. The Arc Pro B370 has 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, and 10 RT cores, with no tensor cores listed. The NVIDIA part provides 3 times the shading units, 3 times the TMUs, 2.4 times the ROPs, and 3 times the RT cores.

The RTX 5060 GB205 delivers 19.18 TFLOPS in both FP32 and FP16, while the Arc Pro B370 delivers 6.144 TFLOPS FP32 and 12.29 TFLOPS FP16. For workloads using FP16 arithmetic, the NVIDIA part still leads by 56 percent. For FP32 workloads, the lead stretches to 3.12 times. The NVIDIA card also provides dedicated tensor cores for AI acceleration, a feature entirely absent from the Intel part's recorded specifications.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses the Xe3-LPG architecture built on a 3 nm process at Intel's foundry. The chip is codenamed Panther Lake and belongs to the Arc Graphics-WM generation. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 GB205 uses the Blackwell 2.0 architecture built on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The NVIDIA chip is named GB205 and belongs to the GeForce 50-series generation.

Process node differences are significant. The Intel part uses a 3 nm node, while the NVIDIA part uses a 5 nm node. The database records 31,100 million transistors on the NVIDIA die, which measures 263 mm², giving a transistor density of 118.3M per mm². The Intel part has unknown transistor count and die size, so density cannot be compared. The smaller process node for Intel does not translate into higher performance, as the recorded compute figures show the larger-node NVIDIA part ahead.

Memory architecture differs fundamentally. The Arc Pro B370 uses system shared memory, meaning it has no dedicated VRAM and borrows from the host system. Memory type, bus width, bandwidth, and clock are all system dependent or shared. The RTX 5060 GB205 uses 8 GB of dedicated GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth and a memory clock of 1750 MHz, 28 Gbps effective.

Shader and fixed-function hardware counts diverge sharply. The Intel part has 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, and 10 RT cores. The NVIDIA part has 3840 shading units, 120 TMUs, 48 ROPs, and 30 RT cores. The NVIDIA part also includes 120 tensor cores, while the Intel part lists none. These hardware differences explain the fill rate, texture rate, and FP32 throughput gaps recorded in the database.

API support is identical for both products. Each supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Neither has a missing API feature that the other provides. The compute differences therefore come from hardware throughput rather than API capability.

Clock architecture differs considerably. The Intel part has a 300 MHz base clock and 2400 MHz boost clock. The NVIDIA part has a 2280 MHz base clock and 2497 MHz boost clock. The NVIDIA base clock is 7.6 times higher than the Intel base clock, while the boost clocks are much closer, with NVIDIA 4 percent higher. The Intel part depends on boost behavior to approach usable performance, while the NVIDIA part maintains high clocks throughout.

Physical form factors separate the products completely. The Intel Arc Pro B370 is an IGP with no slot width, no power connectors, no dimensions, and a bus interface of IGP. Display outputs are portable device dependent. The RTX 5060 GB205 is a dual-slot card measuring 241 mm by 111 mm by 40 mm, requiring 1x 8-pin power, a 300 W suggested PSU, and using PCIe 5.0 x8. It provides 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b outputs.

FAQ

Q: What is the power consumption difference between the two GPUs?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B370 has a TDP of 25 W, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 GB205 has a TDP of 145 W. The NVIDIA part requires 5.8 times the power of the Intel part.

Q: Which GPU has more memory bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 GB205 has 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth from 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus. The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth, so no fixed bandwidth figure exists.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same graphics APIs?

A: Yes. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the FP32 compute throughput for each GPU?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B370 delivers 6.144 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 GB205 delivers 19.18 TFLOPS, which is 3.12 times higher.

Q: Does either GPU include tensor cores for AI workloads?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 GB205 includes 120 tensor cores. The Intel Arc Pro B370 lists no tensor cores in the database.

Q: What are the release dates for these products?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B370 has a release date of January 26, 2026. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 GB205 has a release date of May 31, 2026.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Arc Pro B370 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 GB205 |

|----------------|---------------------|-------------------------------|

| Architecture | Xe3-LPG | Blackwell 2.0 |

| Process node | 3 nm | 5 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Transistors | unknown | 31,100 million |

| Die size | unknown | 263 mm² |

| Transistor density | not recorded | 118.3M / mm² |

| Base clock | 300 MHz | 2280 MHz |

| Boost clock | 2400 MHz | 2497 MHz |

| Memory size | System Shared | 8 GB |

| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR7 |

| Memory bus width | System Shared | 128 bit |

| Memory bandwidth | System Dependent | 448.0 GB/s |

| Memory clock | System Shared | 1750 MHz, 28 Gbps effective |

| Shading units | 1280 | 3840 |

| Texture mapping units | 40 | 120 |

| ROPs | 20 | 48 |

| RT cores | 10 | 30 |

| Tensor cores | not listed | 120 |

| Pixel rate | 48.00 GPixel/s | 119.9 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 96.00 GTexel/s | 299.6 GTexel/s |

| FP32 throughput | 6.144 TFLOPS | 19.18 TFLOPS |

| FP16 throughput | 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1) | 19.18 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 25 W | 145 W |

| Slot width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |

| Suggested PSU | not recorded | 300 W |

| Bus interface | IGP | PCIe 5.0 x8 |

| Display outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b |

| Dimensions | not recorded | 241 mm x 111 mm x 40 mm |

| Release date | January 26, 2026 | May 31, 2026 |

| Predecessor | HD Graphics-WM | GeForce 40 |

| Successor | not recorded | GeForce 60 |

| Launch MSRP | not recorded | 299 USD |

The two products share identical API support, production status of Active, and a 50th percentile ranking against all GPUs. Every other recorded specification differs between them. The Intel part is an integrated solution with minimal power draw and system-dependent memory, while the NVIDIA part is a discrete card with dedicated GDDR7 memory, high throughput, and a defined physical footprint. The database shows no benchmark results for either product, so performance rankings rely entirely on the specification comparison above.