Intel Arc Pro B370 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER Comparison

Intel
GPU

Intel Arc Pro B370

CORE STATE Panther Lake
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 2400 MHz
TDP 25 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE Xe3-LPG
nm
PROCESS 3 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER

CORE STATE GB203
VRAM 16 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2452 MHz
TDP 350 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
N/A
6,269.5

Analysis: Intel Arc Pro B370 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER

Intel Arc Pro B370 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER occupy opposite ends of the graphics spectrum, and the recorded data confirms a decisive performance gap. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6269.5, while the Arc Pro B370 has no recorded benchmark score and sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs. The NVIDIA part, despite holding a 36th percentile ranking, produces the only measurable performance data in this comparison, making it the clear choice for any workload requiring verified throughput.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains a single benchmark result for the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER: a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6269.5. This score positions it within a narrow competitive band. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, posts an identical average score of 6270, representing a 0% delta. The AMD FirePro W600 trails at 6223, a 0.8% deficit, while the NVIDIA Quadro K620 scores 6282, putting the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER 0.2% behind. The AMD Radeon R7 M350 leads the group slightly at 6327, a 0.9% gap in its favor.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 has no entries in the benchmark database. Its average benchmark score is recorded as 0, and no nearest rival data exists. This absence of recorded measurements means no direct head-to-head comparison can be drawn from the database for the Intel part. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, by contrast, demonstrates a robust standalone result that places it in a tight cluster with several established cards, all within a 1% performance band.

The disparity in raw specifications reinforces the benchmark outcome. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers 43.94 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, a figure that dwarfs the Arc Pro B370's 6.144 TFLOPS. The NVIDIA card's pixel rate reaches 235.4 GPixel/s versus 48.00 GPixel/s for the Intel part, and its texture rate of 686.6 GTexel/s overshadows the Arc Pro B370's 96.00 GTexel/s. These figures align with the benchmark result: the NVIDIA card operates in a performance class that the Intel integrated graphics cannot approach.

The Verdict

The data points to a single conclusion for users needing discrete graphics performance: the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is the only option with recorded benchmark validation. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6269.5 confirms it can handle demanding DX12 workloads, and its specification sheet supports that result with 8960 shading units, 280 tensor cores, and 70 RT cores. The Arc Pro B370, with 1280 shading units and no benchmark scores, cannot match this level of compute capability.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER launches with an MSRP of 749 USD, a figure stated once here for reference. The Intel part has no launch MSRP recorded. The NVIDIA card's 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus provides 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth, while the Arc Pro B370 relies on system-shared memory with bandwidth described as system dependent. For any application that stresses memory bandwidth, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's dedicated VRAM is a decisive advantage.

The Arc Pro B370 may serve specific integrated use cases given its 25 W TDP and IGP slot width, but the database offers no evidence of its performance in action. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, with its 350 W TDP and dual-slot design, targets a different segment entirely. Users seeking verified results should select the NVIDIA card; the Intel part remains an unproven quantity in this comparison.

FAQ

Q: What is the recorded benchmark score for each GPU?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER scores 6269.5 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. The Arc Pro B370 has no recorded benchmark scores, with an average benchmark score listed as 0.

Q: How does the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER compare to its nearest rivals?

A: It matches the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 at a 0% delta with nearly identical scores of 6269.5 and 6270. It sits 0.2% behind the NVIDIA Quadro K620, 0.8% ahead of the AMD FirePro W600, and 0.9% behind the AMD Radeon R7 M350.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 8960 shading units, compared to 1280 on the Arc Pro B370. The NVIDIA card also has 280 texture mapping units and 96 ROPs, versus 40 TMUs and 20 ROPs on the Intel part.

Q: What memory configurations do the two GPUs use?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Arc Pro B370 uses system-shared memory with a system-dependent bandwidth and no dedicated VRAM.

Q: Are there differences in API support?

A: Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so no API capability difference exists between them.

Q: What are the physical power requirements?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a 350 W TDP and uses a single 16-pin power connector in a dual-slot design. The Arc Pro B370 has a 25 W TDP, requires no power connectors, and is an integrated graphics processor.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs diverge on nearly every measurable specification. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses the GB203 chip on a 5 nm TSMC process with 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die. The Arc Pro B370 uses the Panther Lake chip on Intel's 3 nm process, with transistor count and die size listed as unknown. The NVIDIA part has a transistor density of 120.6M per mm², while no density figure exists for the Intel part.

Clock speeds differ significantly. The Arc Pro B370 has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER starts at 2295 MHz base and boosts to 2452 MHz. Memory clocks show a similar gap: the NVIDIA card runs at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective speed, while the Intel part's memory clock is listed as system shared.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's compute resources far exceed the Arc Pro B370's. It has 8960 shading units, 280 TMUs, 96 ROPs, 70 RT cores, and 280 tensor cores. The Intel part has 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, and 10 RT cores, with no tensor core count recorded. FP32 throughput measures 43.94 TFLOPS for NVIDIA versus 6.144 TFLOPS for Intel, and FP16 reaches 43.94 TFLOPS at 1:1 ratio versus 12.29 TFLOPS at 2:1 ratio.

Physical and interface specifications also differ. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is a dual-slot card measuring 304 mm by 137 mm by 48 mm, using PCIe 5.0 x16 with outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. The Arc Pro B370 is an IGP with no slot width, no power connectors, and display outputs described as portable device dependent. The NVIDIA card's TDP is 350 W; the Intel part draws 25 W.

Architecture Differences

The architectures target entirely different design goals. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses NVIDIA's Blackwell 2.0 architecture on the GB203 chip, manufactured by TSMC on a 5 nm process. The Arc Pro B370 uses Intel's Xe3-LPG architecture on the Panther Lake chip, built on Intel's 3 nm process. The foundry difference is notable: TSMC produces the NVIDIA chip, while Intel fabricates its own.

Memory architecture separates the two fundamentally. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses dedicated 16 GB GDDR7 memory with a 256-bit bus. The Arc Pro B370 shares system memory, with type, bus width, and bandwidth all listed as system dependent. This makes the NVIDIA card suitable for memory-intensive workloads, while the Intel part's performance hinges entirely on the host system's memory configuration.

Feature sets differ in ray tracing and AI acceleration. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER includes 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores, enabling dedicated hardware for ray tracing and tensor operations. The Arc Pro B370 has 10 RT cores and no recorded tensor core count, indicating a limited hardware acceleration path for those workloads. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so software API compatibility is identical.

Release timing and lineage also differ. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER belongs to the GeForce 50-series and was released on 2025-12-31. The Arc Pro B370 is part of the Arc Graphics-WM (Panther Lake) generation, released on 2026-01-26, and lists HD Graphics-WM as its predecessor. The NVIDIA card has no predecessor recorded, while the Intel part has no successor listed.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER wins in every category with recorded data. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6269.5 provides the only verified benchmark result in this comparison, making it the default choice for any workload requiring measured DX12 performance. Its 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, 896.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, and 70 RT cores position it for demanding gaming, rendering, and compute tasks. The 16 GB GDDR7 frame buffer supports large datasets and high-resolution textures without relying on system memory.

The Arc Pro B370 wins on power efficiency and integration. Its 25 W TDP requires no power connectors and fits an IGP form factor, making it suitable for compact, low-power portable devices. The 3 nm Intel process and system-shared memory architecture point toward integrated use cases where dedicated graphics are unnecessary. Its 300 MHz base clock and 2400 MHz boost clock, combined with 6.144 TFLOPS FP32, provide modest compute for basic display output.

The database shows no benchmark wins for either card in a head-to-head context, as no paired test results exist. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's standalone score, however, establishes a performance baseline that the Arc Pro B370 cannot challenge based on available data. Users requiring verified graphics performance should look to the NVIDIA card, while the Intel part serves scenarios where low power draw and integrated simplicity take precedence over raw throughput.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
Pro B370
RTX 5070 Ti SUPER
Core Specs
Shading Units
1,280
8,960 +600.0%
Shaders
1,280
8,960 +600.0%
TMUs
40
280 +600.0%
ROPs
20
96 +380.0%
Execution Units
10
—
Clocks
Base Clock
300 MHz
2295 MHz
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
2452 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
16 GB
VRAM (MB)
—
16,384
Memory Type
System Shared
GDDR7
Memory Bus
System Shared
256 bit
Bandwidth
System Dependent
896.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
16 MB
48 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
235.4 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
686.6 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
6.144 TFLOPS
43.94 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
768.0 GFLOPS (1:8)
686.6 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
12.29 TFLOPS (2:1)
43.94 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
10
70 +600.0%
Tensor Cores
—
280
XMX Cores
80
—
Power
TDP
25 W
350 W
TDP (W)
25
350 +1300.0%
Power Connectors
None
1x 16-pin
Architecture
Architecture
Xe3-LPG
Blackwell 2.0
GPU Name
Panther Lake
GB203
Generation
Arc Graphics-WM (Panther Lake)
GeForce 50
Process Size
3 nm
5 nm
Transistors
unknown
45,600 million
Die Size
unknown
378 mm²
Foundry
Intel
TSMC
Density
—
120.6M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
Shader Model
6.9
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Dual-slot
Length
—
304 mm 12 inches
Height
—
137 mm 5.4 inches
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x HDMI 2.1b 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
Bus Interface
IGP
PCIe 5.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
—
749 USD
Production
Active
Active
Predecessor
HD Graphics-WM
—
View Arc Pro B370 Details View GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER Details